It looks like another Wipe Out game. Also even though the video wasn't clear there is no way I would buy a $600 PS3 for a game that looks like that. They better come correct if they want my money.
I don't see anything interesting about this game. I think I would do one race, put it down and just be glad that I would never play it again. Granted, the video quality certainly did not aid the graphics, but the game-play itself looked pretty weak. I simply do not know who would find this entertaining, especially entertaining enough to spend around $60. I think all PS3 fans like me should look to other games like Resistance (as achira stated earlier) and Assassin's Creed.
Truthfully i'm a playstation fan, but what was that s*** playing on my pc? That game doesn't interest me at all. That's not really the ps3's fault to be fair though, it's the developers of that game...ugh that was awful.
But remember that most developers have only recently received final dev kits so these games were created on older less powerful dev kits, and it shows...
even though it may not have been made on a final dev kit. doesnt mean the specs werent the same. the original ps3 dev kits were the size of pc's. they just made everything fit into a normal ps3 case. thats the only difference. so i hope you like the graphics!
your saying the only difference between old and final dev kits is the size of it, not its power or specs? Then why were some developers complaining about not getting final dev kits then? Think before u write idiot.
Heavenly Sword only uses 20% of the ps3's power, Gears of War 2 uses 80% of the 360's power. These are the early games that werent created on the ps3 final dev kits, and the graphics are only touching the surface of the ps3's capabilities
the dev kit's are just about finished the RSX chip was finished 2 month's ago and the cell chip has been in all 7 iteration's of the ps3 dev kit the main difference is the blue ray which is being emulated by dvd roms and there will be a handfull of other stuff to add like a working HDMI, where have I got this information from SONY as repoted by edge from the devsation conference in an interview with SN-systems
Anyway this game looks awfull buy a gamecube and F-Zero X for next to nothing or buy the inferior psp wipeout for your psp
How can you judge how much power a game is using heavenly sword use more power than you thing it uses an spe for hair physic's alone who knows how many it will use or how much power it will end up using it may not even make launch yet! and will improve even beyond the impressive showing at E3 gear's of war using the UR3 engine and is not even optimized for the DX10 stuff the 360 can do as it was originally developed for the PC so guessing how much power both games will use is impossible
when i write my comments, i tend to use logical thinking more than technical know-how, so forgive me if i dont understand some of ur post. You had some fair points though
As far as power, i dont care what specs people throw at me, i just know the cell chip is more powerful than anything inside the 360, but we'll see if it is with games in the future
As far as Fatal Inertia, i couldnt care less if it wasnt a launch title lol
bottom line is the game looks like crap...and thats all that can be said so far...fortuneatly a game has nothing to do with the system as there are alwayz badd games. I mean the game does have some promise though.....kinda reminds me of Jet Moto
This game is the worst PS3 showing I have seen so far, it looks like a PS2 vid. The water the showed in the E3 videos looked amazing what happened to that? I was hoping this game would emphazize on physics... oh well!
It looks like another Wipe Out game. Also even though the video wasn't clear there is no way I would buy a $600 PS3 for a game that looks like that. They better come correct if they want my money.
i liked wipeout so this could be a nice game ... but in this video it looks kinda lame + i think the ps3 can do better graphics like that.
sry english is my 2nd language
I thought the video was playing at half speed, until I saw the time counter....looks as slow as Motorstorm
I don't see anything interesting about this game. I think I would do one race, put it down and just be glad that I would never play it again. Granted, the video quality certainly did not aid the graphics, but the game-play itself looked pretty weak. I simply do not know who would find this entertaining, especially entertaining enough to spend around $60. I think all PS3 fans like me should look to other games like Resistance (as achira stated earlier) and Assassin's Creed.
Looks like a ps2 game, i think its safe to say that we can call Sonys new console the ps2.5 most of the time.