Approvals 11/3 ▼
Ezio2048 (3) - 546d ago Cancel
LOGICWINS (2) - 546d ago Cancel
crazyCoconuts (2) - 546d ago Cancel
pntaylor (4) - 546d ago Cancel
700°
4.0

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 Single-Player Campaign Review - IGN

Underbaked, rehashed, and cobbled together from multiplayer parts, Modern Warfare 3’s single-player campaign is everything a Call of Duty story mode shouldn’t be.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community546d ago
Ezio2048546d ago

Ouch. It's the lowest campaign score ever given to COD.

Gamingsince1981546d ago (Edited 546d ago )

Yeah not too good for an MS "first party game" after paying $70 billion to pretend MS makes games, I'm sure obscure observer will be so happy with this since he makes sure everyone knows Activision is first party for MS now

Crows90546d ago

Yeah some here were all giddy calling CoD an Xbox 1st party!

Lol CoD is CoD

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH546d ago

CoD will outsell ANY game you play this year and that’s just a fact. It will be the number one game played on PSN and that’s just a fact. So when you say “not to good for an MS 1st party game” then you clearly don’t know good business..:

Obscure_Observer546d ago

"Yeah not too good for an MS "first party game" after paying $70 billion to pretend MS makes games"

Xbox has nothing to do with MW3´s development!

Sony is the one that will be hurt since they paid for exclusive in-game content, marketing rights, and will be promoting/selling a MW3 PS5 bundle. XD

All of their herculean efforts for this sh!tty game was for nothing!

LOGICWINS546d ago

@Obscure You're right, but Satya shouldn't have referred to MW3 as a "1st party game". Now Microsoft has to take accountability for this 4/10 due to bad PR.

I'm glad this happened. I hope someone from MS goes to Infinity Ward and whips them into shape.

GotGame818546d ago

ROFL! That's pretty funny. I mean yeah I guess technically it is, but...😂🤣

andy85546d ago (Edited 546d ago )

@speakthetruth that's categorically not true. It hasn't been the highest selling game of the year for a few years, and given it's getting this backlash and being labelled as DLC it more than likely won't be this year as well. Especially with the juggernauts of Hogwarts and TOTK.

Redgrave546d ago

@Obscure

Bro. Xbox doesn't have anything to do with most games put out under its label if we're being frank. After all, buying out and redistributing games is literally the name of their game. Marketing and console bundling on Sony's side aside, MS owns this and you can't try and spin it any other way... especially when you spent so long championing the acquisition and everything else.

It's "their" game, regardless of previous honored contracts for marketing and/or bundles. Especially when without that, you know damn well MS would be doing the same thing as its the first COD under their ownership and you'd be praising it as some massive win for them.

Obscure_Observer546d ago

@Redgrave

"Bro. Xbox doesn't have anything to do with most games put out under its label if we're being frank."

Try *honest* because aside those games that were indeed in development prior Bethesda´s acquisition by Microsoft, all of the upcoming first party in 2024 and beyond, will fully developed by XGS. But you already know that, don´t you?

"Marketing and console bundling on Sony's side aside, MS owns this and you can't try and spin it any other way..."

I´m not trying to spin anything. I no moment I said it´s not an Xbox first party game, I said Xbox had nothing to do with its development which is nothing but a known fact. And yes, good or bad, Sony will be the ones advertising this game, like it or not.

"especially when you spent so long championing the acquisition and everything else."

Championing? No dude, I knew this deal would be approved because FTC and CMA didn´t had a strong case to block it in the first place. Especially after all the remedies proposed by Microsoft.

I said many times that I don´t give a damn about COD. I think Phil should had spent that money acquiring SEGA, CDPR, Bioware, Asobo etc.

"Especially when without that, you know damn well MS would be doing the same thing as its the first COD under their ownership and you'd be praising it as some massive win for them."

Again, that means nothing to me. MS could make it exclusive to Playstation and I would still not give a damn.

For me, COD is nothing but steady revenue stream to generate cash flow and fund our Xbox first party games, just like Minecraft. Nothing more nothing less.

Charlieboy333545d ago (Edited 545d ago )

Classic Obscure - if it's shit, Xbox didn't have anything to do with making the game e.g. redfall, MW3. If it reviews well, hey it's a banger from Xbox first party e.g. Hi-Fi Rush, Deathloop.

