290°

Diablo 4 players review bomb game on Metacritic after awful Season 1 patch reception

Fans are voicing their displeasure at the latest Diablo 4 patch by review bombing the game on Metacritic.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Rynxie320d ago

Review bombing does nothing in this case. I suggest sticking to stop playing the game and persuading others not to buy it or play it as well.

Rude-ro320d ago

Is that not what review bombing supports?
Telling other players of the state of the game?
Ie it is not the money they already have, it is to curve new purchases… in todays live service games, a lot of gamers wait to see what a season will bring.

RpgSama319d ago

After 10 million sold, what is the point, they should have waited

Sonic1881319d ago

This game is starting to be Diablo Immortal

Palitera319d ago

It “informs” other people’s purchase decisions.

notachance319d ago

Not true, I always check user reviews on metacritic to see what the general praise/complaint is about from other players.

anast319d ago (Edited 319d ago )

Causal gamers won't buy a game with a low score.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 319d ago
Duke19320d ago

lol @ review bombing. People are pathetic

ChronoJoe320d ago

These guys are super optimistic about people using metacritic user scores to make purchase decisions. No one is.

“People need to leave their feedback and reviews, where it hurts Blizzard’s pockets. Reddit is not the place, encourage everyone to go to Metacritic and make your voice heard. Reviews are used by consumers to inform their purchase decision, not Reddit.”

Yeah, no one is doing that. No one is filtering metacritic by user score. Even metacritic itself doesn't showcase those scores, because they don't mean anything. In large part, because of stuff like this. I'm not saying I agree with what Blizzard are doing or anything like that, but this type of action doesn't achieve anything at all really.

neutralgamer1992320d ago

You would be surprised. There is a reason IGN has like 15 plus million users. After a story like this IGN will most likely cover it meaning many casuals will see it

And many publishers still use MC and open critic when deciding the royalties be bonus so yes it makes a difference

EvertonFC320d ago (Edited 320d ago )

Unfortunately alot of people can't think for themselves or make own dicisions

CobraKai320d ago

Agreed. There are people who swear by metacritic or rotten tomatoes. Weak minded people who need to be told what to like or not like.

enkiduxiv319d ago

@CobraKai Nothing “weak” about reading a few reviews before spending time and money on something. Only a moron would pay a publisher blindly before even trying to figure out if the product was good or even functional.

frostypants319d ago (Edited 319d ago )

Oh please. So you don't consider reviews at all? You just buy the game? Get off your high horse. Who do you think you're fooling?

notachance319d ago

lol what? if people get to play the game for free like reviewers did then sure, think away.
In this case however, it's great to also see what the normal players who have to spend money first before playing have to say about the game.

Cockney319d ago

Perhaps they're making an informed decision based on popular critique, nah surely not, that would be crazy

CobraKai315d ago

@enkid
only a moron would trust the opinions of others. Especially with all these review bombers. I'd rather research the game to see if its gameplay is something I'm into. Then I'd buy the game. If I trusted the reviews for Cyberpunk or Jedi Survivor, I would never have given them a chance cuz they were considered "broken". I played em and loved em.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 315d ago
shinoff2183320d ago

Thats not true at all. I bet lots are using it. People use reviews from all over to confirm purchasin games. I don't understand why but ya know people

ChronoJoe319d ago

From my experience working as a game dev at major studios, they don't put much weight on metacritic user scores. They do use critic scores as internal benchmarking, but analysing player sentiment is much more holistic and complex, and it does involve reading on places like reddit (even if they do not post there). Today, a lot of it involves using AI to analyse data too, as they can pull player sentiment from thousands of posts on reddit without reading and coding them individually.

I don't know how many folks go onto metacritic to look at user scores either, but I would bet it's a tiny number of the potential consumerbase. Something like steam reviews matter a lot, but metacritic user scores are not the same, largely because they do not require verified proof of purchase.

frostypants319d ago (Edited 319d ago )

I use it, or at least consider it. Metacritic is the only place where you can tell if a producer of a game or movie really stepped in dog crap. People don't review bomb if someone didn't seriously screw up. Other sites sanitize the truth away to protect their rep with the producer of said crap.

ChronoJoe319d ago (Edited 319d ago )

People do review bomb all the time on the basis of political views and in most cases I don't believe those are any indication of the quality of the game. For instance TLOU2 was review bombed for having playable female characters and trans characters. Nonetheless, it sold over 10 million units in 2 years, on one platform.

Bobertt319d ago

I agree most regular gamers don't care about metacritic scores but these game publishers do so when they get review bombed it gets their attention.

anast319d ago (Edited 319d ago )

Nice out of touch statement...

