Daniel writes: "You trusted source of gaming news! Last time they refused to give us any score 🤣"
"A trusted news source. Mission accomplished. We no longer have 90% Metacritic score. Be proud of your excellent journalistic standards!"
Kingdom Come: Deliverance 2 includes a feature that waits until players have forgotten how to play before reminding them of why they always loved it.
Jennifer Svedberg-Yen: ‘That was me at three in the morning trying to come up with something’
Vapourware can end up being the stuff of legend, like Rockstar's Agent, Star Wars 1313, or StarCraft: Ghost. Without ever seeing the light of day, these games never risked the possibility of being played and forgotten, and instead live on forever as the subjects of lengthy YouTube essays.
Still, Molyneux's most notable lost game (or tech demo, depending on who you asked at the time) was arguably Project Milo.
I can see the potential of the kinect hardware... its rather impressive tech, but it was just not meant to be for gaming. If anything, MS had a huge missed opportunity to have used it for the AR/VR projects.
"Unfortunately, as we were developing Milo, so the Kinect device was being developed. And they realised that the device that Alex Kipman first showed off would cost $5,000 for consumers to buy.
"So they cost-reduced that device down to such a point, where the field-of-view...I think it was a minuscule field-of-view. In other words, it could only just see what's straight in front of you."
Hmm, exactly what tech was in it, that was cut, affected the development? It was only ever interpreting visual and audio inputs right? The xbox was processing those inputs.
Nor do I see how the field of view thing is relevant to the discussion.
What the F is this. The game has insane good reviews everywhere and a nearly 90 on metacritic. Makes no sense this article.
The job of any games reviewer is to objectively review the game as a commercial product sold to a customer. I’m sick of reviewers believing they shouldn't disclose bugs and that they should be ignored for the purpose of the review. Just shows how incompetent at the job they are.
Reviewers were out talking about the game and it's political views but ignored the performance, and this guy is looking for every negative word that have been said about the game to harass who said them, the game is sitting at 88 and that guy is still complaining
I don't agree with him calling out the review outlets as reviews are entirely opinion-based. I do agree with his criticism of metacritic though. Many issues with how they weigh reviews. OpenCritic is just a much better aggregator.
Your game is janky, it's lucky to get an 8.