130°
8.0

Starfield Xbox Series X Review | NoobFeed

NoobFeed Editor Azfar Rayan writes - Starfield is like Skyrim and Fallout 4 fused in space. Expect nothing amazing, but give it a shot if you like Bethesda role-playing games and are looking for something with a sci-fi twist. While not flawless, the game has plenty of content to keep you occupied for quite some time. There is clear evidence of learning from previous work on ranged combat, and melee combat feels satisfying in general.

Read Full Story >>
noobfeed.com
Crows90320d ago

Melee combat feels satisfying...lol
Funny review.
8/10 is worse than fallout and elder scrolls so do they mean it's a failed fuse?

Flawlessmic320d ago

I don't think it's that much worse than those games or a failed fuse.

For me the issue is it's that it is exactly those games, there hasn't been any innovation or something to be like oh hey they have elevated there type of games to a current gen standard.

For me its literally fallout in space, which ain't exactly bad, I love fallout but yea 10 years in the oven, all the hype from Bethesda that this would be genre defining and what not is why it's not setting the world on fire.

It's basically a good fallout game in space, probably with a lot more flaws actually but still loving the 30+ hrs I've put in so far

shinoff2183320d ago (Edited 320d ago )

I'm enjoying it but in fallout I enjoyed reading computer stories and notes, stuff like that. This one kinda lacks in that area. Most of the books are repeats that I'm finding. The computers are few and far between which is worse imo then fallout considering its the future. Even the slates don't say much at all. I'm about 50 hours in. Its a huge huge game for sure let's fill it with stuff. I do believe some things will be updated, maps etc. I don't want it to sound it's all negative at all. I'm enjoying it more then any other game this year even ps5s biggest exclusive from June. I'd give stsrfield an easy 8

Flawlessmic320d ago

yea look I'm not really digging the stories told anyway, i generally just skip through the dialogue as much as i can, it could also be im tired of actual dialogue system as opposed to the story still not sure which it is or if its both.

never been a fan of telling story's through books and stuff like that so cant say it bothers me, for me the key hook of getting missions and flying planet to planet to complete them is fun enough even if uninspiring which is the best way i can describe the game, uninspired.

I don't think there will be a game this year that i play more than starfield that's for certain, I've definitely had more fun and been more amazed by other games this year though. TOTK, BG3 and for all its flaws FF16 blew my sock off regularly which made up for the low points. haven't had a game make me feel the way FF16 did in a long long time.

Currently would score it the same as you, i had it a bit higher but the way they did the upgrade skills thing is annoying me as for anything past rank 1 i need to use or do something related to that skill and it doesn't take into account previous actions.

Realised i need to upgrade a certain skill to buy a better ship and now i have to do all these space battles even though i have the skill points just sitting there waiting to be used on the pilot skill.

raWfodog320d ago

One of the few balanced, honest, and informative reviews I’ve read so far. It wasn’t fanboy-blind to the game’s shortcomings while still being impressed with the high points. I feel an 8/10 is very good for the game at this point and hope that it will get even better as future improvements and DLC get added.

S2Killinit320d ago (Edited 320d ago )

It is steadily falling in metacritic. Its now down to 85 with only 61 reviews. I predict 83 is where it will land.

320d ago
S2Killinit316d ago

It reached the 83 I predicted already. Maybe you were right. Its going down even more because it only has 71 reviews so far.

generic-user-name320d ago

Keep in mind the PC version has roughly the same amount of reviews, making the total something like 120+, maybe more since last I checked. My point being I'm not expecting too many more reviews to come in, it could stay at 85.

S2Killinit320d ago (Edited 320d ago )

Most games have well over 100 reviews per medium. As in over 100 for console and over 100 for PC. Starfield barely reached 61 reviews because MS limited the number of reviews at launch. Sending copies to a limited number of reviewers.

randomvoice320d ago

Lol so much for the whole GOTY talk

generic-user-name319d ago

No, usually with multiplatform (at least with simultaneous releases) one platform has far more. I just looked up Hogwarts Legacy for instance. 92 reviews on PS5, 20 on PC and 20 on XSX. Starfield is unique because BGS titles are PC focused, hence the more even split.

S2Killinit319d ago (Edited 319d ago )

Are you saying MS didn't limit the reviews at launch? Its a fact that they did.

Also you are comparing a multiplatform release to one that is on one console and PC. Currently Starfield is at 61 reviews. An exclusive such as Horizon FW has 126 reviews on PS5.

generic-user-name319d ago

"Are you saying MS didn't limit the reviews at launch? Its a fact that they did."

They did, but not in the significant number you seem to be implying they did. Eurogamer and maybe one or two others?

"Also you are comparing a multiplatform release to one that is on one console and PC. Currently Starfield is at 61 reviews. An exclusive such as Horizon FW has 126 reviews on PS5."

