Approvals 11/3 ▼
darthv72 (3) - 287d ago Cancel
MaximusPrime_ (3) - 287d ago Cancel
ZeekQuattro (3) - 287d ago Cancel
Zodiac (2) - 287d ago Cancel
270°

Charles Martinet Retires From Traditional Role as Super Mario Voice Actor; Will Be Mario Ambassador

Charles Martinet has been the voice of Super Mario basically forever, but Nintendo just announced that he won't perform in the role going forward.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community287d ago
gold_drake287d ago

he'll definitely be missed.

just a shame Nintendo didnt give him the opportunity to voice Mario in the movie.

-Foxtrot287d ago

Which was a dick move because the characters he did voice were fine, he did a good job. He could have done it.

Asplundh287d ago

He does a good job in the games, but can't really see him carrying conversations in a movie. I think he would had sounded even more out of place than Pratt.

DarXyde287d ago

It's pretty much what happened with David Hayter: they got brushed aside for no reason beyond the big brains wanting big name talent.
Both situations are a damn shame, especially when they were willing.

mjchitown287d ago

Chris Pratt was great as mario in the movie. yell still crying over this ? and yet yell love the movie . make that make sense. nintendo never let Charles Martinet do much with mario voice in the games .

gold_drake287d ago

i never praised the move or anything.
so your comment makes no sense whatsoever.

0hMyGandhi286d ago

I didn't care for the film myself. It was absolutely gorgeous to look at....And that's about it. It's inoffensive, passable entertainment with a few good performances (Jack Black was basically born to play Bowser, apparently) and so it's not a bad watch, just nothing extraordinary, either. I suppose that most who praise the film do so because it bucks the trend of terrible videogame movies, and wasn't the absolute dumpster fire that it could have been.

Pratt was serviceable, just like Anya (whereas Charlie Day killed it as Luigi) .

But here's the thing: people can absolutely detest a major element of something, while still loving that very thing as a whole, it just requires the other facets of that thing to work overtime to overcome that negativity.
Kiefer being brought in on MGS5 didn't ruin the game, but it left a mark on an otherwise incredibly polished franchise with weird background drama that didn't even need to be there to begin with. His performance was * fine * , but Hayter is THE voice that we've all come to know and love, and many felt strange by his absence.

1Victor286d ago

I totally understand why they didn’t used him to voice the animation as they needed a star power name attached to it to maximize the money pull, but they could have forced the studio to have him voicing Mario dad as a Easter egg for the game fan.

mjchitown285d ago

Charles Martinet only had 22 lines of dialogue in mario games. let that sink in

mastershredder286d ago (Edited 286d ago )

Hollywood chooses the talent to represent the character/voice, which is contracted AAA talent that make them big bucks. Also why hollywood and their overpaid screen-talent (replacing long standing voice-specific talent) are destroying an industry they were never part of in the first place.

gold_drake286d ago

america has a weird history with voice acting i agree.

where i live, thats pretty much a standalone job without the "actor" perspective. but i think thats pretty much everywhere where english isnt the main language.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 285d ago
Christopher287d ago

Now is time for Chris Pratt to really shine! /s

MaximusPrime_287d ago

I met him in NYC last year September...by chance..

I was in NYC for a short holiday break. On one day I decided to pop round Nintendo store at Rockefeller plaza. He was there for photoshoot with a young disabled fan who's bucket list was to meet him. No one knows he would be there so it wasn't a fan event but a quiet one. I just managed to meet him and got a photo of his mario pose.

As someone just visiting from the UK managed to meet him without realising was once in the lifetime.

I wish Charles all the best with his future endeavours.

0hMyGandhi287d ago

listen, I love this dude, but there's absolutely zero reason why he should "retire" from his role. Especially for the games, I just can't imagine (beyond a few press events) that there's a massive time commitment, so why not do as the person who voices the gecko in the Geico commercials, and rock out for as long as possible?

Regardless, he will be missed. He's certainly earned his retirement. I just hope this isn't Nintendo forcing him out to get a *ahem* "real" celebrity voice.

Snookies12287d ago

I mean, I get what you're saying. It's only a voice role where he just makes noises and says one or two words. Yet, he's been doing this for decades. I'm sure most people would want to just take it easy after such a long time of doing one single thing.

-Foxtrot287d ago

It’s a shame though he didn’t just do one last game, maybe hold off for the next big 3D game and Nintendo could have incorporated themes of change, new beginnings and possibly a little send off for him within the game

A game celebrating all the games he’s starred in from remixed levels to Easter eggs

Chard287d ago

The send-off is the movie I guess - he plays the father of Mario with his last line being “these are my boys”

HyperMoused287d ago

Isnt Marios vocab...."woohoo"... "yippee" and "its-a-me-a-Mario".. .they have those sounds..

