3D-Only Xbox 360 Debut Title Revealed

Attack of the Movies 3D allows thrill seekers the opportunity to play through some of the greatest action movie scenes of all time - in 3D. The game, which will release for both platforms this May, comes packaged with four pairs of 3D glasses to support four-player multiplayer action.

[What Would Kratos Do]

The graphics look like something i'd play on my phone.

[mjolliffe]

I know, pretty bad :|

[bruddahmanmatt]

This looks amazing. And by amazing I mean complete ass. Simply awful.

[FragMnTagM]

I don't think this game was trying to appeal to anyone that cares about graphics in the first place. But why would they slap 3D into such cruddy graphics. If I want to do the 3D thing, I would hope bad ass graphics came with it. The premise of the game sounds stupid anyway.

[WildArmed]

'Attack of the Movies 3D marks the debut of 3D-only videogames on Microsoft’s high-definition console format.'

I wouldn't put AotM 3D and high-definition in the same sentence.
This is just pitiful. Hopefully Quality Testing will turn the game down lol

[GiantEnemyCrab]

That's the headache inducing old 3D there and this game looks like something out of last gen. Shovelware

[FamilyGuy]

360 and wii being the platforms this is set to release on.
Should be downloadable on the 360 but then you'd have to find your own glasses.

[NateNater]

But...But..But...I thought....

http://www.examiner.com/exa...

[GiantEnemyCrab]

Yeah, they won't jump on board until someone else has massive success with it(see Natal and Nintendo). I find it funny he talks about viewing distance and room size as problems with 3D but won't those also be problems for Natal?

This is just MS showing once again how out of touch they are.. And this 3D is the cheap/fake kind and nothing like the real 3D Sony will be doing.

[kevco33]

This isn't anything to do with Microsoft, it's a third-party game and it's on Wii too. Besides, both 360 and PS3 have already had a 3D option in Avatar, which was also third-party.

[sinncross]

Funny you mention that its also on the Wii.

You would think that due to the fat that the game is about 3D and originally on the motion controlled Wii, they they would port it to the PS3 for the PSN.

I'm not saying that a PS3 version should definitely come, just that its interesting that they haven't announced a PS3 version but a 360 version.

[fr0sty]

you don't want to experience this type of 3D... it'll give you a headache in no time. and the fact that they say the glasses are included means it is using colored glasses to achieve it's effect, as polarized glasses wouldn't work with 3dtv's which require shutter glasses, and shutter glasses are far too expensive to include 4 per game (about $75-130 each).

[BrianC6234]

That's a different 3D. That's the kind where you need a 3D TV. It's real 3D. This game thing or whatever it is just needs lame 3D glasses. They probably use the cardboard kind with one red lense and one blue lense. Why would anyone want to buy this game though? I doubt it sells much.

[glennc]

only fanboys start comments with but but

[-MD-]

I won't be playing 3-D games for a long time.

[mrv321]

Is this 2002? Because it sure does look like it's 2010.

Seriously 1942 looks better.

[Shaka2K6]

.

[LinuxGuru]

Yuck.

[DailyAddict]

what some people referring to is that the 360 does not (and cannot) meet the minimum requirement to output a true 3D HD image, which refers to a bare minimum of HDMI 1.4 (360 is not upgradeable to this) for true 3D pass through at 120mhz. This means that 3D games for 360 won't be HD, but will be sub HD and also limits the types of games they can use because it won't be able to render 'fast motioned games' fast enough for your eyes to keep up. In other words stuff will either look slow or it will hurt your eyes if it tries to actually move at fast rates.

And that's just fact, not fanboyism.

But don't worry, knowing Sony they won't push their 3D advantages anyway because their marketing people completely suck. Why don't we have games for PS3 that utilize mouse/keyboard (huge advantage, not used)? Why aren't games taking advantage of the screen capture (huge advantage, not used) and the list goes on and on. Sony will mention stuff and then never utilize it.

[tunaks1]

I had 3d games on my n64!

/sarcasm

[ChozenWoan]

some of the best gaming I've ever had.

[ReBurn]

The good old days...

[jjesso1993]

DailyAddict i dont know of you notice but sony advertisment team have improved a lot latley couple of months ago i would same thing as you but i have heavy rain mag god war all over bus stops bus shelters on busses tv's. but i do think sony will advertise 3d gaming becuase it could move alot of 3d tv's its all in there best intrest to do so.

[Darkspade]

screw 3d , it's nice, but I feel we are missing the 1080p era... yes there are few games on PS3 and Xbox up converts but just Imagine how good GOW III would look in 1080p or any game for that matter.. Yes 3d is nice but I'll wait until they come out with a 3D TV where I don't need the Glasses.. Then maybe I'll jump on the Wagon

[divideby0]

LOL..this aint the 3D we want...