990°

Xbox Game Pass ‘cannibalizes’ game sales, admits Microsoft in a document

Although Microsoft has repeatedly stated that Xbox Game Pass does not discourage game sales, a document that the Redmond company sent regarding the Activision-Blizzard issue seems to confirm the opposite.

Jin_Sakai591d ago

I enjoy watching all this unfold.

RpgSama591d ago

I mean, anybody that thought different were lying to themselves, only the most niche indie games actually saw an improvement on their sales because it gave them some exposure instead of being released to 0 fanfare and hopefully they got a good deal out of selling the release to MS, any other game besides those it surely Is damaging actual sales.

MrDead591d ago

It makes you wonder about Bethesda's games.

PlayStation was the biggest revenue generator for Bethesda in the console market, now that MS has banned Bethesda's games from PlayStation what will happen, will MS pump money into the publisher to make up the huge drop in revenue caused by removing all future titles from competing platforms and the damage BEING caused by Gamespass? I doubt it, more staff layoffs are sure to come at Bethesda

I got a feeling that Bethesda's days are numbered under MS, they'll just take the ip's they want like fallout and elder scrolls and absorb them to Xbox then close Bethesda down.

crazyCoconuts591d ago

I think if you had a game you were selling and MS approached you about getting it on GamePass, you'd go to your sales projections on Xbox, make some assumptions, and ask for a fee around that amount as a minimum. You wouldn't put it on GamePass unless you thought you'd come out ahead as a game publisher.
Of course I'd assume most rational people don't pay a sub to rent a game and then turn around and buy it unless it had immense replayability.
Some guy on here said he did that with Plagues Tale... whatever, if true, that's gotta be an anomaly.
@Dead, I agree with you but you're conflating exclusivity with GamePass. Sometimes they're together, but most of the time not

shinoff2183591d ago

Crazycoconuts

That may be true to an extent. Take atomic heart for me. I'm trying it out on gamepass. I'll play it and if I enjoy it somewhere down I'll pick it up on ps. I did that with edge of eternity . Played on gamepass picked it up for 25 on ps5. Mostly though cause I like physical games. I can't be the only one.

Pickledpepper591d ago

If I like a game on game pass I honestly do go and buy the physical copy of that game.
I collect all things gaming and it all adds to my collection.
I have a ps5 that has only been use for a week to play horizon 2 because I liked the first game, but really found the 2nd tedious.
I've repacked the ps5 in its box and that's where it's been from a week after horizon 2 was released.
I even buy games for the ps5 but never play them and keep them sealed just to add to my collection.

azzkikr8502591d ago

If Xbox games were selling no way would they need to put games day one on gamepass. If on average gears would sell 8million + at $60 a pop, that's almost half a billion dollars in revenue. Just look at god of war. 3 months and it's sold 11million copies (770billion). Not sure how people can't work out why some of the biggest games will never go day and date on any sub service.

Army_of_Darkness591d ago (Edited 591d ago )

Nobody Will purchase an almost full priced game after finishing it on gamepass. Give me a break! Who ever says otherwise is lying through their tongue... However for me personally, if I immensity enjoyed a game I completed on GP, I would buy it when it becomes dirt cheap later down the line...

SullysCigar590d ago

Wait, so... Microsoft lied? Who could have seen this coming? EVERYONE, that's who! Well, except for the usual handful.

This was a big topic of discussion from the launch of gamepass. No right-minded person would have thought there didn't seem something odd about letting people pay $1 to play AAA day one games that cost tens of millions of dollars to make. MS would have swallowed the loss to desperately bring attention and gamers to it's platform, but it was never sustainable.

The biggest concern was always what will it do to developers? And their vision? And their livelihoods?

This leak is bad timing for MS, as it's ANOTHER example of how they have no regard for the future or safeguarding of the industry. It's ALL about pride and money, everything else is expendable.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 590d ago
Chevalier591d ago ShowReplies(5)
notachance591d ago

Putting it in a subscription after sales has dwindled like how PS Plus is doing is a nice middle ground, letting the smaller titles get exposure while still keeping the sales of hyped big titles.

Vizigoth04591d ago

That’s where demand build traction. Trust me I think it’s cool that Hi-Fi Rush Shadow dropped and I’m playing it but will we ever know what that did for Bethesda and their developers? Did GamePass see subscription boost and that helps with funding? Who knows. Could employees of Bethesda be celebrating a product launch, money put into the studio towards their next product? It’s clear that PS+ is a cyclic service of games a year old and older so that when Megatons drop (Hogwarts) it’s not absorbed in a forgettable subscription service .

