320°

Is Sony painting itself in a corner?

SFG writes: E3 2010 was supposed to be Sony’s grand showing, but instead someone spit on that fuse and turned the firecracker into a dud. Weeks before E3, Sony was going on a sequel announcement spree, and speculation rose to what was left to be announced. The sad matter of the fact was Sony really didn’t announce anything. It was a tech demo, and their conference would have been better suited at GDC. They showed off the already announced Move titles, and only Sports Champions will become a franchise, like its own Wii sports. My gut feeling is that the other titles that they shown, The Shoot, Lights out, and so on, do not deserve retail releases as they look like they really don’t offer much depth.

Read Full Story >>
southernfriedgamer.com
zetsuei15036d ago (Edited 5036d ago )

What I saw was a spetacular Dead Space 2 exclusive content which i was rather happy since ITS GOING TO BE AT FUCKIN NORMAL RETAIL PRICE $59, AWESOME plus Medal of Honor with Frontline remastered and at HD for Free thats simple some insane content and i hope that they keep coming.

I did realize that i didn't have any reason to still have the 360 since Sony its getting some love from third parties and doing that partners program, which made me sell my 360 which was only for multiplataform games.

Sorcery made me say "Ok i'm sold" when even Nintendo Wii at 2006 didn't made me say that, with a brilliant demo at stage which made use of Move at it's fullest and boy that thing got potential.

And finally Twisted Metal which was absolutely epic FOR ANY die hard fan from PSOne and PS2 which was almost dieing for ANY combat car game.

Seriously, the only one LACKING some serious announcements was Microsoft, no games, no exclusive content not even more investment at XBOX LIVE aside ESPN shit.Can't it be more lame?!

I'm just happy that i could sell my 360 before anyone got notice that a slim was coming. Sold it at a good price.Thank god.

Sum up of E3:

jneul5036d ago

welcome to the familly when you get your ps3:):)

HolyOrangeCows5036d ago

-Twisted Metal
-Sorcery
-move pricing
-Patapon 3
-Playstation Plus

...and more.

GWAVE5036d ago

Sony is not painting itself into a corner. It continues to expand and grow all aspects of the PS3. I can tell you who HAS painted themselves into a corner. Here are some hints:

- Has closed and/or lost nearly 2/3rds of the first-party and 2nd-party studios it had when this generation began

- Has lost nearly every key employee who worked on their game system from the last generation

- Has had over 1/4th of its exclusives later released on competing consoles

- Has the worst reputation in the industry for quality hardware

chakan5036d ago (Edited 5036d ago )

Welcome to the dark side. We have cookies and milk. =3

Edit: niiiick! :o

alphakennybody5036d ago (Edited 5036d ago )

@nick
there was no cake in that orange box, it was a lie.

juniordee5036d ago

This is kinda creepy, but after reading these comments I went to mmorpg.com to read on some mmo news, and saw this picture.

http://images.mmorpg.com//i...

Apparently the cake was a lie afterall :/

blumatt5036d ago (Edited 5036d ago )

Exactly man. Sony did a great job of getting devs to start making use of the extra space provided by blu ray. More and more games will start putting more content on the PS3 version of games and make that extra content dlc on the 360 version. That Medal of Honor Frontlines being the same disc for free sounds like a great deal to me. Sony is stepping up their game to me. Then, having Dead Space Extraction for free on the same disc as Dead Space 2 for use with the Move was a great announcement. Then having Gabe Newell come out on stage and swallow his pride and say that the PS3 version would be the best console version available as it has Steamworks support. That was the biggest announcement of all.

Zerodin5036d ago

"What I saw was a spetacular Dead Space 2 exclusive content."
Which was released for the Wii.

blumatt5036d ago (Edited 5036d ago )

But it was a free game, man. You can't go wrong with free, be it a port from the Wii version or not. Stop being ignorant.

ClownBelt5036d ago (Edited 5036d ago )

"Which was released for the Wii."

Which is free for the PS3

But of course, it's a bad thing for the bots. I mean, they never experienced any thing without payment, so it's like cancer in their minds.

ALFAxD_CENTAURO5036d ago

The Author of this Article just got Owned.

raztad5036d ago

This guy from SFG has the insight of a 12 year kid.

Sony could have shown a plethora of first party games. However they decided not to do so. Instead Sony presser was heavily based on multi plat showings + Gabe. Why? because Sony third party support is going stronger, along the increasing PS3 fanbase. The time for relying ONLY on PS3 exclusives is ending. Sony games are among the best and you have them for granted, but Sony mission is to make sure Third Party support is backing the PS3 as it was during the PS2 era.

How many of the big blucbuster on PS2 were third party? a lot.

Focker-4205036d ago

Because Killzone 3, LBP2, InFamous 2, Motorstorm Apocalypse, and Twisted Metal aren't first party games. :rolls eyes:

blumatt5036d ago

Yeah, Sony makes sure it has plenty of first AND third party support. What's your point? Just because Sony has like 20+ first parties and MS only has a couple doesn't mean you have to doubt Sony.

Boody-Bandit5036d ago

Well at least we know what the "fried" stands for.

fooltheman5036d ago

sorry but Shoot does show some great things
escpecially things( crouch and ducking) to be used in later more core shooter games...

