Battlefield players have had a reasonably tough time with the franchise these past few years. 2018’s Battlefield V launch was a disaster, but 2021’s Battlefield 2042 was worse, pushing a lot of Battlefield fans away from the franchise. But now, with just a year until the next major installment in the Battlefield universe set to release, EA and DICE have a lot of making up to do.
While previews of Battlefield 6 have looked intense and quite good, the game has already stumbled into controversy with its early test.
If by "tablet babies" you mean kids/teenagers, they are not the ones complaining about this. Trying to appeal to them is the reason EA is doing this. It's the old fans of the series who are mad.
But of course, you knew all that.
@Muigi
So you're a throwback fan who wants them to go down the same road that led to 2042? Unusual, but taste is subjective I guess lol.
I wanted them to make the destruction back to the Bad Company 2/ Battlefield 3 days. To each their own but a medic with a sniper rifle isn’t going to stop me from buying the game lol.
Non story from Forbes.
The game is in testing.
They're is no "revolt" even the game doesn't have a launch date, isn't finished, and isn't in early access.
At a certain point you just have to blame the players
stop going back until it gets better
Battlefield veterans are upset by this. I’m personally not bothered by it. But I can see their point of view.
Concept art from EA and Battlefield Studios’ next first-person shooter, Battlefield 6, has allegedly been leaked.
The controversial 3D spotting feature has recently appeared in a Battlefield 6 playtest, and it's a mechanic with some clear pros and cons.
Where has this narrative come from and why is it being pushed? There has always been "3D Spotting" although it's always been called "Ping" or "Mark" until this stupid narrative arrived..
Is it still Battlefield though?
The launch was not the issue.
Not being Battlefield was/
Haha they literally say this every year!
That’s the biggest fault with the battlefield franchise since BF2. They always release in an incredibly poor state. There always fixed in the end but it generally takes them ages to get to a finished state.
I guarantee it’ll launch on pc with the DX12 full screen blank boot error and it won’t get fixed for at least 3 months just like every single BF game since BF2.
I love the BF series but my god, as a developer DICE are awful!
Playtesters: "the game is too buggy and needs more time to iron out issues and improve performance"
EA: "we've had a amazing response from playtesters and the game has gone gold and scheduled to release as intended"
Yeah lets see how that plays out *grabs popcorn and beer*
Jokes aside, EA has proven time and time again they are a release first, patch later company. Some fancy PR work isn't going to convince me this will be any different.
I just wanna know will destruction be on par with Bad Company 2 🤔?
Why don't they try making something new and leave battllefield to rest in its current grave