670°
9.0

Gamespot - Dragon Age Origins PS3 Review

When was the last time you felt totally lost in a fantasy gameworld? When was the last time you played a game with such a well-crafted and enjoyable story that you knew you'd remember it for a long, long time? Dragon Age: Origins is that kind of game, so rich and involving that you are powerless to resist its wiles and whims, so touching and triumphant that your mind and heart will be moved. In the fictional land of Ferelden, you meet memorable characters and fight for a cause you believe in, and it's this backdrop that makes developer BioWare's newest role-playing game so extraordinary. Dragon Age is more than a well-crafted story, however: It's a lengthy, intricate, and thoroughly entertaining adventure that's easy to fall in love with.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
sakura20095657d ago

another AAA game only possible on a japanese game console

Nihilism5657d ago (Edited 5657d ago )

...this game is multiplat

@MichaelJackson

the pc review from gamespot was 9.5...bad cover-up there wacko jacko

5657d ago
Foxgod5657d ago

PC version is superior.
I am gonna play that one tonight on max settings :)

thereapersson5657d ago

I thought it was only a PS3 fanboy tactic to spin things by saying they are buying the PC version?

Foxgod5657d ago

I play all multi's on pc, that tactic you speak of is only used by angry fanboys who dont have a good pc to begin with.

champ215657d ago (Edited 5657d ago )

pc >>>>>>>&g t;>>ps3=360

higher fps, mods, free dlcs, better graphics, mouse keyboard support.

all at a cheapr price ;-)

peeps5657d ago

yep pc is pretty much always better (except it looks like mw2 is being majorly shafted for pc lol and by shafted i mean they're basically limiting it to the consoles features e.g. matmaking no dedi's, no mods, buying dlc etc

AKNAA5657d ago

WoW! a PS3 multiplat better than the 360 version?! now thats a shocker! Hopefully this becomes a trend, MW2, AC2...
PC version does obviously look better, but I don't care for it unless its on a console...

t8505656d ago

mw2 shafted = what the console gamers get.

so in console terms pc users didnt get shafted at all, rather the pc version will still be the best looking version.

though i do have reservations at how activision is treating the gamers(pc, 360, ps3), so many copies are sold. is it so difficult for them to give console users dedicated servers as well? specially now that they increased prices even on consoles outside the usa.

i think activision is being greedy and if they are supported it may lead to other AAA developers to treat gamers in the same way.

raztad5656d ago

I really dont get it.

3 different reviews of the same game:

1 - DA PS3 56 comments
2 - DA PC 16 comments
3 - DA Xbox 4 comments

Why is the PS3 article the most populated and commented (by far)?

On topic: I'm glad Bioware did a good job with the PS3 version. I'm seriously considering buying this game to support them, but I'm havent played anything like this before so I'm not sure. Game world setting and story are looking extremely engrossing and interesting though.

gaffyh5656d ago

I'm VERY surprised that the PS3 version is better than the 360 version, when the game was obviously developed for 360/PC first. Maybe there is hope for Mass Effect 2 on PS3 yet?

vhero5656d ago

Gamespot clearly says the PS3 version is superior to 360 version
http://uk.gamespot.com/ps3/... right near the end of the video he clearly says it looks better.

Anon19745656d ago

I've had it argued before that when comparing games on different consoles, metacritic scores are no good because sites always give games the same score. This couldn't be further from the truth. Professional reviews may not count pixels like LOT does, but when a game is clearly better on one platform compared to the other, it's reflected in these scores. When the differences simply don't matter, the scores reflect that too. Why use just one site's opinion, like LOT, when you can look at 70+ professional reviews averaged into one score?

2009 is almost over. So far the PS3 has the best exclusives and the upper hand with multiconsole releases according to metacritic. I don't know why this is so hard for people to accept.

jjohan355656d ago

I need to know whether this game is repetitive or not like some of the other popular RPG franchises. I thought Oblivion and Fallout were very repetitive, yet got overrated scores.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 5656d ago
Jamie Foxx5657d ago (Edited 5657d ago )

good to see ps3 is handling multiplats on par now

Delta5657d ago

They have been on par with some exceptions.

Delta5657d ago

You hit it right on the nose.

TheIneffableBob5657d ago

The PS3 version's graphics are better than the 360 version's, though obviously the graphics are worse than the PC version. The PS3's load times are better as well, when compared to the 360 version.

5657d ago
McErono5657d ago

they say: the Xbox 360 version looks positively disappointing. Textures are highly compressed and colors are washed out, though the upside is that this version maintains a smoother frame rate than on the PlayStation 3, where things might get jittery when swiveling the camera around. The PlayStation 3 version features higher-quality textures than those on the Xbox 360, better color saturation, smoother facial animations, and shorter load times. Minor visual hiccups, like corpses that disappear and reappear, are a bit more common on the PS3, however. The PC version is the superior experience, but if you're choosing between the two console releases, the PlayStation 3 has the upper hand.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5657d ago
Delta5657d ago

LOL at Bots Mass Effect 2 and 1 will be better on PS3. Suck it.