That's irrelevant to my point. HFW has 126. Starfield has roughly the same when adding both Xbox and PC versions together. Had HFW released simultaneously on PS+PC then its reviews would have been split up too. There's not going to be another 60 XSX reviews popping up for it. So unless Eurogamer and the other couple outlets that didn't get review copies are going to dish out extremely low scores like 2, 3 or 4; then it won't move the needle much.

S2Killinit319d ago (Edited 319d ago )

If it wasn’t significant, then why limit reviews?

Also, it definitely was significant because the score is falling since release. That means the limiting of reviews had a material impact on review score and consumer perception.

They literally had less than 50 reviews at launch.

Other games that are console exclusive and available on PC have significantly more cumulative reviews than Starfield did at launch.

You are conveniently ignoring that there were even less reviews for Starfield at the time of release because of MS’s restricting the reviews.

Therefore, saying that it “wasn’t substantial” is misleading and patently false.

generic-user-name318d ago

>If it wasn’t significant, then why limit reviews?

Significant in terms of numbers. How many did MS blacklist? Can you name them?

"That means the limiting of reviews had a material impact on review score and consumer perception."

Many of the reviews that came in 1+ week after launch were positive reviews.

"They literally had less than 50 reviews at launch."

You keep ignoring that the reviews are split 50/50 between PC and XSX. 50 on XSX and 50 on PC. There was over 100 reviews at launch in total. Which is pretty standard for a big AAA title.

"Other games that are console exclusive and available on PC have significantly more cumulative reviews than Starfield did at launch."

I already showed you proof with Hogwarts Legacy that shows otherwise.

"You are conveniently ignoring that there were even less reviews for Starfield at the time of release because of MS’s restricting the reviews."

Again, not in any substantial matter. Can you name all the restricted ones that appear on Metacritic? Eurogamer, Metro, who else? It's been nearly 2 weeks since early access started, when will this wave of missing reviews appear? What's taking so long?

S2Killinit318d ago (Edited 318d ago )

Why do I need to name them?

You say “many of the reviews after release were positive” but the score has been falling from the original 88 down to 85 so far. So that negates the “many reviews” point.

What do you mean “significant”?
I already showed you that the overall metacritic score has fallen from 88 to 85 (and falling still for all we know). That is proof in the pudding. Would there not be a different perception of the game if the score was 85 at launch as opposed to 88? Of course. If you refuse to acknowledge how this is material and “significant” then that is on you.

Ps: hogwarts argument is flawed. Read my previous comment.

S2Killinit316d ago (Edited 316d ago )

Ok, now it is sitting at 83 with 71 reviews. Still not material that they limited the reviews? At launch it was 88!

I mean, its going down and fast. Its already reached the 83 I predicted above. Maybe the guy that said 78 was right.

So what do you think?

generic-user-name315d ago

God is a Geek 9/10 - Sep 8th
BaziCenter 9/10 - Sep 11th
MMORPG.com - 9/10 Sep 12th
Pocket Lint 8/10 - Sep 15th

I'll be surprised if it drops another point, could even go up one again. It's been over 2 weeks, there'd need to be a lot more negative reviews coming in to drop it to the 70s, what are they waiting for? The reviews are about done. Eurogamer and Metros last minute 6's did 2 points of damage at the end, but it is the end.

S2Killinit315d ago

Its gone down from 88 to 83 and still falling. That is not normal.

generic-user-name314d ago

A 5 point drop isn't unheard of. TLOU2 was at 96, dropped to 93. The more reviews come in, the harder it is to keep the points up. But you say it's 83 and still falling, yet there's been no new reviews in over a day, there's not going to be many more reviews added to it at this stage. Maybe one or two, unless you know of reviewers who are still working on their review 16 days after it released?

S2Killinit313d ago

Now you are just making stuff up.

generic-user-name313d ago

If you're going to accuse me of lying, at least point out where the lie is so I can show you how wrong you are.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 313d ago
290°

10 "Bad" Games I Actually Enjoyed

TNS: "We're shining a light on a bunch of "bad" games that may've been left wanting when it comes to their critical or audience reception."

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Good list I've had similar reactions to some games even ones on the list like the order and Callisto

Also I recently grabbed forspoken for, 5 dollars at a eb games Clarence sale and I am actually enjoying it more than I thought I would

Sometimes you just need to give critically panned games a chance

FTLmaster2d ago

Oh gosh, good shout on Forspoken! Genuinely forgot about that one, and haven't got around to playing it. It's on my to-buy-in-a-sale list!

Cacabunga1d 15h ago (Edited 1d 15h ago )

Knack was great ! Had a blast with the first one. Haven’t tried the second one though due to backlog

The Fight: Lights Out was also a game i enjoyed very much and highly detailed with great motion control when you understand how they work, which is what pushed people away from this game..

LoveSpuds1d 14h ago

Both The Order and Calisto were harshly treated in my view. I am not saying they are perfect, but the were both really solid games. I personally really liked them despite acknowledging their flaws and coincidentally, got the platinum trophy for both games.

