850°

Phil Spencer Hints at Xbox Console, Game Pass Price Increase

Xbox boss Phil Spencer has hinted that Xbox console and even Game Pass memberships will be seeing price hikes, stating that they will have to increase "at some point."

Orchard973d ago

They will obviously increase the price of games (and probably gamepass) at some point in the generation, yes. But the main thing is they aren't right now, and the prices are staying as is for the holiday season - not screwing consumers during an economic downturn is a good thing.

I think $20/mo would be my upper limit for GPU.

sparky77973d ago

Exactly MS confirmed Game Pass is already profitable so they don't need to nickel and dime their users.

My guess when they get rid of Gold there will be a pricing change.

Orchard973d ago

Yep, and they confirmed GP is profitable today - it accounts for about 15% of Xbox revenue.

https://www.vgchartz.com/ar...

sinspirit973d ago

For how big the subscriber population is. It has already been stated that the service itself can't be making much, if anything, by itself, and that day 1 releases easily make it a loss. GamePass itself is only barely profitable at such a massive size. As soon as you throw day 1 releases into the mix, it obviously causes losses overall, but that doesn't make GamePass itself not profitable. We already knew that GamePass would be raising the price soon enough when games finally come.

Also, GamePass has been slow for a while. It's not spending much currently on itself compared to before so that's where it becomes easier to call it profitable while it has taken a break. Conveniently, they are talking about raising the price just before the year that GamePass should finally get some day 1 releases. Surprise surprise.

Also, I was curious about the wording I've been able to find. I keep finding it split up or punctuated in a way that could also have meant that he said services including GamePass was profitable, but not GamePass specifically. If anyone finds a video or uncut quote let me know. Tried to search but no good results just yet

973d ago
talocaca973d ago

When exactly did they say it was profitable? They announced 3 billion in REVENUE. That is before all their expenses (that are likely much higher than that between servers, marketing, deals with developers, etc.)

They have never been particularly transparent about the finances of their gaming division.

EvertonFC973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

Hate to break it to you but GP is bleeding money. What MS confirmed was revenue from GP sales that didn't include any losses from aquired GP games paid to Devs/pubs, neither did include making a 150m game like "starfield" or ES6 150m which wont see any return in profits or very little cause gamers will play it with a £1 sub.
Analysts have already said GP will need somewhere between 50/100m to be profitable once you've paid all the Devs/pubs deals off.

Orchard973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

@sinspirit They make about 3bn dollars a year from GP, and have confirmed that it is profitable. See below for source.

@talocaca They confirmed it today in an interview with Wall Street Journal (WSJ), Link is in my comment above and I've copied it below too: https://www.vgchartz.com/ar...

"Game Pass as an overall part of our content and services revenue is probably 15 percent I don’t think it gets bigger than that,"
Spencer added, "I think it will stay in that 10-15 percent of our overall revenue, and it's profitable for us."

@EvertonFC So we should trust you over Phil Spencer & Microsoft? They have access to the financials and run the business - what're your credentials?

Can't be bleeding money if it's profitable and generating 3bn dollars revenue.

Christopher973d ago

***Yep, and they confirmed GP is profitable today - it accounts for about 15% of Xbox revenue.***

Those are two different meanings of profitable being used there and you're falling for it. Everything there was about revenue that involved numbers, but it being "profitable to us" doesn't mean making a profit, but that it is beneficial to them. If it was making a profit, they would say that, but they didn't, they said profitable to us.

tay8701973d ago

@orchard. that is revenue, not profit. after you factor in all the money they have to shell out to get 3rd party agreements, pay all of internal studios staff for making the games, marketing and factor in all the money they lost by putting things on day 1 game pass, they will be very fortunate to turn a small profit. plus if they do manage to aquire activision, it will probably take them close to decade to recoup that 70 billion dollars.

neutralgamer1992973d ago

Profitable man find the difference between profit and revenue. I have 3 years of membership signed up

Netflix launched a while ago and only became profitable in 2020-2021

Right now Ms are paying for games day one on GP but once they start to release their AAA Blockbusters on GP they will be cutting down their profits because AAA games cost 60-75 million on average

$20 a month is $240 trust me won't go over well. That's why companies raise prices by few dollars at a time. Remember when Ms tried to raise price on Gold

I rather take the Sony approach and take the early backlash but in the long run things are more straightforward. Many Xbox fans were bad mouthing Sony but if x box follows and raised the prices it won't be a good look

That's why business and Twitter PR has to be separated

1Victor973d ago

I guessing every Xbox user forgot about the last attempt to raise prices without games and bows the perfect time to do so with everyone distracted by the ABK acquisition.
Right now Microsoft have two paths
The acquisition goes through Microsoft win the price will be higher and make more “profit” towards filling up that 70+ billions hole.

