Approvals 10/10 ▼
TheMART (2) - 4868d ago Cancel
Prcko (1) - 4869d ago Cancel
awiseman (1) - 4869d ago Cancel
Grenadan (2) - 4869d ago Cancel
TheBeast (2) - 4868d ago Cancel
fluffydelusions (1) - 4869d ago Cancel
TheDareDevil (1) - 4869d ago Cancel
360°

Sony can't guarantee PlayStation Network won't get hacked again

Sony knows how - but not who - hacked into its PlayStation Network last month in possibly the biggest Internet security breach in history.

And despite beefing up its system to prevent another cyberattack like the one that exposed the personal information of 100 million users, Sony can't guarantee that it won't happen again.

Read Full Story >>
nydailynews.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

Lame
Jsynn74868d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
Lame
O'RLY?
zeeshan8104868d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
Lame
metsgaming4868d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
Lame
wampdog294868d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
Lame
Frulond4868d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
Lame
LMAO!!! Name one company that can guarantee a network will not be hacked.
Biggunz4868d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(2)
Lame
disturbing_flame4868d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
Lame
cyborg4868d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
Lame
Joshnug1234868d ago WhoDisagree(1)Agree(1)
Lame
ExitToExisT4868d ago WhoDisagree(1)Agree(1)
Lame
Everything can get hacked
Adva4868d ago WhoDisagree(1)Agree(2)
Lame
kenpachi4868d ago WhoDisagree(1)Agree(2)
Old
Surfaced4868d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
Old
Heard this one before
MaximusPrime4869d ago WhoDisagree(1)Agree(1)
Lame
It's pretty common sense for any company.
SkyCrawler4869d ago WhoDisagree(1)Agree(3)
Lame
Loner.
Surfaced4869d ago WhoDisagree(2)Agree(6)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4868d ago
Chug4869d ago

Who the hell could guarantee that? Anything is hackable.

fluffydelusions4869d ago

Some people aren't very computer savvy and don't understand that. They think the matrix is how hackers really are.

trounbyfire4869d ago (Edited 4869d ago )

wait are you saying the matrix isn't real <_<

Anarki4868d ago

They can monitor it very closely. That will prevent anything serious from happening.

Lich1204868d ago (Edited 4868d ago )

Yeah, making something "unhackable" is impossible for the most part. Save, pulling the plug on a computer so its offline. But that practice tends to not work so well with online service.

gumgum994868d ago

@trounbyfire

your mind makes it real. ^_^

blitz06234868d ago

Better to not guarantee than guarantee then get hacked

MaxXAttaxX4868d ago

This article was submitted by 'Loner' with the hopes of inciting something.
Sorry, nothing shocking here.

No company or government can guarantee not being hacked.
Sony did what any other company could do, which was to revamp their network security and improve on several aspects of it.

Basically, there's no story here.

lil Titan4868d ago

@trounbyfire No Mr. Anderson i mean trounbyfire the Matrix isnt real *BOOM* *fight scene*

Commander_TK4867d ago

@trounbyfire

How do u know? Maybe machines control everything.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4867d ago
rabidpancakeburglar4869d ago

That's exactly what I was thinking. It's an article submitted by Loner anyway so you know it has to be stupid.

iamnsuperman4869d ago (Edited 4869d ago )

and in other news the pentagon got hacked by a autistic British guy....Seriously anything is hackable. Calling something unhackable is the same retardedness as saying the Titanic was unsinkable.

Lavitz20124869d ago (Edited 4869d ago )

Yup isn't IE right now under attack from hackers??

Edit:Here's the article.
http://www.networkworld.com...

So what does this tell you?Anything can be hacked.

ZBlacktt4869d ago

It's funny, I was the only person to bring up the Pentagon when the PSN was down. Now I see if more often, lol. :D But it's true. Anyone can get hacked.

Max_Dissatisfaction4868d ago

And a nuclear accident happened in Chernobyl so I guess that makes them ok...right?

Parapraxis4868d ago (Edited 4868d ago )

@Max_Dissatisfaction

...no it doesn't make them "okay" It means that some people have the mental capacity to understand that determinative statements such as "never hackable" or "will never fail" are only proof of shortsightedness and ignorance of odds reducing over time.

