120°
7.0

Gamespot: F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin Review

The image of a pasty-skinned, greasy-haired young girl has become an iconic image in horror films like The Ring, and the original F.E.A.R. introduced a similar figure with great success. Of course, that game gave its ghostly visions a chilling context, drawing you into the unnerving story of a paranormal prodigy named Alma and the horrific suffering to which she was subjected. F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin returns to this fertile universe, but rather than scrutinize even darker reaches of the soul, it merely skims the surface, offering up a series of eerie visions without delivering a good mystery to bind them together.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
she00win995546d ago

what happen to killzone 2's review gamespot?

N4Sony5546d ago

If you are limited to n4g and ONLY n4g for all your gaming news, the Killzone 2 Gamespot review may already be out. The fact that you would not have seen it of course would be due to the score being below 9/10, immediately showing that Gamespot is paid by M$ and biased against Sony and Killzone 2 and PS3 and Jews. The attempted news post would be immediately reported and denied approval by the 80+% Sony hardcores running this site these days.

Of course, in reality, it's not out yet. But of course, Gamespot taking their time to review a game means it's obviously full of poop and getting Bill's money. It only makes sense right?

As for this review, I think it's obvious that F.E.A.R. 2 is little more than it's predecessor without the originality. Too bad, will make a good rent.

TheIneffableBob5546d ago

Wow, this review is pretty spot-on with how I feel about the game.

Helghast Slayer5546d ago (Edited 5546d ago )

Wow where is the gamespot KZ2 review. They sure as hell didn't waist time with this one. Something tells me they are waiting for the day the game comes out then they'll release it in order to change peoples minds about buying the game. I really wouldn't be surprised.

Either that or i have a pretty wild imagination.

Hmm you really don't look stupid now huh EDGE?

Fear2 8
Killzone2 7 lol

You stick out like a extra prick at a gang bang (quote from killzone2 script).

I feel sorry for you 360 extremists. Not a single AAA exclusive worth buying for almost half this year and probably the rest of it lol. Sux to be a F@CKING BOT LMAO.

baraka0075546d ago (Edited 5546d ago )

I'll check it out but I didn't really think it was going to be anything more than just an OK game.

Are_The_MaDNess5546d ago

whaaaaat?
damn thats 2 low
i have finished the game 2 times already and i think that score is 2 low

callahan095546d ago

7 is a high score, and I didn't think this game was very fun based on the demo. I can't judge it fully unless I play the full game, but I didn't like the demo, so for me, this review just further convinces me not to buy or rent the final game anytime soon. Every gamer has different tastes. I mean, a game like Folklore on the PS3 is perfect to some people (for instance, me!) and others hated it (GameDaily gave it a 4 out of 10!). It's tough for review scores to mean anything, they're all subjective, arbitrary crap.

Show all comments (12)
60°

A great F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R. leapt out from behind the TV to scare gamers witless and ruin their underpants in 2005. Amalgamating elements of Hong Kong action films like Hard Boiled with the Japanese terror of The Ring, Monolith hit the nail(gun) on the head. Apart from a large number of grey corridors, it was a tremendous game and one that has had many playthroughs.

Read Full Story >>
thunderboltgames.com
10°

25 Things About Me: Point Man of F.E.A.R.

Between battling Replica soldiers and keeping in touch with his family, Point Man took some time to off of F.E.A.R. operations to talk about his life behind the scenes. Although Point Man could not provide any real personal information and didn’t seem to have much of a personality, he did give us some tidbits about his likes, dislikes and opinions about his missions. We had to get the best typist in the industry to keep up as the interview went really, really fast.

Read Full Story >>
gamepodunk.com
Dead_Cell5018d ago

This has to be the worst article in written existence ever written.

330°

Lamest Video game achievements

The Merriam-Webster'a dictionary website defines an achievement as a "successful result brought about by hard work." However, the following achievements could not be classified as either being considered successful or the result of hard work, mostly since these achievements are boring.

Read Full Story >>
gogaminggiant.com
Murgatroyd75109d ago

Personally, I think most achievements are lame. But for me, nothing is worse than ones that require you to either watch the opening sequence, do the tutorial, or watch the ending credits. I also hate story-based achievements. It's so silly to give an achievement for doing things that have to done in order to advance the storyline. I think the Half-Life 2 achievement is clever. Besides, it's not the points that matter; it's the fact that you did it in the first place. I don't think points should be rewarded for achievements, but maybe that's just me.

zornik5109d ago

Don't forget Quake 2......the full version was a bonus game with Quake 4.You get achievements after every chapter (around 8) with........0 points.

iamgoatman5109d ago

I'd have to say the achievement for watching the credits in Assassins Creed. I just left it running whilst I got something to eat, got back and 50G. Definitely earned that one, that sandwich didn't make itself.

Also any online achievements in general, especially in games with terrible multiplayer.

SPACEBALL 15109d ago

cod waw gave away a 0 point achievement for reaching tenth prestige...

BISHOP-BRASIL5109d ago (Edited 5109d ago )

Where do I sign?

I don't have a 360, and don't know the achievement system deeply, but I'll just assume that what I'll say is reasonable for both.

It's totally bull in an age where I still have to get most games way after they release just because in it's launch there where like 5 other tittles that I wanted more, I barely can complete the trophy list. Take Burnout as and example. Can't get that 8 player meet in baseball stadium simply because it almost never show up and when it does, other player will let the time run out. How cool is that? A trophy you'll be expanding many hours waiting to have the chance to complete and you have no guarantee that you'll get it, even doing the right thing...

Also, since I mentioned Burnout, what's up with that trophy that request the Eye camera? It's pretty dumb to add a trophy, necessary for that platinum, that need a totally optional (and unnecessary) peripheral.

And what happens when everyone left the game? I still having problem trying to get an online match in Brutal Legend (a shame, the strategic batle in the game is GREAT).

Some single player trophies are also dumb as them depend on pure luck. Like that Demon's Souls max bladestone forged weapon... The weapon itself is a piece of crap, the pure bladestone will take you days (or minutes, that's how random it is) to drop and the skill involved, if any, is patience.

Also sucks for gamers that don't play online as they also buy games that have an online part purely for the single player segment. Arguable maybe because trophies are an online comparative feature, but I would argue that some people still like to make 100% of the game for the pure fun of it.

Those were all great games for me, but this online achievements/trophies shouldn't be there or, at least, don't count any point/don't count toward the platinum trophy. That's the reason why the only platinums I got for online games are from Uncharted 2 (which only require you to give the multiplayer a try) and Resident Evil 5 (trophies could be done off or online, probably one of the few good decisions in a Capcom game this gen). All of my other online trophies were got as I was playing with friends, not while trying to get anything done.

I'm no trophy whore, I like the system because it adds some replay value to a good single player not capable of saving a bad one) since you can trace some usually simple objectives that will move you to another one or two playthroughs. Really, except for online-only games (Crackdown, Socom, etc), devs should think a thousand times before attaching games to trophies or achievements that require you to go online, some online trophies are ok, most are just boring and require time much more than skill.

Redempteur5109d ago

do we NEED a article like this every 6 week ??

do we really need that ?

"the most easy/lame achievement/trophies "

Seriously

clembo5109d ago

My Beatles Rockband only came with 3 instruments but I have played it with friends and all 4 of tapping and singing along. But who is this guy to tell us how many people should be playing a game to make it fun? Screw that guy.

Show all comments (10)