320°

GTA VI Console Exclusivity Appears Logical When Viewing Take-Two's Financial Performance

The console exclusivity of Rockstar Games' GTA VI appears logical when viewing Take-Two's financial performance.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
hennessey86108d ago

Not really when you consider they have made more money from mobile gaming for the past two years, we are on a slippery slope.

Redemption-64108d ago

Mobile games makes significantly more money than PC and all consoles combined. Hell if memory serves me right, mobile gaming made over $90B, while PC/consoles made about $51B

fsfsxii107d ago

Not fair to lump PCs with consoles. Consoles make significantly more money than PCs, its disingenuous to lump them together.

The-VG-shamman107d ago

You gotta be joking lol, take two makes most of their money on console, they’re not exactly profiting from mobile the way you might think, another reason they release on console first is due to the wide range of specs used for gaming on pc, in order to optimize a game of that magnitude for day one pc launch would be hell. Also it’s always been like this I’m not sure why anyone would be upset about a timed console exclusive gta game. It’s always been like this.

DazaMc108d ago

Imagine if Playstation got a year's exclusivity again, like the old days.

InUrFoxHole108d ago

Yes.. let's keep taking steps back. I swear gamers are the only consumers that love anti-consumer practices.

badz149108d ago

it's only anti-consumer if it's console time exclusive, right?

pwnmaster3000108d ago

It’s only anti consumer when it doesn’t affect the person.

Knushwood Butt108d ago

^
It's only anti-consumer now that MS can't afford to do it.

InUrFoxHole108d ago

Exclusives are anti consumer period. I dont care if it's ms, nin or sony. Why should sony gamers be kept from playing gears or halo on a ps5 if they want to? And xbox gamers playing uncharted? Companies have trained you well.

derek108d ago

I'm a playstation consumer, it would suit me just fine, lol.

InUrFoxHole108d ago

@Derek
That's fine. It's your money 💰. What i take issue with is gamers who say it's better for us as consumers. If that's your choice that's cool but if I came to you and presented these 2 options, I think we both know which you would choose.
A: This app let's you watch all the movies you want
B: This app let's you watch some of the movies

DivineHand125108d ago

I am still debating if it is the gamers that cheerlead those practices or the other crowd.

S2Killinit108d ago (Edited 108d ago )

@InUrFoxHole
Im ok with exclusivity on a game by game basis. Not happy about it, but at least you could say its competition. What I’m not ok with is buying outright companies/publishers. That is clearly anti-competition.

So, if you are even against exclusivity on a single game, I can count you to have commented against mergers and acquisitions correct? Please tell me I’m correct.

8bitAssassin107d ago

In-house games should never be on other platforms unless certain circumstances. That's like saying you should have a Ferrari engine in the Ford Escort for thousands cheaper. You are seriously fucking the game economy system up. Not all money is good money. It also makes devs lazy, cause now they don't have to try for their core audience. That type of talk is for lazy people, who brag about spending all kinds of money on monitors, phones, and setups. But somehow it's bad cause consoles are still what has kept gaming way afloat. If I wanted games somewhere else. I'd spend the money for that experience. Xbox doesn't deserve jackshit Playstation or Nintendo has.

Jingsing107d ago

Without exclusivity you have no competition. How do you think movie and tv streaming services operate? If you have no exclusives then you only have the need for 1 service which means no competition. Microsoft wants no competition so it can be the only game in town.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 107d ago
Alos88108d ago

Rockstar don't need the extra money- they know this thing will chart for years after regardless.

Eonjay108d ago

Bythe Same token, Sony doesn't really need the deal either. I could see them doing the bundle tho.

darthv72108d ago

^^I can see them doing a themed controllers and some side plates too.

InUrFoxHole108d ago

They make a killing on gta in game $

Christopher108d ago

That would be pointless. They do this console a year before PC solely because they know many gamers will double dip. They don't need anything else and anyone paying for it would be dumb since it would be purely timed and, at this stage in the generation, not push hardware enough to make any point at all.