The acquisition fails the price is higher more “profit” to move on and try to acquire more studios.
In the end Microsoft win our lost🤷🏿

darkrider973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

Profitable.... Something that does 2.9 billions of revenue isn't profitable. Not even close. Some still don't understand that revenue isn't profit...

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 973d ago
SierraGuy973d ago

Hypocrite extraordinaire you are.

Orchard973d ago

Nothing hypocritical in my comment at all.

973d ago
SullysCigar973d ago

Tbf, Orchard, he didn't actually say your comment was hypocritical.

He said you are.

Bathyj973d ago

So you're implying anyone who has raised pricing is simply screwing customers, but when Microsoft eventually do it they obviously had to, even though I'm constantly reminded they have all the money in the world?

Plus I hope you realise the two different situations at the two companies. If PlayStation doesn't make money Sony would probably fold. If Xbox doesn't make money and it doesn't it will just be a blip on Microsoft quarterly earnings.

Plus you were probably up in arms knowing your history when Sony raise the prices of games by 16% but apparently you're happy to pay a 42% increase for getting gamepass

Orchard973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

As a consumer, yes, increasing prices is screwing us. It was screwing us when Sony did it with games and the console, and it will be screwing us if/when Microsoft does it for their consoles and games too. Even worse is doing it during the current economic situation though.

Sony wouldn't go bankrupt if PS financials dropped, they didn't go bankrupt during the PS3 era either. Lets not pretend Sony are a small startup - they are a huge corporation that makes good money off of cameras, displays, sensors, movies, music, etc.

I do see GP as good value yes, for $10/mo or $15/mo (depending on your platform of choice) you can get access to all 1st party games, including Zenimax and soon Activision, as well as EA Play and XBL gold.

Hofstaderman973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

@Orchard what do you mean Sony didn’t go bankrupt in the PS3 era? As I recall the PS3 went on to outsell the XBOX 360 and took second place during that generation after the Wii. Even at their worst and Microsoft at their best Sony has kicked their direct competitor’s backside.

Orchard973d ago

@Hofstader I meant exactly what I said - they did not go bankrupt during the PS3, because they are a big corporation with their finger in many pots. To make out that Sony is some small startup that only has revenue from PS is laughable.

shinoff2183973d ago

Orchard. What your doing now is moving the goalposts. Now its alright to do it but dont do it during a bad economy lol. You guys lol

rlow1973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

Sony brought in over in almost 7 billion net as of June 30th 2022 but their game division was down from 2021. The point is they can afford not to raise prices if they had wanted to. But they know people will pay for it.

As for Sony going the way of the dodo is very narrow sighted. Yes, they would take a hit if they hadn’t raised prices, but they make money on everything from movies, music to sensors, television, cameras and the like. My other point is they are a very well to do company with assets in excess of 250 billion dollars.
So this Narrative that Sony is somehow in danger of failing because they didn’t raise prices is ridiculous. They did it because they can and instead of cutting into profits they banked on their strong position in gaming to raise prices.
Nothing wrong with that at all, because that’s business. But don’t think because MS is a two trillion dollar business that they can throw money around. You don’t get that big by wasting money. Plus just like Sony they have many projects and products outside of gaming.

Both these companies are big enough to handle anything that comes their way.

EvertonFC973d ago

You forgot the amount of money/electricity Xbox uses in standby mode

CaptainHenry916973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

"You forgot the amount of money/electricity Xbox uses in standby mode"

It doesn't have WiFi 6 either 🤔

SurgicalMenace973d ago

Raising prices is not screwing the customer as any financially literate person knows what's affordable for them or not. What we have with this mentality is the notion that you're supposed to be entitled to anything available no matter what. Games are a luxury that don't have to be afforded and with so many alternative options to play there's no need to go on a witch hunt for any company prioritizing their well-being. Prices need to be raised as they have been throughout history no matter who wants to accept it or not.

973d ago
+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 973d ago
tay8701973d ago

lmao all the people who bagged on sony are going to look like fools. even a 2 trillion dollar company is going to have to raise their prices. you will see an increase in console prices, game prices and subsciption prices, the hat trick. im sure there will be crickets from many xbots when this happens, conveniently forgetting how they predicted the end of sony for increasing its price on the ps5.

