300°

Sony Unaffected by June NPD Numbers

PlayStation LifeStyle: "Sony's Patrick Seybold, Senior Director of Corporate Communications & Social Media for SCEA, has responded to the June NPD that released earlier tonight. In his response, he claims that, "PlayStation is delivering an unmatched caliber of content for the back half of the year" and he is confident that the PlayStation brand is, "on pace for another tremendous year"."

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
DJ5826d ago

At least they saw improvements across the board compared to last month, especially with inFamous. Hopefully word of mouth will keep that game popular throughout the year. It's just way too good to pass up.

ps3gamerkyle5826d ago

Summer is usually slow for the entire industry, and it's unfair for people to look at the YoY numbers for the PS3, since MGS4 released last June. The 2nd half of 2009 looks good for Sony + PS3.

EXCLUSIVEGAMER5826d ago (Edited 5826d ago )

ps3 titles have long legs. many more exclusives to come. This is not over yet.

rockleex5826d ago

The fact that PS3 sales rose 30,000 from the previous month.

Instead, lets conveniently compare PS3 June 2009 sales to June 2008 sales... the month of MGS4's release. O_O

LordMarius5826d ago (Edited 5826d ago )

remember they expect to sell 13 million this fiscal year for a reason ;)

@below EXACTLY

rockleex5826d ago

*cough* price cut *cough*

Or a PS3 slim.

RememberThe3575826d ago (Edited 5826d ago )

That's not really saying much considering how low the number really is.

And to say that they're not affected by the low sales numbers of the PS3 is a bit naive. They obviously aren't going to voice their concerns to the public.

They are supporting the PS3 and PSP more then I've seen them support anything else in the past. So their has to be a reason they are taking these low sales numbers now. There has to be a price cut on the way, I just don't see them being able to hold out much longer.

As pissed off as they are making me with their countless failed attempts at advertising, I am hold out hope that the brilliant minds at Sony have a ace up their sleeve. I'll be waiting to hear what they say at TGS.

JonnyBigBoss5826d ago (Edited 5826d ago )

You gotta love a charismatic team of top officials at such a huge corporation.

rockleex5826d ago

JRPGs... exclusive ones. A few of those should be First Party to guarantee exclusivity. Legend of Dragoon 2 would be nice, since it was made by Sony First Party.

They need to work with Atlus to bring Persona 5 exclusively to the PS3.
Work with Level 5 to bring Dark Cloud 3 with play-create-share.
Work with Square to get Kingdom Hearts 3 exclusively, since its the same guy who's making Versus XIII.

Aquanox5826d ago

"On pace for another tremendous year"

When the last Sony's tremendous year in terms of sales?

rockleex5826d ago

Every year.

PS3 first year sales are higher than 360 first year sales.
PS3 second year sales are higher than 360 second year sales.

We'll have to see if PS3 third year sales beat 360 third year sales.

Megatron085826d ago

I dont see how the numbers are anything but bad for sony for this gen. The wii and ds is killing everything. If that wasnt bad enough the 360 has beaten the ps3 in sales for the pass 9 months ( I think its 9). I doubt the ps3 wil be able to out sell the 360 till maybe march of 2010 when god3 is release. These are not good times for sony. To be honest next gen and the ps4/psp2 cant get here soon enough for sony.

jaysquared5826d ago

I love how Sony fanboys disregard how the PS2 dominated last gen and I mean dominated!! Combine the gamecube and xbox sales last gen and it was still outsold by the PS2 by 3 times or more! Now the PS3 is dead last in terms of sales behind the Wii and the 360 and is still not gaining any ground and you guys are happy about that? i dont think Sony is happy that they are not dominating this gen like they did last gen. But hey whatever makes you sleep at night...

Sony has last their market share to both the wii the 360. The 360 sold more this gen compared to last gen even though with all their hardware problems that is a positive sign. The PS3 is bound to sell less than they did last gen and is losing their market to the 360 and wii... Spin it to the positive but in reality as of right now the PS3 is a failure!

themyk5826d ago

your right. what can i say? your right.

u know. i am, i'm mad. i'm so darn mad at sony for being in third place.

i'm not happy. i could care less that their releasing amazing games that i love. their in third place, you know. and that makes me mad.

dude, stfu. no gamer cares about sales.

OmarJA5825d ago

Good for them...

Just keep those AAA titles coming Sony.