DivineHand125108d ago

So tell me something now. How does GTA 6 getting a one year timed exclusive on PlayStation benefit you as a consumer and tell me why that makes you excited?

ravens52108d ago

Exclusivity is perfectly fine. Like knushwood said, now that Ms can't do it it's oh Exclusivity is bad" lol. Cry babies. Never once in the ps1-ps5 years did I complain about not getting halo, gears or forza. I knew if I wanted to play those in had to get an Xbox. Its disingenuous and it's straight malarkey.

darthv72108d ago

I never complained about exclusives because I buy all platforms. So I never found myself in that situation. It's just easier [for me] that way.

PhillyDonJawn108d ago

Imagine if it was xbox and pc only for a year

WelkinCole107d ago

As a Long time PS fan I see no reason for that. Like I would get to enjoy it on my PS5 Pro and I would not enjoy it even more if others are not able to play it on their platform of choice.

What I would want instead is for Sony to greenlight new IP's or sequals to IP's like Killzone or Resistance or infamous which will be much better use of the money that would actually make a diffence for me rather than some stupid time exlcuisve crap.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 107d ago
StoneColdCrazy108d ago

rockstar is one of the greedy companies around the world.

DefenderOfDoom2108d ago

So for every 1 billion dollars that Take-Two generates around 80 million comes from PC and other . Also I feel so much video game creativity comes from the PC developers .

fsfsxii108d ago (Edited 108d ago )

So much creativity, Minecraft clones, BR clones everywhere

P_Bomb108d ago

I don’t mind the concept of exclusives as they give competing platforms some distinction. That said, I don’t think GTA should exclude Xbox. They have a history with that player base. I remember Lost & the Damned and Ballad of Gay Tony coming to Xbox first.

Gamingsince1981107d ago

A paid for by MS history, its not like rockstar did it because they like MS

Show all comments (40)
200°

Take-Two CEO Says Rockstar Games Wants GTA VI To Be The Best Entertainment Product Ever Created

Take-Two CEO says that Rockstar Games want its upcoming open world action game, GTA VI, to be the best entertainment product ever created.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
anast11d ago

They are going to raise the price on this game.

Profchaos10d ago

Who cares I mean honestly honestly the amount of hours you can sink into this game alone would be worth the price of two games

ZycoFox10d ago

Provided they have plenty of missions to the story and lots of interactivity/side stuff, or add more afterwards.. Not much good if the game is very short or a big desert, or both.

-Foxtrot10d ago

Who cares? All of us who don't want other developers to get the same idea which they will

Nintendo already opened the flood games with their pricing now you want it to get worse? You are letting developers have the excuse.

Complete boot licking...we didn't ask Rockstar to make these games super ambitious and spend millions on it.

Also you know most of that money is just going to be raked back in thanks to the Online so why do they need to raise the price?

Profchaos10d ago

@foxtrot I totally understand the perspective of other games don't deserve this and I entirely agree. If Nintendo didn't do it Xbox would have done it twice weeks later their decision wasn't a knee jerk reaction it was hinted at and planned well before the floodgates open they had been giving away their first party titles for a long time now to gamepass subs and failing to recoup development expenses it was inevitable that the price was going up.

If GTA Vi wasn't as ambitious as it is people would riot we say we didn't ask for this but we kind of did the expectation of perfection was set many years ago and the longer the development the more we expect.

Think of half life 3 if that ever actually comes out it has to be god tier it can't be a standard shooter it has to excell same with GTA.

CrimsonWing6911d ago

Can’t wait! Like my hype has never been this high for a game. I hope it really delivers and looks like what they’re showing. Like, I’ll finally feel like we’ve entered next-gen if it does.

lucasnooker11d ago

Only game this generation I’m truly hyped for. A true AAA big budget banger pushing the hardware to the limits like the good old days!

Eonjay10d ago

While is certainly good to.see the push the machines keep in mind the average studio doesn't have the money or resources to invest into development for over a decade. It really isn't feasible for every game or even 10% of them to reach the levels of this game.

lucasnooker10d ago

@Eonjay and that’s why gaming is cooked today!

Eonjay10d ago

I get it but having spent the weekend playing Balatro, I am actually very satisfied with games of different sizes and prices. I think all big companies should have games of all ranges. And technically they already do.

Basically there really isn't a good reason for most games to push hardware to the max.

lucasnooker8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

@Eonjay There was a time we used to expect each generation to be better than the last. Smh. You think people were sharing your same sentiment when we first went from ps1 to ps2? Or ps2 to ps3? Now people actually defend the state of gaming as it is and accept mediocrity. It’s sad to see. Especially if you were there at the time. The buzz for gaming was something different!