DarXyde590d ago

I mean, I'm not happy about the potential industry damage this kind of loss-leader approach can cause, but I love that it exposes the simps. Literally anyone with common sense could tell you XGP eats into game sales and there was so much denial of an obvious fact. Goes to show that you're often dealing with deeply unserious people.

If those people just admitted they have XGP and don't really buy games, I'd have no issues with that. I'd even respect the candor. But that's not how it went down, so those who said as much deserve to be roasted.

senorfartcushion584d ago

The live service implosion has been funny, but also so obvious to see that it’s sad.

These execs make more money than god for basically causing more harm than good

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 584d ago
italiangamer591d ago

We all knew this, just the usual spinning and lying from ms saying this wasn't true. Thankfully we PlayStation users actually BUY the games and give money to developers and publishers.

Tacoboto591d ago

I hope you only subscribe to the base PS Plus plan, then, and have never downloaded the PS Plus monthly freebies. Or at least bought Stray to support them directly. Otherwise your words are empty.

Microsoft pays developers/publishers for being on Game Pass so it's not like they're hung out to dry, and MS offers sales on the games in the service so you can buy them and own them if you so desire. Exactly like what Sony does with games on PS Plus services. But what do I know, as a PS5 player since Day One that also owns an Xbox *and* buys games when they're worth it (even when I play them first on Game Pass)...

Outside_ofthe_Box591d ago

If GTA6 released day one on GamePass and PlayStation Plus, you think sales would be unaffected?

SurgicalMenace591d ago

But you don't. What are you guys not getting? How can an individual expect to be taken seriously when they allow someone else to pay their way? Outside of children, the elderly and needy people, there is no excuse. Adults pay their portion to sit at the table, kids just expect a plate.

Tacoboto591d ago

"How can an individual expect to be taken seriously when they allow someone else to pay their way?"

What does this have anything to do with... gaming publisher-and-platform-holder agreements?

porkChop591d ago

@Surgical
"But you don't. What are you guys not getting? How can an individual expect to be taken seriously when they allow someone else to pay their way?"

GP isn't free. You pay for it. MS pays devs for the games with the $250M+ the subscribers pay every month. You're acting as if Xbox gamers just get games for free. That's not how it works.

SurgicalMenace591d ago

It has everything to do with being grown enough to afford the cost of engagement. Why not just move in with your family, eat up a portion of the resources, and put $15 on the table?🤣 Question: If your ability to buy games was limited to only a $15 a month budget, would it even exist? If the answer is no, then YOU'RE not doing YOUR part. We are not against MS for paying. We are against individuals who are making them have to.

Asplundh591d ago (Edited 591d ago )

@Surgical
Didn't you say that you were forced to close the door on a store you ran? I don't think you should be talking finance to anyone.

Tacoboto591d ago (Edited 591d ago )

Are you okay, Surgical? This is completely unrelated to the topic and neglects that every major corporation in gaming has a subscription service (or takes part in some means of a recurring stream of income).

Apple Arcade for $4.99 or $5.99. PS Plus up to $19.99. Xbox Game Pass from $9.99-$14.99. GeForce Now. Ubisoft+. EA Play. What of people that only play WoW and pay its monthly sub? Or people that only play F2P titles like Fortnite or Apex and only buy the monthly battle pass?

You don't get to define the cost of engagement and what it means for Random Gamer X to afford whatever it is they do or want to play.

Sonic1881591d ago (Edited 591d ago )

"You're acting as if Xbox gamers just get games for free."

If you compare $10 dollars a month subscription to a game that cost $70 dollar's I guess you would feel like it's free or a lot cheaper especially if you don't pay gamepass monthly like I do. I wait for a game that I'm interested in and then I sign back up unless I have Microsoft reward points. A lot of gamers do that especially PC gamers

Elda591d ago

Sony puts games on PS plus basically when those games have ran its course retail wise giving those games a second chance by recouping sales from PS+ subscriptions. Most games on PS+ are old,every now & then PS+ may get a new release & that game is usually an Indie or a AA game like they did with Stray & Shadow Warrior 3.

SurgicalMenace591d ago

You are absolutely right that every corporation makes EXTRA money from services, though companies like Apple and Sony are leaders in the industry because they also perform well outside of their services. MS is at the bottom of every sales metric across the board, making GP a very poor decision to maintain sustainability.
You're absolutely right, as well, that I don't get to determine the cost of access, but the market does. MS pays the market cost for those who aren't willing to, hoping to make SOME money back through subscriptions. A business model that is so poor that it should concern most still engaging with MS's gaming division. When in Rome.🤷🏾‍♂️

1Victor591d ago

@taco “Microsoft pays developers/publishers for being on Game Pass so it's not like they're hung out to dry”

Uh. Yeah they’re been hung up to dry when all the GP owners swarm the game like piañas or a kid ( the game ) kicking a 5 foot tall hornets nest (GP ) hornets = game pass owners 🤣

Tacoboto591d ago

The business model "that is so poor" led them to record monthly active users... But yeah Rome, ok.