Apocwhen5657d ago

...and this has to do with a review of Dragon Age: Orgins how?

5657d ago
The Killer5656d ago

multiplatform games looks better on flopboxtea

7ero H3LL5657d ago (Edited 5657d ago )

they didn't use an extra disc on 360's version that's what happened.

something like that should already be like an unwritten rule, when making RPGs on that specific console.

StarScream4Ever5657d ago

Gamespot sure enjoys playing with numbers.
360 - 8.5
PS3 - 9.0
PC - 9.5

Imma wait to see what Lens of Truth think of it. :P

Tony P5657d ago

That's about what I expected, actually.

Well, tbh I only expected the PC version to score higher than consoles since the game is modeled after the classic PC RPGs. But as I said elsewhere, it looks like visuals are about the *only* real difference and not by much.

If it hurts your enjoyment of the game to know others play a slightly better looking version, reevaluate why you play games. Because besides that, everything else seems to be more or less uniform across platforms.

colossi165657d ago

Dang, you serious? They really need to go back to their old scoring system, that is so stupid!

Nihilism5657d ago

they gave legitimate justifications for the score differences, ps3 looked better than 360, the pc version looked better than ps3, had a better interface and aditional view options ( isometric)

beardpapa5657d ago

the PC version had isometric when i zoomed out, though I found myself using the behind-character view more. I found no need to individually control each party member like i did in BG, NWN, or IWD since the AI setup for DAO was pretty good. You can customize their AI pretty well, it's kinda like the Gambit stuff in FF12.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5657d ago
Show all comments (90)
100°

Next Year, I Promise I Will Play A Different Character In Dragon Age: Origins

I've played the exact same Warden in Dragon Age: Origins for years. In 2025, I will finally make a different one. Maybe.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
CoNn3rB119d ago

Tried it before, doesn't work. I tried to to play a Dalish archer but ended up being a Dwarf Noble warrior again, must be a bug

OtterX119d ago

Next year is tomorrow, so you'll start a new character tomorrow, right? 🤔

OtterX119d ago

It's not now, at least where I live. It's 2025 as of 2 hours ago. :P

Bercilak119d ago

Seriously? I play every playable character there is: a male human noble.

TheColbertinator119d ago

My preferred origin is Dalish Elf Archer that recruits the Templars, Baelen's Dwarves with Golems and Dalish Elves. Took me 3 playthroughs to lock down a "true" file for me. What a game.

118d ago
130°

Does Dragon Age: The Veilguard Top Dragon Age: Origins?

How does BioWare's latest stack up against its best offerings?

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
LordoftheCritics176d ago

LOL

DAO pioneered a new era for cinematic rpgs while Vainguard pioneered well shampood hair.

VenomUK175d ago (Edited 175d ago )

I bought Dragon Age: Origins at launch and I enjoyed it. It didn't pioneer diddly squat. What did it do that Mass Effect hadn't done already?

Armaggedon175d ago

People miss variables easily.lol

TheNamelessOne175d ago

Long story - no
Short story - no

Armaggedon175d ago

Depends who you ask. For me it did, and dragon age origins is still to this day my most replayed single player game.

MeatyUrologist175d ago

Wow, so sounds like you would put Veilguard up there as an all time favorite? Just curious what you love about it. I'm about 10 hours in and nothing has really grabbed me other than the gorgeous environments and animations

Armaggedon175d ago (Edited 175d ago )

What I liked about dragon age has always been the lore. Origins introduced concepts, but they didn’t really start toying with it until dragon age 2. Veilguard still has the lore and sense of mystery for me, but it also has the combat. I am more of martial arts kind of player. Games like Devil may cry, wo long fallen dyansty sekiro, or fighting games are what Im usually playing if I am not playing an rpg. I usually like role playing a super strong warrior, which this game lets you do, and it lets me concentrate on my specific character. One of the things keeping me from playing Baldurs Gate 3 offline is the fact that I have no choice but to control all of my team members. For me, that takes me out of the role playing experience when I am a gallant knight that has to always use a mage or rogue in combat. It was alot better playing with friends though.

For a game to be “good” for a player, it has to have a hook, and veilguard has several things that hook me in from combat, loot, to lore, and even the characters. Some games just dont have a popular hook that rakes in alot of people, so I always understand if someone doesnt like a specific experience. But when people start saying things are trash, thats when I say it gets borderline disrespectful.

SoloZelot90175d ago

In what way is the combat and build diversity good?