Levii_9211d ago

I can't wait for this overblown cutscene game to come out so i never buy it and spend money on it.

pwnmaster300011d ago

Thanks for sharing.
I guess I’ll do the opposite

Yui_Suzumiya11d ago

Hell yes! Someone speaking my language for once.

GotGame81810d ago

Hell yes! Like I said, someone has multiple accounts!

b00mFargl311d ago

That's a really cool story; I'm sure your mom loves it when you tell her those stories when you come out of the basement.

GotGame81810d ago

Someone has multiple accounts!

Yui_Suzumiya10d ago

You know there is more than 1 person in the world who thinks GTA is boring right? Lol

andy8510d ago

Cutscene game? I probably had 100 hours gameplay in one playthrough of V. Not bad for a cutscene game

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 10d ago
GhostScholar11d ago

Technically it looks incredible but I’m a bit disappointed that it’s turned into a franchise about heists. I miss the more carried mission structure. I miss having just one playable character too.

Putte11d ago

Exactly. It's a shame we don't have one playable character. And the boring heist all the time. Miss the more grounded story's about people.

Extermin8or3_11d ago

You realise you can have both on the story right?

LarVanian10d ago

Heists, be it bank heists or smaller scale, have always been present in GTA since GTA3 at least. That game literally kicked off the 3D universe with a bank heist (it was a cutscene albeit).
We still have no idea how the full story of GTAVI will pan out but it should really be expected that there will be the odd heist on top of other aspects of criminality.

GhostScholar10d ago

Yes but starting with gta v that was the thrust of the whole game. I just miss the mission variety of the games prior to V.

-Foxtrot10d ago

"I miss having just one playable character too"

I have to agree, I felt like I couldn't really invest enough time in anyone during GTAV because we kept switching and out of all of them Trevor was the only fresh of breath air since Michael just reminded me of Tommy and Franklin reminded me of CJ. Also only allowing you to buy certain properties with certain characters was annoying.

I'm hoping with the two characters being romantically linked it means they share all their properties and investments in the game.

PhillyDonJawn11d ago

They're definitely gonna charge 2x. Full cost for the story. $80 Full cost for the MP. $80 complete $160 Bundle with some in game currency and Cosmetic dlc. $200

Ninver10d ago

And I'll give them a nice middle finger and buy 2 other games.

fsfsxii10d ago

I’ll buy two copied just to piss you people off.

PhillyDonJawn10d ago

Why would I be pissed? Its gta id buy that sht @$300 lol. I just acknowledged the bs prices the game industry is pulling

Ninver10d ago

But why would anyone be pissed if you're dumb enough to fork over that amount of cash. It's your money lol.

Show all comments (38)
230°

Why The Rumored $1 Billion Budget For Grand Theft Auto VI Does Not Add Up

Here's why the rumored $1 billion budget for Rockstar Games' upcoming open world action game, Grand Theft Auto VI, doesn't quite add up.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
thorstein12d ago

"Or was it i̶n̶f̶o̶r̶m̶e̶d̶ guesswork from analysts?"

Video game budgets will always be fictional, just like Hollywood movies. Unless there are receipts it's all speculation.

And Take Two has a marketing department with an already approved budget (just like studios in Hollywood).

thorstein12d ago

(Continue...I was in the Lincoln Tunnel)
Budgeting isn't included in the total cost because it is a separate budget. These companies intentionally inflate the numbers so they pay less in taxes.

This is not a new trend. And if you give your CEO $30 million per year and a game takes 5 years, you just add that $150million to the budget (CNN).

VenomUK11d ago

The costs don’t seem out of the realms of possibility. Remember that Rockstar isn’t just releasing just the GTA VI single player game, it has been building an online platform that will far surpass that of GTA V in size and scope that could last for 15 years or more - that takes significant investment.

rudero11d ago

Absolutely anything to do with the product is in the budget.
That is the very definition of BUDGET.

The majority of the budget is marketing and not producing the game.

Then said companies can tag anything else they want in said “budget”.

And the one thing that gta games have is commercials galore.

