270°

PS5 Pro Can Handle Unreal Engine 5 Way Better Than Base Model, New Video Highlights

The PS5 Pro runs The Matrix Awakens Unreal Engine 5 demo much better than the base model, showing how the system can handle the engine.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Neonridr173d ago

This goes without saying, but I should hope so.

darthv72173d ago

...yeah, what's with the statement of the obvious?

Einhander1972173d ago

So, websites shouldn't be able to do hardware comparisons?

The two of you seem big mad that PS5 Pro is not only proving to be great hardware but also is selling well.

darthv72173d ago

^^umm... no. Nobody gives a shit about an old ass demo. People want to see what it does to NEW stuff.

The only ones big mad are the parrots on here [like yourself] when others challenge the view on the Pro and whether or not it is currently worth it. Using old titles is not the way you sell your premium product. NEW titles should be doing that.

Einhander1972173d ago

Darth it's just a comparison that was easy to do.

Neonridr173d ago (Edited 173d ago )

@Einhander1972 - who was mad?

My comment was a joke, along the lines of "in other news, water is wet". A stronger system can handle a gaming engine better? I'm shocked. I wonder if I upgrade my GPU from a 3080 to a 4080 it'll perform better..

I get my Pro next week.

BehindTheRows173d ago (Edited 173d ago )

@Einhander1972

There does seem to be some needless aggression in the air. The Pro has really ruffled feathers, and while I get why, it’s just something you have to deal with. A certain “neutral” someone in here now slings insults when questioned. Quite the turnaround from just a few years ago.

For the rest of us who actually bought the thing, it’s a fantastic piece of kit. Literally every game I’ve tried on it is a clear step above its PS5 counterparts and only rivaled by PC versions. Even PC struggles with UE5, so if devs can use this kit to better ports, that is welcome news.

Neonridr173d ago

@Behind - neither me nor darth had any level of aggression until Einhander came busting in the chat like the Kool-aid man. Stating the obvious isn't exactly newsworthy. Will we say that the PS6 can handle Unreal Engine better than the PS5 Pro when it comes along too?

darthv72173d ago (Edited 173d ago )

Yeah rows... Im still more neutral than most here and because of that I can question things accordingly. if that is insulting to you then that is a YOU problem because I dont just go off half cocked at every chance like others do. I see people defending this thing because they have a vested interest in it... it doesnt need defending, it needs to show itself and why it has to be a must buy for the diehard fans. I am reminded of the 4Pro and it took the game God of War to really showcase how much better the Pro was to the base 4. This thing isnt going to get that same kind of chance because the base 5 is already so good and has yet to even be fully realized let alone need a Pro to save the day.

And as ive stated many time, my mind can change and i will get one but I need some serious convincing (like GoW did) to make me shell out another $700 to get this when i could just wait a couple more years and get a 6 which will eclipse this anyway for probably the same price.

So on this subject, I dont mind ruffling the [parrot] feathers because they need to be ruffled.

BehindTheRows173d ago (Edited 173d ago )

You are NOT more neutral than most here. I don't care what you tell yourself. You have a preference and the past few weeks is a clear indication of that. And you had absolutely no reason to say what you said to Einhander. Don't try to claim neutrality when your behavior says otherwise, especially calling people "parrots" and the like. That is exactly the type of aggression that someone would show when they offer a tainted view of things and someone neutral would have had no reason to take it there.

Now, there's not necessarily anything wrong with a preference and people can defend what they want to defend. You do it all the time with Xbox, so of course people are allowed to like what they like. Otherwise, yeah, it's all good.

darthv72173d ago (Edited 173d ago )

@rows... liking what you like is fine, just like having a preference is fine. But having a preference still leaves the door open to try other things as well. hence why its called a preference. But you cant ignore there are more people [on this site] who have a bias which is worse than a preference. bias means your mind is made up and nothing will ever change it. they shit on something for the sake of just shitting on it because their mind tells them to. they cant even come to terms with why they have to shit on it in the first place. It is the same for defending something to no end without even understand what it is your defending.

so when i speak up in defense of something, its usually to counteract the bias that is being shared. If you say you see the real me then you'd see the times i criticize XB and praise PS... but you choose to only speak up when you see me defending XB or questioning PS, like in this situation of value / worth of the Pro as it stands currently. And not once did I ever shit on the Pro or say its bad, I simply question its value in this moment. And I'm not afraid to speak up about it where others might be, but it also goes to show i am also not alone in this.