You can state that a certain outcome may be unlikely or highly improbable, however putting a guarantee on certain things would be setting ones self up for a fall.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4868d ago
Chupa-Chupa4869d ago

I completely agree, if someone really wants to hack you, they will. The problem is that Sony is targeted, but this can happen to any high profile company. It's the quick response that makes you look good.

metsgaming4868d ago

exactly if governments cant prevent getting hacked than companies sure cant. Article is trolling the obvious but making it look like its a PSN issue.

Max_Dissatisfaction4868d ago

Anything is hackable...thats strange, could have sworn I heard how some other console wasn't hackable some time back...oh well

M-A-R-S-H-A-L-L4868d ago

...And what does that have to do with anything?

Just to suit that anti-Sony agenda, right?

Seijoru4868d ago

The console hasn't been hacked. Just the network.

saladthieves4868d ago

Precisely my point. They can't say "Our network cannot and won't get hacked." They just can't guarantee you that. What they can say is that they will work to the best of their ability and resources to prevent/avoid or counter future hacks.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4866d ago
Dart894869d ago

Omg stop with this crap already this is the past it's damn xbots that keep bringing this s*it up.

*Looks at submitter ehh*.

trounbyfire4869d ago

you can't say things like that or they will take yoooooouuurrrr bubbles away, i see you know this.

ZBlacktt4869d ago

MS can't guarantee Live won't get hacked again.

That's a true statement as well.

SkyCrawler4869d ago

Sssssh Loner doesnt know it yet. He lives in fairytale land.

Kon4868d ago

Live was never hacked... Get your facts straight son.

ALFAxD_CENTAURO4868d ago (Edited 4868d ago )

. http://www.joystiq.com/2011...

And more cases behind that....

Jack-H4868d ago

lol @ you and your attitude.

JasonPC360PS3Wii4868d ago (Edited 4868d ago )

Live has never been hacked. Live is the most secure network there is, so far.

JasonPC360PS3Wii4868d ago

Prove me wrong then disagree trolls. Search the net, and try and find at least one thing. Go ahead... I'll wait.

cyclonus0074868d ago (Edited 4868d ago )

Read 3.2.1

It's right above you...

ZippyZapper4868d ago

@cyclonus007 you should read this http://en.wikipedia.org/wik... (phishing) then this http://en.wikipedia.org/wik... (hacking) Don't reply you can't win this.

MaxXAttaxX4868d ago

Not the network(Live) but the system itself has definitely been hacked. Which is a big problem for them, considering the amount of hack/cheating related account and console banning they have to do.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4868d ago
4869d ago
insomnium24869d ago

Again. Would someone please get rid of Loner? Pretty please. All he does is bring down this entire site.

Show all comments (78)
790°

State of Play returns tomorrow

State of Play is back tomorrow, September 24! Tune in live for news and updates on more than 20 upcoming PS5 and PS VR2 games from studios around the world.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 18h ago
Changed: content
Sonic18811d 18h ago

Hopefully not a lot of remasters

Eonjay1d 17h ago

Agreed, but if I could pick one game to remaster first it would be Killzone 2. If you had to pick one which would it be?

Mr_cheese1d 17h ago

I know it's not the same but I'd love a reboot of resistance or warhawk

u-bEttA-rUn1d 17h ago

If they announce Kill Zone 2 remake or resistance 2 that multiplayer would be crazy. But Warhawk I would cry like a 2 year old 😂😂😂 give me bloody roar

ravens521d 17h ago

God of War 1-3, Ascension, Ghost of Sparta and Chains of Olympus all in One.

RaiderNation1d 17h ago

I love Killzone, but I would prefer a complete reboot of the franchise, using the newest version of the Decima engine, rather than simply a remaster of part 2.

SimpleDad1d 16h ago

Sony will not do Killzone 2 or any Killzone because they don't have plans for it in the future... No TV shows, no sequel, no Lego game, no multiplayer...

This is dead for Herman... Only Aloy.
And that's sad.

Zero hype for tomorrow.

Kingrizzy901d 15h ago

legacy of kane, resistance, or just something totally new that hasnt been already done

Cacabunga1d 15h ago (Edited 1d 15h ago )

Hopefully zero gaas, will show that they’re starting to reason!!!
And yeah the remaster trend must also stop.
PS5 exclusives or nothing go home

A new Killzone, Uncharted, Tsushima, inFamous, Resistance, Wolverine or something original single player.

