290°

Diablo 4 players review bomb game on Metacritic after awful Season 1 patch reception

Fans are voicing their displeasure at the latest Diablo 4 patch by review bombing the game on Metacritic.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

Other
I'm afraid age-old N4G rules regarding news based on user reviews particularly metacritic. They aren't allowed here.
MaximusPrime_432d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community433d ago
Rynxie433d ago

Review bombing does nothing in this case. I suggest sticking to stop playing the game and persuading others not to buy it or play it as well.

Rude-ro432d ago

Is that not what review bombing supports?
Telling other players of the state of the game?
Ie it is not the money they already have, it is to curve new purchases… in todays live service games, a lot of gamers wait to see what a season will bring.

RpgSama432d ago

After 10 million sold, what is the point, they should have waited

Sonic1881432d ago

This game is starting to be Diablo Immortal

Palitera432d ago

It “informs” other people’s purchase decisions.

notachance432d ago

Not true, I always check user reviews on metacritic to see what the general praise/complaint is about from other players.

anast432d ago (Edited 432d ago )

Causal gamers won't buy a game with a low score.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 432d ago
Duke19433d ago

lol @ review bombing. People are pathetic

ChronoJoe433d ago

These guys are super optimistic about people using metacritic user scores to make purchase decisions. No one is.

“People need to leave their feedback and reviews, where it hurts Blizzard’s pockets. Reddit is not the place, encourage everyone to go to Metacritic and make your voice heard. Reviews are used by consumers to inform their purchase decision, not Reddit.”

Yeah, no one is doing that. No one is filtering metacritic by user score. Even metacritic itself doesn't showcase those scores, because they don't mean anything. In large part, because of stuff like this. I'm not saying I agree with what Blizzard are doing or anything like that, but this type of action doesn't achieve anything at all really.

neutralgamer1992432d ago

You would be surprised. There is a reason IGN has like 15 plus million users. After a story like this IGN will most likely cover it meaning many casuals will see it

And many publishers still use MC and open critic when deciding the royalties be bonus so yes it makes a difference

EvertonFC432d ago (Edited 432d ago )

Unfortunately alot of people can't think for themselves or make own dicisions

CobraKai432d ago

Agreed. There are people who swear by metacritic or rotten tomatoes. Weak minded people who need to be told what to like or not like.

enkiduxiv432d ago

@CobraKai Nothing “weak” about reading a few reviews before spending time and money on something. Only a moron would pay a publisher blindly before even trying to figure out if the product was good or even functional.

frostypants432d ago (Edited 432d ago )

Oh please. So you don't consider reviews at all? You just buy the game? Get off your high horse. Who do you think you're fooling?

notachance432d ago

lol what? if people get to play the game for free like reviewers did then sure, think away.
In this case however, it's great to also see what the normal players who have to spend money first before playing have to say about the game.

Cockney432d ago

Perhaps they're making an informed decision based on popular critique, nah surely not, that would be crazy

CobraKai427d ago

@enkid
only a moron would trust the opinions of others. Especially with all these review bombers. I'd rather research the game to see if its gameplay is something I'm into. Then I'd buy the game. If I trusted the reviews for Cyberpunk or Jedi Survivor, I would never have given them a chance cuz they were considered "broken". I played em and loved em.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 427d ago
shinoff2183432d ago

Thats not true at all. I bet lots are using it. People use reviews from all over to confirm purchasin games. I don't understand why but ya know people

ChronoJoe432d ago

From my experience working as a game dev at major studios, they don't put much weight on metacritic user scores. They do use critic scores as internal benchmarking, but analysing player sentiment is much more holistic and complex, and it does involve reading on places like reddit (even if they do not post there). Today, a lot of it involves using AI to analyse data too, as they can pull player sentiment from thousands of posts on reddit without reading and coding them individually.

I don't know how many folks go onto metacritic to look at user scores either, but I would bet it's a tiny number of the potential consumerbase. Something like steam reviews matter a lot, but metacritic user scores are not the same, largely because they do not require verified proof of purchase.

frostypants432d ago (Edited 432d ago )

I use it, or at least consider it. Metacritic is the only place where you can tell if a producer of a game or movie really stepped in dog crap. People don't review bomb if someone didn't seriously screw up. Other sites sanitize the truth away to protect their rep with the producer of said crap.

ChronoJoe431d ago (Edited 431d ago )

People do review bomb all the time on the basis of political views and in most cases I don't believe those are any indication of the quality of the game. For instance TLOU2 was review bombed for having playable female characters and trans characters. Nonetheless, it sold over 10 million units in 2 years, on one platform.

Bobertt432d ago

I agree most regular gamers don't care about metacritic scores but these game publishers do so when they get review bombed it gets their attention.

anast432d ago (Edited 432d ago )

Nice out of touch statement...