TripleAAARating173d ago

@darth
Man, I've been on this site for maybe like 14 years, I hardly ever comment, isn't my style, I like reading the insightful and intelligent opinions of others... but man I gotta say you are one of the worst on here.... I say "worst" cause it's like you're utterly delusional and I'm glad many on the site like Einhander and Behind see right through your bullshit... you cliam neutrality but then say it's good to have a "preference", ignoring the fact that having a preference would negate your neutrality....then make cliams you call out XB on their crap and praise PS.. while me and others know you ONLY do that keep up the guise of being neutral.. then spout to the heavens that there's this major "Bias" on this site....yeah dude gtfoh with all that, there are many of us on here that catch on to your BS and that number I must say is gladly growing. You style is ever so subtle with your remarks, you'll catch many, but not all.

Let me ask a question: What's your opinion on the 2TB XBSX which releases soon that's only $100 less than the worthless Pro?.
and:
If MS also released a Pro console do you think the narrative of: "A PRO console isn't needed" would be the same?

darthv72173d ago

@AAA... Im glad you asked. The 2tb X is a special edition and not the standard. Price wise its $100 more than a 1tb x and also $100 less than a 5 pro, so it sits in between when it should have been priced at the same $500 as the regular X and that one should be priced to sell to clear out if they plan on making it the new standard. I get that prices havent really been making the changes like usual, but its been 4 years now and even the 512gb S is still priced at $300 when that should be $200 or less to clear them out and make the 1tb S $300 if they want to stay the course. And MS said from the beginning they would not be releasing a Pro console because the X is their premium and the S their budget. If they were to change their mind... hell yeah I call out that shit as well because they arent even making full use of their X to begin with. Just like Sony and the base 5. Its not hard to see that what should be a premium for a better experience (doing something the base cannot) is more of a cash grab on the PS side because at least with the X it CAN do things the S cannot. Where the S generally gets sidled with only one mode, the X offers two. now if sony were to all of a sudden remove the option to run in performance or quality mode on the base 5 and make that a pro only feature, not only would that be a shit move to the millions of existing 5 users but it would be considered something the Pro could do that the base 5 cannot... Do you understand now? Making it do something the other cant adds value and just combining perf/quality modes is not the flex people think it is so long as the option to run either still exists for the base model.

And yes you can be more neutral while having a preference... being more neutral (in this hobby) is finding the balance to play all the platforms across the board, which I do. I have a very good understanding of all of them and can give my own real world experience as examples where those who are one sided can only give their one sided view (while shitting on the other).

All i want is for people to stop being so negative towards the things they have no interest in. that is XB gamers shitting on PS and PS gamers shitting on XB and both shitting on Nintendo because there is something fun to be found in all of them. you just have to be open to playing the field. I will never stop touting that centrist stance as it is who i am and always has been.

TripleAAARating173d ago

@darth
"Its not hard to see that what should be a premium for a better experience (doing something the base cannot) is more of a cash grab on the PS side because at least with the X it CAN do things the S cannot."

And there it is, that bias and one sided shallow veiw point when it comes to MS vs PS in any sort of discussion or debate.... like are you kidding me?..... 1st of all the PS5 Pro is a MID-GEN UPGRADE.. it's a bigger leap in tech when compared to the PS4 & PS4 Pro...like wtf?. your expectation of it doing something the base CANNOT akin to a generational leap isn't warranted, it should be doing things BETTER which it IS proving to be doing even at this early stage.. which brings me to point 2: The console released A WEEK AGO, WHY would you unfairly judge it this early when there has not been a SINGLE GAME released to take advantage of the hardware at this stage???...
Point 3: With regards to your flawed point of the performance mode and quality mode, they are options provided by the base console that the PRO is performing BETTER at, which it was designed to do so wtf are you even talking about?....
Also nice way of dodging what I asked of you with the 2TB XSX, MS is being made to look stupid, how can you release a more expensive console in a market you're struggling in with it's base price just $100 less than your competitors console which is almost 50% more powerful in hardware and offers a more advanced feature set than your product?.. Crazy work man...
Mark my words, as I said before, within the next 12months, when more of Sony's first party exclusive lineup releases along with 3rd party AAA blockbusters that take advantage of the Pro's tech, everyone will be singing a different tune.

darthv72173d ago

@AAA... you asked what did I think of the 2tb X, i said its priced too high and it should be the price of the 1tb X if they want to make that the new standard. how is that dodging the question?

and this: "Its not hard to see that what should be a premium for a better experience (doing something the base cannot) is more of a cash grab on the PS side because at least with the X it CAN do things the S cannot."

