Approvals 11/3 ▼
sak500 (2) - 5414d ago Cancel
MattyF (3) - 5414d ago Cancel
Pandemic (3) - 5414d ago Cancel
movements (2) - 5414d ago Cancel
splintergamer (1) - 5414d ago Cancel
530°

Why Sony Dropped Speaker and Analog From Move Controller

Thesixthaxis reports: Speaking in the comments section of a demonstration of Move’s tech on the PlayStation Blog, Anton Mikhailov of Move’s research and development department has revealed why PlayStation Move doesn’t come with built-in speaker functionality or an analog stick, and candidly discussed the Nav Controller and why it doesn’t have any motion control.

Read Full Story >>
thesixthaxis.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community5414d ago
Jdoki5414d ago

Yup, sounds about right from the article.

But I do agree that that having an analogue on the main Move controller wouldn't be that great

mikeslemonade5414d ago

There's gotta be a way to have two move controllers and a DS3 together. Attach two move controllers underneath the DS3 controller, and when the game permits you to use the two move controllers you can detach them and use them.

BryanBegins5414d ago (Edited 5414d ago )

@Jdoki: Why? Having a stick would allow you to use two moves AND control your character (i.e: not only on-rail). That makes no sense to me that Sony cut this option. And it would be quite comfortable, it's like the nunchuk. I have no problem usin the stick why moving the nunchuk.

I still see that as a missed opportunity to have the ultimate motion controller. Although not a big one since the games using two moves AND requiring that you control your character (his movements) would be rare.

5414d ago
darkdoom30005413d ago

I agree about their reason for dropping the analouge. Have you tried playing ratchet and clank, using the tornado weapon?

You have to control ratchet using the analog; but at the same time tilt the controller. It's so hard to use.

hesido5413d ago

No, it would be great, it is indeed a missed opportunity. Buying two move controllers would buy you the entire Move experience. For basic two player games, and hardcore games that will have the left move work as navigation controller on steroid.. I understand making moves with your arm and trying to control analogue would be very hard, but you don't need to "waggle" with your left hand while controlling it. Two controllers in your hand would be enough for every game.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5413d ago
sinncross5414d ago

Cut costs indeed and the move is priced attractively.

Also, you dont need the built in speaker when the PS Eye can be used for speech: indeed some ppl use the PS Eye as a mic.

Though I am surprised that the Nav controller did not at least get Sixaxis support.

Sure the motion controller is just the Move but if you held the DS3 in your other hand a game could have made use with basic sixaxix support to compliment the full motion control from the Move.

Jeff2575414d ago

The Nav controller does have sixaxis support. It has been stated that it has the same capabilities motion wise as a DS3. That is why for some people they may not get a nav controller but can still play the agme as intended with a DS3.

IdleLeeSiuLung5413d ago (Edited 5413d ago )

Price attractively? It was dumbed down for cost by $ony!

I was told only M$ did that here on n4g!!!

Trebius5413d ago

...ur an idiot...

On Topic: Everyone cuts costs, especially when it's little things like this that arent really needed.

When things get cut from a project for cost issues, they cut whatever it is that they feel is unnecessary, just like the processor was cut from Kinect.

In the end, the product stays practically the same, and everyone's happy.

badz1495413d ago

I did't know wiimotes have color-changing LEDs. oh yeah...they DON'T!! plus, it still needs the motion+ to get 1:1 tracking matching the MOVE! If you think of Sony like THAT, what do you think about Nintendo selling last gen hardware this gen at profits from day 1?? or M$ selling propriety hardwares at rip-off prices like their wi-fi dongle and HDD? I guess you can live with those, right? why the fvck can you do exactly that with Sony? oh yeah...Kinect cost $150!! bummer!!

Trebius5413d ago

Its funny how third party companies are making move peripherals and are allowed to make their own version of the DS3 if they want, or HDMI wires, or hard drives, or mouse, or keyboard, or bluetooth headset, anything!

But M$ dont allow ANYONE to make ANYTHING for the 360 cause that would mean they cant monopolize their own products and hike the prices.

RageAgainstTheMShine5413d ago

could have been better if the Nav has at least SIXAXIS motion

Dr. Marks once stated that the T button since its analog, can be used for navigating 3D space by pressing on it while your character moves to where ever direction the Move controller is pointing at...

this will be a good replacement option for the Navigation controller.

using a Move controller as a mic? hmn interesting but you have the PSEye or Blueetooth headset for that so its not very important...
speakers on Move... cool feature but you have your TV speakers

badz1495413d ago

I know, right? propriety my ass! I pity those who were banned just because they used their own cheap HDD for the 360 but M$ banned them like they're pirates!