EvertonFC973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

I think it has something to do with Xbox gamers love sucking Phil Spencer's di*k pmsl.
What's worse like you said "2 trillion dollar company" but with hardly no AAA games for 2 years of this generation yet price increases.
At least we've had ratchet, Spiderman MM, sackboy, GoW, GT7, oddworld soulstorm, destruction all stars(meh) returnal, stray,demon souls remake, godfall, astrobot, tlou remake,HFW and kena with our price hikes.

Relientk77973d ago

Funny how you criticized Sony for increasing PS5 prices 2 months ago, but now that Phil Spencer is talking about it, you are totally ok with Xbox doing it. Lol

Orchard973d ago

Where did I say that? Please show me.

jznrpg973d ago

They could come and burn his house down and he would say thanks ! I love it

Mr_Writer85973d ago

@orchad

Here

"But the main thing is they aren't right now, and the prices are staying as is for the holiday season - not screwing consumers during an economic downturn is a good thing."

You at no point say increasing the price is bad, and even try making up a false narrative.

That is defending a potential price hike.

Chevalier972d ago

Ouch Orchard backpeddling like mad with all these built in excuses and the goalpost moving as well. Should be a politician with the amount of flip flopping going on. Really sad to see someone fight so hard that these price increases are gouging and when the shoes on the other foot its just a natural consequence of what's going on in the world. Not believable at all! The word hypocrisy comes to mind. Shown all the proof in their own statements and can't even keep their own 'facts' straight. Simping for a trillion dollar company that could eat the cost easily, but, preparing everyone for price hikes all to gouge. If that price of Gold had gone through and doubled I bet you'd be here explaining how it was awesome for fans to just pay more to get ultimate instead of how it's bad for consumers. Where's your consumer rant now Orchard?!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 972d ago
RauLeCreuset973d ago

"They will obviously increase the price..."

Obviously? Obviously?! Oh, okay. Now that Xbox may do it, it's "obviously." A foregone conclusion. The logical outcome. No need to hyperventilate about how anti-consumer it is and using it to push the anti-consumer narrative as hard as you can. Nope. It's Xbox, so it's "obviously" instead.

"But the main thing is they aren't right now, and the prices are staying as is for the holiday season - not screwing consumers during an economic downturn is a good thing."

Is that the main thing or the narrative you need us to focus on instead? Because dropping hints of a coming price increase that signal to worried consumers to grab one at the current price during the holidays is so pro-consumer and not at all about using a potential price increase to scare up some extra holiday sales. You better hope the economy is in good shape at the time if they do a price increase.

EvertonFC973d ago

Well this global economy ain't sorting itself out anytime soon with Ukraine and Russia added to the mix, So this poor economy is here to stay for a good 2 years.
I think people are expecting everything to return to normal after winter but that ain't happening.

973d ago
CaptainHenry916973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

Like I said it would. I say $25-$30 dollars for gamepass mark my words. $20 for PC probably

SullysCigar973d ago

Well, you heard it here first, folks!

The economic downturn will be over after the holiday season! Also, Xbox will do a good thing by kindly coinciding their price increases so as not to screw consumers - so says Orchard and his crystal ball.

Thanks Phil !

EvertonFC973d ago

Lol, "orchard" thinks everything is going to be all rosy after winter pmsl, were in this economy downturn, energy crisis, cost of living crisis add Russia and Ukraine to the mix for at least another 2 years.
It'll be even worse if Putin decides to drop a few tactical nukes.

potedude973d ago

They've gotta pay for their billion dollar acquisitions somehow.

EvertonFC973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

So you shit on playstation for doing it and forcing gamers to pay £70 yet when MS will do it;

"obviously increase the price of games (and probably gamepass) at some point in the generation, yes. But the main thing is they aren't right now, and the prices are staying as is for the holiday season - not screwing consumers during an economic downturn is a good thing"

You do realise this cost of living crisis and economy downturn, energy crisis is here to stay for about another 2 years don't you ? So I'm 110% sure the increase will happen during the economy downturn pmsl.

Outside_ofthe_Box973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

The hypocrisy is wild. Finally showing your true colors out in the open.

Didn't have that on my bingo card today.

MrNinosan973d ago

He does a couple of times everyday. Nothing new.