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 315d ago
neutralgamer1992320d ago

I really want to play this game but I just want all this nonsense to end and things to be ironed out. I will most likely start playing towards the end of the year

EvertonFC320d ago

I'm 20 hours in and I'm getting bored, it's a good game but just very samey already. ATM I feel like I could have just replayed D3 and saved my money tbh.

JeffGUNZ319d ago

What killed my desire to keep playing was how big the map was and coming to a realization I would lose everything every season to make a new character. The world is massive and to 100% that map takes time. Then you just lose it all. Just a bummer. Diablo 3 this was easier to take, but this one just hits different.

OMGitzThatGuy320d ago

Only negative is the nerfs and that is while making monsters 5 level behind and making other builds viable now or did people expect season 1 to make all the changes that Diablo 3 did in its 10+ years of updates?

Christopher320d ago

Why wouldn't you not start your next game in the series having learned from a decade of your past game? Are we supposed to be sympathetic that they're making the same mistakes all over again?

OMGitzThatGuy320d ago

Every game with stats goes through trial and error when the game goes out to millions, people seem to forget Diablo 3 even now still doesn’t that have the amount of endgame content that they think it has. It had 1 dlc and rifts, thats it and people still play it to this day and the seasons where just wipes with a few armor pieces, D4 season 1 is already gonna change more to the game than a D3 season ever did. D3 also launched with no rifts, while D4 launched with Nightmare dungeons.

Christopher320d ago

***Every game with stats goes through trial and error when the game goes out to millions, people seem to forget Diablo 3 even now still doesn’t that have the amount of endgame content that they think it has.***

This isn't about having content, it's the quality of it and their design choices that they have 10 years of experience working toward and had multiple betas with feedback on it.

neutralgamer1992320d ago

Why couldn’t they build from all the knowledge gained instead of starting from scratch and acting like they don’t know what they are doing and what gamers want. Seriously launching sequels with knowledge of what worked in the past games should be utilized

Show all comments (37)
110°

Celebrate the Diablo Anniversary with March of the Goblins

Come celebrate the 1-year anniversary of Diablo IV and the 2-year anniversary of Diablo Immortal! There are heaps of rewards to mark these celebrations with a bounty of devilish goods across both games.

Read Full Story >>
terminalgamer.com
anast2d ago

This game is about to get buried by Path 2.

LordoftheCritics2d ago

Still no global chat or group finder.

The emptiest MP game ever made.

OtterX2d ago

1 more month then I can celebrate 1 year since i stopped playing and uninstalled the game.

Walalon2d ago

We are on the same team brother!

Rynxie1d 21h ago

I uninstalled d4 after they kept screwing over the sorc build and I beat the game. I also uninstalled immortal after reading the end. I actually went back to d2r here and there.

just_looken1d 11h ago

The only thing i enjoyed in D4 was the mp side but after they gutted my hunter build then again wanted me to grind for over hundred hours each season i too quit like you.

Its insane though a year has already passed.

Daeloki13h ago

Hard pass, gave it a chance on launch with a friend, but we made it a bit past act 1 only to realise how tedious it was.

60°

Diablo 4 Season 4 Turned The Tables on Helltides

Diablo 4's Helltides have undergone one of the best glow-ups in the game in the span of a single season thanks to some balance adjustments.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
90°

Diablo 4: The Argument For and Against Returning to the High Heavens

The High Heavens is an important location to the Diablo franchise, but whether Diablo 4 should return to the location in the future is controversial.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
Tapani13d ago

Is Diablo IV worth it for the Single-Player experience today? I understand it has got many patches and improvements.

Daeloki13d ago

I honestly don't know what they could have changed/patched to make the game enjoyable since last summer. I played the campaign a bit past act 1 with a friend and it just becomes incredibly boring and repetitive. I uninstalled shortly after and haven't looked back. However, with me it may just be a case of that it's not my kind of game. I just didn't enjoy the endless cycle of going into a dungeon, collect loot, teleport to town, sell/dismantle, teleport back to dungeon, collect loot, teleport to town, sell/dismantle... rinse and repeat. That cycle was about 80% of the game back then, completely drowning out the story for me. If there is a demo, or you have a chance to test a friends copy then I'd recommend that before spending any money on it.

Kosic13d ago

I loved D3 and would play a season for weeks.
D4 came out I reached level 60 ish and grew bored, I tried again in S1 and got to the same level and quit. I heard about the loot revamp, and briefly tried season 3 before jumping into the new season.
The game is better because it's easier to feel this progression smoothly increase, without hitting such a large road block, but I am level 61 and in Torment 4, and again I just don't feel the urge to continue.

I found a lack of direction of what to do, the thing that puts me off is the bland world, hell-tides are rather boring. Kill a non stop spawn of demons and summon a boss...

If you can get it for cheap, give it a try, or do a Gamepass trial and play it there.