420°

Activision Blames Disappointing Call Of Duty Sales On World War II

The publisher tries to pin Call of Duty: Vanguard’s poor launch on its historical setting.

GoodGuy091098d ago

Yea totally. Not because of the recycling low effort trash you put out every year...
I hope they forget about yearly new cod releases. Release a new cod at least 3 years apart and just remaster the old games in between or something.

RaidenBlack1097d ago (Edited 1097d ago )

Its not a proper WW2 game even.
Just check the multiplayer updates and add-ons. It seems more like an FPS based around a theme-park nowadays.
The multiplayer looks more theme-park-ish than the past 2 CoD titles' post launch state.
What historical setting?
.
If not 3 years, then at least make CoD bi-annual.

1097d ago
fr0sty1097d ago

Or they could make a COD game that is good enough to release as a service, and just keep adding content to it for several years before releasing a new one.

Inverno1097d ago

But these games are technically 3 years apart. Remember that they're made by 3 separate devs, and they take turns. The problem isn't the development time, they just make shite games cause they're incompetent and they'll sell either way cause of the huge amounts of money poured into advertising.

CobraKai1097d ago

Each annual release has the same core gameplay for the past 20 years, and the same formula since the original Modern Warfare. The developers may have a 3year time frame, but the games themselves don’t change. The only game that broke the formula was Black Ops 4, but that was truly due to incompetence and laziness. No campaign under the idea that people only want multi player when a campaign was actually being developed.

RosweeSon1097d ago

Agreed the series really needs a break.

thorstein1097d ago

Not even remaster. Just launch seasons of content for the current CoD. And charge a subscription model or something. I would do that for sports games, as well. But I am still not touching anything they produce until Microsoft takes over.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1097d ago
CrimsonWing691097d ago

People are tired of the game you’ve been dishing out since gen 7… technically gen 6. Let it go.

Fishy Fingers1097d ago

Let it go... still biggest seller of the year

Business acumen :/

CrimsonWing691097d ago

Then what’s the problem?

senorfartcushion1097d ago

Then why did they make another after CoD WW2

What we are really talking about here is what the word “disappointment” means to psychotic execs nowadays.

It probably sold gangbusters.

phoenixwing1097d ago

Exactly my take on it. It probably was successful but you have to meet expectations set by execs to appease shareholders. It can't make just a lot of money it has to make all the money squeezed out of consumers by throwing all morals aside.

1097d ago
bloop1097d ago

I've skipped for 13 years and counting. Last COD I bought was MW2. It got stale at that point for me. I don't know how people are still buying it year in, year out.

SyntheticForm1097d ago

Friends.

This is the most common answer I receive when I post this question to players directly.

Show all comments (64)
230°

Despite Negative Reception, Call Of Duty: Vanguard Has Sold Over 30 Million Copies

Call of Duty: Vanguard has sold over 30 million copies, a milestone confirmed by the game's former social media strategist.

DarXyde393d ago

That's the thing about Call of Duty: it gets panned online, but still sells gangbusters.

Begs the question: is the online community complaining truly a vocal minority, or are people just unprincipled? Both I'm sure, but to what extent?

VENOM OF SINS393d ago

It's all about the hive mind, and I'm no exception to it. We buy each installment pretty much every year, regardless of the next installment being an improvement or not. Sad to say, but it is what it is.

Lexreborn2393d ago

People know what they like, it’s really that simple. The people who play CoD love CoD and unlike the minority gamers they will support it regardless.

The vocal people online will make sure a game burns they don’t like without even trying it. But, the CoD crowd will buy the game PLAY it and give feedback that goes towards their games growth.

And as long as they can get online and shoot people they will continue to support it.

CPTN MITCHELL393d ago

Cod is not the same anymore, I didn't buy this one or mw3 and I no longer care about the franchise... People complain about Spider-Man 2 as being a copy paste but cod is the same game every single year and they're ok with that.

Lexreborn2393d ago

@cptn you further validate the point, people who enjoy it keep playing, and people like you who don’t stop. But 30 million is greater than your displeasure of the game.