Boody-Bandit5413d ago (Edited 5413d ago )

Don't blame Idle too much. He suffers from severe case hypocrisy and paranoia derived from being bent over the table at every turn constantly having to shell out money for over priced perps and online gaming for a console that is here today and dead tomorrow. Do you have any idea what constant flashing red lights do to your mind? It's a wonder he can form a coherent thought at all. So please take it easy on him.

Megaman42xX5413d ago

"Its funny how third party companies are making move peripherals and are allowed to make their own version of the DS3 if they want, or HDMI wires, or hard drives, or mouse, or keyboard, or bluetooth headset, anything!

But M$ dont allow ANYONE to make ANYTHING for the 360 cause that would mean they cant monopolize their own products and hike the prices. "

Almost everything you said can be used in reverse... Right now I'm able to use a voip headset that isn't made by microsoft at all. I can plug in any usb drive (as long as it's in FAT32 format) to store media/memory. I'm using a non-microsoft headset. I can use a wired usb keyboard. If it's any consolation I'm using a normal 360 controller.

And could someone explain how the ps3 doesn't have its own proprietary hdd? I thought it did.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5413d ago
Christopher5414d ago

I do believe they need to stop taking jabs at the competition. It seems a bit immature, even if it is true. I think they should focus on showing how much Move can do after release through proper marketing.

badz1495413d ago

have you actually read the article before commenting? Anton didn't mention about competition unless asked to but there's no jabbing or what so ever. the article is solely about why the MOVE is the way it is, not more than that!

Christopher5413d ago (Edited 5413d ago )

@badz149: Might want to take your own advice.

From the article: "The Blog also found time for a few cheeky digs at the competition, or at least that’s how it read to us. “You’ll notice that Anton was comfortably sitting on a couch when using the PlayStation Move controller,” it said. “These aren’t gesture triggering animations, folks, but true 1:1 gameplay.”"

If you don't see that as some additional quips against Kinect, then you're fairly ignorant on the topic.

Qui-Gon Jim5413d ago

I mean, one time Mikhailov was asked about Kinect and his response was basically "Yeah, we worked with that technology and ran into walls with the possibilities. If Microsoft figures out a way around that, good for them, but I haven't seen any indications that they have" (paraphrased).

It was in HipHopGamer's interview with him. Pretty good interview, actually, but i don't have time to look for a link.

gintoki7775413d ago

Do not let the appearance fool you the move is a highly dangerous object. Sony has been recently working with the governments around the world and to increase the use of healthcare especially in U.S., Japan, and Europe that glowing ball is a explosive device. The Move will operate for about 8-9 months before it explodes resulting in the possible loss of a hand or even death depending on length from head.

You have been warned....

Gilliand5413d ago

Was that supposed to be funny or just to make you look dumb?

NeoBasch5413d ago

Because it's gaudy? I mean, if it's anything like the Wii's, it won't be long before I want to kill somebody; anybody, just so I can shut that thing up. Anybody here remember Red Steel? Ever since, I've been hoping to avoid speakers at all cost.

Consoldtobots5413d ago

does anyone know if the move controllers will have rumble support?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5413d ago
MGRogue20175414d ago ShowReplies(2)
danmachine5414d ago

controller does have motion...

stuna15414d ago (Edited 5414d ago )

That is what he is referring when he speaks of the accelerometers and gyros in the nav controller

EDIT: My bad I misread the article, but an earlier article did say that it would operate just like an six axis controller. bubble up on my mistake.

Qui-Gon Jim5413d ago

i haven't seen any comments that the navigator will work just like a dualshock, but I have seen it the other way around. The dualshock can be substituted for the Navigator.

Jdoki5414d ago

Doesn't sound like it from the article, which is odd. I assumed it had similar function to the Nunchuk or SIXAXIS.

jerethdagryphon5413d ago

nav doest have motion from what ican tell

its not needed though nav is for navigating move is for moving makes sense

Motorola5414d ago

i think it should cuz the DS3 does...I dont see why it shudnt

Trroy5414d ago (Edited 5414d ago )

The DS3 would go flying out of people's hands, if Motion control games asked people to wave the Nav controller/DS3 around.

I would wager that Sony disallows use of the motion controls in the DS3 when its coupled with the Move, and they aren't present in the Nav controller, for that reason.

exnihilonihilfit5413d ago

DS3's don't go flying out of people's hands now. Having a gyroscope in the controller wouldn't even make it all that useful for thing like waving wildly, just for position and orientation tracking.