Profchaos545d ago

No this stinks of Activision greed how can ms be responsible when they have only been in charge for 2 weeks it's probably why activitision wanted the sale so badly they knew this financial year would have been a stinker without the sale

LoveSpuds545d ago

I recall Obscure claiming MS did well with HiFi Rush and even claimed Deathloop was a MS success story when that was in the running during awards season.

Suddenly, when a game bombs he changes his tune and disavows the game and says MS had nowt to do with it.

itsmebryan545d ago

@gaming
They will be fine. Are you saying COD will will not sell well? I thought most buy COD for the multi-player.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 545d ago
Sonic1881546d ago (Edited 546d ago )

This will be the new standard for Microsoft and Activision going forward. They already messed up Diablo 4 aka Diablo Immoral 2.0. COD is getting stale.

GamerRN545d ago

Wait, you are blaming Microsoft for Diablo also? You guys realize these games were both completed before Microsoft bought them, right?

XBManiac545d ago

Put some more Microsoft executives around and you will have another Lionhead, Bungie, Wingnut, FASA, etc. experience. It has happened where ex-Xbox executives have gone (Bungie is a clear example of mismanagement when some entered the company 4-5 years ago).

TheEroica545d ago

@GamerRN don't tell the Sony fans facts... It'll mess up their fragile world view...

Profchaos546d ago

And what's worse is they completely messed up the best cod campaign since the original mw games. I brought MW2 strictly for the campaign I was really into the storyline then this thing was rushed out the door to meet ab annual release a bunch of warzone maps duct taped together with objectives and puked into a game box

TheTony316545d ago

It's the MS first party effect.

TheTony316545d ago

@Obscure_Observer

"Xbox has nothing to do with MW3´s development!"

Stop. If it got a 90+ Metacritic, you wouldn't shut up about how great Xbox first party is. You did it with Hifi Rush.

ModsDoBetter545d ago

I mean he's not lying though.
They had nothing to do with the development.

Just whataboutism at this point.

Gamingsince1981545d ago

They had nothing to do with hifi rush either olmyerslo, they didn't even market it then teleased it the day it was announced , but that didn't stop people saying it was amazing MS game lol

ModsDoBetter545d ago

"They had nothing to do with hifi rush either olmyerslo, they didn't even market it then teleased it the day it was announced , but that didn't stop people saying it was amazing MS game lol"

So by your logic, Xbox gamers cannot celebrate an exclusive game that reviews well considering the exclusives are few and far between?

Because when a game that isn't even exclusive, but owned by Xbox (only recently) reviews bad, its Xbox's fault?

I get it, you're trying to come from the angle of consistency BUT I never seen anyone claiming Xbox developed Hi-Fi Rush, simply that it was an exclusive. Furthermore, COD has been owned bt Xbox for what? 6 weeks now?

rlow1545d ago

No your try to hard the deal closed roughly a month ago. Anyone not living under a rock knows you can’t make any business decisions for a company until the deal is complete.

Sony exclusives deal with COD was in effect right up to the moment.

TheTony316545d ago

@oIMyersIo

Xbox had nothing to do with Hifi Rush either but it didn't stop Xbox fanboys from praising Microsoft.

TheRealHeisenberg545d ago

You need to stop as well. If it got a 90+ Metacritic, you would have said MS had nothing to do with it yet or paid for the high reviews.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 545d ago
SyntheticForm545d ago

Yeah, it's garbage. Stopped playing after the second level.

Get this Warzone crap out of the campaign.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 545d ago
Vengeance1138546d ago (Edited 546d ago )

Woot, the cracks in the armor are showing and the once mighty CoD is little by little crumbling away... not a chance this series remains relevant in 10yrs let alone 5.

546d ago Replies(6)
crazyCoconuts546d ago

It's not a good year for sure, but no one can predict where it will be next year, let alone 5 years from now.
COD has always had a tight MP that people rely on. Anything can happen, but I wouldn't bet against it, anymore than I'd bet against Fortnite or Minecraft

thesoftware730546d ago (Edited 546d ago )

You just "Wooted", wow not even trying to hide how much you want this to fail.

Did you have this much high hopes of failure before the MS purchase?

Gamingsince1981546d ago

Yes , most people did, go back to any CoD release and you will find most people say let it die already

Barlos545d ago (Edited 545d ago )

I'm happy to see it fail tbh. It deserves to. CoD has never deserved the praise it gets.