CobraKai1d 14h ago

Killzone 1. In think that needs a retelling

Profchaos1d 13h ago

I either want something from the infamous franchise or the cheeky answer is being lemmings back as that's now Sony

DarXyde1d 9h ago

Killzone 2 I think falls into remake territory.

I'll take a Warhawk remake or even a remaster but that's it, really.

Any remasters for a last generation game on a backwards compatible console is just insulting.

fr0sty1d 3h ago

If they do any online only live service stuff, give us MAG or Warhawk, games that actually perfected that formula.

Eonjay19h ago

@Kingrizzy90

Wow. And it looks like you are the winner. Completely was not expecting that.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 19h ago
IAMRealHooman1d 17h ago

only remasters, even remasters of games that aren't even out yet

DodoDojo1d 17h ago (Edited 1d 17h ago )

Wrong, there will also be a 2 minute snippet of Lego Horizon.

bloop1d 15h ago

If they don't show something from a couple of their big studios after the absolute disaster they've had with Concord then I'll lose all hope. This generation has been a complete letdown so far and there's very little to look forward to at the moment.

RaidenBlack1d 17h ago

Pretty sure : RE9, Days Gone Remaster, HZD Remaster, 1 last SH2 trailer, Wolverine trailer, Until Dawn trailer
Maybe(s) : GoT 2 announcement, DS2 (but already happening@ TGS), Pragmata, TLOU2 or SpiderMan 2 PC announcement,
Wishlist : Santa Monica & Naughty Dog's new project tease, Marathon gameplay trailer
Don't Want : Any AC Shadows trailer, Any more remasters other than the ones leaked

Eonjay1d 17h ago

You really think that other remaster is Days Gone? And my God what happened to Pragmata?!?

seanpitt231d 17h ago

It’s 30 minutes, I think you’re being optimistic there, don’t have high expectations, I know mine are the lowest they have ever been since what i have witnessed these past 4 years!

crazyCoconuts1d 17h ago

Agreed w/ Sean. Keep expectations low.

Juiceup1d 7h ago

jfc what is this trash lineup Sony please

Rainbowcookie18h ago

Injustice 3 I'm calling it 😃

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 18h ago
Christopher1d 17h ago

Only 5 remasters. They had to cut back to squeeze in 1 new announcement. They will have another SoP next month to cover the other 12 remasters.

-Foxtrot1d 16h ago

*monkey paw curls*

Horizon Zero Dawn Remastered

Gravity Rush 1 & 2 Remastered

Until Dawn Remastered

DarXyde1d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

In the case of Gravity Rush, a remaster of a remaster that plays on PS5 now would be bizarre. Then again, so does Horizon.

This only makes sense if it means a PC release, but they still closed the studio and releasing this would be very poor taste.

potatoseal1d 16h ago

I'm presonally looking forward to a Days Gone one. Would love any excuse to play that game again. I loved it

darthv721d 11h ago

Why wait for an excuse... just go play it now.

CobraKai1d 14h ago

Im thinking showcasing Pro versions of existing games.

neutralgamer19921d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

They could do a lot right by simply announcing a blood-borne remastered so many people have been waiting for it and they should not only bring it to PlayStation 5 but also PC

If they are all intent on doing a lot of remasters, how about doing some of the remasters from the games during the PlayStation 2 and three generation instead of PlayStation 4 games?

Can we get infamous collection? Can we please get Socom from the PlayStation 2 generation? Uncharted trilogy God of war trilogy twisted metal collection, kill zone trilogy, resistance trilogy some of these games they can simply just unlock online multiplayer. They’re only one need to do a lot of work and people would enjoy them

But instead, let’s just remastered the last of us horizon zero down the God of war 2018 this PlayStation Sony executive bosses are some of the most idiotic in the past 10 years

PlayStation has such a long history. They can simply do a lot of fun service and get so much positive PR but they keep making the same mistake again and again and again.

Rimeskeem1d 11h ago

I would honestly prefer remasters/remakes/reboots of games than GaaS they have tried to push.