Double Toasted5414d ago (Edited 5414d ago )

Only Sony is allowed to remove capabilities from their motion controlled devices....Chuch!

My name is Sony...deepthroat me...chuch!

You guys are such losers and...are...beneath me...chuch!

Terarmzar5414d ago

It still cost less than that garbage your trying to refer to and besides at least move works correctly

Jeff2575414d ago (Edited 5414d ago )

Well that is because they didnt promise any features for Move that needed those specific designs. Instead they wanted to get out something that works and that is in a price range people will pay for. MS however promised a lot of things that Natal could do but took out extra hardware that would have made it possible. With that hardware removed they renamed it Kinect and it now unfortunately wont be as fully featured as earlier promised.

Jdoki5414d ago

You mean remove features they never announced in the first place? Oh yeah! /s

MysticStrummer5414d ago

Microsoft removed precision and potential from their motion controller, but you'll buy it anyway. Who is deep throating who?

Qui-Gon Jim5413d ago

There's a difference between cutting costs by removing minor or redundant features, and cutting corners by reducing capabilities to a point that it doesn't work as well as promised.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5413d ago
Show all comments (87)
140°

Sony Faces Class Action in the Netherlands Over Allegedly Inflated PlayStation Store Prices

Mass Damage & Consumer Foundation in the Netherlands has filed a class action against Sony for inflating PlayStation Store prices.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 1h ago
dveio1d ago (Edited 1d ago )

My personal opinion:

Manufacturers and publishers have indeed inflated the industry.

From $700 million development costs for games like Call of Duty, to digital (store) prices for games and DLCs, online multiplayer fees on consoles (why can you play Helldivers 2 online for free on PC but not consoles?) or still preventing sell/lend digitally purchased games.

Sometime in the future, this bubble will collapse.

They should know better, but they just can't help themselves and suck even the last penny out of our wallets.

BeHunted22h ago

Because Sony knows people will be forced to pay those prices for single player and multiplayer games, not everyone prefers PC gaming. Sony also has a monopoly on PlayStation digital games. In 2019, they stopped allowing retailers and game key sellers to sell PlayStation digital games, making them available only through the official PlayStation Store

anast1d ago

The Dutch gov. wants a piece of the pie.

Eonjay23h ago

They should be suing the individual publishers increasing the prices to $80 instead of suing the store. There are plenty of publishers still selling game for like $50 with much success (like E33). But this proves that the publishers are the ones setting the prices.... so again nothing changes because they aren't even going after the main offender. How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD? Sony being the number one store in the market doesn't mean that publisher have to charge us an arm and a leg. Again the industry is laughing at us because consumers never get real representation. Just these fake platitudes that are meaningless.

BeHunted22h ago

"How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD"

Because Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly, I can purchase Call of Duty at a huge discount from CDKeys or other gaming retailers. The only way to purchase digital PlayStation games is through the PlayStation Store.

djl348520h ago

Weird, I swore GoW, Stellar Blade, Horizon Zero Dawn, TLoU, etc. were on the steam store....uh.....

BeHunted17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

@djI3485

I'm talking about PlayStation games that you can only purchase on PlayStation. I can purchase Steam and Epic games from 3rd party retailers and key stores.

"Sony to stop selling full-game download codes at retailers"

https://www.videogamer.com/...

Killer2020UK22h ago

About time. There is zero fair reason why digitally distributed products that you cannot recoup any value when you want to dispose of them, should be priced higher than that of physical copies that entail all of the costs and the benefits of owning.

Show all comments (12)
170°

Sony Aims To Sell 15 Million PS5 Units This Year, but Is Shifting Focus to Monthly Active Users

Sony CEO Hiroki Totoki and CFO Lin Tao talked about the state of the PlayStation business and the strategy and targets going forward, including how they're responding to the tariffs.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community42d ago
Changed: content
Abriael42d ago
1Victor42d ago

I wonder how the USA tariffs war will affect that projection. 🤔

S2Killinit42d ago (Edited 42d ago )

I think they take that into consideration when they announce their projections. Currently, after the xbox price increase, the PRO is cheaper than the series x! That is ridiculous, and it can’t last.

darthv7241d ago

you keep saying that but the price of a PS5 Pro is S699.99 (US) and the price of a Series X is $599.99 (US)

S2Killinit41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

The series x with 2 TB storage space is more expensive than PS5 PRO which also has 2 TB storage space.

darthv7241d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Oh so you are pitting a regular Pro with a special edition X... got it. If you are going so far as trying to compare apples to apples... please add in the optical drive and stand to the Pro. Seeing as the X has both of those by default.

