Shaz from GL: "Valve is waiting for a "generational leap" for the Steam Deck 2, which may end up being the right choice."
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered just dropped, and it's Steam Deck Verified! Well, the users aren't satisfied with its performance.
People need to understand that the reason it's verified is cause it runs on proton. If anyone actually bought this thinking that an U5 game was going to run smoothly on hardware too weak for it then idk what to tell ya… well I do know what to tell ya but it isn't something nice.
It wouldn't put it on a consumer to know that Verified means 'it boots up'. Perhaps they should be more upffront on the product page to better mangage expectations.
Maybe, but I've played games on my Deck that say it's verified but run like shite. If I can come to the conclusion that hardware limitations is something that will effect a games performance then so can everyone else. People don't need to be spoon fed, they need to use some common sense.
That's why the real argument here is a broader one that the criteria for "verified" should be changed to better factor in performance. The steam deck site uses this general explanation for verified games: "The game works great on Steam Deck, right out of the box." Given this description, the criteria to meet "Verified" status should factor in performance. So no, it isn't that people should expect U5 games to run well on Steam Deck. It's that U5 games shouldn't meet the criteria for "Verified."
It's not like Valve produces a more powerful unit themselves that can run this game in an acceptable way (if reports are as bad as the headline suggests).
Deck Verified should mean and imply that it will not just open but run in that acceptable way on the one hardware they make where that label is of any relevance. And for future hardware that is more powerful, or new OEMs, that label will mean that the game not only runs, but will run better than the baseline.
How is it the consumers fault for not looking deeper into this sort of technicality. This is still misleading the consumer.
There seems to be a misconception about what the deck is capably of.
Not sure what people expect its a portable PC did people expect it to run every new PC game for the next decade. It's not a bespoke console where Devs will target that SKU and optimise for it specifically the thing about pc gaming is that eventually you'll be forced to upgrade or be left behind.
The steam deck hardware was fantastic for running last gen games but modern games are now starting to push into a new level of requirements (finally!!!).
I think the verification system for the deck does need an overhaul though as it's not the first game to be approved which clearly shouldn't
@anast Pretty sure this was a PS4 game, and it's running it. Better than the PS4 even. https://youtu.be/hb9JeNYfXI...
@Anast
"It's not running PS4 games, not even close"
Stop being a dumbass. I've played and finished spiderman remastered, miles morales and Days Gone at a near perfect 40fps on the steam deck.
Cyberpunk 2077 also runs great on the steam deck. In fact, it's a better experience on SD than on ps4
Anast has been on a roll lately with the dumb comments. More so than usual. Some event must have transpired recently to cause him to overcompensate so much.
If you’re a steam deck owner, you would know the ProtonDB rating (platinum, gold, silver, bronze) is the accurate measure of performance on the SD. If something is verified, you would know that doesn’t mean stable 30fps or 60fps is guaranteed.
A savvy SD owner will download and make use of the decky plugin in steamOS. But you have to own a steam deck in the first place to understand this
Baldur's Gate 3, FF7Remake come to mind as well. I love the device but it struggles games from the modern age.
Verified should mean that it runs on Proton and doesn’t dip below 30fps at any point.
But that would mean a huge drop in sales so no dice…
The Outerhaven writes: The mighty handheld gaming PC holds its own with SNK's latest fighter, Fatal Fury: City of the Wolves, and does better than expected.
Playing Minecraft splitscreen on the Steam Deck is possible now, thanks to this script that automates everything for you.
These handheld PCs are only going to be any good for low/moderately hardware heavy games at med/lower settings if you want decent performance, and there are games suited for it.. just don't expect anywhere near even a mid level PC. Though with rumours of the Switch 2 being similar to the Deck I imagine Nintendo will get leapfrogged by a new Deck within maybe a year or so at most.
That said, Nintendo will have their first party games and if they can smash those out the park then that's what they need, as long as they don't go recycling the same tired stuff.
Handheld PC are really good for indies and emulation (the steam deck runs switch games better than the switch itself), but for AAA games? No thanks.
With indie games being extremely popular on the Switch, I wonder if a lot of people will try get a few more years out of their current Switch before upgrading.
They could do the generational leap right now, but they are going to milk it.
My OLED Deck is running Middle Earth: Shadow of War at 60fps. I'll see tomorrow how well DA:TV runs on it as a day-one verified title.
Even if it doesn't run today's games as well as we'd like, it still runs AAA titles from the PS4/Xbox One generation at a high framerate and my backlog is big enough that I'll be good for a good long while.
Honestly the biggest issue is a single black dead pixel near the center of the display. Better than the 3 bright dead pixels on my first LCD Deck though - so my hope is Valve won't bring out a Deck 2 until they fix their ABYSMAL quality control.