Game Rant writes: "As things stand, Microsoft isn’t in danger of losing GOTY awards to a diabolical “Xbox Tax,” its priorities just need to shift toward pleasing players like Halo and Gears of War did back in Xbox’s heyday."
EvilVEvil Review - A fast co-op vampire experience that sadly doesn't have enough bite to keep players entertained for long.
Capcom has confirmed Monster Hunter: Wilds will support cross-platform play between PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X|S, and PC.
Abathor delivers a rollicking hack-and-slash adventure for fans of the genre, and it's co-op thrills can't be denied.
Microsoft seriously needs to step their game up (pun intended) if they want GOTY nominations. :)
Starfield reviewers and influencer were cherry-picked, it is well known that large publications did not receive review codes. Maybe this is the reason for the missing Xbox nominations?
It's a particularly childish form of deflection. Hi-Fi Rush got quite a few nominations because it's actually a great game and deserves them.
Last year Stray and A Plague Tale: Requiem were nominated for GOTY. Hi-Fi Rush would have made the top 6 last year.
But it's fair to say that this year was stacked (the best year for games in a while) so it didn't make it but neither did a lot of high quality games so it's no slight against it. Street Fighter 6, Armoured Core 6, Final Fantasy 16, Jedi Survivor, Pikman 4, The Talos Principle 2, Cocoon, Lies Of P, Hogwarts Legacy, Sea Of Stars, Dead Space, Remnant 2, etc didn't make it either.
If Xbox makes more games of that quality they will inevitably get into the top 6 and could win. It's simple - you have to earn it. I'm interested to see how good Hellblade 2 is.
Talk about delusional, the games aren't good enough, rarely ever are. Xbox needs to focus on the quality of their games if they want to be nominated more often, but that's clearly not something they care about. Plus that's not even the correct application of "tax" as a bias, can't even get that right.
This a bizarre article, they went on to explain what the "Xbox tax" truly is to finalize saying that there is no "Xbox tax". You have to be extremely innocent not to understand that the "Game Awards" is the "Critics Awards" and that this is where the "tax" comes into play. It is no more than bias for a particular type of game, there are outliers when you look at the history of the nominees and even winners, but the vast majority of them fit in the same box.
And that is where this article should end. There is no place where "its priorities just need to shift toward pleasing players" would equal being nominated when there are a couple of dozen players that really matter for the nomination in the first place. If Microsoft wants to have more nominees what they need to do is please this layer of critics that make up 90% of the voting power.