290°

Starfield: the Creation Engine evolves to deliver massive ambition, scale and scope

The Digital Foundry verdict on Bethesda's massively anticipated sci-fi RPG.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
MrDead636d ago (Edited 636d ago )

As long as they fixed the drawcall bottleneck problem that's all I care about, It was an endless pain in the butt for modding Fallout 4 especially if you wanted to break some precombines.

RpgSama635d ago

This is a weird review, they are comparing Starfield and the creating engine mostly against Bethesda previous games, not that much other current gen games, I think not fair to compare Starfield or the creating engine to Fallout 4 that came out in 2015.

darthv72635d ago

It makes sense if they are comparing growth in their development. How much things changed between previous games and this one.

crazyCoconuts636d ago (Edited 636d ago )

So, I'm open to differences in opinion here, but when I read this article, I would sum it all up as "apologetic".
Tons of negatives, glazed over with things like "but not unexpected for a Bethesda game" and with a super positive sounding title. You could make a list of the negatives, there are probably a dozen of them, but in such a careful tone. And no mention of the actual resolution before FSR upscaling in the article? Wasn't it like 1440 / 900p on the X/S respectively?
Just saying, like if, say, Guerrilla Games released this...

phoenixwing635d ago (Edited 635d ago )

@crazy
you're not wrong to criticize the game for getting passes that other devs would get raked through the coals over. However, i hear that the sttory is pretty decent for what it is so I'm ok with the game myself. Except, i don't go into bethesda games thinking they deserve a pass but a fun adventure is a fun adventure to me. I have the pc version so i expect to reap the benefits of the modding community to make it a game it should have been with due time.

Bulders gate 3 easily outclasses this game though. I've been playing it on pc and it's just miles better.

Kornholic635d ago

Why are you talking about the story? Digital Foundry focuses on the technical aspects of the game.

pezking635d ago

you're not allowed to like this game around here

Armaggedon635d ago

It is miles better at meeting the expected industry standard. Starfield has its own strengths that exceed other games.

Umb635d ago

Reminds me of the Halo Infinite video where they defended why it looked underwhelming. Though I always het the feeling DF are MS shills.

crazyCoconuts635d ago (Edited 635d ago )

Yeah, I mean, no question: they couldn't keep getting those Xbox exclusive reveal opportunities if they were critical. MS will reward those that play the game and punish those that don't

PunksOnN4G634d ago

Remember when they were gonna remove FPS test comparison between platforms and fps test just cuz LOL... They always give an excuse when its XBOX but PS it better be solid.

anast635d ago

Asmongold's Starfield video: "It Doesn't Just Work" is hilarious. It compares the game to what Todd had said about it when he was trying to sell it.

Obscure_Observer635d ago

Excellent work by Todd and his team on delivering such a massive, gorgeous and fantastic game!

I´m having a blast!

CrimsonWing69635d ago

I’m early in, but I find it kind of boring. I wouldn’t say it’s bad, it’s more like it’s just fine to me… but I’m hoping it’ll click the further I get into it.

arkard635d ago

That's where Im at to. I'm working on the main quest to get the game going and open it up more supposedly. I just flew to Mars to talk to someone for 1 min to just run back to my ship and have to fly to venus.

I'm dissppointed that they still can't figure out how to not have loading between outside and inside.

jwillj2k4635d ago

According to the creator of the game you need to be 130 hours in to start liking it.

KeyAppearance635d ago

Was quite surprised at just how great the game looked at times, I have played fallout 4, skyrim and stuff to death, so those were the visuals stuck in my head, so this was a pleasant surprise.

Some planets especially look so good

Kornholic635d ago (Edited 635d ago )

Am I the only one who feels that this was a strange video for Digital Foundry? A very odd tone for a DF video.

Normally DF examines the technical aspects more critically and then compares the graphics and effects to the game's contemporary peers.

In this video comparisons are made only to Bethesda's previous titles. Which is a bit silly because of course the game is going to look better compared to a 5-12 year old game from the same developer.

343_Guilty_Spark635d ago

None of Bethesdas games have ever been lookers. This is a great looking game just in general. Is it up to the visual quality of day God of War Ragnorok no but the scale of this game is massive compared to a game like that.

There are moments in Starfield that are simply breathtaking. I never got that ever from a Bethesda RPG until now.

crazyCoconuts635d ago

Here's the DF review for God of War Ragnarok... See if it seems like the visual quality sounds comparable: https://www.eurogamer.net/d...

Kornholic635d ago

None of that made any sense in the context of my comment.

Armaggedon635d ago

I wouldnt say its at ragnaroks level, but they are skilled at using lightening to their advantage.

Show all comments (48)
100°

6 Best Open-World Games Set In Space, Ranked

Pair open-world exploration with an immersive outer space setting, and the result is what players get in these incredible space games.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
gigoran81d 4h ago

starfield is fallout with a space fast travel disguised as a mini game. technically space, but more open world sci fi.

100°

Starfield's Terrormorphs Are Just a Step Away from Achieving Fallout's Deathclaw Status

Starfield features aliens known as Terrormorphs that are key to the UC Vanguard questline, and they're similar to Deathclaws in all but one aspect.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
PanicMechanic3d ago

No one gives a crap about Starfield in 2025. I mean seriously, has anyone remembered this game even exists? Lmao

Alos883d ago

They really aren't. Nothing in Starfield is nearly as iconic as anything from Fallout.

Putte2d ago

Who is even playing Starfield? That was a major let down.

90°

Fallout 4 on Switch 2 seems inevitable, but what about Starfield?

A Fallout 4 Nintendo Switch 2 port seems like an inevitability, but what about other Bethesda RPGs like Starfield.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
neutralgamer199252d ago

I think all games will end up on switch from Xbox. MS has embraced going to other platforms now if games aren't doing well on Nintendo MS may be more selective in the future

On playstation they have been quite successful

anast51d ago

I'm not sure too many people want to play Starfield.

Profchaos51d ago

Phils all but confirmed they are going in hard with the switch 2

TheColbertinator51d ago

All are welcome to Switch 2. Microsoft Games Studios is interested in long term profits and market value not petty fanboy thoughts.

50d ago
Show all comments (7)