330°

Final Fantasy 16 Patch 1.31 Brings Big Damage Buffs for Clive, Better Side Quests, and Much More

Square Enix has published the patch notes for Final Fantasy 16's next update, which is set to drop on the 18th April alongside The Rising Tide DLC. They're surprisingly lengthy, and cover a lot of stuff that was never actually mentioned by the developer upon the update's announcement last month.

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community409d ago
CobraKai409d ago

Whoa! That is a lot. I think it’s time for me to replay in Final Fantasy mode

raWfodog409d ago

This perfectly exemplifies why I choose to wait quite a while to buy ‘new’ games. This meaty patch basically makes the game an improved experience overall from what it originally was. My first impression and experiences of the game will arguably be ‘better’ than it would have been otherwise.

solideagle409d ago

I am pretty sure this is for DLC, as they want to it to be hard...

raWfodog409d ago (Edited 409d ago )

It might have been spurred on by the DLC, but thankfully these changes apply to the whole game. Similar to how Cyberpunk got major game mechanic improvements ahead of that DLC drop.

AKS409d ago

Have there been any improvements to the performance mode in recent updates? The game seemed great, but I wasn't pleased with the way it looked in performance mode. I'm hoping there is a major Pro update.

Crows90409d ago

Looking to grab this in the future...not yet though..too much to play

EternalTitan409d ago

No minigames?
No playable party members?
No fixing the boring environments?
No actual rpg mechanics?
This turd polish 'patch' is just a scam now.

MrNinosan409d ago

Sounds like you're describing other amazing games, like Elden Ring.

mrcatastropheAF409d ago

whoa buddy, love both games but Elden Ring is a masterpiece.

No minigames? -->how would this apply to Elden Ring, when have minigames ever been a thing in the Souls franchise

No playable party members -->The variety of playstyle in Elden Ring more than solves for this

Boring environments -->Have you played Elden Ring?

No actual RPG mechanics --> LOL

MrNinosan409d ago

@mrcatastropheAF
I love both Elden Ring and FFXVI.
My point was that the all his 'bullet points' for being a bad game was stupid.

Regarding the points:
No minigames?
- Not even half of the FF-games have minigames, most rpgs doesn't, so why would no minigames mean a bad game?

- No playable partymember?
There is none in Elden Ring, nor in FFXVI.
There are different combat styles in both, yes.

- No fixing the boring environments?
Elden Ring, even thou not graphically a masterpiece, looks amazing, and so does FFXVI with higher fidelity. His opinion of bad environments is not shared by many.

- No actual rpg mechanics?
I agree there is less in FFXVI than in many other games, but the rpg genre has moved, many times over.
And regarding Elden Ring, what would you say adds to the rpg mechanics that is missing from FFXVI?

andy85409d ago

Not even half have minigames? Wouldn't say that at all. Only one that I can think of from 16 of them is 16 itself. 5 possibly didn't as well.

MrNinosan408d ago

@andy85
Minigames was first introduced in FFVII.
From I-VI no mini games was included in the first releases.

VII, VIII, IX and X had typical minigames.
XII had a crappy fishing
XIII had nothing if you don't count Dreadnought, which is less mini-game than controlling Ifrit in FFXVI.
XV had 2, fishing and Justice Monsters Five, at release.

andy85408d ago

Hm that's not really true. FF1 had the secret puzzle minigame on the OG version. You're right that the other games didn't, but later releases of the other ones had them added in once it became more of a series staple. So those games still ended up having them. I forgot about XIII. That's probably the only 'recent' one lacking in them.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 408d ago
CS7409d ago

Yeah 16 was good but a little too different for a FF game for me.

Seraphim409d ago (Edited 409d ago )

when you fail to see games for their own merits, strengths and weaknesses. I thought XVI was an excellent game in it's own right. Shit remove Final Fantasy from the title and it stands on it's own, but that is part of the problem right. Final Fantasy has been around so long people have expectations of what they feel/think is or isn't FF. Sure there are some aspects that could've been improved/better, but overall XVI was an epic experience & dam solid video game.

EternalTitan406d ago

16 isnt even a final fantasy game.
And its a terrible game on its own.

KwietStorm_BLM409d ago

Gotta love those free user experience "scams."

380°

“We Apologise And Would Like To Correct This”, Says Analyst Who Claimed FF 16 Only Sold 3.5M Copies

Final Fantasy 16 has likely sold more than 3.5 million copies.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community70d ago
Changed: credit url
tiron870d ago
GamerRN69d ago

The time happens! Never them is right when report.

VenomUK69d ago

The analyst is called Hideki Yasuda. In 2021 he claimed the 'Fall of PlayStation in Japan is “Definitive”'
https://nichegamer.com/rese...

In 2024 he Hideki Yasuda said The Sony Group may see PS5 as a failure and the envisioned goals are unattainable.
https://www.resetera.com/th...

