660°

Footage of the first 30 minutes of Starfield has leaked online

Amasr writes: "The first 30 minutes of Starfield have leaked online, so we'd advise steering well clear of spoilers on different websites."

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Jin_Sakai339d ago (Edited 339d ago )

Animations actually look great. Excited to see how it reviews.

shinoff2183339d ago

I'm so tempted to look but I'd rather break my cherry by myself

InUrFoxHole338d ago

I got you man... you're not going to be disappointed. Strap in a prepare for money well spent. What version did you get?

Obscure_Observer338d ago

@shinoff2183

"I'm so tempted to look but I'd rather break my cherry by myself"

Absolutely!

Not watching any leaked footage before experience the game myself. We won´t have to wait much longer anyway.

4Sh0w338d ago

Same guys, it hurts but I will not look, I was told there's been some fake leaks too but it don't matter, first time I will see it is on my big screen with my controller in hand.

seanpitt23338d ago

What I saw was a last gen game with good lighting... what do you expect the game has been in development for over a decade some things will look dated!

RaidenBlack338d ago

SMH whilst looking at the downvotes for this simple comment

Charlieboy333338d ago (Edited 338d ago )

I know you aren't talking about facial animations because they are utter CRAP. Unless your idea of 'great' is just eyebrows that randomly jump up and down, eyes that blink and mouths moving out of sync. No other facial movement.

purple101338d ago

You can make out facial animation quality from a iPhone recording off a screen? Not even lined up properly?

Also apparently I don't know, but people saying it was on series s...

So maybe just maybe there is better to come on series x version. Unlikely but I wouldn't eput it part them..

Ohh no - actually, scrap that comment... 'Console parity'... and all that jazz

Gunstar75338d ago

34 bitter downvotes

Don't you just love it

Rocketisleague337d ago (Edited 337d ago )

Looks like fallout 3 in space, not even fallout 4. Graphics are good though especially lighting, animations are particularly Last gen but eh who cares. Combat looks atrocious as always, you'd think with the slayings of action rogs over rhe last 8 years Bethesda would try improve the combat by now.

Called the loading screen a while back, can't believe they made a space game with loading screens everywhere again. That engine needs to die.

To those saying 'not going to be disappointed'...when is the last time bestheada have made a good game? For me I didn't even like skyrim or fallout 3. I liked new Vegas, but that was obsidian(god that company got fked so hard by publishers in the past, especially Bethesda and EA)

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 337d ago
sparky77339d ago

The third person animations look amazing, that extra year really paid off.

purple101338d ago

Deffo did yes. They thew the kitchen sink at this; and it appears to be sticking.

yarbie1000338d ago

Video shows terrible AI that is on par with Redfall where dude was out in the middle with no cover and AI still couldn't hit him. Also saw tons of loading screens, even inside your ship if you just simply climb up a ladder. Also long loading animation to watch your ship lift off the planet and then it jumps to just sitting still in space. Still getting it, but the leak did the game no favors and my expectations have been lowered

IGN 10/10

shinoff2183338d ago

Even with all that, ever play xcom2. One of my personal best games last Gen. Frame rate dips are common. Loading screens are long. Still a Hell of a game. I'm not worried about starfield. Some complaints I see are just seeming like having to have something to complain about. Game looks amazing and sounds like this sci fi nuts dream come true. As a Sony fan mostly it's a shame they seem to not care about rpgs these days

solideagle338d ago (Edited 338d ago )

I abandoned Xcom 2 because of loading. It was first time playing that genre and I kept dying or was too perfectionist to load the game if character dies. Atrocious loading, I hoped they would patch it for PS5 but it never happened. I think game was fantastic but I never completed it :(

Rocketisleague337d ago

Agreed about sony, they ficus on cinematic games mostly. But hey at least they're generally fun. I just sit around waiting for 3rd parties to. nnovate in gameplay

-Foxtrot338d ago (Edited 338d ago )

The loading screens are what annoyed me, especially in the ship. Load the whole damn ship so I can freely move around it

It’s like in Elder Scrolls or Fallout when you had to load into a city then load into a small house. It got annoying after a while l with how frequent you travel between places for side missions.