Syronicus5825d ago

I still cannot believe how well the PS2 is selling. Support for a console this old is amazing. The PSP is doing well and the sale of PS3 is higher this month than last. Good month for Sony.

Aquanox5825d ago

So... beating the Xbox 360 sales with launches aligned but not in parallel is your idea of a tremendous year for the console maker that single handed dominated all others in the past generation?

That's too many conditionals. In my opinion, Sony is still yet to have a "tremendous year" this generation in terms of marketshare.

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 5825d ago
KingKionic 5826d ago

Nice to see Sony with a Open mind...

Open mind.

ps3gamerkyle5826d ago

Optimism is what Sony needs right now.

However, things really aren't THAT bad. Just the fact that the 360 version of Prototype outsold the PS3 version by a margin of OVER 2:1.

thereapersson5826d ago

They don't bash the competition, or try to spin; they remain positive and see the glass as half-full. Just bring us those games you are promising, Sony, and remember: MARKETING, MARKETING, MARKETING!!!

ps3gamerkyle5826d ago

Can't argue with you there. Sony has rarely gone out and openly attacked the competition. They've always kept their composure.

DJ5826d ago

There's countless times where they could've bashed the competition, or responded to bashing. Yet they stay steady as a rock. Confident, composed, and optimistic.

raztad5826d ago

That is exactly how a true leader behaves. Keeps his/her composure in the worst moment and never acts by impulse following a rigorous and long term plan. Sony already scored BIG, BD is the indisputable winner in the HD war. The future is bright and games have been coming in a steady pace.

kewlkat0075826d ago

They need a damn price-cut and better marketing.

tuglu_pati5826d ago

@ kewlkat007

I'm with you on this one.

DJ5826d ago

How would you change their marketing? What would your strategy be?

Qui-Gon Jim5826d ago

I do think they need to work on getting the name out there more. It seems like every videogame commercial i see is a multiplatform game that has the XBox 360 logo come up at the end. To most people it looks like 360 is the only system to have any games.

kewlkat0075826d ago (Edited 5826d ago )

SOFTWARE - When Big Blockbuster games come out, I do not see Sony's commercials frequently. I think I saw a KZ2 commercial 3 times up till now. Not just talking about that game but many more. MS seems to throw a party for its games, meaning they attack on most stations, sci-fi, sports networks, G4, MTV, A&E..News channel..etc They celebrate their 1st-party games.

True Story: I walked into a GAME STOP the day before KZ2 came out(I'm fn serious, there was no huge cardboard helghast in your face or anything) but there was plenty Halo Wars boxes in the Window. I remember saying WTF is going on, almost like KZ2 was just another game. No midnight launches or anything. For a game of that caliber, that was a shame but who do you blame?

Sony no longer can depend n all those great 3rd-party titles that helped them to the top in the last 15 years so putting focus on 1st-party is great idea and the caliber of the games shows but Sony, to me, seems quite comfortable with it's software numbers. I think, it's because they have a strong PS2-base, that they will eventually count on, to buy PS3's in their 10 year plan, which will then, give these games much needed legs.(I'm guessing that's the plan).

HARDWARE - I do not know if it's the same everywhere but we know, the economy stinks. So affordability, a great marker-price, and value marketing is important. Maybe Sony is still trying to make as much as they can with a high price before they drop it, I'm guessing.
Regardless of how well it sells at it's price, it's just not gonna cut it, in the state we are in. Right now, if sales were just based on loyalty,looking at the past PS2 install-base, Sony should be doing great but this time around $399-$499 price of a console after Tax + games...etc is steep.

It's either Sony is not hitting the mark with it's "Value Marketing" vs other consoles or plenty don't feel like it's worth the price, regardless of the specs(the average consumer doesn't know or care much about that).

I'm a firm believer of "Price Matters" not just Exclusive games. Especially in this Economy, if you can't justify a the high price of an item or convey it to a consumer, then other choices might win out. I don't think Sony's Exclusive sell all that well like they should. All their exclusives are BUNDLED at some point which should help sales. So to me, that 23+ million install-base is not all made up of PURE gamers. I think it's a smaller install-base hiding behind hardcore movie watchers, currently. Though, the Xbox 360 does not have a BD-Drive(for the better or worst) but no ones gonna buy it to just watch DVD movies. Same as the Wii.

kewlkat0075826d ago

Why I may choose one thing can be totally different then why you think I should choose another.

Of course it's the console manufacturers job to convey that "VALUE".