HarryM5036d ago (Edited 5036d ago )

"Seriously, the only one LACKING some serious announcements was Microsoft, no games, no exclusive content not even more investment at XBOX LIVE aside ESPN shit.Can't it be more lame?!"

It's funny how you summarise Microsoft's conference in that poorly written sentence. Microsoft DID show games, and they DID show off exclusive content.

And that image you posted as "Related", yeah, sums up the PS3 fanboys: "Xbox has NO GAMES blah blah blah."

And no, before you ask, I'm not a fanboy for any console..

EDIT: But I do agree that PS3 had quite an interesting conference. Also I agree with the fact the writer was wrong to say "But Sony didn't really announce anything". That's completely false, Sony showed off enough..

aceitman5035d ago

gamescom http://www.gamescom-cologne...
and the tokyo gameshow http://tgs.cesa.or.jp/engli...
and sony does announce some big things at those 2 patience to all and sony did have a good show and it was a handful

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5034d ago
IRetrouk5036d ago

lmao, sony had the best show.

D4RkNIKON5036d ago (Edited 5036d ago )

Nintendo even had a great show, they both just made MS look even worse than they already were.

@below, Sorcery did look really cool. I kind of wish they would have a major franchise attached to it tho like Harry Potter, then it would sell out like mad.

LiquifiedArt5036d ago

but sony did the best, imo.

Sorcery showed what the glitchy zelda (wii-motion+) could not and the graphics were better as well. Thats a win-win.

After 15mins of glitchy zelda, i was turned off.

Titanz5036d ago

Sony had the best E3 show? I'll admit it was "entertaining", but the 3DS piqued the most interest at E3(And that I'm sure of).

spektical5036d ago

3DS was lame imo.. i cant stand handheld games, i seem them for kiddies.

sure PSP has peacewalker, but im still bummed at Kojima for not making it on PS3.

UP5036d ago

to be fare the Nintendo e3 felt so amazing because we had no expectations because of their past horrible e3 conferences.

ReBurn5036d ago

This is going to turn ugly. I've learned over the last few years that E3 just doesn't have the same pizazz that it once had. While the announcements of what's coming later in the year are exciting, I think that this year everyone knew what cats were in the bag. I wasn't really surprised by any of the big three.

Elwenil5036d ago

You were not surprised by Gabe?

Rich16315036d ago (Edited 5036d ago )

Like the other guy said, the Gabe/Valve/Steam/Portal 2 news was a total, WTF shocker. Nobody saw that coming.

ReBurn5036d ago

Portal was my favorite game in the Orange Box collection, so much fun! But was I surprised by Gabe Newell announcing Portal 2 for the PS3? Not really. The guy may be abrasive and spout off a lot of nonsense, but I would have been more surprised if he'd shown up on Microsoft's stage announcing a console exclusive. The PS3 install base is just too big to ignore.

MysticStrummer5036d ago

Of course Gabe Newell was a surprise. That guy has hated on the PS3, loudly and repeatedly, for years. Him walking out was a much bigger shock than seeing Kojima walk out during the MS press conference to announce a Metal Gear spin off for the 360.

dinkeldinkse5036d ago (Edited 5036d ago )

E3 isn't as exciting as it used to be. In fact, I thought the last two E3 were extremly dissapointing.

Also, I agree with ReBurn that Portal 2 coming to PS3 isn't that surprising.

atticus145036d ago

blame it on the internet...i can remember being young and you only knew about E3 and games in general from magazines that were like 20-30 bucks a year. I usually subscribed to the majority of them, and if I didnt i always bought their E3 issue.

In todays world nothing is a secret, we have HD video trailers at our finger tips, and most magazines subs can be had for dirt cheap if you wait for a sale.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5036d ago
cliffbo5036d ago

oh, come on now. Nintendo and Sony had the best conferences. i was glad to see Nintendo back on form and Sony showed stacks of stuff. what E3 did this guy watch?

chakan5036d ago (Edited 5036d ago )

Better yet, what kind of crack was he smoking?

Who keeps approving flamebait articles?!

jneul5036d ago (Edited 5036d ago )

Ninty and Sony brought the awesome sauce!! seriously sorcery and zelda ftw!!
MS brought casual controlerless control from the 2000's (with reference to eyetoy)

Show all comments (52)
90°

Sony Patents To Prevent You From In-Game Harassment By Reading Your Emotions

A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.

Profchaos8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.

I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons

I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.

exputers4h ago

Agreed. Blizzard recently banned a college Overwatch 2 player who's dependent for saying "shit." Pretty harsh.

z2g1h ago

Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.

phoenixwing31m ago

Cmon where's the pictures of your children. Don't hold out on them.

H956m ago

At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath

130°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

jznrpg16h ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos16h ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion15h ago(Edited 15h ago)

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola11h ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (8)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies21d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken20d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga20d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken20d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6420d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long20d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197220d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic20d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 20d ago
DivineHand12520d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91320d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer20d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91320d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit20d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 20d ago
Christopher20d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6920d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit20d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher20d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken20d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197220d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic20d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2320d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218320d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder20d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts20d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)