Lightning77973d ago

I already said that gamepass will increase in the future. There's no way they'll put there big AAA stuff on the service without some sort of price increase.

That's guaranteed to happen.

darkrider973d ago

Of course. With even more studios making ttriple A games that cost 200, 300, more marketing cost that sometimes cost 50 80 millions with worldwide campaign....

By buying Activision and getting even more triple A games.... Microsoft will need to have a big increases on price of gp and have 200 millions subcribers....

Mr_Writer85973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

@orchard

"Even worse is doing it during the current economic situation though."

Why? Why is when they do it a problem? I mean correct me if I am wrong, but a PS5 and games etc are a luxury item which you would only purchase if you have the money no?

So unless you deem owning a playstation and games on the same level as food, clothes and energy I don't get how a price increase either now or further down the line is any different?

Chevalier972d ago

Nah apparently Orchard thinks luxury products are the same as necessities. Just a huge hypocrite. Just look at all the backpeddling everyone has been doing. Like oh with all these AAA games coming to the service it was bound to happen.... uh no the trillion company would be smart to actually eat the cost to increase subscriber numbers to balance it out. They're choosing not to. Remember when everyone said no way they increase the price..... really?! When everyone reminded them this is the same company that boldly tried to double the price of Gold?! But still people were adamant. Well here they are literally conditioning subscribers to be ready for price increases. Watch them do it right after announcing some 'must have' games at E3 next year just in time for their next fall releases to come. You know why they're going to do it? Because they couldn't when they didn't have any regular AAA content. As they get more regular AAA games expect regular price increases.

Mr_Writer85972d ago

@Chevalier

Tbf Microsoft are a Trillion company, but the Xbox division is not.

And trillion $ companies don't become so by eating costs.

Phil has to probably run Xbox as if it's mostly it's own thing. I can't imagine other executives would be pleased if Spencer kept getting handouts and bailouts from their divisions profits.

Xbox is making money, but obviously the bank of MS is telling them they have to make more.

MrVux000973d ago

Gamepass will eventually see a price hike.

Nacho_Z973d ago

Whoah Orchard your Microsoft is out and we can all see it.

This was a fun read. It always seemed inevitable to me that prices would go up seeing as they've already tried it with Gold and they're spending vast sums.

darkrider973d ago

Microsoft doesn't care about players... It always was a shady company. Of course here the damage control brigade its tryng to spin this.... Trillion dollar company needs more money....

TheEroica973d ago

So many down votes for such a rational comment... Nonetheless, your sentiment is absolutely correct. This is a conversation about value assessment... Each gamer should ask themselves, "am I getting value from my subscription?" if so then it's a fantastic deal! If the price outweighs the value then the gamer gets to make the choice to end the subscription. Everyone already knew GP prices would increase. Now you simply assess the value and move on.

Also, I'd bet the farm the majority of those down votes are from the same people who defend Sony charging 70 bucks for a game, so don't take it to heart. Gamers are weird.

Outside_ofthe_Box973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

No one is taking issue with the "rationality" of it. It's the hypocrisy. Just as you did it yourself here.

You bring up people "defending" $70 games as if you have an issue with it even though there are rational reasons and the same "value assessment" applies to it as well. But when it comes to MS eventually increasing the price on any of their products, it's no longer "anti-consumer" or bad/evil, just something that is inevitable or natural and if you don't like it just "assess the value and move on." Also keep in mind that Phil literally a month back said there were no plans to increase anything just to turnaround and day this. . . .

Yeah people like you and orchard are weird indeed. Bash Sony, but turnaround and be rational for MS for the same exact thing.

Mr_Writer85972d ago

@TheErocia

£70 games isn't really an issue as A) It's a launch price and B) Unlike a certain other Japanese gaming company Sony don't keep the price that high.

Example. Two first party games launched November 2020.

Demon's Soul remake PS5
Launch Price £69.99
You can get on Amazon now for £40
Cex second hand £22
Has been on sale on PSN 11 with £39.99 being the lowest price

Hyrule Warriors Age of Calamity
Launch Price £49.99
Amazon current price £48.99
Cex £35
Has been on sale twice on the eshop £32.99 being its lowest price.

How much do you want to bet that by November 2023 Demon's Souls will be £20 maybe even less, and Hyrule will still be £30+

All the £70 increase means is you just wait longer for a game you want.

I am very picky with my games, and the £70 launch price just makes me even picker, Infact other than GOW Ragnarok I can't name a single game that I will justify buying at launch.