"...the market does"

And that's exactly why we see [insert $10 subscription here] [insert game with battle pass here] [insert other sub] [insert MMO], because the market has adapted to both what gamers are playing and the way they spend, as opposed to setting some qualification on what it means for a gamer to "do their part" on supporting an industry that makes more money than film and music.

jznrpg591d ago (Edited 591d ago )

I download the games from PS + have premium and I still buy hundreds of games a year . What’s your point ? Most of the games given I don’t own or already already played . I only got premium because it was cheap . I had 6 years left on plus and paid less than 200$ to upgrade . I’ve barely used it except for Stray but I also have a physical copy unopened . PS gamers spend money on games and don’t expect everything day 1 .

This is a a ploy by MS to get people in the door before they jack up prices , Xbox gamers have always bought less games and now with Gamepass it’s closer to 0 than most think .

RedDevils590d ago

Tacobell here is really reaching for straw it's seem.

wiz7191590d ago

As an adult with children , paying for multiple games for multiple consoles gets very expensive .. Gamepass helps with that a ton , adults losing jobs for XY reasons , inflation , wtf are half you people even talking about ?

Crows90590d ago

Ive bought every single high quality exclusive. Other games...not as much. If not for the subscriptions there's a ton more indie that I would be buying. If his words are true then regardless of his actions, they aren't empty.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 590d ago
Obscure_Observer591d ago

"Thankfully we PlayStation users actually BUY the games and give money to developers and publishers."

Please continue.

1Victor591d ago (Edited 591d ago )

@obscured all comments
Your comments here read like a person having his fingers blocking the ears while loudly screaming lalalalalalala in a fetal position😱.

We already suspect that Microsoft didn’t make money from games purchased by their fan base but know it’s confirmed by themselves in a attempt to keep making themselves look weaker beyond a soap bubble in the hope that the regulators take pity on them and approve their purchase of ABK

Obscure_Observer591d ago (Edited 591d ago )

@1Victor

Lol. If you believe in all the bs Microsoft´s lawyers are telling regulators to win this deal, then certainly isn´t me the person living in Lalalalalalala Land.

They said Sony blocked Bloodborne from ever coming to Xbox (Bloodborne is a Playstation first party IP)

https://trademarks.justia.c...

They said Sony has the double of MAUs compared to Xbox (when latest report from the very UK´s regulator CMA shows MS as the clear leader in 2022)

https://www.tweaktown.com/n...

If you can´t see through some obvious legal maneuver like "Gamepass cannibalizes sales" among the others I´d mentioned above, when, in some vague attempt to try and make Xbox look weak in the eyes of regulators to get this deal pass through, well, let´s just say that one of us still don´t get it.

BehindTheRows591d ago (Edited 591d ago )

Prove otherwise.

Crows90590d ago

It's okay. Don't forget to breathe. I know this news is difficult to accept even though it's been common sense for a while.

mandf584d ago

When you pays the bills it's yours. Not paid exclusivity. You made it and paid someone else to buid it.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 584d ago
SurgicalMenace591d ago

Forced to close my doors? Not at all, sir, I say the financial downturn coming by seeing the big corporations closing locations and followed suit. Took my company online, blind dropped my product, increased profits by 1465%, with little to no overhead. Was a very sound plan, to be sure. I'm 41, semi retired, and have the freedom to move as I please. Thanks to listening to men like Warren, Ramsey, and the like, who all pay their own way effortlessly in life.

Note: Let's say I did fail, sir. Gates failed. Bezo failed. Jobs failed...until they didn't.🤣 Winners are winners because we don't give up due to the presence of hurdles. Furthermore, you advocate using a $15 service to save money, are you one in a position to question the financial literacy of one who doesn't need nor support the service?🤔

Asplundh591d ago

Sigh. What did you lose it in... Meme stocks or crypto?

porkChop591d ago

You know what I find hilarious? Remember before GP, back when PS+ was the only subscription around? People would scream from the rooftops about how PS+ was such an incredible value, and how they otherwise would have had to pay full price for those games. When PS+ would get the occasional day one release people were ecstatic.

It's just so funny that the minute the competition offered a better service suddenly PS gamers didn't care about value or saving money anymore. Suddenly it was about how PS gamers actually pay for their own games, and how subscriptions were bad for gaming. It's so odd that PS gamers didn't care about any of that when PS offered the best subscription. What a coincidence.