Lets look back at the 4Pro (since you brought it up). the 4Pro was able to do stuff the base 4 could not. Like run games in higher res as well as improved frame rates. Where the base 4 would sometimes struggle to maintain 30fps... the Pro would make that solid and even higher into the 45-60 range depending on the game and there was no choice of performance / quality back then. it did it by virtue of being a better machine AND it was priced at the same as the base 4 originally released at. It was more bang for the buck by comparison.

The Series X is like the 4Pro in that it too can run games in higher res and faster frames by default compared to the Series S. Then you can use performance or quality modes in games that offer it for even better image quality and performance over the Series S. Its effectively the Pro console for XB and priced at only $500. the 5Pro is an "I dont know who this thing is for" console because its coming out at a time where we havent even seen the base 5 pushed to the point of warranting a Pro like we saw with the 4/Pro when it came out.

this is the hill i am willing to die on because it just isnt worth it "right now". This entire generation has been a clusterfuck compared to last. Maybe thats because these companies have yet to fully remove themselves from the 8th gen, so we are very underwhelmed by what is being passed off as 9th gen games when they are really 8.5 gen. both Series X and PS5 do better at running 8th gen games because 9th gen has yet to fully start...

Maybe by the end of this gen a 5Pro will really shine as by then they will have let go of the past and started making games that really showcase its capabilities compared to the base 5. you know... new stuff that make it worth having rather than just combining perf/quality.

BehindTheRows171d ago (Edited 171d ago )

No, there was a time when I thought you had grown to neutrality. I'll give you that. But, of late, you've shown that you just aren't the bipartisan happy-go-lucky you claim to be. Sure, you defend PlayStation every now and then, but it's never to the degree of Xbox and you've never been so aggressive when defending it either. I speak up when I see you being hypocritical. Someone accused you of being mad. What did you do? Prove him right! There are quite a few people on here who are neutral parties and never behave like that.

In any event, because you're not supposed to be the topic of discussion, we can move on. No, you aren't a bad person for having an obvious preference, but the preference, at least based on your posts, is very real. Nothing wrong with that. Needless name calling? That is an issue.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 171d ago
Belmont85173d ago

Ps5 Pro was the last nail in the coffin for me to get a PC after 27 years of loyal service.

northpaws173d ago

Just curious, why does it matters if PS5 Pro exists or not? People can still buy PS5.

ZycoFox173d ago (Edited 173d ago )

People make out the Pro to be superior to a decent PC, it's not. It's good, but PC is still better overall. See DF's latest video, 4070 20+ fps faster than Pro, better RT (Pro is lower than the low setting on PC) and Pro has a fair amount of shimmering on the floor, and CPU bound games will show the same limitations as the original PS5.

https://www.youtube.com/emb...

northpaws173d ago

@Number1TailzFan

And your point is? 4070 is more expensive than the whole PS5 Pro.

ZycoFox173d ago (Edited 173d ago )

Northpaws

People were saying that the Pro is like a 4070, obviously not, but you can get a close equivalent AMD card right now (RDNA4 and RTX 5000 early next year) and a much more recent and better CPU, overall system cost just a few hundred more than the PS5 Pro minus the cost of the disc drive.

fr0sty172d ago (Edited 172d ago )

"minus the cost of the disc drive"... and windows, and a controller, and a keyboard and mouse... Not to mention only being able to buy games digitally after spending over $1k.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 172d ago
VENOM OF SINS173d ago

My PC constantly nags me to buy viagra and escorts. My PS5 Pro has a much more positive influence on my life. It’s like, “awww bro, you picked up a sweet achievement”, “check out this free shit this month”, “get in on these killer sales my dude!”.

Knushwood Butt172d ago

My PC is constantly running anti-malware executable.

OldDuffer173d ago

Why? No one's forcing you to get one and all the games will run great on standard PS5.