RauLeCreuset973d ago

Compare and contrast Orchard making sure to post the first comment to tell us there was obviously going to be an increase and to spin a narrative about how it's not screwing consumers during an economic downturn to Orchard's response to Sony's price hike:

"Outrageous - no one else is increasing the price of their console and Sony could obviously afford to not do this.

"Also no price increase in the US, of course, it’s the only western region where they’re getting pressure from Xbox.

"This generation is For The Payers."

https://n4g.com/comments/re...

"Also they chose Gamescom week to announce this… PlayStation under Jim Ryan is so out of touch with gamers."

https://n4g.com/comments/re...

The first word in response to Sony was "outrageous." First word. The game is obvious and should be addressed for what it is. Why keep refusing to see the pattern in order to pretend these comments are being made in good faith?

roadkillers972d ago

Right now I’m paying $181 for 3 years of GPU. Going to get that $181 for 3 years again when I run out in March. Currently paying $5.02 monthly for Gamepass Ultimate. I will pay at most $10 a month for Gamepass.

The reasoning is that I have only spent $60 this year for Elden Ring… 80hrs and still haven’t beaten. Once I do, I’ll grab another $60 or on sale game that will last me the year. I understand the amount of games, but I honestly don’t have the time for more than $10 a month.

+ Show (18) more repliesLast reply 972d ago
italiangamer973d ago

Now magically all the people that went against Sony will be okay with ms doing it. Bunch of sheeple.

crazyCoconuts973d ago

Or respond to your gross oversimplification of human behavior with one word responses like "Facts"

VenomUK973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

For the record here's the story on N4G about the PS5 price rise. It's interesting to compare and contrast people's responses between that and the possible Xbox price rise.

https://n4g.com/news/250103...

An N4G user called Orchard wrote: "Outrageous - no one else is increasing the price of their console and Sony could obviously afford to not do this. Also no price increase in the US, of course, it’s the only western region where they’re getting pressure from Xbox.

This generation is For The Payers."

crazyCoconuts973d ago

That's one person. I don't think we should generalize across a population of people without data, that's all

Jin_Sakai973d ago

Let’s result to name calling. And who said it was ok?

Tacoboto973d ago

Raising the base MSRP of two year old hardware is never ok for the consumer.

But I'm sure as an entity that likes money, Sony increasing the price and seeing unit sales continue to increase is irresistible to follow up on for even the least experienced accountant at Microsoft.

RauLeCreuset973d ago

Wasn't it Microsoft that claimed Sony raised the price because of their unshakeable place atop the market? Can't argue Microsoft is just following the leader while they're arguing the leader is in a unique position to do it because they don't fear competition.

Tacoboto973d ago

You guys have an incredible lack of depth in your thinking, it's astounding.

CaptainHenry916973d ago

Sony didn't increase the Price in the US though. Microsoft will be increasing the price worldwide including the US

CS7973d ago

@Tacoboto

I’m a Sony guy through and through and the delusion in the thinking here really baffles me.

RauLeCreuset973d ago

Tacoboto and CS7

Somehow I doubt I would receive the same leeway to respond to your insults in kind, so I'm just going to leave this here for you deep thinkers to digest and consider as it relates to the suggestion that Microsoft couldn't resist following Sony's lead.

Microsoft arguing to the CMA reviewing the Activision acquisition that Sony's price increase is reflective of its market power and ability to do so without fear of losing market share, while stating it confirmed no plans to increase the price of Xbox.

"Sony engages in conduct today which is reflective of its market power in console gaming, including increasing prices of its consoles without fear of losing market share."

"Sony announced an increase in the price of PlayStation consoles in the UK and other countries in August 2022 ('PS5 price to increase in select markets due to global economic environment, including high inflation rates', 25 August 2022, link available here). Microsoft confirmed that it does not have plans to increase prices of Xbox consoles (link available here)."

https://assets.publishing.s...

RauLeCreuset973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

Self-proclaimed "Sony guy through and through" CS7 when the PS5 price increase was announced for certain markets:

"LOL! The warnings were there all along! But no one would listen.

“'ThEy CaN cHaRgE wHat ThEy wAnT!1!!1'

"Look the results now."

https://n4g.com/comments/re...

Self-proclaimed "Sony guy through and through" CS7 had 10 comments attacking Sony out of the 11 comments that immediately preceded the one quoted above collapsed as inappropriate. What was that about delusion? Okay.