SurgicalMenace591d ago

I would get your point if Sony wasn't still topping sales charts in spite of PS+ inception, so there were SOME celebrating the free aspect of PS+ while most were still just buying their games. GP is a lifeline, while PS+ is a choice, major difference.

porkChop591d ago

You can try to justify it however you like but hypocrisy is still hypocrisy regardless of who's doing it.

IamFrasierCrane591d ago

What’s hilarious is there was GWG (games with gold) before GP and PS+ was not the only subscription around. Get your facts straight.

shinoff2183591d ago (Edited 591d ago )

I don't think there's been many day one games on ps plus at all. Maybe 2

Might be wrong of course but even back then I don't think day one was around.

Iamfrasiercrane

Psnow was out before gamepass. Console wise it definitely was the first out. Unless you go back to sega TV

porkChop591d ago (Edited 591d ago )

@IamFrasierCrane

I'm talking about even before GWG. But still, even after GWG it still applies. GWG was never on the level of PS+ and we all know that. None of this matters though so good job missing the point and focusing on the least important part of what I said.

Knushwood Butt591d ago

I've been a Plus subscriber from day 1 in Japan and the first few years were really poor and no where near as good as what other regions were getting.

As of now I'm really happy with my Extra sub.

porkChop591d ago

@Knushwood

Yeah I remember the offerings would vary between regions. Though to be fair I remember Japan would sometimes get some great JRPGs that the others didn't.

FinalFantasyFanatic590d ago

@Shinoff2183,
I really can only think of that death racing game thing on PS5, that was free on release, but I cannot recall anything else, every game with that exception has been a year old or more before ending up on their. Plus it's two (now three games) a month, not 4 or 5 dozen games like gamepass.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 590d ago
georeo591d ago

Glad I just buy the games I just want to play and don’t get into the drama and business aspect of things. Fan boys be cringe as hell.

FPS_D3TH591d ago

With that logic I hope you don’t pay for Xbox live either, taco.

Godmars290591d ago

No. No we didn't.

Yes, SOME OF US saw the obvious, that Gamepass would effect sales as soon as it was announced, yet others defended it. Said it would only be good for gamers. Are very likely here defending it even after MS have admitted it.

Btw, I don't have have PS+. Don't currently even have a PS5. Given that will say PS+ isn't as bad because it doesn't offer major titles day one.

Nevermind that MS "major" titles are far and few between...

Drakul590d ago

Are you 5 years old? Do you really think that MS does not pay devs and pubs?!!!

ChasterMies590d ago

I haven’t bought any games since PS+ Launched. I did buy some DLC for Stellaris and one of my kids wanted Goat Simulator 3, but I’ll patiently work through backlog while I wait for more games to come to PS+.

frankiebeans584d ago

I LoVe sPeNdIng MoNeY I WoUlDeNt HavE tO bEaCuSe I pLayStAtIoN dErrr. being a fanboy is still a thing in 2023?

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 584d ago
lodossrage591d ago

When people on here try to say that very thing, they get called fanboys. But if Microsoft themselves say it internally how can anyone still argue?

I mean seriously, who would want to buy anything if you can just get it for pennies on the dollar? I'll just sit back and watch the usual suspects on this site try to twist, spin, and make excuses on this bit of news.

Outside_ofthe_Box591d ago (Edited 591d ago )

But Hi-Fi Rush!

Well this is coming from the horse's mouth so no more spinning or begging Sony to lose out on sales just because Microsoft does it themselves.

And it makes common sense anyway. There's is very little incentive to buy a game you've already played on a subscription.

Obscure_Observer591d ago

"But Hi-Fi Rush!"

Thanks to you guys, Hi-Fi Rush outperformed Forspoken in it´s debut week on Steam, making more revenue for Xbox Studios while costing less than half.

Everybody is happy!

lodossrage591d ago

@Obscure_Observer

Hi-Fi Rush was also INSTANTLY available when it was announced AND cost $29.99 whereas Forespoken costs $69.99.

Outside_ofthe_Box591d ago

"Hi-Fi Rush outperformed Forspoken in it´s debut week on Steam, making more revenue for Xbox Studios while costing less than half."
~Obscure_Observer

"Lol. I couldn´t care less about games sales."
~Also Obscure_Observer

Chevalier591d ago

@Observer

Way to Cherry pick there.

You want to talk about revenue? Playstation sold 11 million copies of GoW and that alone would 💯 absolutely crush everything Xbox releases this year and it won't even be close.

https://sea.ign.com/playsta...