287d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (23)
90°

15 Great Games Where Every Minute of the Experience Feels Earned

GB: "We take a look at 15 amazing games that had the perfect length."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community7d ago
7d ago
coolbeans7d ago

Pretty good list. Botany Manor would be the newest addition that encapsulates that title.

400°

Anyone else not blown away with graphics these days? Me neither

Talal writes: "I'm talking about having that rush of excitement - that feeling you get when you know you've just made a memory for a lifetime."

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community10d ago
OptimusDK10d ago

There are different games. Some have gamplay at it highest priority, some have the story, some have the replay value and choices... There are a lot of different game experiences.

It is laughable that just now graphics does not have anything to do with that experiene. We have had many games of that type over time. This is just the one that have come closest to feel like playing an actual movie. Just look the the Digital foundry walkthrough it is a masterpiece in that perspective and hence wrth trying. But yes do not do it for the gameplay - but that was never the goal of this experience.

GamerRN10d ago

It's because it's on Xbox. When Xbox has amazing graphics, they don't matter. When PlayStation does, it's a game changer!

Lightning7710d ago

Pretty much my thoughts. They were technical marvel's on PS and still are. The moment Xbox puts out a graphically intense game is doesn't matter suddenly.

4 years ago this month would the UE5 tech demo debut with the girl flying (tech demo said it was only possible on PS5 because of the SSD. Glad to finally see it in its glory.

fr0sty10d ago

FFS, gaming journalism has really gone downhill. At least hire people with a basic grasp of grammar... "Me neither" means the exact opposite of what the "author" is trying to say. That's like saying "I could care less"... lol.

S2Killinit10d ago

Maybe because the gameplay being dull allowed it to have the amazing graphics and people are not as impressed by graphics alone anymore? I mean there is a lot of sites saying the story and the gameplay are lackluster. So what are we supposed to enjoy then? Cgi graphics are beautiful but since they arent interactive, they dont impress me as much as they used to. Thats an extreme example, but you get my drift.

Terry_B9d ago

When Playstation (Sony) does it..its usually a great game and not a cinematic experience..or at least something new at the time..like Until Dawn back in 2015.

1Victor9d ago

@gamer:” It's because it's on Xbox. When Xbox has amazing graphics, they don't matter. When PlayStation does, it's a game changer!”

The game looks as good as any other PlayStation game in my eyes why can’t you and the other hardcore Xbox be happy about it and drag PlayStation into every conversation and force PlayStation hardcore to look into the game and find flaw that most games have in one way or another.
@light: “ 4 years ago this month would the UE5 tech demo debut with the girl flying (tech demo said it was only possible on PS5 because of the SSD. ”
Yes at that time it was only possible on PlayStation SSD how ignorant of you to think that after 4 years the technology wouldn’t evolved and move to a industry standard 🤦🏿I wish your mentality wasn’t so naive and narrow to post stuff like that 😩 in a year or 2 a new game will come out that might look better, it’s the nature of the industry.

Now that the distraction is gone I feel that is a good thing that the graphics in games are starting to hit the rooftop and hopefully the developers will put more thoughts into story and gameplay mechanics than just the next shiny oily skin of old.

Reaper22_9d ago

So true. Not surprised by all the negativity. It's a really good game and looks better than any game I've ever seen. GOTY nominee for sure. Like I said before, sony screwed up big time by not purchasing Ninja Theory.

Asplundh9d ago

Pretty much. It's like how the Switch and Steam controller using haptic feedback in their controllers wasn't a big deal but then Sony did it and it was then a "game changer".

fr0sty9d ago

The game runs at as low as 21fps... That isn't much to brag about no matter how good it looks.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 9d ago
MajorLazer9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

We've had graphical gamechangers before, such as Crysis but those games still had gameplay to compliment it. Hellblade pretty much has none, and only achieved such graphics through being incredibly linear and having very small, closed off environments where very little is happening.

Vx_9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

GFX does not mean anything if the game is boring. It is simple like that and these major companies need to understand this simple concept.

Games are like your lady, she may be beautiful to look at for a while but then it gets boring if her character isn't interesting and fun to be with.

10d ago Replies(7)
Kneetos10d ago

Mario kart 8 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Sonic188110d ago

Horizon forbidden West has great graphics and great gameplay

GamerRN10d ago

Yeah but graphics don't matter, remember?

anast9d ago

@RN

I've been pretty consistent in saying that we need both.

