250°

MAG Full Game Trial on December 21

"We’re extremely excited to announce that starting tomorrow, on December 21, MAG will be available in its entirety as a full game download on the PlayStation Store.

Priced identically to its boxed “Greatest Hits” counterpart, the downloadable version of MAG (4.7 GB) will run you a mere $29.99 and come complete with all the bells and whistles found in our patches up to v2.10."

Read Full Story >>
blog.us.playstation.com
Pandamobile4880d ago

I would have played if it didn't require PS+...

Drekken4880d ago

MAG is the best online FPS experience of 2010. I stand firmly by this statement.

SCEA_RULES4880d ago

yes it is, no other game on any console offers 256 players in one game with out lag

Drekken4880d ago

Panda, as much as you have elaborated as to why it is not... no other online shooter this year pushes for such cooperation and teamwork. The level of customization and different build options you can choose as you level up make it a perfect candidate for best online shooter of the year.

No other shooter kept my attention for over 6 months this year. The rest are all cookies made from the same template.

-Alpha4880d ago (Edited 4880d ago )

Well that's your opinion Drekken and you are entitled to it. Personally I enjoyed BC2 more.

As for this update: I don't see the point of downloading so many GBs for 1 hour of play. And with them capping you at level 8 I really hate the concept of these trials. For a game like MAG they should easily extend the playtime to like 2 hours in order for people to really get a feel for the game

I'll be putting my Dec 21's download towards LBP2's demo. Been waiting forever for that. If I had Move I would have bought EchoChrome 2

Pandamobile4880d ago

@Alpha

Agreed. BFBC2 was a much better overall shooter than MAG.

MAG's only claim to fame was its player count. Other than it was a pretty average game

Dramscus4880d ago (Edited 4880d ago )

It totally is. It's a sophisticated fps for people that like strategy and thinking in a game.

@alpha in the comments section on the sony site jeremy dunham says you can play as much as you want but are capped at level 8.

-Alpha4880d ago (Edited 4880d ago )

@Panda

MAG really did have a great structure for teamwork though. While the 256 players was the clear selling point I think Zipper did a good job ensuring the game was played properly. It could have gone so wrong.

It's something I wish more team games followed. I think it was a good game, just not my favorite this year. I have friends (Drekken himself) who have poured days into MAG. And I can see why.

@Dramscus

I know, but you wont be able to unlock more stuff. And with MAG you tend to get owned by higher players because of their ability to buy more things. As you level up you get skill points to use towards making your classes... that's how it still works, right?

hesido4880d ago

@alpha-male:
plus users can play the game as much as they can without paying, their levels are capped. They can't get anymore generous than this, can they?

punisher994880d ago

Yeah I agree. The game is simply outstanding and very underrated. And this is comming from someone that doesn't like Call of duty games.

ThanatosDMC4880d ago (Edited 4880d ago )

Well, it's an incentive to buy the game. But i suggest not buying it on PSN but rather gamestop or the like. Grimhammer someone from N4G and on my PSN friends list said he got a copy of MAG for $14.99. I have no idea where but check gamestop or used games bins. You might get lucky.

I should get back on MAG. Currently on Raven gonna join ONS clan when they start touring Raven.

Drekken is a SVER player. He hates it when his mortars explode and tries to repair them as much as he can. So lets go kill him. Add me on PSN if you're on Raven. Let's group up.

@ alpha
"Yep. As long as you’re a PS Plus member, you can play the game at no charge, with a level 8 cap." Yeah, looks like you can play as long as you have + but capped.

ThanatosDMC4880d ago (Edited 4880d ago )

Dont listen to this guy. He's never played the game to matter. He's not on the magleaderboards. His PS3 has never touched the game.

http://www.magleaderboards....

Type people's PSN id on the upper right hand corner.

-Alpha4880d ago

@Thantos

That is not an official or accurate source. My name isn't on there and I played MAG.

@Hesido

Considering how much it takes to download, no, 1 hour isn't enough

ThanatosDMC4880d ago

Actually it's an accurate source. Go to MAG forums. Even the devs refer to it. I'm just not sure if it's theirs or not just like the Warhawk leaderboards.

If you played just the first beta, then you may not be on it.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 4880d ago
jack_burt0n4880d ago

"I would have played it"

You seem to talk like you already have!?

Balt 4880d ago

BAM!

I'm in. I've been waiting for this to happen for so long now. I am all in on full game downloads for PS3.