IamFrasierCrane545d ago

There has been near universal hate for Call Of Duty on n4g for years. We’re not going to start liking it just because green man bought it.

Hereandthere546d ago

The xbox cutting all corners effect.

546d ago Replies(4)
Barlos545d ago

Not really. It was in development before MS bought ABK. This is all on Activision.

TheTony316545d ago

And if it was a 9/10 it would be all on Microsoft, according to Xbox fanboys.

IamFrasierCrane545d ago

Deal was completed before the game released. MS 100% could’ve delayed the game.

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH546d ago

You people blaming MS do realize that this game was in development before MS took over right? I mean it’s like trying to blame Sony for all the Layoffs at Bungie right? Right? 😉

Nacho_Z546d ago

I don't think anyone's seriously suggesting MS had anything to with it, they've only owned them five minutes. It is a bit funny though.

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH546d ago (Edited 546d ago )

Oh yes they are. That’s exactly what some of them are suggesting…

goldwyncq546d ago

You never know. The president could die the next day and fanboys in here would somehow find a way to blame it on Phil Spencer. That’s the level of spite fanboys in here are running on.

Barlos545d ago (Edited 545d ago )

Some people actually are though.

Having said that, you can't really blame them since Phil Spencer himself has said that this is one of their first first party games since buying ABK. Which is just a downright lie.

CrashMania546d ago

I actually agree, but people were also trying to act like MS made deathloop in 2021 and were touting it as a GOTY, now a 4/10 releases and suddenly MS have nothing to do with it lol

Tedakin546d ago

I mean they owned bethesda for a while before Deathloop, not literally 3 weeks like with Activision.

Chevalier545d ago (Edited 545d ago )

Hifi Rush was in development for a couple years before Bethesda was bought, but, Xbox fans have no problem acting like MS made it too.

Nacho_Z546d ago

I don't know about that, I don't think anyone's daft enough to believe that if someone buys a completed product they're responsible for the quality of said product.

It's just a bit of fun.

DickyD1226546d ago

Didn't Microsoft include it in there first party list?

BillyCrystals546d ago

Who cares, it's fun to trash Xbox and their monopolistic ways. Eat it, Phil!

hiawa23546d ago

Seems cool to bash MS and Xbox every chance they get while licking Sony's pole any chance they get. Can it just be about enjoying the games and not the names on the boxes that plays them? Gamers are worse than political people.

Charlieboy333545d ago

"Can it just be about enjoying the games and not the names on the boxes that plays them". No, it can't.

545d ago Replies(1)
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 545d ago
z2g546d ago

burtal. 2 was pretty decent I thought. not perfect but varied and interesting. this one seems like they could have waited a year or 2

Show all comments (148)
50°

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III & Warzone - Season 6 Combat Pack Trailer

Free for Playstation owners

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community218d ago
210°

Modern Warfare 3 flooded with cheaters after arrival on Xbox Game Pass

Players are using hacks to gain an advantage in the game, such as aimbots and wall hacks. The first gives a player superhuman aiming abilities, while a wall hack lets you see through walls to gauge where other players are.

Read Full Story >>
standard.co.uk
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community275d ago
Jin_Sakai275d ago (Edited 275d ago )

“These hacks are typically used by PC players, but those playing on PC via Xbox Game Pass are identified as Xbox players in multiplayer lobbies.”

This is pretty dumb to say the least.

Cacabunga275d ago

All about them headshots for Xbox

badz149275d ago

Gotta pump those numbers up

blackblades275d ago

That's a WTF, they suppose to be labeled as pc users even if its on PC game pass. They mess that up big time.

XiNatsuDragnel275d ago

Oh bad this will be entertaining to watch

ZycoFox275d ago

If AI keeps getting better (and it will) it's just a matter of time before there's more sophisticated cheats even for consoles, and they wouldn't even need to be running on it, I have little doubt about that.

lelo2play275d ago

Don't Gamepass online games have anti-cheat systems?
If not, that's pretty dumb. Microsoft need to fix that asap.

Rynxie275d ago (Edited 275d ago )

They won't ever fix this problem, unless they (developers, publishers, Sony and MS) go after the cheat providers directly. You no longer need to hack consoles to use hacks. During the ps360 days, they were going after cheat devices, but it was a cat and mouse game. These cheating methods were around during those days, it's nothing new, but they kept it under control. Since the PS4/Xbox one generation, they stopped going after these cheating devices and it became widespread. Which I find odd, since they started charging for online play (PS4).