Be real, people. Just be real. Don't try to lend your agenda a false sense of legitimacy by proclaiming to be a Sony guy through and through. It's so easy to spot. It's been tried before.

Edit: What did self-proclaimed "Sony guy through and through" CS7 have to say about Xbox hinting at price increases?

Nothing. Crickets. Only that he's a "Sony guy through and through" and baffled by our delusional thinking.

Our delusional thinking. That's rich.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 973d ago
Jericho1337973d ago

Who is going to be ‘ok’ about this?? Doesn’t matter which side of the fence you sit on, as a consumer price hikes suck. Selfishly hoping it’s for consoles instead of games or gamepass, although a price hike of the latter is probably a long time coming.

Outside_ofthe_Box973d ago

"although a price hike of the latter is probably a long time coming."

Sounds familiar.

gangsta_red973d ago

Who said it was okay? And when did MS increase the prices?

Chevalier972d ago

They're conditioning everyone right now what the heck do you even read?! They don't want this shock and negative reaction like when they sprung doubling Gold so suddenly so they're already preparing everyone for the eventual price increase. Why else do you think he's even being quoted this in an interview? Forget leaving a trail of crumbs does he need to throw the crumbs directly at your face to see? Probably wouldn't work anyways if you got blinders on.

gangsta_red972d ago (Edited 972d ago )

@Chevalier

Answer the question, who said it was okay?

All of you are so quick to point out hypocrisy without acknowledging your own. Where are the excuses like a good number here did for Sony?

A GP price raise was inevitable, this has been discussed since it's inception. Consoles is another story and absolutely no one has said it was okay... besides the many on this site that made excuses for it happening for Playstation.

So I have to laugh at you and others jumping the gun at being upset at something that hasn't taken place at all.

Outside_ofthe_Box972d ago

Nobody is jumping the gun at anything. People are pointing out that the same people that cried anti-consumer and greedy at Sony when they increased their price are all of a sudden a lot more rational at Microsoft's statement. Literally people said that MS would follow suit so nobody is bashing MS for it, just pointing out that the diehards that attacked Sony are coming out with reasonable responses when they weren't doing that for Sony and called people that "defended" Sony as blind fanboys supporting an anti consumer company.

gangsta_red972d ago (Edited 972d ago )

@outside the box

"Nobody is jumping the gun at anything."

*reads comments * You're kidding right?

MS hasn't raised the prices on anything and the majority of these comments are already calling for the heads of others who commented on Sony when they actually did raise the price of their console. Do you not even see the difference? You asking for outrage on something that Phil may do somewhere after the holidays.

"People are pointing out that the same people that cried anti-consumer and greedy at Sony when they increased their price are all of a sudden a lot more rational at Microsoft's statement"

Who? I keep asking this question and I'm not getting any answers on who are these people that are leaving rational answers, because from this site alone there were a lot more rational comments left in the articles when Sony raised their prices. So it's funny to now read the comments of "oooh, now it's okay" when it was these so called "defenders" that set the narrative of it being fine in the first place.

Nobody should want the price of old hardware to be raised, whether it's Xbox or PS.

Chevalier972d ago (Edited 972d ago )

Who is okay? You being a hypocrite.

"A GP price raise was inevitable, this has been discussed since it's inception"

This is you being 'okay' with rising prices. So don't talk about hypocrisy. It's NOT inevitable nor has it ever been discussed since inception. A company worth almost $2 trillion was subsidizing garmepass all along and could easily keep doing it to increase their subscriber base. They're choosing NOT to.

Also speaking of excuses. Xbox raised their prices first in India before Playstation did.

"MS hasn't raised the prices on anything"

It inevitable though. This isn't some nobody being quoted it's Spencer. So regardless of your making excuses for them doesn't change that it will happen.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 972d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 972d ago
isarai973d ago

Like i said when sony did it, it sucks but not really much of a choice given the many factors affecting production and logistics of the hardware.

blackblades973d ago

Yeah, it also sucks that Sony got flacked for it and now everyone is ok with it when MS does it. Sony was the one that came out and told why they doing it, then ms said some shh about it then now they came out saying they doing the same.

Lightning77973d ago

If MS raises the price of the X in 2023. I'm definitely saying something. I'm pretty hard on MS. I'm complained when they raise the prices I've a said they need a release date for Redfall from the recent trailer. I don't play numbers I play games when they announced their financial earnings. If it's a a Gamepass increase. I already saw that coming from miles away. Once they start having a steady stream of exclusives hitting the service best believe the police will shoot up. 20 to maybe 25 a month.