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 427d ago
neutralgamer1992432d ago

I really want to play this game but I just want all this nonsense to end and things to be ironed out. I will most likely start playing towards the end of the year

EvertonFC432d ago

I'm 20 hours in and I'm getting bored, it's a good game but just very samey already. ATM I feel like I could have just replayed D3 and saved my money tbh.

JeffGUNZ432d ago

What killed my desire to keep playing was how big the map was and coming to a realization I would lose everything every season to make a new character. The world is massive and to 100% that map takes time. Then you just lose it all. Just a bummer. Diablo 3 this was easier to take, but this one just hits different.

OMGitzThatGuy432d ago

Only negative is the nerfs and that is while making monsters 5 level behind and making other builds viable now or did people expect season 1 to make all the changes that Diablo 3 did in its 10+ years of updates?

Christopher432d ago

Why wouldn't you not start your next game in the series having learned from a decade of your past game? Are we supposed to be sympathetic that they're making the same mistakes all over again?

OMGitzThatGuy432d ago

Every game with stats goes through trial and error when the game goes out to millions, people seem to forget Diablo 3 even now still doesn’t that have the amount of endgame content that they think it has. It had 1 dlc and rifts, thats it and people still play it to this day and the seasons where just wipes with a few armor pieces, D4 season 1 is already gonna change more to the game than a D3 season ever did. D3 also launched with no rifts, while D4 launched with Nightmare dungeons.

Christopher432d ago

***Every game with stats goes through trial and error when the game goes out to millions, people seem to forget Diablo 3 even now still doesn’t that have the amount of endgame content that they think it has.***

This isn't about having content, it's the quality of it and their design choices that they have 10 years of experience working toward and had multiple betas with feedback on it.

neutralgamer1992432d ago

Why couldn’t they build from all the knowledge gained instead of starting from scratch and acting like they don’t know what they are doing and what gamers want. Seriously launching sequels with knowledge of what worked in the past games should be utilized

Show all comments (37)
110°

Interview: Blizzard on the future of Diablo 4

Blizzard mentions: “The notion that you’ve missed four seasons, the only thing you’ve missed is us continuing to learn and iterate”

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4d ago
pwnmaster30004d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Agreed. I just put in 50 hours of it because I was told to just push through but I think I’m over it.
A shame because I had so much fun with Diablo 3. I bought it twice. Putting 100 of hours into both.
Diablo 3 on the switch saved me from going crazy on a deployment. Oh well hopefully next Diablo will be better.
As long as I keep my gamepass sub I won’t miss a thing

Michiel19894d ago

diablo 4 is actually a pretty good game now, the launch was just terrible, but honestly it was worse for D3 at launch. Farming inferno for 10 hours just to get a bunch of yellows that weren't for your class or 10 levels lower, combined with the rubberbanding and Hydra getting double the bonusses that it should have and the real money auction house. Hardcore was unplayable in D3, in D4 it was fine for me at least. Combined with not being able to log at launch or just getting kicked out. D3 was definitely way worse than D4 at launch, took them 2.5-3 years to turn it around.

If you played D3 once rifts were out, then there was actually some content, but that was YEARS into the game.

Lionsguard4d ago

Have people just forgotten how terrible D3 was at the start? Real Money Auction House? Absolutely abysmal gear drops with stats that make no sense whatsoever?

Brazz4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Bring back Paladin/Crusader or GTFO. The fans never asked for Spiritborn.

Luc204d ago

Look at BG3. Great story, online co-op, couch co-op no micro transactions, no unnecessary seasons. Once you've finished the game you can play again and make different choices that will change the story. What happened to diablo?

Michiel19893d ago

if you're playing diablo to get branching story paths you're doing something wrong. Completely different game. The replayability in arpgs is the grind for better items and the ultimate chase is the perfect item. Might not be your cup of tea, but millions of people do.

Christopher4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

We wouldn't feel like we're missing anything if you made it so people could go back and play through each season rather than miss out on it entirely. But that's not your goal. You want people to feel like they are missing out on things and force them to play when you want them to, regularly each season, rather than just make a game that is more enjoyable to play and with better content.

80°

Lost Boys Interactive - A Notice on Staff Layoffs

Lost Boys Interactive writes: "Lost Boys Interactive has made the very difficult decision to reduce our overall headcount in accordance with local laws and consultation processes."

Read Full Story >>
linkedin.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community11d ago
70°

Diablo 4 dev confirms an armory is in the works, potentially allowing you to swap builds quickly

In response to a player’s post asking about a potential armory in-game, Diablo’s senior vice president Rod Fergusson simply said, “Working on it!”

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community23d ago
Kosic22d ago

D4 is a joke. It's taken them a year to copy d3...