I will help you if you are unable to do so.
PS5 Pro 2tb: $699.99, Optical Drive: $79.99, Stand: $29.99 = $809.97
Xbox Series X Galaxy Black Special Edition 2TB: $729.99

41d ago
S2Killinit41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. The series X with 2TB storage and much weaker, is… more expensive! So yeah, Im pointing out that fact.

Also, the PRO does not require a stand.

Ps: regular series 2TB is $749 (where did u get 729?)

darthv7241d ago

Its right here on the official XB site: https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

Okay, so no stand for the Pro, but you might still want the optical drive. So $779.98 vs $729.99. A properly outfitted Pro is still more $$ than a 2tb X.

S2Killinit40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Do I need to mention that the series x is not nearly as powerful as the PS5 PRO?

And no, the PS5 PRO runs just fine without a drive, and people don’t have to buy the drive right away, assuming they want it.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 40d ago
drivxr42d ago

I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU.

RaiderNation42d ago

Because that's where the real money is made, in microtransactions.

Profchaos42d ago (Edited 42d ago )

People are spending less time playing is a typical trigger for this.

The less time spent playing the less likely you are to spend more money on games and services including subs or even the next console.

Increased engagement equals more money.

42d ago
DarXyde41d ago

Same reason Microsoft does it: it looks better to investors and it's a solution when unit sales slow down.

Personally, I'm not a fan of this metric; and by using it, you're kind of signaling that you're moving into the "This is a PlayStation" era.

Z50141d ago

Because the PS4 also has users and not necessarily sales

Obscure_Observer39d ago

"I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU."

Because they´d finally realized that MS wasn´t wrong after all.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 39d ago
42d ago
41d ago
310°

Sony Announces Large Profits Growth for PlayStation; Expects Further Wins in Current Fiscal Year

Sony announced its financial results for the fiscal year 2024, and things are certainly looking up, despite a decline in PS5 sales.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Duplicate story
MaximusPrime_42d ago WhoDisagree(1)Agree(0)
+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community42d ago
Changed: content
Abriael42d ago
CrimsonWing6942d ago

Expect sh*t to slow down if prices aren’t kept in check.

Redgrave42d ago

Who downvotes the truth?

Even PSN itself is too damn high.jpg

S2Killinit42d ago

Gamepass is already at 20$ per month if im not mistaken.

toxic-inferno41d ago

@neutralgamer1992

Not all of us. I'm a big PlayStation fan, and have been since the PSOne. But I can't begin to defend what's happening currently.

At least Nintendo release a large number of games from their major franchises. Sony is just not banking on their established franchises, and yet are raising prices. Not great.

S2Killinit42d ago

Im pretty sure we are going to see a price increase for PRO. I mean think about it, its currently cheaper than xbox series x! That cannot last.

Eonjay42d ago

I'm absolutely sure we will not see a price increase. I don't think we should 'expect' to see price increase because it just adds validity to what Nintendo and Microsoft have done.

darthv7241d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Sorry to pop that bubble but the Pro is not cheaper than a series x... generally speaking (like you are). It is cheaper than one specific version, and doing so by not including the optical drive and stand like the X has by default.

So keep on trying to convince people you are right when everyone knows it's quite the opposite. A stock Pro is $699.99 and a stock X is $599.99. A special edition galactic black 2tb X is $729.99. And if you really want to compare apples to apples... adding the aforementioned optical drive and stand brings that Pro to $809.97 and then they would be on equal footing.

Twisting truths to fit a narrative... I expect better from you S2.

S2Killinit41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. And the series X with 2TB is more expensive. Which in my opinion is insane conseidering how much more powerful the PRO is. The PS5PRO does not need a stand, it can be used without a stand.

TheKingKratos42d ago

So the Pro is not offering any push in sales at all ?

CrashMania42d ago

It's still an expensive, niche product ultimately. And they exceeded their sales projections for units sold by half a million.

lawox42d ago

"18.5 million units have been shipped during the full fiscal year. This is actually ahead of the 18 million units target set by the company."

They beat their yearly estimate. It's not broken down by device, but it's clearly performing well enough. Since it's been released it's consistently been the second best selling SKU on Amazon only after the the Slim with disc.

41d ago
Bathyj41d ago

18 million a year is in the toilet?
I remember when 10 was considered good
Hell Microsoft would take that right now.
Probably pay $100b for it.