Good luck playing with windows, installing drivers weekly, dealing with half dozen store fronts, and checking websites to get optimum settings every time you want a quick gaming session. It's an all digital market too, no physical.
I have a £2.5k pc rig, but hardly ever touch it for gaming. Couch console experience is absolutely miles better than fiddling with PCs, and I say that as someone who has had a state of the art pc for at least 30 years. I was a developer for over 2 decades which is why I always have one, but when I want to chill with a game I always reach for a console.
If your post is genuine then I genuinely hope you enjoy it more than I ever have, for a lot of casual gamers, it's an expensive mistake

Belmont85173d ago

Thank you. Will sail different waters. I get to play old games as intended, thats a good excuse. Without to wait for any patch.

anast173d ago (Edited 173d ago )

Enjoy spending 2k rig with a perpetual $700 updates or not paying 2k and playing really old games with compromised graphics with perpetual $500 upgrades.

TheDreamCorridor173d ago

My man here thinks consensual transactions qualify as service.

🤡

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 172d ago
Einhander1972173d ago

Pretty great, this is without even any Pro updates. I'd like to see how it would perform with PSSR enabled.

BehindTheRows173d ago (Edited 173d ago )

Yep, should make for some nice improvements overall!

Key being right here: The Matrix Awakens Unreal Engine 5 demo runs considerably better on the newly released system than on the base system without a dedicated patch that would allow the demo to take full advantage of the PS5 Pro's power and features.

Neonridr173d ago

If I ran something with a 3080 and then the same thing with a 3090, I'd also get improved performance with no patch required. Food for thought I guess.

BehindTheRows173d ago (Edited 173d ago )

@Neonridr

I get that you're trying to somehow have an issue here where there shouldn't be one, but respectfully, who cares?

TripleAAARating173d ago

@Neonridr
You seem to be sarcastically pointing out that "of course it should run better, it's newer hardware" right?... but that sentiment has made a total 180, since before the PRO's launch part of the narrative against it was that "it isn't worth an upgrade because you can Hardly see a difference from the base PS5" while ignoring the fact that anyone doing comparisons and tests were limited with what they could do because the freakin console wasn't fully available 2 months ago. Now it's "well duh it's better hardware"??... The fuck??

Neonridr172d ago

@Triple - regardless if it's a 10% increase or a 90% increase, it'll run stuff better. That's a given. Hence the sarcastic tone. Imagine the Pro ran something poorer than the base PS5? Would make zero sense.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 171d ago
CrimsonWing69173d ago

Great! I’ll just wait to see how the PS6 handles it.

Software_Lover173d ago (Edited 173d ago )

I'm going to go out on a limb here, now this is just me assuming, that the PS6 will handle it better than the PS5pro. Don't kill me. I could be wrong. I'm going to also assume that the PS6 pro will handle it better than the PS6.

CrimsonWing69173d ago

No need to go out on a limb, that’s sorta kinda the whole point I was alluding to… and you could say PS7 will handle it better than the PS6 Pro.

DiRtY173d ago

I hate statements like these.
For this pricetag, I expect the console to do everything better than the base model. Period.

173d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (51)
70°

Frostpunk Returns: Unreal Engine 5 Remaster Titled Frostpunk 1886 Revealed

The original Frostpunk is getting a remaster in Unreal Engine 5 alongside new content for returning fans.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
820°

The Witcher 4 Stuck In Development Hell Due To Unreal Engine 5, Says KCD2 Director

The renowned director says The Witcher 4 is stuck in development hell due to UE5 as the engine can't handle complex open worlds.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
Christopher91d ago

PLEASE NOTE: This is the opinion of a developer not working on any CDPR games and only spoke to 'someone' at CDPR about it. This really should not move the needle of concern at all.

IMHO, developers not working on actual games should shut up about those games until it's released. Why are you stepping on the toes of fellow industry professionals and making claims that could be out of context to the intent of the original? Just shut up. I'm certain you don't want others talking similarly about your own games.

rippermcrip91d ago

Ya it's pretty messed up of him to bring this to the public.

Eonjay91d ago

The internal Source may have wanted this info to be made public. He may have also been responding to DF's underhanded critique on using CryEngine (as opposed to UE5).

From a dev perspective there is nothing more frustrating than developing in a difficult environment. From a management perspective there is nothing worse than having a tool result in extended development times which only explode costs.