Playstation did what $7.8 billion in revenue breaking the industry record when Xbox was literally down across the board in EVERY category Playstation was up across the board and up 53% over last year. Lol

Obscure_Observer591d ago (Edited 591d ago )

"Also Obscure_Observer"

Lol. I really don´t care. But if you guys are saving the industry with your hard earned money, who am I to complain? XD

@Chevalier

Calm yourself, dude. PS5 (so far) is doing better than Xbox series in sales. So it´s PS5 games. There´s no reason to deny it. ;)

RedDevils590d ago

"So far" what are you implying? That one day the SX will outsold the PS5? Stop live in denial. This maybe your last generation owning an Xbox. It will be soon be just a service if MS continue this trend.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 590d ago
Tacoboto591d ago

"Who would want to buy anything if you can just get it for pennies on the dollar?"

Honestly - the rare people that actually put their money where their mouth is on supporting developers who make quality content. A lot of the incentive to own is naturally gone, and it does provide discounts as a perk but there is no denying that unless a title is in that two-weeks-remaining list or you care about a single game more than renewing your sub, the only incentive is to vote with that wallet.

If you don't subscribe to the service and refuse to buy games just because they exist on the service, that's a whole separate discussion on Microsoft's awful marketing tying every-single-thing to Game Pass rather than letting the titles stand out on their own merits. "Play Redfall on Game Pass!" as opposed to "Play Redfall!"

lodossrage591d ago

Tacoboto

The problem with that is Microsoft has does EVERYTHING in their power to tell their customers to rent rather than own REGARDLESS of quality.

Most people are doing exactly what you say, refusing to buy games because it exist or will exist on the service, a service which you can still to this day get for $1.

Just look at the people on this site. ANYTIME Microsoft says a game is coming, what do people say, "I can't wait to play it on gamepass", " this is why I love gamepass", etc.

Half of the xbox fans on this site do the marketing free of charge for Microsoft.

So unfortunately, xbox gamers are speaking with their wallets. And what they're saying is they'd rather have their stuff on the cheap regardless of quality

Pocahontas591d ago ShowReplies(4)
XiNatsuDragnel591d ago

When Microsoft themselves said this cannibalizes sales you know ppl can't argue against this anymore imo but ppl will figure out a way.

zsquaresoff591d ago

Not shocking or surprising to anyone, apart from the diehard xbox fans.
Add another lie to the collection from Phil 'the lying snake' Spencer.

The Wood591d ago

Been calling him the sith lord for years

zaanan591d ago

Ehh, he’s not very snakelike… more like a weasel. Just look at those beady eyes. Phil “The Weasel” Spencer ;)

Show all comments (244)
350°

Microsoft Reportedly Spends $1 Billion Annually To Get Third-Party Games On Game Pass

Uncover the spending behind Xbox's Game Pass subscription. Discover how Microsoft invests a billion dollars annually in securing third-party games for the service.

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
Obscure_Observer2d ago

Good.

Now that you´re releasing games and making big money from every gaming platform, you should double that amount and give us even more day one third party games!

Jin_Sakai2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

You’re delusional beyond belief. Businesses wise it doesn’t make sense and sooner or later they’ll be raising prices again to cover that billion they’re blowing every year.

outsider16242d ago

Lucky for xbox that papa microsoft is rich.

purple1012d ago (Edited 2d ago )

As someone else said earlier today, they are past the growth stage, it’s been stagnent for last 3 years, they are now in the money making stage, prepare to be goosed for as many dollars as possible for the least amount of content. It may not be bad now, (actually it is) but it will be soon (even worse) this year you got hellblade and starfirld and a load of other games that could be bought in bargain bins for about $5-30 and for that you pay them monthly

To add I honestly don’t know how you put up with the barrage of Xbox negativity (which is deserved). I put it down to:

A) you are being paid
B) you may have a problem thinking clearly
C) prefer rooting for the underdog, that’s a legit thing too. English people do it by default

Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Yeah Aussies also love an underdog as long as that underdog isn't Xbox as they were too of the game with the 360 then lost their minds

Chevalier2d ago

3 straight years of missing Gamepass targets. Some people are just blinded by their own idiocy. Will be interesting to see if COD does anything this fall

CosmicTurtle2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

He is a troll. Designed to stoke people up on here. We know this.

It’s quite funny.

Popsicle2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Yet people still allow the troll to derail an entire topic. I don’t understand how moderation allows it.

I literally just skip the comment. This may be the best comment obscure ever made. I don’t know because I didn’t read it. I have read to many thread derailing post from this person to ever devote any time to reading another.

I wish everyone would ignore the trolls so we can have a genuine discussion. Stop feeding it and it will go away. Even just hitting the disagree button feeds it. Thats what it wants. This is the last post I will ever post about obscure because I am feeding them now.

