Approvals 13/10 ▼
Soulcreat1ve (1) - 5526d ago Cancel
Johnny Cullen (4) - 5526d ago Cancel
adriano999 (1) - 5526d ago Cancel
Hellsvacancy (1) - 5526d ago Cancel
MainEv3nt 69 (1) - 5526d ago Cancel
-Mezzo- (2) - 5526d ago Cancel
PhilipLarkin (1) - 5526d ago Cancel
sunil (2) - 5526d ago Cancel
1030°

Is the developer Rockstady already equipped with the PS3 Slim?

videogameszone.de writes: "In the current Batman: Arkham Asylum trailer is somewhat veiled at minute 1:36, which suggests so far a not well-known console." Playstation 3 Slim, maybe? Screenshot inside!

Read Full Story >>
videogameszone.de
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

Lame
DanTheCrazyMan5525d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Bad spelling
-EvoAnubis-5526d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Wrong source
Translate your primary source please.
Elven65526d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Bad spelling
In the title you wrote: Rockstady instead of Rocksteady.
Vespertine5526d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Bad spelling
Rocksteady
gaffyh5526d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Megaton5526d ago

That is kinda strange, blurring out what appear to be PS3's in their office.

Trollimite5526d ago

that second one in the backround was silver or white. and it does look smaler than the regular ps3.

talltony5526d ago

they also blurred out a 360 if you look closely.

Blaze9295526d ago (Edited 5526d ago )

even if it was the slim, I don't see why developers would have it as it really doesnt benefit them at all to have. Unless Sony made some revisions to the debug units like Microsoft did by adding extra ram for development, its really useless and a waste of money for Sony to send out new units just becuase its slimmer.

And talltony is right, at 1:35 to the left of that burred black figure is a blurred out white figure as well. Probably just debug PS3/360 kits they think the public arent allowed to see.

phosphor1125526d ago

I mean, the game IS multiplat.

celtics3455526d ago

Phosphor's most likely right guys, Its a sony trailer & their probably blocking the xbox's for that reason. I've seen a trailer(can't remember what for) that had some guys playing a game using the 360 controllers, & they were blurred out.

InFAMOUS15526d ago

They probably don't have the rights to use the name... I see it all the time in tv and such.. Someone drinking a can of pepsi but the can is blurred out.. I highly doubt its a slim

5526d ago
y0haN5525d ago

It's obviously a regular PS3 blurred out so they can use the video to show 360 owners. Gosh.

Pika-pie5525d ago

More like PS3 Fat.. that thing looks huge, doubt its a PS3 Slim

G3TDOWN5525d ago (Edited 5525d ago )

even the mice are blurred, the mice could have the DELL logo on them for example

I don't think there was a PS3 slim there

Christopher5525d ago

It's likely that they're custom units of some sort with logos on them that they don't want to advertise. Likely custom skins of some sort.

Giriath5525d ago

Maybe Gabe Newell didn't want anyone to know they actually have PS3s in their office.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 5525d ago
TheColbertinator5526d ago

Interesting.It might just be a normal PS3 with a dev kit attached

Unicron5526d ago

A PS3 devkit looks nothing like that. They are massive beasts.

Raf1k15526d ago

Could be but wouldn't that make it look bigger?

PirateThom5526d ago

Sony reduced the size of the PS3 dev kits when they cut the price, the "slim" Dev kit is the same as the normal PS3.

http://www.engadget.com/200...

Unicron5526d ago

That's technically a test kit. They look like production PS3's. A devkit is about the height of a retail PS3, but a good 3 times longer (front to back).

Eiffel5525d ago

It is a PS3 Devkit. You can see based on the size and detail you can make out from the blur. It's standing upright is all.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5525d ago
Elven65526d ago

If they went through the trouble of blurring it out why not remove it completely during the editing process? Or even yet, cut the scene out altogether?

Perhaps it may have something to do with legalities, perhaps the kit was branded with a sticker or something similar that would require blurring?

Finalfantasykid5525d ago

Ya I thought of that as well. This would be a pretty pathetic way of avoiding a ps3 slim leak, since the blurring will create very obvious rumours and conspiracy theories.

PirateThom5526d ago (Edited 5526d ago )

It could be a PS3 slim... it could just as easily be a box of drugs or a porn stash.

lloyd_wonder5526d ago

Yeah. wtf they blurring dev kits for?