Consumers decision to either bite on the value pitch. If they can't afford it then does it matter to them at the time?

onanie5826d ago (Edited 5826d ago )

I suppose you're saying that $400 is above the ceiling of what many people can afford, where any value that is represented by $400 is thrown out of the window anyway. I must say I don't know how many people are in that situation. Neither do you, but it is an interesting thought. I imagine, though, if one managed to save $300, then saving a bit more to get to $400 might not be an impossible thing to do.

I would agree that value is subjective, even pliable. Indeed, it seems to be the mission of many PS3 detractors to drive the perception of its value down. Despite their agendas, I think most people familiar with PS3's features will say that it's current pricepoint still represents good value, when compared with the competition. The upcoming exclusive games ("exclusive" represents what the competition doesn't have, afterall) also add value to the machine. What remains is the marketing.

The difference in our opinions is in the effectiveness of Sony's marketing thus far. The surrogate marker for that is in the sales of the machine. Sony's worldwide sales rate is exceeding that of 360. So why does Sony need to market their console better?

You might point out the discrepancy in US sales. I have no good explanation for that, other than the fact that quite possibly, the negative campaigning worked, and its reach is clearly visible in English speaking populations. The PS3 is still clearly preferable in other areas.

Syronicus5825d ago

Sony has really stayed focused on their own issues, good or bad. You don't hear too often, Sony bashing the other console makers. Instead you hear them talk about how they plan to improve or how they are doing and what they are doing to make us consumers happy. That is the Sony I like to see. Last gen they got a bit arrogant but this gen they seem to be back on track and for that, I respect them.

ps3gamerkyle5825d ago

Bubbles for you, Sir.

I just think Sony needs a good showing at Gamescom (which they'll have a 3 hour press conference!!) and TGS (more JRPG's besides WKC) and they'll roll into the holiday season on a high note.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 5825d ago
dimitry215826d ago

sony have lots of AAA games for next year so im not too worry.infamous is still a great game

ps3gamerkyle5826d ago

For next year and this year. However, by the looks of things, 2010 is looking to be more crowded than originally thought.

da720izcumin5826d ago

I say we start the hype right now!!!!!11111111

Show all comments (95)
100°

Infamous Franchise Deserves Another Chance From PlayStation

Sucker Punch rejuvenated the superhero genre with Infamous, a series that focused on the pure fun of wielding destructive powers.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
shinoff2183370d ago

Atleast release a remaster trilogy or something to gage interest. I'd buy it. With that said I'm pretty over superheroes at this point. Infamous is still dope as fk though so it'd be a buy

isarai370d ago

Omfg i would go apesh!t for that 😩

jznrpg370d ago

I agree but games take 4-6 years to make so who knows when they would do it? After Ghost of Tsushima2? They could have something else in the world as well in early production who knows.

mkis007370d ago

It's a shame Sucker Punch finally figured out a good open world formula only while making Ghost of Tsushima. Infamous 1 and 2 were great for their time, but Second son felt too much like a checklist in It's design. I love the hell out of all 3 games (2 and 3 are just so damn good, while 1 shows it's age and the ps3 struggles), but I would love to see how they would do another infamous with all they have learned. Wouldn't hurt to release a remastered collection either.

Demetrius370d ago (Edited 370d ago )

This series, days gone, will continue to get ignored by sony, luckily we still have the horizon series, sly cooper not getting pushed anymore, speaking of that I'm bout to get on my ps2 and play some sly 2 anyways lol, but seriously I never woulda thought back then sony would ever cold shoulder most of their franchises I'm actually surprised they're still letting ratchet&clank be around

Show all comments (8)
230°

The inFamous games deserve more love from Sony

The inFamous games are an important part of PlayStation history, but the series is in limbo and playing older entries isn't exactly easy.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
LucasRuinedChildhood496d ago (Edited 496d ago )

Would like remasters of 1 and 2. I enjoyed them much more than Second Son.

1 & 2 had more of an emphasis on climbing and the traversal requires a bit more effort in a good way. It was rewarding. Second Son made climbing mostly obsolete so they put little effort into it. The traversal was just great in inFamous 1 & 2. There's a reason Sunset Overdrive copied and improved upon the induction grind mechanic.

Reminds me of how I felt about the decline of parkour and the well designed tombs (basically Prince Of Persia levels) that we saw in the Assassin's Creed games.

The story and atmosphere were also much better in 1 & 2.

Electricity is just a brilliant superpower for an open world city. It perfectly fits just like webslinging does in New York and it has many applications.