Remember the small missions in Skyrim with the Thieves Guild. Oooft.

azedean338d ago

Because it is still the same engine updated since oblivion (gamebryo).

kambeix338d ago

Do you mean the 1 second black screen when entering the ship? Yes, it could be seamless, but come on, it's not like a 10, or even 5 second load time

anast338d ago

It's had those 10s in the chamber since the initial announcement. They probably already wrote the basic structure of the reviews, a few years ago, with some blanks they need to fill in after playing it for 15 minutes.

Visceral89338d ago

Starfield needs that PS5 SSD with 12 priority levels

ChasterMies338d ago

No joke. Fallout 4 and Skyrim instantly became better games on PS5. If you are building a gaming PC, pay more for the faster SSD. Money well spent.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 337d ago
shadowT338d ago

This videos is poorly recorded and Starfield is maybe only running on a Xbox Series S.

ABizzel1338d ago (Edited 338d ago )

It’s not native 4K on Series X, it runs at a weird resolution on Series X of 1296p upscaled to 4K using FSR2.0 (hence why it’s likely an AMD exclusive feature) which is why it also looks a little blurred. FSR2 is good at upscaling 1440p to 4K, but lower resolutions it starts to blur a bit, not to mention digital foundry and most outlets have been reviewing the Series X only version.

The Series S version is likely 900p or even lower upscaled to 1440p, and will probably be super blurry.

kambeix338d ago

doesn't matter if it was 4K HDR 12 bit... you can tell from the video the TV is not good then the recording it's also not good. Really can't tell if it looks good or bad, but it certainly looks way worse than last night's gameplay demo

rakentaja338d ago (Edited 338d ago )

Just some previous comments from your side (pony confirmed?)
1) glad I'm on Ps5 🥳🥳
2) I'm 30+ and only owned 1 Xbox console🥳
3) Why is Xbox still a thing?

jeromeface338d ago

you tell us, you bought one

badboyz09330d ago

Reviews are dropping today and so far I was right🤣

lelo2play338d ago

You forgot to take your pills ... again.

Tapani338d ago (Edited 338d ago )

Having checked out thousands of movies and game trailers, and reading thousands of reviews, and played hundreds of games in nearly four decades, I think it is quite easy to see which games are really good based on the materials shown before release.

Starfield has nothing that catches my eye, it looks extremely mundane, plain and boring. It may have its moments here and there, but I predict it has nothing that No Man's Sky cannot make you feel. That being said, I was wrong about the new Zelda, and might be wrong here as well, but I don't think it's a game for me.

These space exploration type of games need much, much more personality and flair. Something like Guardians of the Galaxy, a story like that, but with more open-ended planets and fleshed out RPG systems would make much more sense compared to this type of "Skyrim in space". Eidos and Crystal Dynamics would have been the perfect developer for this type of a game, having had semi-open world Tomb Raider and Deus Ex with more dense environments. Albeit I like them working on a more purposeful new entry of Deus Ex rather than chasing the space sim dream.

Skyrim in the first place was extremely dull, and now you want to do it in a larger scope? What a great idea... Why do we need to go to 1000 planets? I mean who goes to even 1000 cities on earth, what's the purpose? Exploring is our nature as humans, but we need a purpose to do so. We haven't sent probes to every single rock that is flying in our solar system, we very carefully choose the missions based on scientific purpose. If you have planets that serve pretty much the same function of mining planet and only have procedurally generated assets and perhaps handpicked minerals, then what's the point? One, more dense handcrafted planet with variety of minerals and ecosystems or biodomes would be much more interesting instead of a large number of "samey" planets.

I just don't get the "here's 900 empty planets to explore, you can click here at the rock to mine, and here's a random pirate post so you can loot some random stuff. But here's also 100 that are a bit more dense and interesting." We don't need those 900 randomly generated ones just to "feel the scope". We realize what has been fully developed and what is randomly generated.