TheEroica1d 10h ago

Release the remastered games on the sheep!

JackBNimble1d 7h ago

Hahaha... I was going to make the same joke.
That's all they have

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 18h ago
RaidenBlack22h ago(Edited 22h ago)

Lol, but like most I was expecting a 'Playstation showcase' but looking at how brief the Pro reveal was ... I am guessing these short State of Plays á la N.Direct style is how Sony is going to continue.
The next big PS showcase is gonna be the PS6 event. Till then all will be SoPs.

1d 18h ago Replies(2)
Relientk771d 18h ago

Hopefully there's good games, but we'll see. Going in with low hype, and I hope to be pleasantly surprised.

Show all comments (118)
330°

Why do Sony keep making obviously bad decisions?

TSA writes: While the PlayStation 5 has been the runaway winner of the generation, running laps around Xbox for the last few years, it's been a pretty bumpy ride.

Read Full Story >>
thesixthaxis.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community18d ago
Changed: title
darthv7218d ago

I disagree... Sony may make a bad decision now and then, but to say "keep making" implies they are doing it all the time. That is MS who does that. And to be honest, Sony gives every idea a chance, no matter how good or bad the end result turns out. The "bad decisions" are more associated with the teams who come up with them than Sony who just lets them do their thing.

pwnmaster300018d ago

100% agree.
One thing I like about Sony is they at least give it a try. No matter how much some fans disagree, they always take chances.

I mean look at Concord and Astrobot.
Two completely different games.

GhostScholar18d ago

Concord is the whole point of the article and no one wanted it and no one is playing it.

outsider162418d ago

They should have researched how the fanbase would react to it.
Would the game be better as a f2p model or paid.
100 million or more spent, they could atleast have done that.

Chevalier18d ago

I think people forget the original Uncharted opening month only sold 50,000, but, Sony believed in the series and built it up from nothing.

They could have been complacent and said no to TLOU when Uncharted blew up too.

Cacabunga18d ago

It’s ok to make bad decisions, the important thing is to learn from them and improve from there.. grants you more respect

fr0sty18d ago

Jim Ryan steered them off course with the GaaS BS, and once you start up several projects and dump hundreds of millions into them, you have to try to at least make something back off of them. Now that these games are releasing, we can start to move past them, and back to what made Sony so great to begin with.

thorstein18d ago

Concord was made by a studio that Sony bought a year ago. This entire article makes no sense in that context.

Tankbusta4017d ago

Concord wasnt a chance it was a idiotic cash grab that was 5-7 years too late to the hero shooter genre...a chance would be creating a game in a genre that wasn't established

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 17d ago
GhostScholar18d ago

But people blasted Microsoft when they let the redfall devs “do
Their thing” lol

Rude-ro18d ago

Big difference in waiting a decade for a new AAA ip from Microsoft for it to be redfall vs A game that got hammered non stop from the beginning from Sony.
Huge difference.

DodoDojo18d ago

Let them do their own thing? Lol Microsoft had them rush it outdoor when clearly they needed more time and according to reports many of the devs left during development because they didn't want to make a multi-player game.

pwnmaster300018d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Yeah like how everyone busted Sony for the same thing.

But also Sony didn’t really hype up concord. It was already blasted to hell.
Now MS hyped up redfall fully knowing it was ass.

Also red fall was really bad at launch unlike concord.

The only thing that saved red fall from having the same fate as concord was game pass. If Sony put concord on plus it would have a way more active fan base and be alive still

For me redfall is far worse then concord.

TheNamelessOne18d ago

@pwn

Sony didn't hype Concord? Open and closed beta, tons of advertising. They even spent the money to get it featured on that upcoming Amazon tv show - Secret Level. They outright bought the studio.

The hundreds of millions of dollars Sony spent around the Concord IP says otherwise.

derek18d ago

Neither the maker of Redfall or Microsoft are the victims of unfair treatment.

pwnmaster300018d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Thenamelessone.

I rarely saw any ads for concord, compare to other games like god of war, spider etc. tons of advertising??? Literally just normal advertising for a game they own.

Open and close beta, of course they will do an open beta. It’s a multiplayer game. Has any multiplayer game not have that?? The purpose of it is to work out the kinks that people didn’t like. That is not hyping a game up. Your reaching.