StormSnooper275d ago (Edited 275d ago )

Possibly, this is because the companies were going after cheats because the same cheats were being used to pirate the games, whereas today, the companies use online verification to prevent piracy, thus eliminating the need to go after people who cheat only to gain an advantage in the game. As long as the cheater remains below the radar, and does not completely break the game, the companies look the other way as their wallets are not threatened by it. (that is my completely Uneducated opinion on the matter)

pwnmaster3000275d ago

I mean, COD games was always filled with hackers, nothing new. I can’t blame MS on this. Activision had years to try and fix this. Might take MS some time to make some change.

Rude-ro275d ago

It all depends…
Microsoft’s guidance on how to handle gamepass on pc and their love to force crossplay with pc seems like a them issue.
And they own activision, so it is still a them issue.

StormSnooper275d ago

lol well that sucks.

Is there a reason this happened upon arrival on xbox?

Show all comments (19)
210°

Activision Reportedly Sold An AI-Generated Skin In Call Of Duty

The Yokai's Wrath bundle was released despite previous guarantees by Activision that A.I. would not be used for final assets, per the report. Instead, Activision assured developers it was simply for internal concepts. That, of course, was not followed through. For what it's worth, per the PlayStation Store, 2,400 COD Points cost $19.99, meaning players potentially spent real-life money on a skin that was not created by an actual human.

As far as A.I. use goes across Activision, a source told Wired that 2D artists are utilizing A.I. to aid their work. That is a result of mass layoffs, in which many 2D artists were impacted. “A lot of 2D artists were laid off,” the source named Noah said. “Remaining concept artists were then forced to use A.I. to aid in their work.” Mandatory A.I. trainings have been implemented, according to Noah.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community278d ago
boing1278d ago (Edited 278d ago )

I mean, is this even surprising?

just_looken278d ago

It is not ubisoft has a ai tool for crating stories/script's they even talked about npc's having there own ai speech like we see with those skyrim mods.

Ai is the future sadly which sucks in so many way's.

S2Killinit278d ago (Edited 278d ago )

Activision. And MS. They will ruin console gaming forever.

Oh and where the FRIGGIN outrage people? When Sony makes a remaster of a masterpiece single player story driven game, they get roasted. But this, this, goes unnoticed? Then don’t complain that you aren’t getting enough single player story games.

278d ago Replies(1)
just_looken278d ago

Ea and ubisoft also use ai

ea using ai for development threatening mass layoffs.
https://www.pcmag.com/news/...

ubisoft ai for npc speech
https://www.theverge.com/20...

Almost every big boy in the industry is using ai in some sort of way now

Oh and sony? well they are making spyware ai were they can see how long it took you to do X and adjust difficultly.
https://gamerant.com/sony-a...

Then you got AI agents
https://www.ign.com/article...

https://www.creativebloq.co...

blackblades278d ago

Sony ai is a patent doesnt mean it came to light

just_looken278d ago

@blackblades

Wow this site every time you say the S word or P word they dive in defend there god its beyond nuts

I said "they are making"

You know a term that means its not out yet ffs

S2Killinit278d ago (Edited 278d ago )

How is that a response to what I said? Are they also selling AI generated skins?

Cacabunga277d ago (Edited 277d ago )

Always bringing useless links totally off topic.. just to try to show you are superior in knowledge to everyone else

…simply laughable

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 277d ago
just_looken278d ago

@S2Killinit

You never mentioned skins in your comment just stated its all microsoft's fault like so many others.

When like i showed they are late to the ball game as every other company is using or plans to use ai in various field.

If you combine everything then its getting closer to hitting a button and poof out comes a game no soul no passion nothing.

Right now its art/3d models/skins/writing/voice work some and coding can all be done via ai.

