860°

Windows 7 cracked and activated with leaked OEM license key

85 days before general release, Microsoft's Windows 7 operating system has fallen foul of the hacking community.

Maddens Raiders5384d ago

that's pretty much all one can do. lol

Gamertags5384d ago

is incredible! You can take my word for it, this is the operating system you actually want. It is that good.

Certainly worth paying for.

It is funny to see all the little kids making comments about MS when you know that every company has leaked and hacked software.

Guitarded5384d ago

What kind of lame hacking is that.

Montrealien5384d ago (Edited 5384d ago )

Is this the same windows 7 I have on my computer atm, you know, the one MS let me install and gave me a key to install it with for free? The one that is good till 2010 that I can actually just activate when it is officially released?

btw, it is a great OS, I have not been impressed as much or even considered actually buying a windows OS since 95. That says a lot.

Major_Tom5384d ago

This key is probably blacklisted by now just so you guys know.

zag5384d ago

mmmm, man this is old hat news.

This has been done with the old Vista cracks on Win7 beta release.

Why I have no idea as the beta/RC1 keys are free you can get a RC1 key till the 20th-august from MS and just use that.

Why people are fussing around with cracking a beta/RC1 Win7 OS, when it'll just wipe itself on the 30th of june next year with/without the key... cracked or not.

It's just silly, RC1 keys are all OEM, there's no offical Win7 keys released so far unless the MSD keys are different.

shawnsl655384d ago

I thought MS gave everyone the free upgrade to Windows 7.

vhero5383d ago (Edited 5383d ago )

You cant blacklist a leaked OEM key you moron otherwise you would blacklist OEM's pc's its a default key used for OEM's all OEM's use the same and have already built there systems built on this key. They cannot change it back as its not an actual key like retail users have its a LOT more advanced method of checking files etc.. than that. Before you talk BS statements know what your talking about in future. The cracks not perfect yet but its only matter of days it works though for 70% of people. Updates work and everything. Makes MS think your PC is an OEM machine and they cannot tell if it's not either. Just the same as he Vista crack going about at the moment. MS made its too easy to crack this time... It's what you get rushing out a new OS I guess though

Arthur_5383d ago

Not only is this OLD NEWS, but its not impressive when you realize how it was done.

But I will say this: With new software being pirated everyday, im not surprised, at all.

Major_Tom5383d ago (Edited 5383d ago )

Really you 'moron' because I was using the EXACT same key earlier and now it's black listed.

Jesus christ kid. Thanks for playing the failure game.

I had to use a newer updater for it activate, so next time actually k.n.o.w. what you're talking about especially since you're probably not even running Windows 7. Amateur.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5383d ago
Paizen5384d ago (Edited 5384d ago )

Unfortunate, but inevitable

The Meerkat5384d ago

And everyone will continue to use XP

militant075384d ago

Windows 7 is better than Xp at , at least for me.

its run much faster in my computer and look much better.

I love it

JOLLY15384d ago

have fun in your 32 bit os running 3 gigs of ram. Those are some limitations you have there.

Baka-akaB5384d ago

not me , i have no issues with 7 so far , and Xp has reached it's peak , it wont go any moe stable and faster on my rig . So time to switch for me

Carl14125384d ago

@Jolly

Really, i don't care. That won't effect me and won't effect most people for at least a while

JOLLY15384d ago (Edited 5384d ago )

If you use photoshop, 3ds Max, Maya, Mudbox or any sort of video editing software, it has mattered to you for the past 3 years. Most people use their computers for more than going to n4g. Yes carl, I realize that you probably check out the pr0n

STK0265384d ago

but isn't there a 64bit version of XP?
anyway, 7 looks nice, but I'll still wait a few months before getting it, just in case, I'm definately not rushing to get it like I did with Vista...

Tehdaza5384d ago

The 64 bit version of XP had a lot of driver compatibility issues.

It never ran stable for me even after I tried reinstalling it a couple times. Then I switched to x64 Vista and everything was well.

JOLLY15384d ago

with hardly any driver support? Yes, yes they did. I own it. The problem is hardly anyone supports it.

zag5384d ago

Will you still use XP?

When all the next lot of PC games are DX10+ only... meaning they won't work on XP as it's DX9 only.

JsonHenry5383d ago

Been playing around with Win7 on a friends PC (x64) and it is head and shoulders better than XP. But then again, I thought Vista was better than XP as well.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5383d ago
Yi-Long5384d ago

... if they'd just release it for 50 bucks orso, most people wouldn't mind paying for a legal copy and would even consider it quite a bargain for an OS they are gonna use for years to come.

Reibooi5384d ago

If you pre ordered it from best buy it was only $50

Bubble Buddy5384d ago

Meh, after Vista, IMO it should have been free.

cpuchess5384d ago

Yes, anything that is overpriced is ok to steal and screw over the people who created it.

Jhun5384d ago

I hate people who try to make up excuses to justify pirating.

Stealing is stealing.

Transporter475384d ago

Okay if it is stealing like you say, so your saying that if i go to your house and let's say i take your car it is stolen right? But okay lets say i go to your house and i get a duplicate of your car just to try it out and see if i really want it but yet you still have your car but i have the exact same car due to the internet is it really stealing?

