Note:Inspired by historical games and developers, this work of opinion was written, created and produced by a multicultural team of various religious faiths and beliefs, and one angry Irishman.
AC: Brotherhood....better graphics, better combat, more features (ie: Assassins Guild).......Yea AC2 was sooo much better /s
yup agree....AC brotherhood was better in all aspects... and it was points added to have multiplayer..
I loved Brotherhood, it was my favorite game of the year. Cannot wait for AC3 after hearing rumors of a WW2 setting
brotherhood was much much better than 2 i think. and im addicted to the online.
I thought the only thing better in AC2 was story, the revenge plot was good. There wasn't enough emphasis on what you were fighting fo in brotherhood for me. Apart from that was better in every way.
The graphics were the same in every way, the combat just got easier, and the features never really gave anything to the story.
I thinka brotherhood is alot better in all aspects of the game. I think you are mistaken but understand where you are coming from.
Candle....NO. Blade through the throat...YES.
Brotherhood is better but it should have been in AC2.Creed is trying to become yearly projects which may lead to unfinished story like AC2 and then we will be forced buy a new game to finish the story.Though brotherhood is definitely the best in the series so far,but the way it came is a bad practice and should not be encouraged.It could have been a nice expansion with a lower price tag.
The location and story was better in AC2.
I agree about the "assassination missions" from AC2, and the combat did feel simplified, but it's certainly better than the old style of combat, hands down. Multiplayer is a blast.
I see what is going on in Brotherhood. And really, the progression is nice. However, I think the coming of age story in AC2 was better.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.