Devil may cry has the style meter that encourages good combat. It also has enemy variety...veilgaurd doesn't. Veilgaurds builds are pretty much non-existent. The itemization is boring due to its extreme linearity.

As far as lore goes...I guess you're fine with them butchering the qunari.

Armaggedon175d ago

. If people can have fun with souls game combat, they should be okay with the combat in veilguard? Learn to view a games attributes in respect to the entire game instead of viewing everything in isolation. Devil may cry, all you do 98 percent of the time is beat the crap out of stuff….. of course its going to have more enemy variety and deeper combat. Thats the whole game😂
I dont too much care for what they did with the qunari, but Im not going to get caught up on it. Only an empty cup can be filled.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 175d ago
Armaggedon175d ago

In terms of traditional rpg aspects, origins wins. In terms of scale, presentation, and refined simplicity, Veilguard wins. Its not as simple as game A is better than game B, we have to set parameters

For example: Are there people that think origins is better? Yes, alot of them. Is it though? That is debatable.

SoloZelot90175d ago (Edited 175d ago )

Huh?

Okay in terms of story and choices as well as outcomes and character progression and writing...origins does it better.

In terms of combat decisions, diversity in encounters and strategies as well as meaningful power progression and itemization...origins does it better

In terms tone...that's more a preference...I'm not a fan of the change in direction....prefer dark fantasy and gore that origins brought.

I will give you the simplicity and eye candy vistas though the graphics have less to do with the game and more to do with videogames graphic progression. As far as simplicity...yes 100% veilgaurd wins there. The combat is so simple and mundane it is made for the casuals too busy on their phones to care too much about complex systems.

And before you tell me that the writing being bad is my opinion ..first maybe go check what actual writers have to say about it. People go for degrees about this type of thing.

Armaggedon175d ago (Edited 175d ago )

They follow a certain set of rules that is decided upon by the supposedly fallible, as to how things are supposed to be done. Does not make them untouchable because they have a degree. What they say is of interest, but it should not be considered gospel by anyone with awareness of how things work in this existence. I have bested opponents that are considered professional level, and Im not one myself. I have likewise learned from those not considered to be at my level in a specific area. Alot of that is subjective. In terms of character progression, Im seeing more in veilguard. In terms of story, it was simply gather treaties to fight darkspawn. This game is very similar: collect people to help stop the evanuris. Im more invested in this. The evanuris debit, is akin to Madara Uchihas build up and subsequent appearance in Naruto. They have been building towards this for three games. For me, what I am experiencing is hooking me in far more than origins.

And what is meaningful power progression? I never get to make the Sage of Strength true to form in these rpgs because warriors are always so normal, never possessing the herculean strength to role play the way I want. This game is one of the only rpgs I have played where the warrior feels superhuman. Whos to say that causing an earthquake with a stomp is not more meaningful to me than what origins has? Origins is more tactical, but more meaningful? Debatable
When setting these parameters, it is of paramount importance to detach oneself from personal bias, otherwise it will defeat the purpose.

SoloZelot90175d ago

Only for those with tremendously low standards and/or who are trying to push an agenda into gaming.

I'm thinking it's really just the former...that's what I hope anyways.

In no way, shape or form does this game come even remotely close to the nearest galaxy far away from dragon age origins or dragon age 2 for that matter.

Armaggedon175d ago

Lets not get hyperbolic now.

jznrpg174d ago (Edited 174d ago )

I really disliked 2 so I doubt it’s worse than that one but I am haven’t played Veilguard yet so I can’t say until I do

SoloZelot90174d ago (Edited 174d ago )

2 is my favourite for 2 reasons. Companions were all incredible...it's where we got varric after all.

And the events after each act actually have meaning. Sure the end state doesn't vary much but the storytelling surrounding each act ending as well as the possible outcomes is magnificent. I won't get into spoilers but loved that about the 2nd. I'm willing to have my mind changed but I've yet to encounter anyone able to tell me specifically what was so horrible and detrimental to the second that you don't also get in something like inquisition.

Inquisition is up there with it for me. I can recall all companions or most from both games and remember them fondly. Same for Kotor. But with inquisition I can't recall a single character outside of solas and the woman templar but only slightly to be honest.

jznrpg174d ago

I’d guess it doesn’t top it for me as I really enjoyed the first game but I can’t say for sure without playing both of them

Armaggedon174d ago

Depends on what you liked about origins. If it was the story and lore buildup, then you will probably be fine. If its the roleplaying aspects, veilguard is probably a hard pass because the rpg aspects seem extremely light, especially compared to dragon age origins. Choices and consequences do exist, but they seem to be small scale so far.

Show all comments (25)
80°

Great Games for Avid Readers

GF365: "If you’re a reader, this list of great games for avid readers is for you. Games are a form of art, and some have written literature in them."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com