210°

StarCraft II in Windows Seven

StarcraftWire.net continues to explore the technical aspects of StarCraft II. Having revealed confirmed system specs, talking of DirectX and Havok among other topics before, the tech guru Kalos reveals Blizzard replies and analysis of StarCraft II in Windows Seven.

Read Full Story >>
starcraftwire.net
SCFreelancer5503d ago

I hope Windows 7 is going to be what they say: as Vista should've been. Nice article Kalos.

kalos5503d ago

Thank you. I'm glad of the praise. Should be fun to see how things pan out in the end of it all when the game is released, but I'm happy Xordiah didn't yell and throw stuff at me when I asked her for her help :D Fact for the all: Don't upset your Blizzard Rep, feed them chocolate instead!

Cogo5503d ago

Yes, the article is nice. And if Windows Seven is NOT what Vista should be, I think we'll all start buying macbooks or learning Linux...

Dorjan5503d ago

I agree! Windows users are really starting to lose faith.

I just hope that windows 7 really does do what windows should be doing.

Leord5503d ago

Hehe, I'm trying to delay buying a new PC until the new Windows is out. Unfortunately, I assume that even if it's very well made, it will still be a while before bugs are weeded out. I am not traditionally an early adapter, I want things that work!

xwabbit5503d ago

W7 is an improvement of vista, heard it may actually be good.

danarc5503d ago

@1.4

I think if you buy a Vista PC now, you get to upgrade to W7 free when its released, I done that with my XP PC, bought it late and get Vista mailed to me :)

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5503d ago
kalos5503d ago

I did what I could with this article, sadly I'm pressed for time with other things right now. Hopefully this helps a great deal of people, its why I think up and write these things.

Leord5503d ago

It was actually quite useful, very nice.

Cogo5503d ago

Yes, it's good. I don't think I've seen an article from that author that wasn't good.

Leord5503d ago

It's quite interesting to get an insight in exactly how things like OS compatibility works for older games.

I just say that because I like to play lots of old games, including SC1 and HoMM3 =)

kuangtu5503d ago

I'm not really into Tech, but my experience is some DOS games are hard to run on Vista and sometimes XP. I love some of those games, they are simple and full of memories. I hope Win7 is more compatible with all the old applicants and games.

kalos5503d ago

Iknow what you mean. Nothing like booting up Xcom or Monkey Island One even on Windows Seven Beta just to enjoy the good old times.

kuangtu5503d ago

thanks. of course we always can find some way to make things work but it's not really convenient. Some of my favorite softwares doesn't work on Vista. I need to install XP again to some other section of my HD. =/

Leord5503d ago

Yeah, the DOS box and other software are not 100% compatible with Vista. but that's what we're all whining about anyway =P

Vista is just not up to par.

Azymn5503d ago

DOS games generally run fine in DOSBox, even on Vista x64 (which I have). Sometimes they need tweaking, but you can almost always get them up and running. I use it for Master of Orion 2.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5503d ago
kuangtu5503d ago

woot. It's finally out.

I think SC2 will be fine on Win7 if Blizzard want this game last as long as SC1.

Leord5503d ago

As Blizzard say themselves, it's the way they have handled previous operating systems =)

Fyzzu5503d ago

Eh, should work okay then, even if they're not saying it in so many words.

kalos5503d ago

Indeed. I saw it as not wanting to commit themselves to supporting until it has been tested through and through on at least the Release Candidate to know that it'll work without problems, but they'll be doing everything they can (and shouldn't take much effort if any as the article explains) to make sure that Starcraft II works not just with what we have now but what is going to be the mainstay of OSs in the very near future.

Show all comments (25)
90°

It Seems Pretty Clear Why StarCraft 3 is Not a Thing Yet

Even though fans have been clamoring for a StarCraft 3 for years now, it seems like Blizzard really has no reason to spend time making one.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
StormSnooper159d ago

They sort of ran the story as far as it could go.

Also, it seems like blizzard is more busy with mediocrity at this point in time.

Jingsing159d ago

The problem with Blizzard is they have franchises that don't need sequels. People are happy playing the games that they previously made. What they need is new games, none of this business of trying to transport the old audience into a new version of an old game which only ends up nickle and dime'ing users.

170°

$15 horse for WoW made more money than StarCraft 2: Wings of Liberty

Jason Hall, currently an indie developer and former Blizzard employee, has been sharing some really interesting stories from his long career in the industry for a while now. Some of them are truly insightful, while others may seem depressing.

Read Full Story >>
gameworldobserver.com
Sciurus_vulgaris161d ago

I’m a little shocked that StarCraft 2: Wings of Liberty sold only around 6 million copies. The original StarCraft did over 11 million. Maybe Blizzard was too leisurely in releasing StarCraft 2? Starcraft 2 came out 12 years after it’s predecessor.

Plague-Doctor27161d ago (Edited 161d ago )

Im surprised too. Starcraft was still a huge name in 2010. It was kinda the only new RTS around and other genres like MOBAs hadn't really kicked off yet. I do remember at the time sentiment around the game was
pretty angry the game was being split into 3 but I doubt that would have impacted sales to that degree

Sciurus_vulgaris160d ago

For a long time I believed StarCraft II sold on par or better than its predecessor. There was so much hype for the game. Plus it had a pretty strong E-Sports scene for a few years.

Myself and half a dozen friends all bought StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty and played it religiously for a full year. While I bought the expansions, most of my friends did not. RPGs seem to be a generally low selling genre.

Nerdmaster160d ago

I'm not shocked at all. This was an early example of Blizzard being greedy. Instead of releasing a complete experience, splitting Starcraft 2 in 3 parts so it could make us purchase it 3 times if we wanted to know the whole story and play story mode with the other races.

Sciurus_vulgaris160d ago

I originally had that stance. However, Wings of Liberty, was just as long, if not longer than StarCraft 1. The expansions were of decent length too and added a good amount of additional content.

il-JumperMT161d ago

and people wonder why we are having mtx in everything. i blame the people who actual buy them.

Nerdmaster160d ago

It's interesting he used Brazil as an example of the importance of regional pricing. Nowadays many companies on Steam are setting their prices in Brazil as high as, if not more than, their price in USA. I simply refused to buy a few games when I noticed that's the case.

Extermin8or3_160d ago

This right here is the fucking problem.

160d ago
70°

Star Discord is a StarCraft lookalike optimised for mobile by a one-man team, out now

Illogical Games has just announced the official release of Star Discord, the one-man indie dev's charming StarCraft lookalike on mobile.

Read Full Story >>
pocketgamer.com
XiNatsuDragnel830d ago

I wish for a console version too