I think it will be a game full of busy work and checklists and the tasks are repetitive and serve no purpose. People will probably be taken by the scope, presentation etc. but I suspect there's no real purpose for the game to exist, it's just a vague idea. I bet the writing will be awful as well.

Nacho_Z338d ago

Great summation.

There will be good aspects but taking a Bethesda RPG and stretching it to breaking point in every direction isn't a recipe for success.

HyperMoused338d ago

Thats just like...your opinion man

Lightning77337d ago

Too bad your long winded comment are already aging badly but then again you have strong record of downplaying everything Xbox does so I'm not surprised.

Pete Hines played 150+ hours and no where near close to doing everything in the game not even close just scratching the surface. A simple mission will take you to a a whole detour of an expanded story like it's a second story outside of the main story. Apparently there are tons and tons and TONS of mission structures like that in the game. He and another employee played the same amount and ended up with very different experiences not one thing was similar in their play through. Not a single thing.

Pete also said this a "irresponsibly large game" where you can pour 1000 hours in.

For perspective I poured in 450+ hours in Overwatch. A 7 year old game that I bought at launch and still play....

Tapani337d ago (Edited 337d ago )

@Lightning77
I'm okay if my comment is aging badly. It's just an opinion and it is not important for me to be right. I would actually be happy to be proven wrong just like with the latest Zelda game (which I'm playing right now happily!), but I just have not been a fan of Bethesda's largest games. They are empty busywork.

I have nothing against Xbox brand, I'd like them to succeed because more competition is better for creativity and essentially to the consumer. I like Microsoft as a company as well, and think Nadella is a wonderful, high EQ CEO.

I just share my thoughts openly. Sometimes yes, long-winded.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 337d ago
Show all comments (82)
290°

10 "Bad" Games I Actually Enjoyed

TNS: "We're shining a light on a bunch of "bad" games that may've been left wanting when it comes to their critical or audience reception."

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Good list I've had similar reactions to some games even ones on the list like the order and Callisto

Also I recently grabbed forspoken for, 5 dollars at a eb games Clarence sale and I am actually enjoying it more than I thought I would

Sometimes you just need to give critically panned games a chance

FTLmaster2d ago

Oh gosh, good shout on Forspoken! Genuinely forgot about that one, and haven't got around to playing it. It's on my to-buy-in-a-sale list!

Cacabunga1d 11h ago (Edited 1d 11h ago )

Knack was great ! Had a blast with the first one. Haven’t tried the second one though due to backlog

The Fight: Lights Out was also a game i enjoyed very much and highly detailed with great motion control when you understand how they work, which is what pushed people away from this game..

LoveSpuds1d 9h ago

Both The Order and Calisto were harshly treated in my view. I am not saying they are perfect, but the were both really solid games. I personally really liked them despite acknowledging their flaws and coincidentally, got the platinum trophy for both games.

Evil West is another really fun game that's worth checking out for sure.

andy851d 9h ago

Forspoken was great. Never really understood all the criticism. 2nd best traversal in a game after Spiderman

Profchaos1d 3h ago

Yeah gameplay wise I get huge infamous vibes with its combat starting out as low level eventually becoming a unstoppable power spewing killing machine with a wide variety of powers infamous is one of my favourite franchises obviously it's not the same but I love the combat of it so far.

ChasterMies2d ago

I feel like we’re finally starting to see a sea change in how we treat our favorite games. Sure, we all acknowledge that a game can suck and we can still enjoy it. Hopefully this results in meaningful review scores. Personally, I find a lot of bad games are better if you blast through them on the easiest difficulty. Callisto protocol on the image is a good example of this.

LoveSpuds1d 9h ago (Edited 1d 9h ago )

I really liked Calisto, harshly treated for sure and I don't necessarily think it needs to be played on easy to enjoy it. It's not perfect, but it's not the car crash the media portrayed it as either.