Legit question to Mods. After such a long history of being a troll, how has this poster not been banned?

Profchaos1d 15h ago

Is he though or does he just blindly love Xbox in the same way Sega fans loved the Dreamcast even though it was clearly dead they thought it could be redeemed

Ok yeah he's saracstic and does troll but I enjoy seeing what he comes out with it would be boring here if we never had conflicting opinions

Sonic18812d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Are you insane? You want them to double the amount when the Xbox is already struggling and losing money 🤔

Hofstaderman2d ago

Correction....XBOX is already dead.

Obscure_Observer2d ago

"Are you insane? You want them to double the amount when the Xbox is already struggling and losing money"

As long we get the games I couldn´t care less about a trillion dollar company losing money. That´s their business to worry about. I only care about the games.

And "struggling and losing money"? Really?

"Microsoft reports Xbox’s revenue is up 61% in Q4 FY24 thanks to Activision"

https://venturebeat.com/gam...

61% more revenue and BO6 is not even out yet.

MS will make a sh!t ton of money with that game alone in all platforms. So 2 Billion yearly invested in their *core* business is nothing!

So yeah, I want them to double the investments on Gamepass. Period.

Sonic18812d ago (Edited 2d ago )

"So yeah, I want them to double the investments on Gamepass. Period."

That ain't going to happen. Just because you want it 😂

fr0sty2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

They'll do that, after creating 4 more higher-priced tiers and making the one that currently includes everything only contain games that have been on the market for 4 years.

"Gamepass Ultra to the MAX: Now only $299 per year!"

MrNinosan12h ago

Already $240/year, so we're there within a year, without new tiers.

jznrpg5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

It will be 29.99$ a month eventually 360 a year

Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

They are trying to get a return on abk and Bethesda they won't double day one we're lucky we are still getting them now that day one has been removed from base tiers

They want to make money not give it away

OlderGamer171d 22h ago

Sorry O_O, I tought you where loosing it, but i now come to the conclusion that you realy lost it.
The coping from you is not on a stellarr level....

Flakegriffin1d 15h ago (Edited 1d 15h ago )

Homie got 77 dislike and his brain rot will still help him think that he’s right.

1d 12h ago
+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5h ago
MrDead2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I like how they twist cannibalising game sales into "invests".

No lifetime sales with MS, they'll F-up gaming the same as streaming services have done to the movie industry and it's workforce.

Fishy Fingers2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Out of interest do you think those 3rd parties signing the deal are unhappy with the severence and have a gun to their head?

Bro probably has a PS+ sub and has library full of Epic launcher free games.

TheNamelessOne2d ago

lol

Pretty much. There's a lot of hate on this site for Gamepass, but put games on the different tiers of the PS subscription, and whenever they get that free day one release, it's an entirely different tune. No talk about how this choice is killing devs.

DarXyde2d ago

Do we think they're unhappy?

Umm...YES...?

They literally need to be paid up front to put games on the service. It's become a way to gain a foothold on the platform.

Do you think Atlus would launch on Game Pass otherwise?

MrDead1d 18h ago

"Out of interest do you think those 3rd parties signing the deal are unhappy with the severence and have a gun to their head?"

I think you mean severance... and I've noticed you don't know what it means either, MS aren't firing the third-parties they're purchasing from.

"Bro probably has a PS+ sub and has library full of Epic launcher free games."

I'm not a console gamer, but yes I do have Epic with a library full of free games... but guess what Epic rotating free games every week doesn't do. It doesn't destroy lifetime sales and cut workers out of residuals. Then you bring up PS+ a service that also doesn't destroy lifetime sales as their model allows for new releases to earn.

DivineHand1252d ago

There are pros and cons to everything. Streaming services like Netflix is no different than cable tv except it is on demand. Services like Netflix has made it so that more studios can get a share in the profit where they can reach more consumers worldwide compared to the old days where the masses will only watch a few new titles per month.

The only negative about streaming services is that it no longer makes any sense to sell DVDs and Blu-rays though it can be argued that those persons may have moved on to building digital libraries for the sake of convenience.

The reason Xbox is doing so poorly is because they are not doing enough to be competitive. Their output of AA and AAA exclusive titles are extremely low compared to the competition and they haven't had a game of the year nominee in years.

Releasing their games the same date on PC is also hurting their console and it would have been more strategic for them to delay those releases by a year similar to what Sony does to maximize profits.

Gamepass alone is not to blame for Xbox's current position because it can be argued that if the service didn't exist and they had the same gaming output as they have now, they would be in an even worst spot.

MrDead1d 19h ago

"Streaming services like Netflix is no different than cable tv except it is on demand."