S2Killinit278d ago (Edited 278d ago )

That was the whole point of my comment, I wrote it in response to the article. Instead of focusing on making exciting games and developing talented developers, they are busy making AI generated skins that people are buying for huge sums of money. Then, some people turn around and shit on Sony when it tries to capitalize on single player classics by making remasters, and the same people then complain that they want more single player games. MS cannabalized the industry because they never thought making games was essential to their business. So, instead of nurturing theor own studios, they let them die, then went and shrunk the industry, hurting interests of every gamer in the world. Anytime there is a bad trend in the industry, MS is at the helm, leading the way. That is what I’m saying.

smashman98277d ago

I'm sorry but do you honestly believe Sony will sit out of A.I. Every executive at every one of these publishers is wetting themselves in delight at the prospect of A.I. You best believe that once we start seeing it spread throughout the industry Sony won't be too far behind. The only people we'll have to blame are the consumers themselves.

S2Killinit277d ago (Edited 277d ago )

No, I don't believe that Sony will not do the same. But, as I mentioned, MS is always the first to embrace such things and create the worst trends. Once they establish that this is the best way to make money, everyone else will follow. (Have to follow if they want to stay competitive)

thesoftware730277d ago

S2, and blackblades:

All from the Horse's mouth below.

"Artificial intelligence (AI) in video games is crucial for Gen Z and Gen Alpha, who seek “personalization across everything,” says PlayStation executive Asad Qizilbash."

“Advancements in AI will create more personalized experiences and meaningful stories for consumers.”

"He emphasized that AI could enable non-player characters to interact with players based on their actions, enhancing the personal connection within the game."

Yeah, Just MS and Activision...smh

S2Killinit277d ago

I’ve already explained myself twice. Quit your false equivalence, same thing the xbox fateful pulled before and after the ABK acquisitions. Which by the way, blew up in your faces real good. Now, doing the same thing when someone brings up MS’s nefarious behavior, defend them to the end, and watch them scorch gaming as they have been. At least rest of us can take consolation in that the smoke will go in your eyes before anyone else’s.

thesoftware730277d ago (Edited 277d ago )

"Quit your false equivalence, same thing the xbox fateful pulled before and after the ABK acquisitions. Which by the way, blew up in your faces real good."

I'm not sure what you are talking about, you seem to have a issue communicating, because we are on a post about using AI to create video games content, and you put that solely at the feet of MS and Activision, when it's being, and will be used industry wide, right from Sony mouth, I would say it's relevant...then you went on to give Sony a spit shine slob down about a masterpiece TLoU when this had absolutely nothing to do with Sony or TLoU, then you attempted to clean up your rambling spit shine with no real backing for a ridiculous comment.

Obviously you meant to post that nonsensical over exaggerated comment. I also don't know what blew up in people faces, I am perfectly fine with the game industry, I don't have time to be internet outraged about nothingness.

Really read your comment and listen to what you said.

"Activision. And MS. They will ruin console gaming forever."

Bro, for real? Really? Seriously? It's that serious? So there is nothing Sony and Nintendo can do against MS and Activision? MS is 3rd place with you even talking about?

If we stay relevant on MTX, then you still sound ridiculous because again, you lay it all at MS and Activision's feet when almost all companies have used some form of MTX, including yup... Sony.

S2Killinit273d ago

I read this comment, it boiled down to “seeiously?”.

My answer: yes seriously. Since you didn’t say anything else, what else can I tell you? Yes MS is seriously ruining gaming. They have been for some time, and working their way to where we are today, and aren’t even done yet. MS are the worst thing to happen to console gaming.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 273d ago
swedishMeatwad278d ago

"The Yokai's Wrath bundle was released despite previous guarantees by Activision that A.I. would not be used for final assets, per the report."

We're talking concept art? Because as of right now there's no way to generate a final 3D model with final textures. So the final assets don't use AI. That's not to say that it sucks for 2D artist that it's easier to generate visual ideas and build from them leading to less 2D artists needed (really sucks), but are they say the final concept art was completely AI generated and then 3D artists built from that? And yes, I'll pile on that Activision as a publisher and their developers I have experience with suck and they'll do whatever, ethics be damned.

OldDuffer277d ago

Thats actually a very useful and informative piece, thank you.

just_looken277d ago

@OldDuffer

Your welcome though it seems it went over many users heads.

PapaBop278d ago

Wow I can just imagine the likes of Activision, EA and Ubi etc having an army of AIs creating overpriced crap and the fanboys just lapping it up. I hope the AIs have a good union.

montebristo278d ago

I understand why people think it’s good idea to Unionize to fight back against such things but it’s not. It’s a bad idea. It’s activisions wet dream to have these pumped out weekly by some AI. Protect your neck!

Show all comments (29)