Cacabunga496d ago

For sure.. one of my favorite Sony licenses

Shane Kim496d ago

Loved one and two. I actually liked the story as well.

Minute Man 721496d ago

The standalone DLC was a sweet

jznrpg496d ago (Edited 496d ago )

I enjoyed Second Son but it was too short. The first 2 were great though

-Foxtrot496d ago

Second Son was alright but didn't touch the first two games

It felt short and lacking in comparison

Also I really thought Reggie would have made a better protagonist, someone who is anti-conduit as much as him and ends up becoming one would have been interesting to see. I kind of enjoyed his character throughout the game as his development.

badz149495d ago

why is it right now, the thing I want the most from Sony is to release remasters of inFamous (1,2 & SS), KZ (1,2 & 3), Resistance (RFoM, 2 and 3) and Motorstorm (1,2 & 3)??

The_Hooligan495d ago

All great choices. I would like to add Warhawk/Starhawk to that. The multiplayer in Warhawk was amazing. I am surprised Sony hasn't looked into MAG either. That game was ahead of its time.

Maybe Sony should make an internal studio like Bluepoint games and all they do is remake/remaster these amazing games, even going back to PS1,PS2,PSP, Vita portfolio. And because of the recent articles suggesting cost cutting, budget issues and releasing more games on PC, they could do that with these remakes/remasters. Do a day one on PC and PS5. At the end of the day Sony or any other company is going to do what makes them the most money.

Kiryu1992495d ago

Would love a remastered collection on PS5/PC

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 495d ago
kpgs496d ago

Wouldn't the onus be on the consumers? If they bought the Infamous games, then we'd have more games from that series.

KwietStorm_BLM496d ago

Infamous has sold millions of units. People have been asking for more. They aren't interested. Just like people have been asking for more Resistance or even a remaster collection, but insomniac isn't revisiting that either. Likely never getting a new sequel since they're a Marvel studio now.

LucasRuinedChildhood496d ago (Edited 496d ago )

No. Infamous was successful. But after a few entries (which are taking longer to make these days) a lot of Sony studios move on to new IPs. That's not a bad thing at all. They don't need to make inFamous games forever, just like we didn't need new Sly Cooper games forever.

But people would like to be able to easily play them on current hardware which is reasonable. Same for Killzone, Resistance, MGS4, etc. Good games shouldn't be trapped on old hardware. It's good that Bluepoint ported Uncharted 1-3.

kpgs496d ago

I'm not saying it wasn't successful. I enjoyed playing all 3 entries and DLC. But like you said, people move on, studios move on. But I don't think I've heard people asking for more Infamous in a long time.

Profchaos496d ago

The franchise was popular we got quite a few games but Suchet punch wanted to beach out I think that's why we got ghost of Tsushima over infamous 4

Tbh ghost is a fantastic game I'm not complaining about that but I'd love to see infamous handled by another team

jznrpg495d ago

Id take GoT2 over Infamous right now but after GoT2 or maybe 3 if they go trilogy I’d like a new Infamous.

badz149495d ago

that's the problem with Sony that puzzles me A LOT! they have studios specifically specialized in remastering and remaking old games for new gen hardware, but we are getting very few of them. SoTC, Uncharted collections, Demon's Souls Remake, TLoU Part 1...and?? that's it? why aren't they giving their old games new lease of life on the PS5 for the new generations of gamers to enjoy? they clearly have the expertise. for god sake, I can even accept lazy porting like Nintendo are doing for theirs if I have to.

FinalFantasyFanatic495d ago

There are a lot of games that consumers have been asking Playstation for, Playstation won't do it, so a lot of these developers have gone and made it themselves by any means possible such as Kickstarter (e.g. Armed Fantasia, Penny Blood, Ratatan, 100 Heroes, ect...). Developers have even asked if Sony could help them out with porting/remasters some of these older games for Playstation, they said no.

Crows90495d ago (Edited 495d ago )

Um...dude like you say that as if nobody bought them....the devs went on to do ghosts after 3 infamous games....3

People ask for new resistance and new infamous at every moment where it makes sense to mention it.

Having a remake of 1 and 2 would be very welcomed I'm sure.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 495d ago
chicken_in_the_corn496d ago

I would love to see a new game but a feel that would get a response similar to Saints Row.

