330°

How long does it take to beat Elden Ring?

Elden Ring is a tough game, even for Soulsborne veterans, so it can be a rather substantial time investment.

Read Full Story >>
infinitestart.com
adamwparker1156d ago

What a relative question, because for me, it's probably going to be 2056 hours(ballpark)... lol

camel_toad1156d ago (Edited 1156d ago )

Same here. The first Dark Souls average time to beat is 42 hours. I know the first time I beat it I was at over 100 hours. And I'm not a trophy hunter at all.

I don't doubt one bit that I'll be playing Elden Ring well over 100 hours. Speaking of that it's time for me to go create my character!

FlavorLav011155d ago (Edited 1155d ago )

I know I’ll be skewered but there lies my problem with this game. If it has an amazing story, which I’m aware of the writing talent, won’t 100+ hour variable run times to see the endgame ruin some of the cohesiveness of the story telling. I need focus not to forget aspects of a story in games less then 50-60hrs. Outside of cool optional fights throughout the world, this feels like an overly gratuitous method for any kind of meaningful or tight narrative to be invested in. I’m very concerned I’ll get side-quest distracted and never finish this game, which for me I hate when that happens.

DVAcme1155d ago

@FlavorLav01 The Souls games' narrative and lore have always been secondary, though, and more important for setting up the mood and ambiance of the game than for any sort of storytelling purpose. Sekiro is the only Souls game where there is any resemblance of a coherent story and purpose, and that's in big part because the player character is an ACTUAL character and not a player-created cypher. Honestly, as long as the game surprises us with bits of lore and secrets, I don't think there's much to complain about at all.

Elda1156d ago

I'll be taking my sweet time playing due to me playing other games including expansions from (2021/2022) & more being released next month. It'll possibly take me throughout this entire year before I beat Elden Ring depending on how captivated (interesting) it has me when playing.

camel_toad1156d ago (Edited 1156d ago )

It's Elden Ring and nothing else for me while I'm playing it. I'm dropping Dying Light 2 now even though I like it and Elden Ring is also why Horizon has gone straight to my back log (top of the backlog though). But Elden Ring is just going to grab me like only soulsborne games can.

Elda1155d ago

I hear you. I'm invested in Dying Light 2,The Witch Queen expansion,HFW,Cyberpunk 2077,FC6 with expansions including some indie titles that I'm playing & there's more games are being released in March. I just can't dedicate my time to one game. I like playing a variety of different games.

Eidolon1155d ago

I've pretty much dropped my backlog for February releases.. Dying Light 2, Horizon, Elden Ring. Done with DL2, open world fatigue set in after like 30 hrs.. Idk when it will happen with HFW, but I'm definitely getting the platinum.
Souls games have always had intriguing worlds, and the challenge is even more enticing to me, but a year to beat might be a stretch, though I have a feeling it will be one of those games I might have to take a break from. I'm switching between some games that require less thought, like Crysis Trilogy, Chivalry II. Going to finish(maybe platinum) Spider-Man MM .

Couldn't get through FC6, had to return it, OWF set in quickly, felt like a chore and a drag to get through. Will try to get a cheap copy of Cyberpunk.

EvertonFC1156d ago

Stupid question really as it all depends on your gaming skill level

DarXyde1155d ago

Not entirely at all. Do you skip cutscenes? What is your character class? What level are you by the time you reach certain areas? What equipment are you using? How much experience do you have with this type of game? Do you do side quests? Have you gotten lost? Which platform are you playing it on? How much time do you typically have to play?

See my point? Plenty of other factors beyond gaming skill level. Completion time is extremely multivariate.

EvertonFC1155d ago (Edited 1155d ago )

Maybe i worded it wrong, all your points is what I meant. I didn't mean just how good you are with a controller.
Thats why I said it was a stupid question lol, someone who is awesome is different to a new comer to the genre.
My point was why make a article on how long is a game ?
Kinda funny games played Hzd FW in 30 hours missing the whole point of the game yet someone new or reading the review might be put off by game length for there value of purchase is what annoys me with these articles.