Knushwood Butt69d ago

Curious as to what this means:

'The Japanese branch of GamesIndustry.biz (Translation: DeepL, adjusted)'.

What is DeepL?

Nerdmaster69d ago

@Knushwood Butt
It looks like you also don't know that Google is.

Pro-tip: enter google.com, type "What is DeepL?" and press enter.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 69d ago
oldenjon69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

FF16 sales the time, and tbh game the time

S2Killinit69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

What about all the damage he did? People were talking like this game was a flop.

StormSnooper69d ago

I think that is why he is apologizing. He wants to make sure he doesn’t get sued for defamation.

badz14969d ago

SE and Sony definitely should sue him

Babadook770d ago (Edited 70d ago )

This isn’t news. The analyst could be right or wrong. Square Enix hasn’t said anything.

mandf70d ago

He admitted he was wrong didn’t have knowledge of the actual sales

Babadook769d ago (Edited 69d ago )

When there is knowledge of actual sales you wouldn’t need an analyst. He more or less admits his analysis is wrong but that’s bound to happen in that field. They make predictions that they hope will be useful. This wasn’t.

Anyway, it seems people are taking my comment as an attack on this game. I like the game and hope it does well. Hopefully FF gets a resurgence. They pretty much deserve that. I just think this story is of no importance.

70d ago
tiron870d ago (Edited 70d ago )

Obviously a game that stayed on the top ten then regularly returned to the top 10/20 and then released on PC would have sold more than .5m more than the first week sales.

Final Fantasy 16 Sold 3 Million Copies During Launch Week
"Square Enix said the milestone includes both physical and digital sales on PlayStation 5."
https://www.ign.com/article...

70d ago
pwnmaster300070d ago

lol even with facts certain people will still not believe it

The Wood69d ago

@pwnmaster3000

They don't wanna believe....... narratives need to be upheld at all costs

Elantregaless69d ago

Steam user scores and Playstation scores indicate otherwise.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 69d ago
Elantregaless69d ago

Exactly. The analyst does not mean anything.
As far as we know the official sales are still at 3 million.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 69d ago
70d ago
thorstein70d ago

Analyst is wrong again. Shocking.

70d ago
CrashMania70d ago

Always thought it was the case, sold 3 million in the first week and 300k on PC from the last numbers we got, so only 200k extra copies in almost 2 years on PS5 and since the PC release?

Make it make sense lol

pwnmaster300070d ago

Doesn’t matter. People will still believe the mistake. How are you an analyst and get it wrong?

jznrpg70d ago

Analysts have agendas so you can not trust what they say in articles.

68d ago
JEECE69d ago

Yep. You better believe in two years when people are making an argument about big AAA games not selling enough, or PS5 exclusives not selling, or Japanese games not selling, or whatever the dumb argument happens to be, this "number" will get cited as evidence. The retraction never has the same reach as the false story.

mandf69d ago

That’s why propaganda works

68d ago
Show all comments (55)
250°

Final Fantasy XVI Sales Reach 3.5 Million, Lagging Behind Final Fantasy XV’s Launch Numbers

Lifetime sales of Square Enix's action role-playing game, Final Fantasy XVI, have reached 3.5 million copies.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community78d ago
Cacabunga78d ago

A terrible game, but good it sold well then they keep the franchise alive. I hope they do better next time with an RPG and not a dmc clone..

CrimsonWing6978d ago (Edited 78d ago )

I think they’re saying it underperformed and isn’t selling well. It was 3 mill near launch, it only did 500k more and that’s even after a PC launch.

jukins78d ago

This article is a lie. They announced 3m in a week on ps5. It finished top 20 for the year it release and continued top 20 throughout 2024. By this logic it sold over 3m on launch week and then never sold another copy until pc release.

S2Killinit78d ago

Also, They are not considering that this was exclusive to PlayStation. Am I correct in this?

If so, its clickbait.

CrimsonWing6978d ago

@S2Killinit

They mention the PC version… like 3 mill was the announcement, like a month after release. Now, after the PC release there’s 3.5 mill units sold.

Square has already come out saying this and Rebirth underperformed. Considering how much they spent on development and marketing and the way sales aren’t moving to recoup cost, it’s a little concerning to me, especially as a mega-fan of this franchise.

I didn’t think 16 was the worst game I played, but outside of some epic boss battles and the Benedikta arc… I found it rather boring. The DLC have the best boss fights in a game I’ve played in a while though.

RaiderNation78d ago

Lol no, it's not a terrible game. Far from it actually. It's just not a FF game.

CosmicTurtle78d ago (Edited 78d ago )

The problem for me is that the combat was not varied or customisable enough to last the game’s play time.

Otherwise, I agree with RaiderNation it is the reason I held out from buying it until it initially, is it was not the genre I wanted. I am happy for a series to change and grow but I want an RPG to some extent. It’s a shame because it handled narrative and dialogue pretty well.