TravsVoid496d ago (Edited 496d ago )

If they keep any of the characters from the previous games I think it would do fine unlike Saints Row which decided to replace fan favorites with less likable replacements. I wouldn't be surprised if that decision caused a majority of their buyers to be new to the series rather than returning players. I will say though, if Infamous Second Son or the first two Infamous games were remade I would be a day one buyer on PC.

ocelot07496d ago

Loved all 3 of them. I couldn't get on with the vampire spin off though. Wish they didn't move away from cole but I didn't mind the other character.

DefenderOfDoom2496d ago

Loved 1 and 2 , would definitely love a new INFAMOUS single player campaign.

Show all comments (39)
310°

Nixxes Software Can't Go Wrong With An Infamous Remaster

Nixxes' Remaster focus could set the stage to resurrect many obscure titles like the karma-centered, superpower-fueled sandbox of Infamous.

maniacmayhem713d ago

Infamous remaster? How about an Infamous re-Boot! This is one game that doesn't need a remaster, it needs either a proper equal of a reboot of the original. And since Sony is currently in development with Marvel, i can totally see them having guest marvel characters to appear in Cole's world.

BanginTunes711d ago

This is one of the worst things I have ever read

1Victor711d ago

I would prefer Warhawk or Starhawk ether or both will keep us fans happy for a looooooooong time

The_Hooligan711d ago

Warhawk would be awesome! So many good memories playing that game on PS3. They could do a massive 50v50 mode, battle royal with last Warhawk standing, classic 20v20 mode, so many options.

shinoff2183711d ago

I'd rather infamous. Sonys got enough online bs in the pipeline. No need to add more.

1Victor711d ago

@shinoff I disagree with you both of those games was extraordinarily fun to play just the satisfaction of transforming your plane into a bot and stomp a enemy then transform and fly off on Starhawk was a experience that hasn’t been replicated since.
The game was extremely valanced to the point you could go against a tank on foot and win with the ratchet or 1 shot a plane doing a massive attack with your tank. In Warhawk you could pick up half your team and fly them to a base and take it over but those are experiences you had to play to know how awesome those game was even YouTube videos don’t do justice to those game.
Anyways I’ll stop here or I’ll run out of words to post a wall text taking about those games

Christopher711d ago

Here's the thing, infamous and *hawk are such different games and with different audiences that Sony could... do both at the same time? Nixxes doesn't need to be involved in the shooter (that would be new for them I think since they usually do SP games) but someone else could and Nixxes could share support with development/engine needs.

shinoff2183711d ago

1victor

Ya know Christopher is right they are completly different games. Me personally I don't value online games I just don't care for them. Hell in another bubble I probably enjoy them. In this bubble nah I just prefer single player unless I'm playing Mario or Mario party with my girl and kids or something.

1Victor710d ago

@shin of course I know Chris is right but the games have to be approved first before assignment to a studio I didn’t mean this studio in particular making those game I meant the approval process and Sony harder push on MMO games.
I’m just one of the millions of players that loved those game and a top 800 word wide ranked on Starhawk and proud owner of its platinum trophy

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 710d ago
DankSinatra711d ago

A remaster would allow people who don't have access to a ps3 to experience the game since there's so many stuck on the ps3 that are exclusive to the console and Sony refuses to invest in backwards compatibility

darthv72711d ago

Who doesnt have access to a ps3? There were over 87m of them sold. They are cheap and easy to find. Just like wii and ps2.

shinoff2183711d ago

Or maybe it's just not ready yet, ps3 was a different kinda animal.

DankSinatra711d ago

@darthv72

Not everyone is willing to go out and buy a ps3 for a single game or a handful of games when they have a ps4 or a ps5. A port or remaster would actually help. Younger audiences who did not grow up with a ps3 would have exposure to these games that Sony has essentially left behind on the ps3 due to them not investing in backwards compatibility. If they would do backwards compatibility then we wouldn't need to shill out more money for the same games. Something I actually applaud microsoft for (the only thing they have done that's good).

zaanan711d ago

Agree, and PS3 is getting long in the tooth, so failure rates will be going up. I had to send my slim in for repair years ago.

shinoff2183711d ago

I had a couple extra dollars and came across I guy selling ps3s for 50. I bought all 4. Just felt it was a good deal. Now if I could find controllers. I swear I can't find any cheap controllers around me

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 711d ago
jeromeface711d ago

go back to marvel avengers, sounds like more your cup of tea

KwietStorm_BLM711d ago

You know what, now that I think about it.. yeah none of that makes any sense.