It's nothing like cable. My comment isn't a guess lifetime sale of films has shrunk to a point it's almost gone and so has the revenue it generated, that is money from competing TV networks, cable/satellite and physical media sales.

Lack of revenue transparency with streaming has meant workers job security and pay has massively diminished, earnings from residuals is almost gone for example the writer for Squid Games because of streaming gets no royalties despite series earning $900 million for Netflix, before streaming he would have royalties form lifetime sales.
Or another example Willow the series was pulled and is no longer watchable here's why: “Willow” was one of nearly 50 titles that Disney+ pulled from its streaming library in May. Other titles included the series “The Mysterious Benedict Society” and the feature film “The One and Only Ivan.” Disney CFO Christine McCarthy explained that Disney was expecting to take a write-down in the June quarter of $1.5 billion-$1.8 billion by removing content from its streaming platforms. By writing down the value of the content assets, Disney can remove that from its balance sheet and reduce its tax bill." Also when you pull a show you no longer need to pay residuals to the workers.

Have you also noticed the drop in quality on sfx or thought some older films look so much better then they do now? This is because the industry now relies on cheap labour for sfx outsourcing abroad, more green screen instead of location shooting and a lot less real extras bring life to a scene.

Streaming in gaming is going to be far worse as we've seen with MS consolidating a massive part of the industry to try and make the service sustainable, lifetime sales being cannibalised by gamespass and a work force that has no unions like SAG is already paying the price.

All streaming does is remove income transparency, cuts the workers from the money and sets flat rates and removes consumer ownership... but CEO's and shareholders will still be ok as they benefit from the industry consolidation.

Huey_My_D_Long1d 15h ago

MrDead is absolutely on fire with the post.

Nothing else I have to add other than that.

DivineHand1251d 15h ago

@MrDead like I said pros and cons. Some of those issues can alleviated with alleviated with regulatory intervention to give more transparency to the industry but unlikely anytime soon with all the lobbying going on.

The issue with the squid game's writer can be attributed to the terms and conditions he agreed to. It happens often in business as no one really knows how popular something will be until you catch that lightning in a bottle. I remember reading about how Nintendo hardly made anything off Pokemon Go dispite Niantic making Billions.

I don't blame streaming services for studios finding was to reduce the cost of making films. That stuff would have happened regardless because of the greed of these corporations. We see that same cost reduction happening in every industry from food to Aerospace.

shadowT2d ago ShowReplies(2)
CrimsonGuardVII2d ago

@badz148 its not, it just straight lied.

gold_drake2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

we know this, we have known this since last year.

this is not new or news.

Show all comments (73)
260°

Filing Lawsuit for Infringement of Patent Rights against Pocketpair, Inc.

Nintendo and Pokemon Company have filed a lawsuit against Pocketpair Inc., the creators of Palworld, in Tokyo, Japan.

Read Full Story >>
nintendo.co.jp
Number1TailzFan4d ago

Ye, Custom Robo Arena was a lot better than Pokemon anyways, now that's a game.

Eonjay3d ago

Interestingly this comes like a day after they announced they would be at the Tokyo Games Show.

Vits3d ago

We should all really hope so. Otherwise, this could lead to many issues, as they hold patents on numerous game mechanics. And when I say numerous, I truly mean it. Take this one, for example:

"Abstract: In an example of a game program, a ground boarding target object or an air boarding target object is selected by a selection operation, and a player character is caused to board the selected boarding target object. If the player character aboard the air boarding target object moves toward the ground, the player character is automatically changed to the state where the player character is aboard the ground boarding target object, and brought into the state where the player character can move on the ground."

In plain English, do you guys remember that super amazing mechanic where you surf on the water with a Pokémon, and then when you hit land, it changes to you walking? Yeah, they patented that.

3d ago
porkChop4d ago

A patent lawsuit? What Pokémon-related patent could Palworld even be infringing that other similar games haven't? This makes no sense. Feels like Nintendo just trying to throw its weight around to bully competitors, just like they do with emulators even though they're legal.

Kaii4d ago

They can't Innovate their own IP, but when others are breaking the ceiling, they run to the courts, gtfo Nintendo/Gamefreak.

Companies' gatekeeping mechanics behind the patent system to stifle innovation, consumers will always pick the better product, it's not the consumer's fault that Gamefreak has sat on their lazy assess for years.

Kornholic3d ago

"Consumers will always pick the better product"

Since when?

swedishMeatwad3d ago

You can't argue with _subjective_ taste. Some people are going to like games you find crappy. I'm happy not everyone has the same taste.