Nooderus78d ago

I really didn't enjoy it. Combat was trash, main character trash imo.

Cacabunga78d ago

You buy a game called FF to realize it’s something else is utter lie. I would never have bought it if it was called something else. The game is so boring and poorly exexuted. Beginning and ending are the good sides of it. Rest is trash

RaiderNation78d ago

@Cacabunga

What did you do? Walk into Gamestop and completely blind buy it without reading any of the reviews/previews or watching any of the YouTube reviews? Hell the game had a demo you could try out before deciding to buy! Don't give me the whole "wow I was completely blindsided by this and had no idea" excuse. That's on you. If you didn't like it, fine. Opinions vary. But don't act like you were a victim to some bait and switch attempt because that's just not reality.

Cacabunga78d ago (Edited 78d ago )

I am an old time FF fan so i never want to spoil any episode. I didnt even want to finish the demo. I liked the feel of it but i didnt expect it would turn into a pure action game.

No i dont watch reviews because they are subjective.

Its ok i didnt like the game things like this happen. Game was just ridiculous, side quests are absolute trash. I have platinum trophy I know what i am talking about.

I supported it as a FF fan, i hope they do better next time.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 78d ago
Nooderus78d ago

Agreed, worse than ff13 by far

MeteorPanda78d ago

if you played ff 14 this really did feel like an improved mmo...that is 10 years old.

first ff entry l barely finished and traded in. Bloody horrible storytelling. The story was okay, the execution was cringe af.

Amazingly however the first part was the best part, the demo being the highlight.

FernDiggidy78d ago

Terrible is fucking insane. Keep swallowing crayons

AnotherGamer78d ago

You really can't be serious lol

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 78d ago
Npugz778d ago

Are you serious? This was not a terrible game at all it was very good!

FernDiggidy78d ago

Good game for sure, certainly not terrible. Very good is debatable.

ravens5278d ago

Great game. Doesn't seem like PC helped at all of these numbers are correct.

JEECE78d ago

Yeah, these numbers are a little hard to believe. If it sold 3 million in the first week and had even a semi-decent launch on PC, for these numbers to be right you'd have to assume it sold basically zero copies on PS5 after its launch week. Given it was in the NPD Top Ten in its second month, and the top twenty its third month, that's hard to believe, even if I'm sure they anticipated it charting higher for longer. That's to say nothing of sales boosts it probably got from PSN sales.

nommers78d ago

The link that the article is mentioning doesn’t give much context. It likely needs good translation as well.

raWfodog78d ago

I hope this helps the 'complete' edition go on sale for a huge discount. It went on sale a while ago for only about 25% off but I'm waiting for that 50% off (or higher) sweet spot.

GhostScholar78d ago

It underperformed because it was on less platforms I get no one wants to admit
That

Elda78d ago

It wouldn't have sold that much that better had it also released on XB, people on XB would have only played FFXVI if it was on Gamepass.

DivineHand12578d ago (Edited 78d ago )

If it has the opportunity to launch on all platforms at launch then yes the sales would have been better but it is difficult to say by how much. It would have benefited from the excitement and marketing in that window.

One thing to bear in mind is that it would be a struggle to get the game running on the Xbox because of the series S. The game does not hit a stable 60 on either the base PS5 or PS5 Pro. Based on Digital foundry, it only hits 60 FPS during fight sequences on base PS5. The game is also set to have dynamic resolution so instead of prioritizing frame rate in non battle sequences, the game prioritizes resolution making it difficult for the PS5 Pro to maintain 60 FPS as the game tries to reach 4k native instead of using PSSR. Square really should have updated the game.

I am not saying all this to be unfair to the Xbox because I believe I am one of the most fair users towards that platform on this site. I am just giving you my honest opinion based on my experience with the game.

Show all comments (48)
60°

Just Let Me Be the Big Monster: A Final Fantasy 16 Rant

Players just want to smash wild Chocobos into oblivion.

Read Full Story >>
loprototypetech.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community79d ago
DivineHand12579d ago (Edited 79d ago )

Final Fantasy 16 was a great game. It had one of the best combat systems out of many JRPGs. It does have some elements of it that could be better, like what the author of this article said. It would have been nice to be able to use fully transformed Eikons at will like in the previous games. I believe the FF13 and FF7 remakes were the last to allow players to do this. Let us hope FF17 will allow players to use summons at will.

POSSIBLE SPOILER ALERT: There are some other elements story-wise that could have been better. I would have preferred if Clive was more militant, and he rebelled against the non-Bearers much like Spartacus. That would have had me more invested in the story than him not wanting to change the status quo despite the harsh treatment Bearers across the kingdom faced from their slavers. I also think the FF games in general need to start distancing themselves from these bittersweet endings and give us a happier ending. Yes, you defeated the bad guy, but what is the point if the main characters can't enjoy the victory?