Iamback4880d ago (Edited 4880d ago )

i will try it
EDIT:nevermind it's 4 ps+ users

CrzyFooL4880d ago

Would somebody please tell me is MAG is good!? Reviews are all over the effing place!!

Angels37854880d ago

Depends on what your preferences are. If you want to go all one man army, then DONT I repeat DON'T get MAG. The game REQUIRES teamwork. I have so many friends that tell me "You die to easily, it suxxxxx" the reality is they suck at the game and don't use teamwork.

Neckbear4880d ago

For a digital copy? When you can actually find a physical, new one for half of that?

Oh dear.

mushroomwig4880d ago

That's another thing I hate, I thought the whole point of companies going down the "digital" route was to SAVE money because they no longer have to go through the process of making the discs/cases/booklets, but instead they price them like this? Logically these games should be much cheaper, right?

MagicAccent4880d ago (Edited 4880d ago )

And yet they wonder why they can't counter the used games market.
It's insulting, quite frankly.

himdeel4880d ago (Edited 4880d ago )

Yeah it was $14 at Gamestop not too long ago. If you got a pal to share the cost with it's cool because you can both download it off PSN.

EDIT: But being able to play up to level 8 cap for free as long as you have PS+ is cool. I'm downloading it to get in some quality time with Move control for a FPS.

Show all comments (47)
470°

MAG was one of the most ambitious shooters ever and deserves a PS5 sequel

Zipper Interactive were once one of Sony's most important studios and became a household name due to their work on the SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs series during the PlayStation 2's heyday. Their most ambitious title was MAG. Could it make a comeback?

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
yellowgerbil1555d ago

Best game ever. I had put over 1700hrs into that game before it deteriorated too far with cheaters getting out of the map and sadly decided it was time to let it die (Zipper had already been closed down by that time).

_SilverHawk_1555d ago

Amazing game. Hopefully sony makes a sequel

XisThatKid1554d ago

This is the game in modern gaming that even got me into shooters i spent literally days with this game Raven All the way. War against the the mighty D ride oh so edgy S.V.E.R.

NecrumOddBoy1555d ago

Original Battle Royale. No microtransactions. Definitely ahead of time.

XBox4eva691555d ago

It's almost as far from battle royale as you can get. o_O

frostypants1554d ago

It didn't have a BR mode.

Da12RespectA1554d ago

That wasn't a battle royale game at all.

rdgneoz31554d ago

3 teams of 32 fighting it out would be considered Battle Royaleish. If you're gonna saying teams are OK when you start doing teams of 2 or 3 or 4, then 32v32v32 should work. And on besides that, it had 128 v 128 which was insanely fun.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1554d ago
Muzikguy1555d ago (Edited 1555d ago )

I personally hadn't played much of it. I did spend a lot of time in PlanetSide 2 though (somewhat like MAG). Games like these tend to get overrun by cheaters and then ruined too often.

Teflon021555d ago

MAG didn't have that issue as far as I remember. I use to love the 256 matches. That game had an amazing community. Everyone actually communicated and played together. No one B****ed at the team. Everyone understood there was so much going on that if things are going wrong. Everyone had to think of new strategies.
Fav moment was when all 3 other squads 32 took their objectives but we were struggling with ours and had one more to blow up. The other leaders were communicating asking if the 2 nearest squads should send ppl. Our leader was like Naw I got a idea. So he told us all to die and set ourselves at the nearest hills prone without being seen. So we all did and surrounded the areas.
He said everyone on his count throw your grenades. Then snipers go all out and everyone else run in. They won't be able to get everyone and if needed the snipers go in about 10 seconds after.

Everyone did that and I got to the objective and set it off. 9 of us survived and got it. felt amazing to say I got the objective, cover me in that moment. Wish it was PS4 so I could have saved that moment
It was literally the coolest moment I had in a online shooter, closest since was BF4.

Muzikguy1555d ago

@Teflon

That does indeed sound like an awesome moment. One that makes games like these memorable for sure. It does seem like MAG had a lot more cooperation than most any online shooter

Teflon021554d ago

It did because you absolutely can't get no where in it without teamwork. It also didn't have an extremely big base of players. Everyone who played really wanted to play. I really hope they bring it back and do the same thing to only have serious players get into the big matches again

UltraNova1555d ago

Wow, what a run! This game looks better than PUBG!

Muzikguy1554d ago

Watching that video you wouldn't think the game was on PS3.

Spenok1555d ago

I adored this game too. Some of my best FPS online memories on it. So freaking good.