AAA costs are high enough. These issues are being passed on to consumers.

dveio91d ago

It happened in the past already that fellow studio talent from the outside were given top secret information on purpose to talk about it publically.

Maybe to raise attention to an on-going internal conflict in HR people over there are afraid of raising themselves.

Or like here, for one of a technical matter they're also afraid to talk about fearing punishments.

My personal take:

This here is the game director of Kingdom Come: Deliverance 2 talking, with probably a ton of very good connections and knowledge within the industry's "What to say and what not to say".

And he by himself did NOT choose UE5 on purpose for KCD2.

Because not just maybe, but highly likely there IS indeed truth about UE5 rather being curse than blessing for the entire industry in its current shape & management goals:

https://youtu.be/M00DGjAP-m...

I really recommend watching all the channels videos. This one linked here isn't even the newest.

Rebel_Scum91d ago

Fully agree with your point about devs commenting on other devs work whilst in development.

Also worth mentioning that learning a new engine has its growing pains on every individual developer.

porkChop90d ago

Also, Witcher 4 basically just entered full production. I don't see how they could already be in development hell at this point.

Iras_90d ago

Name one complex open world game on UE5.

Christopher90d ago

What do you mean by complex? Lords of the Fallen? Ark? STALKER 2? Fortnite LEGO?

Will you just find some excuse to ignore games to make a point or are you actually looking for games?

Avowed? Clair Obscur? MGS Delta? Fable?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 90d ago
RaidenBlack91d ago

There's still a chance to ship the Cyberpunk sequel in Red Engine.
The 2077 build is already there, just use it to create the sequel, instead of using UE5 from scratch.
CP2077 looks better than most current gen games and is actually a current gen game, the last gen builds shouldn't even exist.
So that they can adjust the dev timeline, delay the UE5 Witcher and prepone the Red-engined-CP-sequel development and release. I know it wont happen but to me this makes abit sense.

Christopher91d ago (Edited 91d ago )

***There's still a chance to ship the Cyberpunk sequel in Red Engine. ***

I have it on pretty good authority that this is not going to happen. They moved to UE to make it easier to develop multiple games at once and have people move from one project to another and an ease of integration from outside sources.

Edit: to note, I agree that Red Engine is great and produced an amazing cyberpunk game that I'm not sure would be the same in UE. It's sad to see an engine go away after all that time they put into it as well, even going from third-person to first and having to reconfigure the game to match those needs because they couldn't get it to work in third-person to begin with.

RaidenBlack91d ago (Edited 91d ago )

I know. The decision was final. Hence my end statement above.
But ..... a last Red Engine endeavor still makes sense. They've got the very tech-laden/forward build ready. It outclasses most rivals. They've just gotta think of a new story, progression and world design. Instead of going all-in on UE for all 3 projects from scratch at the same time. Witcher projects can start their UE transition, CP can follow later.
There's a reason some AAA studios are sticking to the same IP/engine for some time and not transitioning to somethin new . Like Guerilla and Sucker Punch. Coz they can iterate on the previous build than put effort in a whole new IP design change or engine change from scratch.
And CP 2077's Red build at current state is just really good.
But anyways, they wanna streamline internally, so my opinion is from a surface level observation here. But one last Red engine hurrah would've been great.

babadivad91d ago

No there isn't. The talent who knew that engine intimately are gone. It's why they moved to Middleware. So they don't have to spend time training new hires on their engine.

persona4chie91d ago

I was thinking, “What is KCD2”? I didn’t recognize the abbreviation. Then I looked it up and thought, “wait so this guy doesn’t even work at CDPR, nor is he working on the Witcher 4 sooo what is he on about?”

GamingSinceForever91d ago

Who ever said that game development doesn’t have its hurdles? Whatever is happening they will figure it out.

glennhkboy91d ago

If this person was quoting the truth from the insider source, than it show that there maybe some fundamental problem on the CDPR development process. CDPR changed to UE5 because it struggle with its own engine. Now it is rumored to struggle with a common engine UE5.

Johnh522391d ago

From what I read its true which is the reason cd project is not just using UE5 but they are working in tandem with Unreal to improve the entire engine for other devs and them also its a collaboration.

Christopher91d ago

UE grows based on working with the people who needs it to do things better for them. They may pay for it, but it's definitely a collaborative effort on improving the engine. After all, if Epic doesn't listen to the needs of their customers, they'll just stick to their own engines.