Evil West is another really fun game that's worth checking out for sure.

andy851d 13h ago

Forspoken was great. Never really understood all the criticism. 2nd best traversal in a game after Spiderman

Profchaos1d 7h ago

Yeah gameplay wise I get huge infamous vibes with its combat starting out as low level eventually becoming a unstoppable power spewing killing machine with a wide variety of powers infamous is one of my favourite franchises obviously it's not the same but I love the combat of it so far.

ChasterMies2d ago

I feel like we’re finally starting to see a sea change in how we treat our favorite games. Sure, we all acknowledge that a game can suck and we can still enjoy it. Hopefully this results in meaningful review scores. Personally, I find a lot of bad games are better if you blast through them on the easiest difficulty. Callisto protocol on the image is a good example of this.

LoveSpuds1d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

I really liked Calisto, harshly treated for sure and I don't necessarily think it needs to be played on easy to enjoy it. It's not perfect, but it's not the car crash the media portrayed it as either.

I have said it before, but part of the issue is that there is a mind share going on in games coverage, with all the main outfits being personal friends and talking too each other. As such, there is a risk that everyone ends up sharing in the same opinion rather than thinking from themselves. I reckon that's why some games get a universal bashing when consumers actually like the game and equally, games get great reviews across the board and the game doesnt land with consumers.

RaidenBlack2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Actually, I started liking FO76 after the wastelanders DLC ... it has been my guilty pleasure
other games I can think of Order 1886, Driveclub, Resident Evil 6 (only the Leon part), Alpha Protocol (pretty unique, needs a remake), XIII Remake (after patches), Medal of Honor 2010, Medal of Honor Warfighter, Homefront The Revolution, Enemy Front, Legendary The Box, Faces of War, Conflict: Vietnam, Conflict: Global Storm & Codename: Panzers – Cold War

CosmicTurtle2d ago

Driveclub was genuinely a good game with a poor launch. Alpha Protocol is superb, just a few archaic design choices for the time.

RaidenBlack1d 15h ago

I want past games with interesting setups/mechanics but having some flaws (due to crunch or budget) to be remade so that the gaming community can appreciate and enjoy them as was envisioned and intended by the developers. In contrast to a successful game being remade again just with prettier coat of paint.
Alpha Protocol tops that and I'll include FO:NV as well as an exception (it is popular but features were cut due to limited dev time). And also Vampire the Masquerade: Bloodlines I, Singularity, KOTOR II and maybe Daikatana.
There might be others which I can't recall atm.

SonyStyled2d ago

I loved Enemy Front. I pre ordered it months prior and remember calling the store to check if it came out that day. The guy never heard of it but confirmed my copy was ready to pick up. Game was simple and basic in a good way. Didn’t have any tacked on extras. A simple mission and objectives in each level. Kind of reminded me of the first Crysis in a way

gold_drake2d ago

The Order was really good. abit short

RiseNShine2d ago

I loved The Order, ridiculous graphics for it's time and a very interesting setting, it was linear but not as bad as people say. Similar thing with Callisto Protocol, i admit that i played it a long time after release so maybe issues were fixed by then, but it was a fantastic Dead Space-like horror game with some of the best graphics i've seen in my life.

LoveSpuds1d 14h ago

Yup, I am afraid to say I waited on Calisto and picked it up for around 30 quid. Once I played it on felt really badly for the devs because the game was really decent.

Show all comments (26)
100°

Earth Becomes Habitable Again in Starfield, Thanks to this Mod

Thanks to the Starfield Creation Kit, the "Earth Restored" mod has transformed the Earth into a Pine Forest and filled the sea with life.

Read Full Story >>
gamerstones.com
4d ago
130°

Starfield DLC needs to be as awe-inspiring as Shadow of the Erdtree to win players back

Shadow of the Erdtree saw a 1000% player count surge at its launch. Will Starfield’s Shattered Space be able to do the same?

Read Full Story >>
starfielddb.com
Brazz14d ago

Spoiler... It Will not. Bethesda is outdated.

anast14d ago

If it gets rid of the loading screens and adds space exploration, it will.

phoenixwing14d ago

loading screens and zones are hardboiled into the game, they would have to remake it to change it. which if they had just made a new engine or used someone else's they wouldn't be in this mess

purple10114d ago

only PSpro release will get rid of there loading, at at minimum, half the time it takes.

lucian22914d ago

nah cuz game has multiple things that have to happen before transition to outer space; issue is it isnt seamless

BoneMagnus14d ago

I played Starfield this past weekend. I enjoyed it and overall was about 30 hours in, but as soon as I got the e-mail about the GamePass price increase, I cancelled my account and deleted Starfield, Halo, Forza and others off my Series X.

If I want to play those games, I’ll just buy them outright - and truth is, I’m pretty sure I won’t. They aren’t worth it to me.

Ninver14d ago

Brutal truth. Thanks gor being honest.

Show all comments (18)