I have said it before, but part of the issue is that there is a mind share going on in games coverage, with all the main outfits being personal friends and talking too each other. As such, there is a risk that everyone ends up sharing in the same opinion rather than thinking from themselves. I reckon that's why some games get a universal bashing when consumers actually like the game and equally, games get great reviews across the board and the game doesnt land with consumers.

RaidenBlack2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Actually, I started liking FO76 after the wastelanders DLC ... it has been my guilty pleasure
other games I can think of Order 1886, Driveclub, Resident Evil 6 (only the Leon part), Alpha Protocol (pretty unique, needs a remake), XIII Remake (after patches), Medal of Honor 2010, Medal of Honor Warfighter, Homefront The Revolution, Enemy Front, Legendary The Box, Faces of War, Conflict: Vietnam, Conflict: Global Storm & Codename: Panzers – Cold War

CosmicTurtle2d ago

Driveclub was genuinely a good game with a poor launch. Alpha Protocol is superb, just a few archaic design choices for the time.

RaidenBlack1d 11h ago

I want past games with interesting setups/mechanics but having some flaws (due to crunch or budget) to be remade so that the gaming community can appreciate and enjoy them as was envisioned and intended by the developers. In contrast to a successful game being remade again just with prettier coat of paint.
Alpha Protocol tops that and I'll include FO:NV as well as an exception (it is popular but features were cut due to limited dev time). And also Vampire the Masquerade: Bloodlines I, Singularity, KOTOR II and maybe Daikatana.
There might be others which I can't recall atm.

SonyStyled2d ago

I loved Enemy Front. I pre ordered it months prior and remember calling the store to check if it came out that day. The guy never heard of it but confirmed my copy was ready to pick up. Game was simple and basic in a good way. Didn’t have any tacked on extras. A simple mission and objectives in each level. Kind of reminded me of the first Crysis in a way

gold_drake2d ago

The Order was really good. abit short

RiseNShine2d ago

I loved The Order, ridiculous graphics for it's time and a very interesting setting, it was linear but not as bad as people say. Similar thing with Callisto Protocol, i admit that i played it a long time after release so maybe issues were fixed by then, but it was a fantastic Dead Space-like horror game with some of the best graphics i've seen in my life.

LoveSpuds1d 9h ago

Yup, I am afraid to say I waited on Calisto and picked it up for around 30 quid. Once I played it on felt really badly for the devs because the game was really decent.

Show all comments (26)
100°

Earth Becomes Habitable Again in Starfield, Thanks to this Mod

Thanks to the Starfield Creation Kit, the "Earth Restored" mod has transformed the Earth into a Pine Forest and filled the sea with life.

Read Full Story >>
gamerstones.com
4d ago
130°

Starfield DLC needs to be as awe-inspiring as Shadow of the Erdtree to win players back

Shadow of the Erdtree saw a 1000% player count surge at its launch. Will Starfield’s Shattered Space be able to do the same?

Read Full Story >>
starfielddb.com
Brazz14d ago

Spoiler... It Will not. Bethesda is outdated.

anast14d ago

If it gets rid of the loading screens and adds space exploration, it will.

phoenixwing14d ago

loading screens and zones are hardboiled into the game, they would have to remake it to change it. which if they had just made a new engine or used someone else's they wouldn't be in this mess

purple10114d ago

only PSpro release will get rid of there loading, at at minimum, half the time it takes.

lucian22914d ago

nah cuz game has multiple things that have to happen before transition to outer space; issue is it isnt seamless

BoneMagnus14d ago

I played Starfield this past weekend. I enjoyed it and overall was about 30 hours in, but as soon as I got the e-mail about the GamePass price increase, I cancelled my account and deleted Starfield, Halo, Forza and others off my Series X.

If I want to play those games, I’ll just buy them outright - and truth is, I’m pretty sure I won’t. They aren’t worth it to me.

Ninver14d ago

Brutal truth. Thanks gor being honest.

Show all comments (18)