CG writes: We like Bethesda’s Starfield so far on PC, but can’t help feel that Microsoft should have allowed the game more time to cook in the oven. Some of its first week issues make the game almost unplayable in places when using Nvidia RTX 4090 GPU. The problems we have encountered just within our first 3 hours of playing have been numerous and totally off-putting. The main issue is audio not working properly. This shouldn’t be happening and the fix of restarting the game doesn’t always work. Music stops working, and NPCs lips move with no sound. Terrible, and immersion breaking. The issue is caused by the game being installed on a HDD rather than SSD.
The other issues aside from excruciatingly long loading times is horrible pausing during combat which makes some of the combat a complete dud. This might also be as a result of HDD installation. Controller aiming ceasing to work but movement is fine. Aside from these issues, the game looks fantastic using Ultra settings. 4K resolution, No dynamic scaling, no DLSS or in this case FSR2 being enabled for what that is worth. In the Starfield gameplay video, you can see all of this and how well the RTX 4090 runs in a benchmark type scenario. With the the GPU and CPU being worked quite hard this is some poor but perhaps expected results. We hope a patch is coming fast as some of these issues really spoil the flow of the game and really shouldn’t be happening with such a high-calibre title for Microsoft.
Please note, some of the issues persisted when the fps was capped at 60 with far less load on GPU and CPU. The CPU reached 90 degrees at some points which could have contributed more to the issues in the video. But they remain with the CPU temp at around 70 degrees which is a quite normal temperature.
TNS: "We're shining a light on a bunch of "bad" games that may've been left wanting when it comes to their critical or audience reception."
Good list I've had similar reactions to some games even ones on the list like the order and Callisto
Also I recently grabbed forspoken for, 5 dollars at a eb games Clarence sale and I am actually enjoying it more than I thought I would
Sometimes you just need to give critically panned games a chance
I feel like we’re finally starting to see a sea change in how we treat our favorite games. Sure, we all acknowledge that a game can suck and we can still enjoy it. Hopefully this results in meaningful review scores. Personally, I find a lot of bad games are better if you blast through them on the easiest difficulty. Callisto protocol on the image is a good example of this.
Actually, I started liking FO76 after the wastelanders DLC ... it has been my guilty pleasure
other games I can think of Order 1886, Driveclub, Resident Evil 6 (only the Leon part), Alpha Protocol (pretty unique, needs a remake), XIII Remake (after patches), Medal of Honor 2010, Medal of Honor Warfighter, Homefront The Revolution, Enemy Front, Legendary The Box, Faces of War, Conflict: Vietnam, Conflict: Global Storm & Codename: Panzers – Cold War
I loved The Order, ridiculous graphics for it's time and a very interesting setting, it was linear but not as bad as people say. Similar thing with Callisto Protocol, i admit that i played it a long time after release so maybe issues were fixed by then, but it was a fantastic Dead Space-like horror game with some of the best graphics i've seen in my life.
Thanks to the Starfield Creation Kit, the "Earth Restored" mod has transformed the Earth into a Pine Forest and filled the sea with life.
Shadow of the Erdtree saw a 1000% player count surge at its launch. Will Starfield’s Shattered Space be able to do the same?
I played Starfield this past weekend. I enjoyed it and overall was about 30 hours in, but as soon as I got the e-mail about the GamePass price increase, I cancelled my account and deleted Starfield, Halo, Forza and others off my Series X.
If I want to play those games, I’ll just buy them outright - and truth is, I’m pretty sure I won’t. They aren’t worth it to me.
Going by the reports on other places the main issue here is likely not the GPU but rather the CPU. Apparently, Starfield likes cores and there are already at least a couple of reports of that de-syncing happening in 6-core CPUs. Also doesn't help that this computer has an i5 running at over 90ºC. I would check the thermal solution used here first and foremost because that is just not normal for an i5 13600k and it might be hurting the performance even more.
Yeah, I would trust a reviewer that gave this game a 10.
So they can afford a 4090 but not an ssd.........
I'm sorry, but the requirement of any current gen game running properly on hdd is just rediculous.
Ssds are cheap now there is honestly no excuse for people to expect devs to launch games that run on a hdd.
What is this absolute garbage? The game lists a SSD as a requirement, they install it on a HDD and then complain about performance?
I bought the best 65-inch 8k TV money can buy + the best 7.1 sound system money can buy.
And I can assure you that Starfield looks super ugly on my TV due to my RCA cables.
Microsoft should have allowed the game more time to cook in the oven.
Also probably again due to my RCA cable, I have noted several times that the 3d surround wasn't working so again this is unacceptable since I have the best TV and sound system that money can buy.
Let's make an article about this.