They literally just released how a normal multiplayer game should be. of course they will market a game they own, it’s literally their job to do so, but they did not overhype it to be something more then it was.
Redfall had more advertising then concord and that’s fact.

18d ago
Einhander197218d ago

Ok, Redfall and Concord are totally different problems.

Redfall was rushed by Microsoft so much that the game was completely and obviously unfinishe. You might remember they had to put a sticker on the box because it didn't have the promised 60FPS mode, as well as the game being so broken the games enemy AI didn't work as well as textures that took minutes to fully load and many other problems, the game was barely even a beta build on release.

Concord was a fully finished and highly polished game that consumers simply didn't want. The game was not bad on the technical level at all, it was 100% made to Sony's highest standards.

FinalFantasyFanatic17d ago

@pwnmaster3000

I think I only ever saw one or two ads before Concord released, and even then, I saw more from streamers talking about the game, otherwise it's like this game barely existed, or at least the marketing barely existed.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 17d ago
CrimsonWing6918d ago

Jim Ryan has been a complete sh*t show from the very start. In fact, this whole Gen has been maybe the weakest I’ve seen since… well, ever for Sony. I thought with Jimbo out things would be brighter, but… well, we’ve got a bunch more GaaS coming our way. Let’s just hope it gets balanced out with their stellar traditional games.

DarXyde18d ago

Frankly, we shouldn't really care if they do GaaS. Why not?

The issue, for me, is having the very competent non-GaaS studios work on GaaS. If they want Haven to do Fairgame$, I really don't care. Bungie can make Destiny and Marathon forever. But when you try to get Naughty Dog, Sucker Punch, Insomniac, Guérilla, etc etc on that?

Now we have a problem.

CrimsonWing6918d ago (Edited 18d ago )

@DarXyde

What is the point of the GaaS business model vs just making a traditional game? I guess the real question is why would you choose to develop GaaS games? I’ll give you a hint, it’s to f*cking continuously milk consumers through recurring revenue on a budget stretched thin over years.

The model is disgusting and quite frankly it’s some Frankenstein’d concept stemmed from the mobile game design model. I don’t care how fun a GaaS game is, it’s a model that is the cancer of this industry and the fact that they keep forcing it after failure after failure is revolting.

DarXyde16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

Mate, I'm not a fan of GaaS games. I also don't like online multiplayer or first person shooters.

So what do I do?
Avoid all of them. I just pretend they don't exist. And really, I don't care for the studios making them either. Never played a Treyarch, Bungie, or whatever game I couldn't just tune out.

Same deal. Allow them to exist, but don't engage. They can be super scummy pay to win models, but we've got to let the community decide. Sony has already learned the hard way that a great single player studio doesn't mean they're a great GaaS studio.

I think they're learning the lessons quickly, really. Even if they still have some GaaS in the pipeline, we see how quickly they pulled the plug on Concord. They've been letting Insomniac cook, so I tend to believe they're being cautious and not letting their golden geese make those games.

0hMyGandhi18d ago

why do I get the impression that no one actually reads the articles anymore.
Read the article.

BehindTheRows17d ago

They'd rather argue with each other. If it wasn't so typical, it'd be funny.

Jin_Sakai17d ago

You don’t keep making bad decision when you just released one of the best games of the generation.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 16d ago
Goodguy0118d ago

This gen has all but been odd.

Philaroni18d ago

I'm glad I'm not the only one who feels this. I don't want to even guess what's next. For all I know we could finally divide by zero. And the Mc Flurry machine will work at every Mc Donald's.

FinalFantasyFanatic17d ago

I don't even know what's going on anymore, it seems like dumb decisions all around despite clear warning signs, from Microsoft/Sony, from multiple developers, etc... The entire gaming landscape is just baffling at the moment.

VivaChe18d ago

The writer's take on PSVR -- totally true. But it's not just PSVR; for whatever reason all the VR companies just don't invest and support the platform like they should. Even the mighty Oculus Quest 2 + 3 have oddly feeble software support. I see mostly the same games and apps on the store now as I did 3 years ago. PSVR is another one of Sony's "abandonware" examples (along with Vita, PS TV, etc. etc.) that are just head scratchers. Like why even develop and release a piece of hardware if you're not going to support it? I don't know.