Kornholic3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

@swedishMeatwad

PS5 Pro is obviously objectively the better product when compared to the base PS5, but the majority of consumers interested in a PS5 will not be picking Pro over base PS5.

There are countless examples like this out there.

The_Blue3d ago

Rather you like it or not COD has many accessible options and customization that allows for better experience than most other FPS.

Knightofelemia4d ago

The Palworld has been out since January of 2024 and now Nintendo finally decides to do something. I fail to see how Palworld is like Pokemon besides evolving monsters. There are other games out there as well where you can capture and level up monsters. Tales of Symphonia 2 does that capture monsters and have them fight with you and they evolve when levelling up. The two games might share some similarities but what game doesn't borrow from another game. I could understand if Palworld was just a straight on copy clone of Pokemon but it's not. Nintendo is starting to become a pain in the ass. Going full gung ho with rom sites that I can see, purposely taking down pictures from a strategy guide for Mario 64 the strategy guide never came to North America and Nintendo had the pictures taken down. Where does it every stop with Nintendo?

babadivad3d ago

Monsters don't evolve in Palworld

Software_Lover3d ago

It's because Palworld became a worldwide viral success. Nintendo can't fathom someone else being that popular when it comes to a small monster catching game.

VersusDMC3d ago

Nintendo is only acting now because they just finished a lawsuit which they won.

https://www.nintendolife.co...

Atlus should get on this and sue Nintendo as SMT came out before Pokemon. If Nintendo is going to play this game.

isarai3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

This feels like a scare tactic more than anything else. There's nothing here dozens of other games haven't already done, they're just mad this game showed people how much the pokemon series has been slackin and are desperately trying to make an example out of them.

How's about instead of spending all that money on court fees and lawyers you invest it into making pokémon better?

Profchaos3d ago

I think if it was a scare tactic it would have happened when the game came out I have a feeling they've been building a case for a while

isarai3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

It did happen even before the game came out, they tried several tomes before and nothing came of it

Profchaos3d ago

I was pretty sure the only statement they made was they would investigate

Show all comments (29)
180°

The 'Steam Deck 2' seems a lot more promising with Ryzen Z2 chips announced

The 'Steam Deck 2.0' needs to make use of the AMD Ryzen Z2 chips if it wants a fighting chance against the competition.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
TheNamelessOne4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

I think when the next wave of these handhelds release I'll see what's available and finally grab one. The handheld aspect is nice, but I really just need something small to take with me when traveling. Been using my Series S, which has been good, but it would be nice having my PC library on the go.

Yui_Suzumiya4d ago

Steam Deck OLED is the best gaming device I've owned in 35 years. Give it a chance and you might be quite happy.

Tapani4d ago

I appreciate it is a great device, but simply not enough to run the games I play. I’m also going to wait for a Z2E or Z3E OLED version of Steam Deck before jumping in.

I want to run games at medium/optimized settings at 60fps for 3hrs+, and we are not there yet.

redrum063d ago

Tbh, I mostly play on my Steam Deck OLED since I got it, leaving my Series X in the dust. There's something really enjoyable about handheld gaming, and the speakers and screen are amazing on this device, despite it being 800p.

3d ago
RiseNShine4d ago

I have the Rogue Ally and miss the Steam Deck, i love the extra power of the Ally but i am sooo tired of a million issues with windows and games, i miss the simplicity of SD, you launch a game and it works as long as it's supported, period, Valve really turned PC gaming in a console experience, so SD 2 is day one for me.

redrum063d ago

Had the Steam Deck OLED, sold it for a Legion Go, then sold the Legion Go to get a Steam Deck OLED again. SteamOS is so much better than Windows.

3d ago
UltimateOwnage4d ago

Deck doesn't need a "fighting chance". Specs have never won in the grant scheme of things. Value has, and the Deck has significant value and usability advantages over its so called "superior" competitors. Ask Nintendo how being in 1st place in sales in the next gen race with last gen handheld hardware works.

redrum063d ago

Nintendo has good exclusive first party titles to compete with the rest, so that's not quite a fair comparison

__SteakDeck__3d ago

@redrum06 But Valve has their own killer app, and that’s Steam.

Vits3d ago

Ask Nintendo how much that helped them with the Gamecube and the Wii U. Exclusives alone aren't really anything, they are just one factor in what makes a devie provide value.

3d ago
Kosic3d ago

The steam deck has been my go to device since I got it.
I've tried an Ally and LeGo, both are decent handhelds, but I prefer the design of the deck with steam OS and window boot.

If they release a Deck 2 with a big enough upgrade. I'd definitely get one of those.

3d ago
kryteris3d ago

it would be rad if they used the same board layout and cooling allowing previous owners to upgrade.