TheKingKratos711d ago (Edited 711d ago )

Lol 😂😂😂

Christopher711d ago

Yes to a reboot, absolutely no to Marvel characters in it.

maniacmayhem711d ago

*either a proper equal of a reboot of the original. *

Damn, there needs to be an extension on the Edit feature.

"Either a proper sequel or a reboot of the original"

And people aren't with Cole interacting with cameos from Marvel? Especially with Sony making Spider Man and Wolverine?

Why exactly would that be a bad idea? Especially with the multiverse being a huge deal and all.

Christopher711d ago

***Why exactly would that be a bad idea? Especially with the multiverse being a huge deal and all.***

There's enough Marvel. Let's not spread it everywhere and let other IPs be their own thing. Please.

neutralgamer1992711d ago

Infamous 1-2 collection would be amazing on current generation. God of War 1-2 and PSP games also playable on PS5 Yes please. And last but not least MGS4

There are so many great games which are on PS3. We need them to be remastered and released for current generation.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 710d ago
GoodGuy09712d ago

Idk why sony hasn't done remasters for 1+2 yet. Such great gems.

RaidenBlack712d ago

I'd like a Killzone 2 Remaster.
Keep the visuals style as is ... just improve the LoD and the resolution

ArchangelMike711d ago

Now that COD is in Microsofts back pocket, it's time for Sony to start investing in it's own 1st party shooters. I loved Killzone - even Shadowfall. But Yeah Killzone 2 was the high point of the Franchise.

ClayRules2012711d ago

Yes. KZ2 was the high point of the franchise and a strong, solid and just bloody fantastic shooter! Had so much fun those days with the game.

Neonridr711d ago (Edited 711d ago )

Shadowfall was my first introduction into the series as the PS4 was my first Sony console. Maybe compared to the others it was not great (personally I don't know), but I had a blast playing it and found it quite enjoyable. I'd love a Trilogy Remaster though so I could go back and enjoy the original 3 for the first time (with a new coat of paint + updated controls)

shinoff2183711d ago

Naw were good. There's plenty in the sea

zaanan711d ago

It’s about damn time for a Resistance trilogy remaster!

long-time-gamer711d ago

Most def the highest point of the franchise, the music, gameplay and story was awesome

ironmonkey711d ago

absolutely right! killzone has been quiet long enough since ps4 release date.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 711d ago
long-time-gamer711d ago

man id love a killzone 2 remaster, its one of my favorite games of all time, but who knows what shape that code in and where its at, prob wont happen under jim ryan though! you can keep your fingers crossed though and see what happens but GG is all about Horizon now

Vits712d ago

There is a lot of the PS3 era that I would love to see ported/remastered. But, unfortunately, they are probably not commercially viable and I have no idea who owns the rights currently. Stuff like Sire: Blood Curse, White Knight Chronicles, Tokyo Jungle, Folklore, etc.

Infamous on the other hand was never a series that I found good or interesting. Especially when compared with other contemporaries like Prototype. But, given how bare the subgenre is right now, I would dig a remaster.

BehindTheRows711d ago

Sony owns Siren. I can’t speak for the rest.

As for inFAMOUS vs Prototype, I feel the opposite. inFAMOUS mopped the floor with it, quality and gameplay. Just felt far more polished. That said, I enjoyed Prototype’s powers a little more.

Vits711d ago

Fair enough, I agree that the production values of inFamous were higher. But I found it to be a snore-fest.

darthv72711d ago

...no meed. Sony could add ps3 support to the 5 and then people can play loads of games already available. No streaming required. Rpcs3 could be adapted to run on the 5... it would solve so many problems.

Vits711d ago

No need, because they instead could do these two other things that they have shown no interest in doing? Sure.

Shane Kim711d ago

But then they couldnt charge you for remaster (even though I would love one for infamous) or charge you for PSN premium.

darthv72711d ago

It would be even funnier if the series x gets rpcs3 support and can play the ps3 games while ps5 still cannot (not without streaming them)

shinoff2183711d ago

Don't most people still have issues with rpcs3. It's not as stable as alot of emulators out there. From what I've read

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 711d ago
zaanan711d ago

My kids and I had a fun time in Tokyo Jungle!

long-time-gamer711d ago

prototype def was not on the same level as infamous far as gameplay or graphics

Pocahontas710d ago

It was legitimately bad game.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 710d ago
isarai712d ago

Infamous, Resistance, and killzine are so ripe for a remaster, I wish Sony would make it happen.

Show all comments (74)