Soldier of Fortune: Pay Back lets you travel the world as a hired mercenary, the goal to sneak into terrorist camps and slaughter people in terrible ways. Much like its predecessors, the game's enemies feature multiple points of dissection, and you'll smirk with homicidal glee as you blow off heads and limbs. With that said, the bland story mode, despite whisking you away to numerous locations, features lame brain artificial intelligence, a boring narrative, corny characters and the same point A to point B objectives, making it worth just a few hours of play. Multiplayer adds value, with the ability to play various modes, such as death match and capture the flag, but there's no reason why you should play this instead of its closest rival, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare.
Raven Software's Brian Raffel would like to "evolve the Soldier of Fortune series" and mentions that the company had a great prototype ready for number three before it got shelved.
Well that would nice. But I really want to see a new IP from Raven instead. I hope they soon will be able to make games again. Instead of just helping make DLC for Call of Duty.
This article describes five behaviors that go above and beyond normal achievement hunting, suggesting a severe Gamerscore addiction.
im nowhere near that bad. did not play kids games (apart from Kung Fu panda that came with my xbox and was NOT EASY FOR ACHIEVEMENTS) and i don't use a robot or play hannah montana.
those 5 signs are BAD.. but i do like my gamerscore
I would definitely say if you find yourself following in the path of any one of these warning signs, you may have a problem, haha.
Gamerscore is a great idea and concept, but I'd love to see it yield more tangible rewards for those who are truly dedicated to it.
XboxOZ360 writes an extensive article about the ludicrous state of gaming censorship in Australia. Starting with the recent drama around Fallout 3 and a government funded TV show where one elected official compared games to "snuff films" and "rape" simulators, it then proceeds to look at the issue in depth and the contradictions that flourish when comparing Australia's system to that of the United States and Europe.
"When shown the game in its Australian sleeve and asked if they would buy it for their child, most said yeah, probably, it's only MA15+ after all, it's really for kids anyway. Might be a bit violent, but if it was bad, they would ban it.
Then when shown the same game sleeve from the UK, most denied it was the same until shown the disc with the same content on it, same packaging, same instruction booklet etc, except with a clear, big red 18+ marked on the cover, spine, and on the game disc..."
Does anybody know when our silly country is having the formal debate of the issue? Or was it a consensus? Whatever it was, date? Month? Year? :<
Actually, after speaking earlier on with Ron Curry, he has stated that all states can use the R18+ if they so choose, much like Qld currently do with some of their ratings, not allowing some in their state that are readily available in others.
He said that IF the industry wanted to, they could run their games in the R18+ classification in all states bar South Australia, but they would have to weigh up the financial risk against sales in that region. If it was marginal, then some would take the risk, based on more sales for a game that was well sought after being readily available in all other states.
He said that is one option that the OFLC has, and is already applying to Qld in some cases. So a precedent has already been set in that regard.
If it's not fuel, health, transport or grocery related, then the Government really doesn't give a crap...
Interesting panel debate..... I was unaware that we didn't have any rating system for games /end sarcasm/
When some of the people representing us in politics don't even know the basics of our archaic
classification system I doesn't give me much hope.
Pretty poor showing for our government really. What the heck was Barnaby Joyce going on about with a game where you can rape people? Sounded like he was talking out of his ass.
For a budget title (Activision Value) it looks rather decent and graphics and gore effect at least look great. Can't wait.
COD4 should put this kind of gore in there game than it would be a perfect game in my eyes.. COD4 is already hands down the best army shooter out there but think if it had more realistic kills and gore..
I still want to play soldier of fortune it looks really fun to just blast people to bloody hell.. lol.. I think i will just have to pick this up to witness the blood bath i will insue on my enemies
i think there next COD they will step it up a notch.. They did with COD4, if you notice more blood and blood splats on the wall.. But they need to make it an all out blood bath.. lol...
This game plays alot better then most of the other mutliplayer fps on the 360 now out. Love to shoot parts off of the other people in multiplayer. Graphics are better then average and the single player isn't that bad either.
PSP
PS2
PS3 vs Xbox360, Wii/ DS. hey atleast Nintendo has more than 1 system they still working and continue to develope games for.
As for MS, they abandon Xbox PERIOD!! Sooner or later that 360 you have will also be abandon. It's the MS way. Just like they do in the PC world. If you dont move with them, they leave you in the dust.