There's no backlash now because MS hasn't raised anything yet.

Chevalier972d ago

@Lightning

Lol. Yeah your so hard on Xbox like you are on Playstation. What a hypocrite. Barely saying much is 'saying something '.

shadowT973d ago

Let see what price hike on Game Pass or Xbox Series X/S we will get.

excaliburps973d ago

Maybe 50 per consoles and for Game Pass, a $1-3? I doubt they'd hike it to $5 since that's way too big.

LabRat973d ago

It is 14.99 for Ultimate right now, I could easily see them raising it to 19.99. If they do that though, they better be putting up some great games, cause as it stands now some months are pretty bad in terms of content.

973d ago
EvertonFC973d ago

You can only do the £1 sub once ? Unless you want 100 email addresses and no achievements

Golfcoachh973d ago

EvertonFC, didn't you know everyone subscribes for just $1 dollar over and over and over again? Thats all I see on this site is how everyone does $1 subs, not one of my friends that has gamepass has it for $1 dollar anymore.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 973d ago
Destiny1080973d ago

gamepass will go up to 2 dollars a month

Orchard973d ago

So it's $1 right now? 3bn dollars revenue at 1 dollar a month is an insane number of subscribers.

Doing quick napkin math, that's $12 a year per subscriber, so that's 250m subscribers they have on GP today.

LabRat973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

I'm sure he meant 20

Crows90973d ago

Pretty sure gamepass makes money from other sources as well. You can get gamepass for free thru the rewards program so ...it's really baffling that people are willing to pay for what's actually free.

livedeht973d ago (Edited 973d ago )

Damn why u shillin? Lol

Orchard973d ago

@LabRat Sadly he didn't. He regularly posts misinformation on here that GP is $1/mo.

shinoff2183973d ago

It is more then 1 dollar. Idk what bs numbers your spewing. Its 1 dollar for the 1st month. Do your parents pay for yours so you didnt know after the first month it goes up. Theres no way theres 250 million gamepass subscribers. Your crazy dog.

EvertonFC973d ago

You ain't right in the head fella, seriously I'm concerned for you and suggest you see a doctor.

darkrider973d ago

Stop dude, it's getting sad.

Chevalier972d ago (Edited 972d ago )

@Orchard

Didn't you just call someone out for 'misinformation '?! Wow. Take a look in the mirror and look at your own comments. Seriously why are you making excuses for a company that is worth a trillion dollars?! Didn't you just say Playstation could easily cover the cost of increases and call out Playstations boss? Wouldn't it stand to reason a company worth so much more than Playstation could also eat the cost? Weren't you literally saying that it was anti-consumer?! Now Xbox is conditioning everyone for price increases and your reaction is literally the opposite. No calling out Xbox, Microsoft or Spencer?!! Seriously you're a hypocrite.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 972d ago
Show all comments (166)
240°

Sony is all-in on PlayStation Plus, says its most expensive tier is thriving

Sony kicks off PS Plus' 15th anniversary by chatting with Game File about the past, present and future of its gaming subscription service: Talking price, catalogue tweaks and where the PS3 games are.

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
CrimsonWing6922h ago

Glad, I’m about to downgrade when they raise the price. For me, I don’t really access much or care about the games they have in the library and if I do, it’d be cheaper to just buy them over time rather than stick to some expensive subscription model.

crazyCoconuts21h ago

When you're new to the service you've got an avalanche of games to play. After you catch up, I agree, it's not worth it beyond the Essential tier for me.
That being said, the Essential tier is the best deal in console gaming imo, based on the monthly games you get to keep.

Profchaos15h ago

Yeah same will be downgrading $214 aud is insane and we don't even get the streaming capabilities in Australia which they said would make the top level subscription cheaper.

If i was to just buy the games I actually play that come to the service id be far better off.

Ill keep the essential tier to retain the games ive collected since the ps3 and for mp but I'm not convinced of the premium tiers value any more

victorMaje12h ago

Went back to essential a few months ago. I’m buying more physical and it has helped in finishing more games.

Profchaos2h ago

Tend to agree if i go to the trouble of buying a disc ill typically finish it

Alos8822h ago

Extra is probably the best value for money right now, Premium doesn't have anything special enough to justify paying the additional imo.

OtterX22h ago

*unless you have a Portal & you catch Premium on discount during Days of Play or Black Friday.