I'd love to see another game like this come out at some point. And NOT like Planetside... M.A.G. was something special.

yellowgerbil1555d ago

Yeah problem is if it existed now adays, it would likely be riddled with xp boosts and dance moves and all that other pay garbage...
MAG and Warhawk are the only 2 online games I ever got into, and both need a PROPER sequel on PS5.
Remember the first time I got 100 kills in a match, was in a turret with a repair kit and just mowed down wave after wave on Valors map.

1554d ago Replies(1)
1553d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1553d ago
PrinceOfAnger1555d ago

I had so much fun with this game

TGGJustin1555d ago

This is a game that was ahead of its time. Had it came out on PS4 it would've done much better. I put hundreds of hours into this despite the problems it had on PS3.

UnholyLight1555d ago

Really interesting as an Xbox owner at the time. This game had captured my interest as a kid but I never got a chance to play it. Being on PS4 and soon possibly PS5, I would love to see this franchise brought back to life. I imagine with the power of next gen it would be really quite fun.

From what I hear and what I remember, this game was FAR ahead of it's time. A real shame it never truly took off from my understanding.

grifter0241555d ago

I'm an xbox boy since mech warrior but got a ps3 slim for mag. If you liked halo or cod you'd have had a blast in mag. Was one of the first games you could actually do something other than shooting and still make a difference in game.

spicelicka1554d ago

PS4 needs something like it. In the multiplayer space it's far behind the Xbox, there are no quality multiplayer games on it that aren't on other consoles.

Dirtnapstor1555d ago

Yes, yes, and yes. Way ahead of it's time. Would love to see a PS5 variant of this game.

Show all comments (100)
120°

Modern Warfare Ground War mode has MAG vibes

Erina Rose, Sausage Roll writes, "Call of Duty: Modern War introduced a new, improved, Ground War game mode this weekend that reminds us of the old PlayStation 3 classic, MAG."

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
ilikestuff1680d ago (Edited 1680d ago )

I never played mag, I did play this beta however, and if mag was like this beta then (fart noises) for mag.

1679d ago
TheGamez1001680d ago

Man do I miss mag and zipper.

TheSinsibleOne1680d ago

Seriously though. Nowadays this and next gen are practically begging for a new MAG.

zodiac9091680d ago

How did we go from having games like resistance 1, 2, warhawk with 30 vs 30 player battles, and M.A.G. with 128 vs 128 players, ON LAST GEN to now having 20 vs 20...such a step back.

JEECE1679d ago

Because Sony hadn't figured out how to market their exclusives yet. Plus at that time COD craze was at its peak. So "generic high school bro #7," who was the primary purchaser of FPSs at that time (or at least represented a crowd necessary to sustain a playerbase), if he even had a PS3, would have just seen a game like MAG as a "copycat of Black Ops, man."

Not to mention MAG was pretty terribly uninviting for new people after awhile, because it was more skill-based. This was great for veterans, but if you weren't willing to put in the time getting destroyed for awhile, you would never appreciate the game. The Battlefield: Bad Company and BF:3 games out during that gen were far more accessible to lower level players.

Vegamyster1679d ago

Battlefield 4 was at the start of the generation and had 64 players, to me it depends more on how the map/gameplay is utilized, i enjoyed the 20vs20 modes more in the MW Beta than the 64 player ground war mode.

1679d ago
moomoo3191679d ago

It feels absolutely nothing like MAG lol. Way more battlefield vibes

xX-oldboy-Xx1679d ago

And even those are very small vibes, it still feels like COD at the end of the day.

390°

MAG: The Greatest Game You Never Played

Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out and most of you probably never heard of it, never got to play it and never will.

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
FiLTHY ESKiMO1799d ago

Who would the next gen version nor that Zippers gone?

_SilverHawk_1799d ago

I remember this game and it was amazing. I would like it if Sony would make another one because this game was ahead of it's time.

RememberThe3571798d ago

It was an amazing concept and it was a cool game, it was just ahead of it's time. I played the sh!t outta MAG, but the game itself played just okay. I'd love to have seen a sequel, even just a spiritual successor, especially with the next gen coming and the way cloud computing has advanced a game like that nowadays would be awesome.

Elwenil1798d ago

It may have been amazing if you played for SVER, but if you played for Raven or Valor, it was an unbalanced mess. I had some fun with it, but the player count was an illusion at best and false advertising at it's worst. The map and faction balance was so ridiculously skewed you knew who was going to win as soon as you saw what team you were against. It definitely had some interesting ideas, but was far from an amazing experience in my opinion. I would have much rather Zipper have made another SOCOM game rather than MAG.

darthv721798d ago

that game would make for a great battle royale release. So many players all at once... it was ahead of its time for a console shooter.