Ares84HU5384d ago

I guess in your book Robin Hood is an evil man, right??

PS360PCROCKS5384d ago (Edited 5384d ago )

Dude if you could go to someones house and get a "duplicate" car why would you steal his? Furthermore these people are not "trying it out" they're taking it and keeping it, stupid analogy.

zag5384d ago

Yeah maybe, but....

what if you had to buy a computer so you could make a program and it took you 12 months to make it, and you'd have 12 months of rent and bills etc to pay as well.

and going by what your saying it'd be fine for me to copy it, because I'll only giving it a try... of cause.

If I'm not interested in using your software, I won't pay though as I'm not using it and thus there's no requirment to pay for it, if I do use it... I won't need pay as I'm only testing it out to see if I want to pay for it and I simply haven't finshed testing out your software.

So you'll be fine with me for no paying for the software you made even though you'd have the computer/rent/power etc for 12 months built up needing to get paid.

Sweet!!!11!!!1!

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5384d ago
Show all comments (108)
60°

Bard's Tale IV is no longer compatible with Windows 7 apparently

Windows 7 official support ended recently and inXile Entertainment are now pushing Bard's Tale IV players to install Windows 10 apparently. Considering it was originally playable in Windows 7, players are not liking the minimum system requirements change.

90°

Microsoft has made it possible to port Nvidia’s DX12 ray tracing to Windows 7

Building on the success of porting WoW's DX12 version to Windows 7, Microsoft has published help for other DX12 devs, which includes a runtime that supports all the features of Windows 10 October Update... including DirectX Raytracing.

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
160°

Microsoft Ports DirectX 12 to Windows 7 - Boosts World of Warcraft's Performance in Latest Update

That's right, DirectX 12 has come to Windows 7

Read Full Story >>
overclock3d.net
bmf73641870d ago

Strange they made this update with DX12 when Windows 7 is going to be EOL next year

rainslacker1869d ago

I guess when they said they needed the new kernel for DX12 that was just them spewing BS like they always do. I knew this to be true, because Win10's kernel is essentially Win7's kernel. Same BS they've spewed for so many DX updates locked behind new versions of windows, which held back PC gaming for so long, because devs wouldn't use the new API's, and even skipped generations of the API because MS didn't sell enough of the new OS's to make it worthwhile for the dev.

it is a surprise though, because I thought they were going to abandon older versions of windows because Win10 was their way forward, and Win7 doesn't have the native access to Live like they have now.

King_Noctis1870d ago

World of warcraft? Does this game need a boosting at this point?

Stanjara1870d ago

I still don't get it if dx12 is better for performance or not.

Sgt_Slaughter1870d ago

I guess it all depends on the developer and how they optimize it.

maybelovehate1870d ago

DX12 allows much better optimization. But that is of course up to the developer to take advantage of.

CaptainCook1870d ago

Since DirectX12 was built around Windows 10, it will always offer superior performance compared to Windows 7

rainslacker1869d ago (Edited 1869d ago )

If the dev takes advantage of it then yes. Even if you don't have a DX12 card, there are some things with the rendering pipeline which are better than previous versions. The low level stuff can be hit or miss with older cards, but luckily it can adapt when you do the actual application runtime.

@Captain

DX is not built around Win10. The graphics API, which is the most important, is not actually tied to the kernel, and Win10 uses essentially the same kernel as Win7. MS saying it's a kernel related issue was them just once again trying to get gamers to upgrade to new versions of windows, just like they have so many other times in the past. That lie that MS kept spewing has held back console gaming for years, because devs often wouldn't support new versions of DX because people weren't upgrading their OS's.

Win10 does have other advantages in terms of game performance, but it has nothing to do with how the API and kernel are connected.

Stanjara1869d ago

Bravo...this is absolutely the right answer!

maybelovehate1869d ago

Yeah, it would make more sense to say that Windows 10 was built around DX12.

rainslacker1869d ago (Edited 1869d ago )

@Maybe

No, it wouldn't.

The windows Kernel, and DirectX have no direct relationship to one another. One is a software API that runs in windows, and is not dependent on it outside the interpreter that handles the instructions that get carried out between the API and the hardware. Windows itself does not in any way need DirectX, nor does the base rendering process have any connection to how Windows renders the OS, or anything in it. Developers can enable that in their programs, but it isn't required. It is even possible to uninstall DirectX if one knows the process to do so. I have done so on many occasions in my work due to beta versions having issues which didn't allow me to do my work, so I had to reinstall other versions.

Win10 is a modified version of Win7. A few core commands have changed, but the meat of the kernel is still the same. There may be dependencies for DX built into Windows which are based on the kernel, but dependencies can be implemented in older versions to allow it to work. MS just chose not to do so, because they want to push new versions of windows.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1869d ago
maybelovehate1870d ago

Seems strange to port it to Windows 7 at the same time they started to notify customers it has reached its end of life lol

eddvdm1869d ago

Woah, that's great actually! I can finally throw my Win 10 in the trash and go back to an OS that doesn't f*** up my games performance at each update.