Yea, I really do wish they'd up their effort on Premium titles, but allowing a large catalog of titles that can stream to your Portal without even having to use your PS5 is pretty awesome. We travel about 2 hours to stay with my inlaws from time to time, so it's been pretty killer to only need to take my Portal for that!

andy8521h ago

Yup if you have a portal premium is the best tier for sure

KyRo5h ago

Extra has been getting worse and worse each month. I've had it since it's launch and it's been great to play some games I may not have played but the selection has been declining rapidly for a while now. My sub runs out in August and I'll be going back to essential. They actually add games to that which are more appealing.

jznrpg22h ago

Add some more classics with trophies. Vagrant Story first

OtterX21h ago

Nice choice. I agree!

Jeanne D'Arc was my favorite PS+ catalog title from last year & I Platinumed it!

Eonjay19h ago

I like Ridge Racer, Tekken and Grandia. Add Xenogears, digimon World 3, Classic GTA and ill be happy

jznrpg17h ago

Jeanne D’Arc was great!

@Eonjay there is a Grandia collection available for PS4, I’m not sure if it’s been on plus already or not

darthv7222h ago

cloud streaming to the portal, without using the ps5, is the selling point of premium to me.

Obscure_Observer21h ago

If the consumers are happy, Sony is even happier.

It is what it is.

Show all comments (31)
60°

Hitoshi Sakimoto Celebrates 40 Years Of Game Composing With A Streaming Collection

The legendary composer celebrates forty years of game composing with a new collection.

220°

Yoshida claims PS believes Xbox is their only competitor, truth is they don’t have one any more

Former PlayStation boss Shuhei Yoshida claims PlayStation still believes Xbox is their only true competitor, not Nintendo.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
8d ago
Terry_B7d ago

True, they have pretty different audiences..and some People just have both at home or a PS and a PC that emulates more or less everything from Nintendo.

Knightofelemia6d ago

Xbox hasn't been a competitor since the XB360. Last generation and this generation Sony has been running circles around Xbox. As for Sony vs Nintendo Sony runs circles yes but I don't really see Nintendo as competition. Nintendo does their own thing and it works.

6d ago Replies(1)
Lightning776d ago

Details are important. Console sales yes. Overall games Xbox seems to be doing fairly well in that department.

LoveSpuds6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

MS were doing so well that they had to start selling their games on their main competitors system which in turn results in around 30% of each sale going to Sony as the platform holder.

I do think tjat MS' fortunes will improve now that they are actually selling games rather than giving them away for pennies on the dollar.

Something that occurs to me is that the more success MS published games have elsewhere, the more stark it will become that selling games is much more profitable than renting them. If that becomes highly noticable, I wonder what the shareholders (who ultimately run the show) will make of a service which has stagnated for years?

crazyCoconuts6d ago

PlayStation doesn't compete with third party games, they compete on consoles. They profit from third party games. If you're not comparing consoles there's no point in comparing.

drivxr6d ago

Console wars are over.

Eventually, everyone else will catch up to this fact.

attilayavuzer6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

I think it's all PS fans have left at this point. Console wars were always a competition for fourth place behind Nintendo, PC and mobile. If Xbox evaporates into a hybrid virtual platform, then PS will be perennially left in last place.

Christopher6d ago

Strange, I recall all those FCC documents and witness testimonies saying the exact opposite... Guess Microsoft doesn't know what it's talking about?

PanicMechanic6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

Great analysis. Just joking.

Pretending like companies give a f about where they “rank” against each other is just super retarded. This isn’t the World Cup.

Tell me, how does “PC” compete against a brand like PlayStation? It just doesn’t make sense at all. What you just said, is complete and utter nonsense

BlaqMagiq16d ago

I don't think PS cares about being in this so-called "last place" you came up with when they're making profits hand over fist.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6d ago
Destiny10806d ago

microsoft wanted to crush sony into dust and they had the money to do it, but with such weak leadership it was always going to fail

Reaper22_6d ago

Had the money? They still have the money but the industry has changed since xbox 360. Microsoft is the number one publisher in gaming. I'd hardly call that failing.

IRetrouk6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

The industry hasn't changed though, just ms, Microsoft was the no1 publisher for a month in december 2024, the actual no1 for fy2024 was tencent if game sales are all that's being counted.

Profchaos6d ago

Money doesn't mean you'll be successful large corporations have entered and failed before like Nec

Show all comments (23)