But the writer isn't correct about the Portal. That one has been a success I think. It works pretty well, and lots of people love it. Now notably, that one doesn't require much ongoing support from Sony -- it has one purpose and it does it fine enough -- so maybe that has helped.

ChasterMies17d ago

VR companies are appropriately investing in and supporting the platform. VR is still niche, generally uncomfortable to wear, difficult with glasses ,still causes motion sickness, and requires a play space that a lot of people don’t have.

TheNamelessOne18d ago

They've definitely fumbled hard in the live service space (buying Bungie, the utter failure of Concord, spending years on Factions 2 just to cancel it), Even Helldivers 2, which was a hit at launch, has lost most of its user-base due to weak post-launch support.

Other than that though, they've been doing well.

RhinoGamer8818d ago

Spoiled and arrogant. PSVR failures should have resulted in a house cleaning. The Discord Sony team should be fire...lots of talent on the market.

Show all comments (67)
170°

Sony Executive Admits Company Needs To Work On Having More Original IPs

Sony CFO says that the company lacks the creation of enough original IPs, but this statement spans more than just Sony's gaming division.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community19d ago
Changed: title
exputers20d ago
-Foxtrot19d ago

The thing is they do have a lot IP wise but most of them aren't be used

Legend of Dragoon? Syphon Filter? Resistance? Dark Cloud? Ape Escape? Heavenly Sword? The Getaway? LocoRoco?

You have the IPs, you just don't try to use them

How long have we been wanting Bloodborne 2 or even a remaster?

Whitey2k19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Or just buy a publisher that do have IPs

EA
Capcom
Sega

These 3 publishers has tremendous amount of ips and not just gaming ips but also for sony movies entertainment and for Esports aswell that includes Live services aswell looking at EA apex titanfall etc etc

Tbh I'm getting sick of remasters it be like gta 5 , ps3 , ps4 , ps5 , eventually ps6 and 7

tehpees319d ago

No. Just no. The first parties cannot afford to buy out major publishers so stop pushing this practice. It’s BS!

Microsoft closed so many because the amount they bought was not financially sustainable.

The only benefit to the buyer is they inherit their IPs. It’s bad for gamers and it’s bad for workers. Enough with the ‘revenge buy’ nonsense

KyRo19d ago

Buying whole publishers is lazy AF. Sony has some incredible IP that people love but they refuse to use them. GoW was reinvented. There's a lot of other IP that could reinvented and modernised too.

The one thing that has let Sony down this generation is staggering out PS first party games (remasters don't count like TLOU, Until Dawn). Were a bit starved of them. Let's hope this state of play fixes some of that.

Profchaos19d ago

How's that working out for Microsoft hasn't killed their platform and forced them to go multi plat because they had to make a return on invest at all right ?

MrDead19d ago

Why would they need to buy those publishers when Sony are their lead platform in the console market? They already make games for the PlayStation, all that would happen is what we've seen with MS, a handful of already rich people getting wealthier at the cost of industry consolidation and thousands more devs being fired.

Whitey2k19d ago

@Mrdead and others Microsoft are a bunch of fools and they don't know what there been doing since xbone all I'm saying is just one. there not just for us gamers but it would probably help them alot more within the movie space and Esports arena if there concerned about the lack of ips not just for games but movies aswell

18d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 18d ago
Profchaos19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Nintendo have successfully recycled their legacy IP since the 80s if an IP is good it will have staying power

Sony for some reason love to run with a particular mascot or game series for a generation of two then send them out to be retired.

It's also funny timing this was said right after the launch of the highest metacritic rated game of the year which happens to be their IP

FinalFantasyFanatic18d ago

I honestly don't know why they've benched all these IPs, there are lots of people who would clamour for a new entry from any of them. I already bought some of these games as Playstation Classics on the PS4, I also believe they don't need to spend AAA budgets on them, some of them can easily be done on a AA budget.

raWfodog18d ago

New IPs are always welcomed but, as Foxtrot pointed out, Sony has a vast library of proven IPs that they can draw from. Whoever is in charge of making these decisions needs to get their head out of their you-know-what.