Early hands on… in the budget.
Review copies.. in the budget.

senorfartcushion11d ago

How much you have as a budget is different from how much you spend making a product. This is one thing journalists never seem to get

isarai12d ago

I don't know where they get these numbers, absolutely NO games is spending anywhere near that amount on production even including marketing. If we're talking lifetime estimates for like a 10yr plan maybe, but even that would be a very vague projection. RDR2 at the time of release cost less that GTAV did and GTAV cost about 265mil with marketing being an average of about 200-300mil each.

Lightning7712d ago

I believe it's somewhere around there. Cod is 700m$ to make. I think GTA could be around there if not more. The insane level of detail in the trailer says it all.

Yeah I believe it's around there personally.

goken12d ago

The $700m cod budget is for tax purposes imho.
I also seriously doubt a game even as top notch as GTA would cost a billion to make.

QuantumMechanic11d ago

Yeah, that would be tax fraud. Public companies are independenly audited. They cannot just put whatever number they want "for tax purposes".

thorstein11d ago

@quantum

It's literally called Hollywood Accounting when movie studios do it.

So, you believe that goken and I are wrong, and Return of the Jedi never turned a profit.

It happens all the time.

anast11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Hate to break it to you Quantum, but multi-billion dollar companies don't have to follow the rules.

QuantumMechanic11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

There's a difference between choosing how to allocate corporate/merchandising/royalt y expenses ("Hollywood accounting") and fraudulently inflating project expenses (ILLEGAL). Even if the IRS didn't catch wind of this accounting immediately, the SEC requires quarterly third-party financial audits of public companies. Corporate executives get sued and go to jail for misrepresenting company performance because it affects the value of publically-traded shares.

thorstein11d ago

@Quantim

"It's called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it."

You're doubling down and we are just trying to get you to understand.

Of course it's legal, their politicians made it so.

QuantumMechanic11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

There's nothing I "need to understand". I have no problem with "Hollywood accounting" (which is legal because all expenses are taken into account in some capacity on the balance sheet). I was arguing against coming up with some large number "for tax purposes" which cannot come from nothing; it must be documented with receipts/invoices. If a company claims total cost of a production is $700M because they included fixed operating costs, no problem there! If they claim this cost without spending this cost on some component of their operations or the project, that is fraud and they will not pass their SEC audit (if they are a public company). Period.

https://www.sec.gov/about/r...

thorstein9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

"There's nothing I need to understand. I don't have any problem with Hollywood Accounting (which is legal..."

Have a good day, guy.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 9d ago
SimpleSlave11d ago

To be fair, the $700 million in development costs were over the game’s lifecycle, not just development - Black Ops Cold War (2020) in this case. And of course, this also include their marketing campaign.

But then, you take into account Activision Blizzard's shenanigans for not paying taxes, even getting tax refunds, moving billions to tax havens, plus all the money paid by Microsawft and Sony for exclusive deals, and I bet you that figure is substantially way lower than $700 millions. And I do mean SUBSTANTIALLY lower than that.

Oh, and if you think Rockstar hasn't figure out that scheme by now, lol, they have. They all have.

walken711d ago

Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwnnnn n.

ravens5211d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Same way the $100 rumor started, silly people.

Show all comments (32)
150°

GTA5 Has Sold Over 215 Million Copies, Red Dead Redemption 2 Has Sold Over 74 Million Units

Take-Two announced its financial results for the fiscal year 2025, also sharing an update on the sales of GTA5 and Red Dead Redemption 2.
The anticipation for GTA6 has reached fever pitch, with the latest trailer being the biggest video launch of all time.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
LostPotato12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Milk...get your milk...and so much more. Really when you release the same games in three editions over 15 years it's amazing how much money, and the amount of sales you earn. It's amazing how no one can compete.

Mr_cheese12d ago

To be fair, no many companies could release the same game over and over. They've earned that whether we agree or not

DarXyde12d ago

I mean Resident Evil 4 has had longer legs and still hasn't done anything like this.

Profchaos12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

GTA v isn't the only game that's released three consoles generations running but nothing has sold those numbers including GTA San Andreas which is now 4 console generations deep.

anast12d ago

Looks like a 2040 release for GTA6

gold_drake12d ago

thats insane right?
absolutely insane

rlow111d ago

No surprising considering that it’s been on every major platform and store.

I decided to look up the longest and most sold games list. To my surprise Tetris has takes the top spot.