Show all comments (41)
220°

Majority Devs Shifting To Unreal Engine Is A Double Edged Sword

Most developers are now shifting to Unreal Engine 5. Despite its capabilities, the engine’s widespread adoption raises concerns about creativity stagnation, outsourcing inconsistencies, and monopolistic control by Epic Games.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
127d ago Replies(3)
Green-Smurf127d ago

been here for damn near 20 years

127d ago
Obscure_Observer127d ago

"Decima for the win"

Dated. PS4 tech.

Guerrilla is working on a next gen Decima Engine but we won´t see it until the next mainline Horizon game is out. Probably a PS6 launch game.

Hypertension140127d ago

"Decima is the best engine of them all, now suck it!"

How was that? Did I do good?

These dated engines have produced some of the best-looking games around. You can check out death stranding for a good example, because you'll never play anything outside of your precious box, so how would you know?

Obscure_Observer126d ago

@Hypertension140

"These dated engines have produced some of the best-looking games around. You can check out death stranding for a good example, because you'll never play anything outside of your precious box, so how would you know?"

I bough Death Stranding, dude. Check on my comment history. Decima is dated like you or not.

Hellblade II, Indiana Jones and Star Wars: Outlaws won Digital Foundry´s best looking games of 2024 for a reason.

And before you go mad calling DF biased:

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Decima is still good, but dated. Nobody is impressed by Death Stranding 2´s graphics when compared to most heavy hitters coming this year.

It is what it is.

bartfart110d ago

Death stranding 2 is using decima and it looks graphically amazing. Probably best in class

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 110d ago
127d ago
cthulhucultist127d ago

This really troubles me, given that Unreal Engine 5 games are not that performant this gen.

Perhaps the next iteration/update of Unreal Engine 5 will be much better however this does not negate the fact that most games look a bit alike using the same engine and tools.

CD Projekt Red, 343 and EA have shifted to Unreal Engine 5 which is a shame because RedEngine and Frostbite were solid game engines.

At least Capcom still uses RE Engine, Sony has Guerilla's amazing Decima engine and Ubisoft uses Snowdrop which keeps surprising us with stunners like Avatar and Star Wars Outlaws.

And we still have ID Tech 7

RaidenBlack127d ago (Edited 127d ago )

Only Respawn at EA uses UE, (coming from Source engine which still powers Apex), others still use Frostbite. Next BF will be on Frostbite, Dragon Age Veilguard was on Frostbite, Dead Space Remake was on Frostbite, NFS is still on Frostbite etc, etc.
Other devs who also abandoned their own good engines are eidos,crystal dynamics, IOI and slowly likely square enix as well.
As for proprietary engine which is still kicking around, you forgot Remedy's Northlight, Rockstar's RAGE, Avalanche's Apex, Monolith's Lithtech, ubisoft's AnvilNext(Snowdrop was created by UbisoftMassive for their own Division games, whereas other ubi studios used other proprietary engines like mainly Anvil, now for the first time, FarCry devs will abandon their own Duniya engine and will use Snowdrop for the next Farcry).
And of course there's CryEngine, powering Kingdom Deliverance 2 and Crysis 4 as well as Unity powering stunning upcoming games like No Rest for the Wicked
~fin~

isarai127d ago

That's kinda what annoys me about Epic and the unreal engine, since ps3 and 360 it's been the same issues, and all i hear is "maybe next gen" and next gen comes and the issues persist. I think UE is great for small studios, but man it is not suited for what a lot of studios use it for, and it's not well optimized. Some of the performance out of UE5 games make no sense.

P_Bomb127d ago

“At least Capcom still uses RE Engine,”

I’m currently playing RE4R, and yeah that’s a nice one. I like playing different engines. Just never been a big UE fan, for one reason or another.

Green-Smurf127d ago

Most games should shift to unreal 5. It is proven and Epic is giving everyone a sweet deal on it. It's developer friendly and you don't have to pay them until your game starts making money

Rebel_Scum127d ago

It would be more developer friendly if you could code in c# rather than c++ tbh.

Iras_126d ago

Most of UE5 games works like shit on most gaming platforms and this is bad.

PRIMORDUS127d ago

Stutter Engine 5, POS. ID Tech engines for future PC games. Indiana Jones runs so smooth on PC, I have no issues at all.

Show all comments (25)