And if they like it, they’ll keep playing and paying.

anast393d ago

Most of them are young people that look up to characters like Dr. Disrespect.

Tacoboto393d ago

"are people just unprincipled?"

I mean... You're on this site. You've seen the discourse over COD, how awful it is, yet how aful Microsoft was for taking COD away from PS gamers, despite not once saying they wanted to do that.

Another similar one - fans of BG3 since day one refusing to buy Alan Wake 2 because it doesn't have a physical edition. Or anyone calling 30fps unacceptable but is enjoying DD2. Or anyone complaining about bloated open world games yet is complaining about shorter, focused narratives.

Neonridr392d ago

they haven't taken CoD away from PS Gamers.

WiiU-Dude393d ago

I've said something like this many times. When something is huge...it could be music, video games etc, it is fashionable to start the hate. I have loved every iteration of COD. Each has it's own merits. I have enjoyed them all and have never had a problem proclaiming it even when people heckled me. Oh well. People gonna hate.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 392d ago
RhinoGamer88393d ago

Just like Madden and Fifa (FC), the audience is conditioned to buy every year by EA and ATVI.

VersusDMC393d ago

Why talk about Vanguard? It was still the best selling game of that year. And at a 70+ metacritic.

Modern Warfare 3 last year was the 2nd best selling game of the year(been awhile since it wasn't 1st) and at a 50+ metacritic.

It would be cool to see the sales for all the call of duties to see if there's a trend and to compare.

jznrpg393d ago

I have only bought 2-3 CoD’s ever and the last time I bought one was at least a decade ago. The only reason I bought it back then was to play with my Son who was still in high school. I got some copies for free here and there from friends but I would only play the campaign. I’ve been burned out on PVP since Battlefield Vietnam on PC , Planetside stuff like that. I do enjoy PVE if done well but I doubt I’ll ever play a PVP game again unless they do something totally different than what’s been done before and I don’t see that happening anytime soon.

I have friends that buy every CoD and I ask them why do they still play after 20 years of the same game? Most of them say because of their online friends or real life friends that play it. Not because the game is good or it’s better than the last.

TheColbertinator393d ago

Battlefield Vietnam was so much fun

ocelot07393d ago

Maybe because people pre ordered it. I have pre ordered every COD since COD MW 2019. I enjoyed mw and cold war. Didn't play beta to vanguard I just pre ordered it like 2 days before release and regretted it a few days after release as it was bad.

Show all comments (30)
140°

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II ranked play arrives in 2023, says goodbye to older COD titles

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II ranked play arrives in 2023. Meanwhile, ranked play gets retired in two older COD games.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
Welshy913d ago

I'd only thumb this up if it meant SBMM was being entirely removed from unranked. Otherwise the only difference between ranked and unranked is the visibility of where the game deems your skill level.

gamer9913d ago

Exactly, we're already playing ranked play in quickplay, cod has zero clue what they're doing on quickplay vs ranked. All they need to do is copy other popular games but they can't figure it out

REDGUM914d ago

Don't laugh but I don't understand as I'm a casual gamer but what's the difference between the MW2 multiplayer that I'm playing online now compared to this ranked play etc? What is ranked play. I thought I was playing with a rank that increases at certain point stages.

TheEnigma313913d ago

Ranked means they will match you with similar skilled players. Like a level 50 will match with level 55 and a level 10 will match with a level 5ish.

Welshy913d ago (Edited 913d ago )

It's not account level that will be matched, but skill level via some MMR/ELO system. There are level 2 smurfs out there who will stomp lvl 55's.

I'm not entirely sure on how they'll grade it, whether it will be bronze/silver/gold etc like Rocket League or an ELO number like Siege. I suppose functionally it's the same thing so it doesn't matter.

gamer9913d ago

Is it going to be crap like all their previous ranked play? Timed events that place you in a ladder and you move up and down in that ladder? Just give us a normal ranked play like every other comp game please, let us move up and down between the ranks based on ELO, for the whole season

40°

Call Of Duty: Vanguard Fortress Map Gameplay

Here is a look at what is likely to be the last new map for Vanguard before the new game is released.