TheGamez1001799d ago

Was such an underrated game. One of my most favorite fps of last gen. So unfortunate zipper was closed down. Imagine if it was a success and thered be a 2nd game by now.....

TekoIie1799d ago (Edited 1799d ago )

I can think of many better games that I've yet to play...

"Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out"

HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better. I'm afraid that MAG is basically your standard FPS but uses scale as it's selling point. The vast majority of shooters that focus on smaller scale matches have gameplay leaps and bounds better than MAG so it is definitely not the greatest FPS.

I know many people are going to try and refute this by telling me to look at the three factions but MAG has literally no character. The game is call 'Massive. Action. Game' for gods sake which is a contender for 'The Worst Title a Game Could Have' award. I've never been a fan of Zipper but I hear great things about them from their PS2 days. However, with MP gaining popularity in the generation that followed I think it says a lot that they couldn't keep up with the competition.

Knushwood Butt1799d ago

'HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better.'.

It was released years later.

Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?

TekoIie1799d ago

"Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?"

Yes, Planetside 1.

Knushwood Butt1798d ago

Fair enough.

Can't say I've played it, but I enjoyed MAG for a while.

FantasticBoss1798d ago

MAG was one of the very few games trying to do scale like it did, but I think it missed the mark. Wish it could have had a sequel though as they may have been able to iterate on it to create something pretty neat.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1798d ago
Profchaos1797d ago

Sony had a awesome approach to online in the PS2 days with SOCOM co op that had games working together to achieve a tactical goal they pioneered voice chat on the PS2 for SOCOM but as they steamrolled ahead it was clear team Deathmatch would take over in popularity which shifted zippers approach so all their experience amounted for not much when designing online in the PS3 era.
It still was a decent game but couldn't stand out compared to cod which had millions of players consistently

yellowgerbil1799d ago

Loved mag had over 1700hrs into it across many accounts, remember my first 100 kill sabotage game, was insane

BLow1798d ago

Yes, so do I and not that game they released on PS3. I'm talking the one Zipper did and not Slant Six. At least Slant Six tried to do the series justice once they fixed the issues.

The one Zipper did didn't feel like Socom to me. It felt more like Ghost Recon to be honest. I absolutely loved the voice commands and I figured they would be even better on next gen hardware. They didn't even bother doing anything.

Maybe, I just wanted it more grounded and not so techy if that makes sense. I just wanted to go into jungles or missions just using my wits and patience and not have to use a bunch of gadgets. I wanted to be able to give orders with my voice to squad members. Yeah, they can at least have earpieces lol.

It's hard to explain but I know the old school Socom players know what I'm saying. Socom just had a certain feeling and the new game didn't feel that way. Slant Six yes. Zipper no...

We can only hope but if they bring it back they have to do it right. If not don't bother and just make something new. I rather have the memories I had with Socom be mostly positive than negative. Unless you pull a God of War, don't bother lol.

I've already said too much but that goes to show how much I loved Socom. Especially 1 and 2.....

Deathdeliverer1798d ago (Edited 1798d ago )

Game was simply ahead of its time. If mag came out now with improved graphics people would be blown away. Back then people whined about the graphics even though it had players literally everywhere. It was several great games in one. Battlefield, Ghost Recon, and Call of duty.

Hungryalpaca1798d ago

What exactly was it ahead of its time in? Player count? Planetside released in 2003 and and played count per match was over 300.

xkvcq1797d ago (Edited 1797d ago )

The BETA for MAG was one of my fondest gaming moments. I was highly anticipating the start of the beta servers but I had school that day. I had started downloading it that morning as soon as it was available and just when it finished downloading I found out school was cancelled, last minute, because of weather. BEST. SNOW DAY. EVER. I played the beta all day, continuing to put off my homework :P

TekoIie1797d ago (Edited 1797d ago )

Well have I got news for you pal! Planetside 2 has been available for nearly 4 years on the PS4 and longer on PC and people still aren't blown away. Maybe the novelty of scale is actually overrated and people don't care as much about it which is why MAG failed when multiplayer shooters were at peak popularity during it's lifetime?

If you were blown away by 256 players in 2010 why would you not have been blown away by 1000 roughly 2-3 years later?

Show all comments (84)