Think back to the years 2004 and 2005. The Playstation 2 ruled the video game universe and nobody had any concept of quality handheld gaming beyond Pokemon, which wasn't exactly pretty to look at. All the analysts and fans were picking their favorites based on E3 keynote speakers and pure hearsay. But five years later I feel like it's fair to look back and figure out who actually won this generation. Was it Sony, Nintendo or Microsoft? Was it anybody?
Chris Barrett was one of the prominent developers who was fired a few years ago during the Me Too scandals that hit the game industry.
girl, 8 women reported you.
thats how that works. u wrre not "entitled" to anything.
shouldnt have been a creep.
"While that sounds despicable, Barrett was accused of crossing the line between professional and personal behavior. In the course of its journalistic investigation of the Me Too scandal, Bloomberg interviewed eight people, including multiple women who reported Barrett, as well as other Bungie employees who were either involved in the investigation or spoke to the women involved."
Yeah, sounds like you did it, dawg.
PlayStation is celebrating its upcoming 30th Anniversary by letting you sit on its logo while riding the Victoria Line in London.
Reminds me of Sony's other awesome PS promotion in London, such as OXO tower and London underground roundels. All with shapes replaced with PlayStation's iconic 4 controller shapes.
Awesome promotion, Sony!
Kadokawa has confirmed interest from Sony in an official statement, clarifying that nothing has been decided yet.
currently, the kodakawa enterprise is worth a wooping 4 billion dollars. according to google. might be wrong
If/when Sony acquires Kadokawa I hope it means that anime games can start to be a lot more than they are now. The stories are fleshed out they just need to add quality gameplay/environments. It makes financial sense to me since you have anime fans and gamers who would buy these games if they are high quality.
Is Sony trying to be a monopoly and keep games out of the hands of gamers? Or is this different?
the gamers ;)
"Well, it turns out the PS3 wasn't nearly as powerful as Sony made it out to be. It looks fairly similar to the 360 in every capacity. Sure, you could install Linux on the system, but the internet browser is woefully bad as are many of the other computer features on the system. Sony stepped up its game with first party titles in this generation like God of War III, Uncharted 1 and 2 as well as a couple Ratchet and Clanks. But really they didn't have a fantastic game like Halo or Mario. It was just a bunch of good games and customizable ones that are fun for 5 minutes like ModNation Racers, a blatant MarioKart ripoff, and LittleBigPlanet. Sure it's fun to watch Sackboy play Sweet Child of Mine and dress him up like Henry XIII, but that gets old fast. Their games obviously outsold Nintendo's for the most part but the system didn't come close. It was a distant third. The people who predicted that Sony would dominate again and still be synonymous with video games were clearly mistaken."
*nose bleeds profusely
Not withstanding that this generation isn't over yet:
- if you're going for sales numbers on the console itself, the Wii is winning thus far.
- if you're going for games, hmmm... many arguments can be made that if you're talking about the "biggest" AAA games versus the "most" AAA games you're looking at a mix between the 360's biggest title game "Halo" (I don't know if a bigger game has came out yet that matched or could match the sales numbers of Halo games: GT5 doesn't count because it's not out yet). The "most" AAA games were easily on the PS3, as they own their own studios and put out a lot of high quality titles.
-If you're talking about the tech, the PS3 has it. No offense to any other console.
Not to downgrade the blu-Ray, the built in ports and wi-fi, and the low failure rate for such a powerful console, but the Cell Processor hasn't even been fully realized in games and a lot of people will tell you that. The reason for the slow advancement on The Cell is that there is no back-library for the Cell. PC compliant code on the Wii and the 360 has a rich library. The Cell probably could go another ten years before it's officially "maxed out". Between that enigma that is known as "Lair" which is so far and still one of the most advanced games out (even if it's a little clunky in some small spots) and Saboteur's PS3 anti-aliasing with steady advances in between from other developers, once this knowledge is pooled together, greater advances will come even faster.
This gen is far from over, but as of right now the PS3 has a distant lead. Thats of course my opinion. If you're a gamer and you don't have a PS3, shame on you.
My. Lame ass article..And factually off.