41d ago
BeHunted42d ago

If their profits fall next quarter, we'll probably see more price hikes. I can't imagine having to pay £20 a month for PlayStation Plus.

S2Killinit42d ago

I think gamepass is already paying that much.

42d ago
drivxr42d ago (Edited 42d ago )

Decline in hardware sales.
Behind on lifetime sales and decline in first party sales.
Third party content and PSN came through to save the day.
Things will improve starting with the next Ghost game.

Hopefully a steady flow of first party content by end of '25

rlow142d ago (Edited 42d ago )

I guess you get downvoted for stating facts from Sony’s own lips. What I’m curious about is what their top games of the year were and how much Xbox games contributed to the increase?

CrashMania42d ago

Well, generally 3rd party publisher games contribute the most anyway, so no different to capcom, EA and so on contributing to this figure.

lawox42d ago

That's because the report is actually really good.

They beat the console sales estimate that they set last year March, they have increased users both due to the record numbers of PS4 users and strong PS5 sales which is leading to great profits in sales and user spend.

This report is about the financial health of the PlayStation brand and as a platform PlayStation is stronger than ever. Heck they even have Microsoft putting their biggest franchises on the platform.

41d ago
S2Killinit41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Well, the facts in the article are positive. Nothing wrong with his comment, but in my opinion it doesn't correctly indicate all the facts and nuances that give context to the reality of things. I downvoted for that only.

Make sense?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 41d ago
Lightning7742d ago

This is exactly what happened to Xbox year's ago. They had no first party and started seeing decline in 1st party sales, which effected their third party games which eventually effected their console sales. A slow decline across the board.

Calm down PS fans I'm not saying PS is becoming like old Xbox. I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. Look how Xbox finally has compelling first party and things are on a up swing(despite years going on a downswing). I know thanks to PS releases which helps a ton, (which is why Xbox hardware only dropped 6% instead of 30+% like it usually does) The point still stands despite what Genz Trends may go, first party and compelling games sell hardware and software still. Sony's financial quarter is an example of this, of what lower First party output looks like.

No matter they'll be right back on track in due time any time especially with DS2 (not my type of game but I know many like it) and Yotei. They're not Xbox and let things get bad for so many years on end.

crazyCoconuts41d ago

"I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. "
First party is mostly relevant for the sole purpose of creating EXCLUSIVES that are needed to stay competitive. With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important. PlayStation as a platform now has free reign to profit without the high expense of needing exclusive first party titles.

red2tango41d ago

Sony has been very lazy with 1st party games compared to the PS4 era. And even the PS4 era was nothing compared to the PS3 era in terms of games.

S2Killinit41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

We have Ghost and Intergalactic coming. And then Marathon which is not exclusive to PlayStation. I think Covid and that chip shortage put a speedbump in game development because game manufacturers dont want even more risk that their game will arrive to too little hardware, but the games are starting to show up.

Lightning7741d ago

"With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important."

Absolutely not. If that was the case then Nintendo would put Mario on Sega Genesis and Sonic on Super Nintendo. I know things are way different 30+ years later but not much has really changed in terms of exclusives and their impact on hardware. Especially early in the console life cycle.

Sony made all the money this quarter handover fist. Profits isn't a issue for them right now. I was just saying lower hardware sales and lower first party sales will hurt them or any console manufacturer of they don't have the compelling games in the long run. Just like it hurt Xbox. IF Sony keeps up not having lower first part output. Which we know they're not.

crazyCoconuts41d ago

Well no big exclusives in the last two years yet PS is doing great. What are people gonna do? Buy an Xbox?

S2Killinit41d ago

I agree with you. But they have had plenty of exclusives so far. Has it been ideal? Nope. I have a feeling we are seeing a resurgence with the effects of covid and that chip shortage now behind us.

Lightning7741d ago

No it's just like 360 where they had no games yet ppl still bought it because they sold ppl on the games early on that gen the fans were locked in and invested. They were riding the good will and was dubbed the shooter, racer box. The games dried up and they never recovered from it which hurt them in the long run. Same here with PS they still make the big bucks because they had games early on and the fans locked in and will continue to lock in for a little while longer despite lacking in first party.

S2Killinit41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

I agree. But the problem with xbox was that for some crazy reason MS thought game development wasnt all that important to a platform holder. They literally did not fund games with their own studios. When they lost marketshare they couldnt justify paying for exclusives with large install bases making it too expensive. That is not the scenario with PlayStation.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 41d ago
Show all comments (46)