240°

AMD challenge Nvidia to prove the GTX 590 is fastest

Ironhammers writes: AMD is steaming towards Nvidia in their latest blog post, after Nvidia’s marketing team has stated the GTX 590 is “the world’s fastest graphics card” — essentially calling them out and asking them to prove it.

Read Full Story >>
ironhammers.org
NYC_Gamer5195d ago

6990 is the fastest gpu on the market

OpenGL5195d ago

If you look though at 2560x1600 they showed that the Radeon 6990 beat the Geforce GTX 590, and that is the most stressful resolution setting.

AndrewRyan5195d ago

Majority of players don't actually play at 2560x1600. But if you do I would then pick up a 6990. If not stick with the 590.

Theonik5195d ago (Edited 5195d ago )

@OpenGL
The 1600p thing has more to do with the smaller amount of memory per GPU not the card itself though. Difference at that res is also quite minuscule between the 2.

BeastlyRig5195d ago (Edited 5195d ago )

Yeah 6990 is the fastest gpu on the planet!!

It will max out all the console ports!!

Nvidia's cooling is just better.. they should lower the price..

theonlylolking5195d ago

The HD 6990 is faster than the GTX 590.

bumnut5195d ago

590 has physx, 6990 does not. Nvidia 3d is better supported too.

Correct me if im wrong, please don't just disagree.

kyl2775195d ago

that doesnt mean its faster, all modern nvidia cards can do 3d and physx

Killzoned5195d ago

Your point? Having Physx and Better 3D support doesn't make it faster, why are people like you trying to derail the topic?

I have an GTX 580 just so you know i am not an AMD fanboy
But even i know the 6990 is faster than the 590

bumnut5195d ago (Edited 5195d ago )

people like me?

I was just adding a valid comment, no need to be like that.

I wasn't saying it was faster, just adding to the discussion, thats what this site is for.

Rice5195d ago

You are right, Nvidia also has better support for gnulinux and I believe an inch smaller. But overall it seems that the HD 6990 is SLIGHTLY faster while consuming more power and producing more noise although it is cheaper. Performance is negligible and it ultimately comes down to features. Price.performance can be dismissed since both cards have terrible ratios and people who are interested in buying it, wont care too much about the price.

Oldman1005195d ago

The 6990 is faster than a Somalian.

BlackTar1875195d ago

but not faster THEN KENYANS KENYANS KENYANS

news4geeks5195d ago

The 6990 is as fast as my gran on a running track.

Big_Dom5195d ago (Edited 5195d ago )

Pissing contest ahoy! Mine is bigger than yours, he says.

SuperSaiyan45195d ago

No actually its not the case of mines bigger than yours, those 2 companies are in direct competition with each other and if Nvidia are going to make such claims when AMD have something that is actually the worlds fastest then Nvidia are lying and putting out false claims.

Its a bit of a tricky one.

Show all comments (32)
70°

NVIDIA Smooth Motion: Up to 70% More FPS Using Driver Level Frame Gen on RTX 50 GPUs

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 “Blackwell” architecture has been a bit of a bore for us gamers. Apart from Multi Frame Generation, which has limited use-case scenarios, there isn’t much to be excited about. It is achieved using GPU-side Flip Metering. The optical field data is generated using AI models in the Tensor cores.

Read Full Story >>
pcoptimizedsettings.com
60°

PNY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti GPU Review

Between the price, performance and power draw, with the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti, NVIDIA nailed the mainstream formula.

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com
61d ago
230°

Nintendo Switch 2 Leveled Up With NVIDIA AI-Powered DLSS and 4K Gaming

Nvidia writes:

The Nintendo Switch 2 takes performance to the next level, powered by a custom NVIDIA processor featuring an NVIDIA GPU with dedicated RT Cores and Tensor Cores for stunning visuals and AI-driven enhancements.

Read Full Story >>
blogs.nvidia.com
ZycoFox74d ago

The raytracing probably doesn't even equal a low end PC GPU, even if it did it would probably be mostly useless. They'll probably force it in some game now that will run like shit maybe 30fps at best, just because "it can do it"

B5R74d ago

Raytracing is so unnecessary for a handheld. I just hope you can turn it off.

Vits74d ago

A lot of gamers don’t realize that ray tracing isn’t really about making games look better. It’s mainly there to make development easier and cheaper, since it lets devs skip a bunch of old-school tricks to fake reflections and lighting. The visual upgrade is just a nice bonus, but that’s not the main reason the tech exists.

So you can be 100% sure that developers will try to implement it every chance they get.

RaidenBlack74d ago (Edited 74d ago )

Agree with Vits .... but also to add, if devs and designers just implement RT to a game world then it won't always work as expected. RT is not just reflections but also lighting and illumination as well. For example, If you just create a room with minimal windows, then it will look dark af, if RTGI is enabled. Devs and designers needs to sort out the game world design accordingly as well.
DF's Metro Exodus RT upgrade is an amazing reference video to go through, if anybody's interested.

darthv7274d ago

So is HDR... but they have it anyway.

thesoftware73074d ago

Some PS5 and SX games run at 30fps with RT...just like those systems, if you don't like it, turn it off.

I only say this to say, you make it seem like a problem exclusive to the Switch 2.

Neonridr74d ago (Edited 74d ago )

sour grapes much?

"It probably doesn't do it well because it's Nintendo and they suck". That's how your comment reads. Why don't you just wait and see before making these ridiculous statements?

Goodguy0174d ago

Please. I'd like to play my switch games on my 4k tv without it looking all doodoo.

PRIMORDUS74d ago

Nvidia could have said this months ago and cut the bullshit. Anyway the rumors were true.

Profchaos74d ago

Would have been nice but NDA likely prevented them from saying anything

PRIMORDUS73d ago

TBH I don't think Nvidia would have cared if they broke the NDA. A little fine they pay, and they go back to their AI shit. They don't even care about GPU's anymore. I myself would like them to leave the PC and console market.

Tacoboto73d ago

This story was written half a decade ago when the world knew Nvidia would provide the chip for Switch 2 and DLSS was taking off.

Profchaos73d ago

Yeah but similar thing happened a long time ago when 3dfx announced they were working with Sega when they took the company public Sega pulled out of the contract for the Dreamcast GPU.

In response Sega terminated the contract and went to a ultimately weaker chipset.

So there's a precedent but that Nintendo would have much Of an option its AMD, NVIDIA or Intel

Profchaos74d ago

I'm not expecting of anything from ray tracing but dlss will be the thing that sees the unit get some impossible ports.

andy8574d ago

Correct. All I'm seeing online is it'll never run FF7 Rebirth. If it can run cyberpunk it'll run it. The DLSS will help. Obviously only 30 fps but a lot don't care

Profchaos74d ago (Edited 74d ago )

Exactly right when I buy a game on switch I know what I'm getting into I'm buying a game for its portability and I'm willing to sacrifice fidelity and performance to play on a train or comfortably from a hotel room when I travel for work.

74d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (23)