18d ago
DOMination-18d ago

Unquestionably, Sony are sitting on a lot of unused IP .but how many of those games would go on to be commercially successful? I feel like this is the reason why we don't see them being greenlit (even though nearly all of them were critical hits).

Out of all of the ones listed by users, Syphon Filter imo has the potential to be a big hit if they made it a AAA game. There's an obvious hunger still for that genre and there's a gap in the market with Ubisoft continuing to sit on/screw up their Tom Clancy games.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 18d ago
Lionsguard19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

It just still irks me that they have something like Astrobot for YEARS now and they've really done JACK with it. They could have had a Fall Guys game with the Astrobots before Fall Guys were a thing. They have something great and they're just sitting on it like idiots, that is until the recent Astrobot game and even then... they ignored any VR compatibility...like, what are they thinking? Do the people in charge just hate money or something? That must be it if they sat there and thought Concord was going to do gangbusters. Still no Bloodborne 2, not a damn thing from Naughty Dog or Insomniac other than Spider-man. This entire generation has been a bust.

porkChop19d ago

"they ignored any VR compatibility...like, what are they thinking? Do the people in charge just hate money or something?"

Bro the PSVR2 failed. It was DOA. They aren't going to waste a bunch of extra resources on making the game VR compatible.

And, sure, they could have done a Fall Guys-style game with Astro Bot. However if you just pump out trendy games like that under the Astro Bot name it'll devalue the brand. It's called milking, and it's what killed a lot of great franchises.

Profchaos19d ago

I agree they wouldn't waste a bunch of money on making it compatible but they should it's about respecting the fans that outlayed hundreds of dollars for a headset that they dropped within a year.

If Nintendo can respect it's fanbase enough to release multiple huge games on the Wii U with 13 million sales Sony should be able to respect it's fans who brought the psvr2 also

Lionsguard19d ago

It wouldn't have failed if you know...they made games for it but now we know where all the money is going, crapfest GaaS games. You also can't devalue something if they never really valued it in the first place. Also, is Nintendo devaluing Mario? The ONE thing Sony has going for them and all of a sudden you're protective of it? I'm not saying they have to cram Astrobot into everything, but to also neglect it to this degree is also criminal.

UltimateOwnage18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

PSVR 2 was never going to reach a bar critics would say is a success. Even the PS Vita didn’t achieve that and it was still a fantastic platform with excellent games. PSVR 2 shows Sony is willing to take risks to make new types of content. MS basically bowed out of VR completely and it’s kind of baffling.

Michiel198919d ago

i honestly dont give a fuck about their ips and which they use, just give us more games that aren't 3rd person action games and stop thinking that if you wan't to revive an IP, you need it to be the biggest blockbuster game ever with budgets in the hundreds of millions.

RaiderNation19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Sony has a blue billion IP's that have been in friggin "cryosleep" for years! I'd rather see them revisit some of those before adding new ones...

Killzone
Resistance
Socom
Syphon Filter
Dark Cloud
Bloodborne
Motorstorm
Mod Nation Racers
Wipeout
Warhawk
Legend of Dragoon
Jack And Daxter
Sly Cooper
Infamous
Twisted Metal
Patapon
Fat Princess
Puppeteer
Jumping Flash

And I'm sure there are more that I'm forgetting!

bRuud8319d ago

They have enough IP's but nog enough studio's to actually make them.

RaiderNation19d ago

I don't expect ALL of those. I'm just pointing out that they already have a ton of existing IP to choose from that are known quantities. I'd rather see them resurrect some of those before choosing to add more to the list.

red2tango18d ago

The fact that we don't have a SOCOM game yet since Confrontation is bull$hit.

porkChop18d ago

We got SOCOM 4 after Confrontation. Though it wasn't so good, and it released the day before PSN went offline after the big PSN hack. Terrible timing and it was DOA.

red2tango16d ago

porkchop, Nocom 4 wasn't socom. That was a lame ass attempt at COD in 3rd person.

GOULDYBOBS18d ago

I played nearly all of this list and yet wouldn't be interested in remake or prolonged sequel! I want something new

RaiderNation18d ago

I don't believe you at all. The law of averages alone say there's at least SOMETHING on that list you'd be interested in playing a new iteration of. I think you're just being hyperbolic to make a point.

Show all comments (35)