GamerRN8d ago

So until dawn, too human, or whatever those series of games were... Graphic masterpieces it garbage with no gameplay?

VincentVanBro10d ago

I agree and I actually think Forbidden West looks better than Hellblade 2. I easily prefer looking at it at least.

Sonic18819d ago

It does look better in my opinion as well. I don't know why it looks better but there's something about the Decima engine or that guerrilla games is using tricks that we don't know of

Abear219d ago

Can you fly a mount under water in Hellblade 2? I think not! One of the best moments this Gen

Show all comments (111)
90°

Two Decades Later, the Original Splinter Cell is Still a Masterpiece

They don't make games like this anymore.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community18d ago
vgvill18d ago

Too dated in my book. The AI is way too unpredictable to be acceptable today. It's definitely a game of its time.

Jingsing18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Agreed with those sentiments. The quality of the CPU controlled characters make or break a stealth game and they are pretty poor in all the Splinter Cell games by today's standard. This is what led me to playing Spies vs Mercs all the time in later games just to get a better stealth experience from a real person. Arguably Sony are making better stealth games albeit not Tom Clancy stuff.

TheProfessional18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

You should stick with fortnite or one of the countless bloodborne style games then. What a joke.

rlow118d ago

I had a good time with the game. It is a product of its time. But when it came out it was a must have game for a lot of people. I wish Ubisoft would make another game in the series or at least a reboot.

vgvill18d ago

They are making a remake, I think. I loved the original game when it was released, but I tried to play it again in recent years and just couldn't get on with it. The same with the older Hitman games.

PrecursorOrb18d ago

Yeah chaos theory still holds up though I gotta say. If you’re a fan of the series I highly suggest you go back to that one. Ubi has said they are remaking sc for “modern audiences”. I don’t have a lot of faith for the future of that company

Chocoburger18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Due to the lack of modern stealth games, and me constantly playing the MGS series, I've been looking for alternative stealth games to play, and went back and re-played the SC series recently. I wouldn't call SC1 or SC:PT masterpieces, there are AI issues, they're very much trial-and-error games, and that can lead to a lot of frustration. I also found the stories in this series to be boring, uninteresting, and just sloppily told. Cinematics are also of poor quality for both in-game scenes and CG cut-scenes, the soundtrack didn't leave any impression on me either.

Chaos Theory is better, but there was still a lot of room for improvement, and Double Agent (old gen ver.) was a sloppy mess that ended up a regression from CT. But still, at least they tried back then, these days Ubi-junk doesn't even try to make good games!

HvNzSoul9d ago

Everyone needs to quit with all of the unnessacery Ubi-hate. SC Conviction and Blacklist are both still good games.

HvNzSoul9d ago

Everyone needs to quit with all of the unnecessary Ubi-hate. SC Conviction and Blacklist are both still good games, they just weren't 100% focused on stealth with Conviction and they remedied that in Blacklist. The only thing they have released recently that I was disappointed with was Watch Dogs Legion, and Skull & Bones. Everyone seems to be salty about the misleading trailer for the original Watch Dogs and The Division. Which are also, both good games, and actually Watch Dogs seems like it was ahead of its time even with all the trailer drama (having gone back and played recently, can say the game didnt deserve all the flak). Yeah the misleading E3 trailer that had better graphics than release is understandable to a very small degree, when most Teaser Trailers, or Game Demo's only have that portion of the game developed so they use the highest quality assets of w/e they have being showed, or what they are showing was made purely for the showing, allowing for extra polish . As to the gripes about minor game design changes, or cut features upon a games release just goes to show how unknowledgeable most gamers are in terms of how game development works or to even understand what what the hell a WIP, let alone titles still in early development.

Good games from Ubi since 2014 (Year that SC Blacklist Released) include:

Watch Dogs 1 & 2
The Division 1 & 2 (Although I had a hard time getting into The Division 2 at first)
R6 Siege
Ghost Recon Wildlands & Breakpoint
Immortals Fenyx Rising
AC Origins, Odyssey, MIrage (Haven't finished Valhalla games too damn long)
Far Cry Primal, and 5 (6 also has a length issue)
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora
Prince Of Persia The Lost Crown

Haven't played a couple of titles those being For Honor (played at launch but didn't honestly give it an actual go), The Crew, R6 Extraction and at the time of writing this xDefiant.

Even if you absolutely hated any of the above titles, they aren't inherently bad games, they're just good, but not always top quality either.

I say give Ubi credit where credit is due, they at least fix games post launch if they start out rough, Breakpoint is an excellent example this and is such an enjoyable experience now compared to it's launch.