Battlefield 3 is giving MW3 the finger with Battle Log

Tank_Commander_E65132d ago (Edited 5132d ago )

No more lag for me thanks, COD you can keep your peer2peer laggy crap fest BF3 (with it's dedicated servers) will be the only military FPS I'll be playing this year. : )

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

Dart895132d ago

Lol giving the finger to Activision more like laying the smack down on their candy a$$.

Reply Agree 8 Disagree 0

electricshadow5132d ago

Take my money, EA and DICE. I don't want it anymore.

Reply Agree 4 Disagree 2

shadowwizard5132d ago

Who would ever buy Elite anyway?

Reply Agree 6 Disagree 0

DirtyLary5132d ago (Edited 5132d ago )

the 90% of the player base obsessed with their kdr

Reply Agree 4 Disagree 1

shadowwizard5132d ago

Touché

Agree 0 Disagree 0

Rhezin5132d ago

MW: 3 looks exactly the same as the previous two. I bought MW in the beginnning because it was something new and fresh, it was amazing the see a game set in modern warfare with the COD hub. but now...it's like EHHH!

Battlefield 3 is gonna be awesome!

Reply Agree 3 Disagree 0

Show all comments (13)

80°

Battlefield 3 Cut Missions From Campaign Detailed by Former DICE Dev

excaliburps|168d ago |News|3|

Battlefield 3's former Lead Designer has revealed that there were two cut missions from the main campaign

Battlefield 3 PC PS3 Xbox 360 mp1st.com

Read Full Story >>

mp1st.com

- Comments (3)

XiNatsuDragnel168d ago

I wish someone can get those EA game leaks to see all the cut content ngl

anast168d ago

Get rid of campaigns, move the game to mobile, and try to compete with warzone. They would save time and money.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 7

Johnh5223168d ago (Edited 168d ago )

Bf4 was fun hope the new bf is just as good.

Battlefield 3 Battlefield: Bad Company 2 PC PS3 Xbox 360 gamerant.com

100°

Battlefield Needs the Glory Days of BF3 and Bad Company 2 Back

FallenAngel1984|953d ago |Opinion piece|22|

Whether it comes through remakes or a new game with a similar style, DICE should aim to revive the glory days of Battlefield 3 and Bad Company 2.

Read Full Story >>

gamerant.com

- Comments (22)

Expand all

masterfox954d ago

hmmm I think there will be no old BF glory days for EA since they are loyal to their greediness and laziness :D

Reply Agree 9 Disagree 0

Knightofelemia954d ago

You're asking for a miracle with EA that will never happen unless they can exploit the money making schemes behind it.

Reply Agree 5 Disagree 0

MadLad953d ago

We'll see what happens now that Zampella is overlooking the series.

Reply Agree 3 Disagree 2

953d ago

Replies(1)

Father__Merrin953d ago

Anyone that wants to plat bf3 you can still go ahead and play it

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 5

Psychotica953d ago

Why are they so reluctant to create a new Bad Company??

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

INMATEofARKHAM953d ago

Single player campaigns take time and effort... EA ain't got time for that.

Fluke_Skywalker953d ago

DICE have already stated that they actually don't know how to. They literally have no idea what made BC2 so good and clearly have no idea how to repeat it.

Yui_Suzumiya953d ago

Definitely agree with the title. If they make Bad Company 3 then that would definitely be a step in the right direction!

ChubbyBlade953d ago

It’s done. The current development team has no idea why people liked BF.

Reply Agree 4 Disagree 0

CorndogBurglar953d ago

Which is so ignorant it almost physically hurts.

They have the damn templates lol. Everyone LOVED Battlefield all the way up through BF4. Everything after BF4 is where fans started getting divided because they started dumbing down the gameplay.

So they need to go back to the favorites. Bad Company 2. BF3 and BF4.

Take those games. Take the exact same gameplay. Update the graphics. Add some different game modes. Make new maps. Add new guns. Choose two armies. And make a single player campaign.

That's seriously it. They need to quit trying to make BF something it isn't. They have everything they need. Why they can't figure this out just hurts my brain trying to understand.

Orchard953d ago

BF3? They need to go back to BF2 for the mainline. Heck, I'd settle for true-to-source remakes of BF2 and BC2 (w/ Vietnam). Everything they've done in the 'modern' era is just bad.

CorndogBurglar953d ago

Anything from BF2 - BF4 would work fine. Those were all great games.

MadLad953d ago

I thought BF3 and 4 were great, and I've been playing since 1942.

Demetrius953d ago (Edited 953d ago )

Doubt they will smh which is messed up

TheColbertinator953d ago

EAis pretending to be one of those deaf mutes

Profchaos953d ago

I've not played 2042 myself but after v I don't feel like it. I played a few hours of v with friends but it feels ultra sterile I can't figure it out but the game looks and feels clinical. The storys in the campaign were also bland and uninteresting and felt like a dull trudge through checkpoints as you waited for an ending.

I've played the franchise dating back to it's original PC launch and PS2 spin off games I did enjoy 1 overall and it's take on placing you in different scenarios and battles was interesting but not all that good imo as you couldn't really connect with any characters longer than 2 hours.

hardline for all the hate it recived was a fun story and a new take but a bad mp game

I feel like v overall was the turning point and instead of showing the gritty reality of war they turned everything sterile and presented it in a clean cut boring frame in order to pump it full of weird micro transactions overall they spent far to much time on trying to implant ray tracing and other graphical flourishes and forgot to make the game enjoyable