Show all comments (64)
240°

Nintendo Accused of 'Bullying' in Weak Patent Dispute Over Palworld

The article discusses a claim by an intellectual property (IP) expert that Nintendo likely does not hold patents strong enough to prevent the game developer Pocketpair from creating Palworld, a game that some believe resembles Pokémon. The expert suggests that Nintendo's legal challenges against Palworld could amount to nothing more than corporate bullying, as the patents Nintendo might be relying on are not robust enough to stand up to legal scrutiny. The situation could be seen as an example of a large corporation trying to exert undue influence over a smaller competitor.

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Wrong source
Gamesradar is the original source not MSN that used gamesradar.. correct URL >> https://www.gamesradar.com/games/survival/ip-expert-says-nintendo-probably-doesnt-own-patents-strong-enough-to-prevent-pocketpair-from-making-palworld-and-this-may-boil-down-to-nothing-but-bullying/
MaximusPrime_2d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (3)- Updates (3)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 20h ago
Changed: url
WolfSeed1d 22h ago
Changed: title
WolfSeed2d ago
-Foxtrot2d ago

Crazy how far they are willing to go over nothing rather than tell Game Freak to get their shit together and sort the quality of the mainline games out.

Personally I'd drop the two game bullshit, make a full on complete game, and take their time making the best game they can without relying on a silly battle gimmick they'll ditch after one game. Gimmicks out of battle is what they should be focusing on, beauty contests, berry making, secret bases, the underground, Seasons, events during day / night and post game content like travelling to a new location or something.

porkChop2d ago

That's the thing, this is why we're now seeing more serious competitors in the genre. Game Freak has just been coasting by, doing the bare minimum in innovation for the last 20+ years. They need to get with the times. Hire more devs, give more dev time to foster creativity, etc. But now that they can't get away with that bare minimum they're trying to sue their competitors out of existence. It's disgusting.

Cacabunga22h ago

Nintendo risks big with this one.. it’s means competition to pokemon and that they dont want

gold_drake2d ago

been saying this since sun and moon.

gamefreak just isnt used to, still isnt used to, the console market. they did well on the handheld space but as a complete 3d developer z they fail miserable

the last two pkmn gens look like gamecube games. not to mention the bugs at launch.

but uve seen the ridiculous anount of copies sold at launch too.

Profchaos1d 17h ago (Edited 1d 17h ago )

Realistically though palworld Pokemon with guns featured so many themes and concepts that Nintendont
There's no way they would make a game where you could use realistic weapons or have pals slaving away.

They're not the same genre at all they just feature similar characters

Markdn1d 2h ago

Can't hide plagerism I guess, Palworld had it easy, even flaunting it, they deserve ever thing Nintendo decides to throw at them.

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 14h ago

I pretty much agree, two editions of the same game shouldn't even been a thing at this point. The foundations are solid, but the lack of content and having a lived in world really let the latest games down.

Profchaos1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

Two editions worked way back in the day as a gimmick hey your mate has different Pokemon in blue than you have in red so trade them but nowadays it's pointless we don't have any of those limitations system links not really a thing anymore and two editions feels exploitive nowadays like they are targeting kids to double dip

badz1491d 13h ago

why would they do that when the fanbase is still willing to buy whatever low-effort and low-cost crap they are churning out? they are out to make as much money as possible with as little investment as possible and say what you want but GF is excellent at that front mainly because the fanbase allows them to. Nintendo is saying nothing because they are making money.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 22h ago
Valkyrye2d ago

posting articles from msn.com now seriously?

MaximusPrime_2d ago

The article is actually Gamesradar's. MSN just used their page like a URL shortened link.

Pyrofire951d 19h ago

Yeah, they've been bullies.

MeteorPanda1d 18h ago

It's straight up bullying with mooney and using the government laws as a tool to do so. They should be fined.

Show all comments (23)
80°

Anniversary: Nintendo Is 135 Years Old Today

Where does the time go?

Read Full Story >>
nintendolife.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2d ago
70°

Xbox: Gaming Evolved Interview

Xbox discusses the brand licensing strategies connecting iconic video game franchises with the world’s most diverse fan base.

Read Full Story >>
licenseglobal.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3d ago
MrDead3d ago

We asked MS, why are you so amazing and how do you come up with the ideas for creating such titles as Call of Duty and Elder Scrolls?