DarXyde1155d ago

On that point, I completely agree. Some bold assumptions for anyone to say a game takes x hours to complete. Best they can do is get a group of people to finish it, get a mean of hours taken, and ballpark it.

Indeed, strange question

nitus101155d ago

Basically if you the player no matter what your skill level are enjoying the game, play-time is not important.

Brazz1156d ago

hum... i will likely spend at least 500h.

FanboysKiller1156d ago (Edited 1156d ago )

Someone with tight schedule shouldn't ask these types of questions , it's not even worth the time to sacrifice other important things for playing hundreds of hours.

Eidolon1155d ago

I don't understand what you're getting at, was any of this in question?

Show all comments (25)
90°

10 Highest Rated PS5 Games

Some of the best PS5 games are exclusives like God of War Ragnarok and Astro Bot, but there are some indie highlights as well.

Read Full Story >>
theouterhaven.net
90°

Best Easter Eggs in Video Games

These are the best Easter eggs in video games—from Atari to Elden Ring. Hidden secrets, surprises, and scandals await.

Read Full Story >>
clouddosage.com
Killa786d ago

Using Elena to play Crash on Uncharted 4 was pretty great.

ZeekQuattro6d ago

Saving some trapped aliens in Super Metroid and seeing them escape. Daisy's third eye in Melee. Seeing Mario characters portraits in a window at Hyrule castle. Megaman X using Ryu/Ken's movesets in mutiple entries. Bayonetta cosplaying as Fox McCloud while using an Arwing to kill angels and demons. So many good ones throughout the years.

160°

2020s - The Decade of Bloated Masterpieces

VGChartz's Mark Nielsen: "Halfway into the decade and the 2020s has been an interesting one for gaming in both good ways and bad, with the restructuring of the industry, a mix of innovation and the same old, and of course many, many long waits. But there have also been many quality titles, to be sure; the last three years in particular have seen a number of critical darlings. Something the most acclaimed ones have had in common (with the obvious exception of Astro Bot) has been an absolutely massive scope, easily boasting 100+ hours of content.

In my own experience that massive amount of content hasn’t always been a positive; in fact I would go so far as to call their slightly overeager strive for quantity a shared flaw of these games. I’ll be looking at four titles in particular here and going over the different ways in which these otherwise solid experiences became victims of having just a bit too much fluff."

Read Full Story >>
vgchartz.com
Profchaos38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

To much unimportant content and bloat is mote likely to cause me to stop playing or never revisit it. Especially when it feels like you're forcing the player to do side quests to pad out your game length just to make it long enough so you won't have the player trade the game in to fast

One recent example for me is Hogwarts I enjoyed the story but despised the level gating there was no real reason to lock missions behind a leveling system it was just forcing the player to fly around doing side quests and puzzles so they could advance to the next chapter

gold_drake38d ago

omg hogwarts

i love every second of it but damn, does it feel like a chore to play haha.

scorpio_204938d ago

Hogwarts Legacy should have stuck to what other games couldn’t do: Let us be a Hogwarts student. The open world aspect was just like any Ubisoft game.

attilayavuzer38d ago

Honestly wish it had more of a Bully feel. It was clear that 90% of the attention went to the school and town and the rest felt like the northern chunk of Just Cause 3's map. Almost like they had to justify the flying mechanic by spreading things out.

Profchaos38d ago

Yeah agree the Hogwarts castle and grounds is ripe for exploration. Look at the PS1 Argonaut game i felt like that old game did a better job with relaying what it's like to be a student at Hogwarts than what legacy did.

Legacy was like ok you've done a few classes learnt to ride a broom go spend the next multitude of hours exploring nearby towns and killing hundreds of goblins and spiders I don't think they did enough with the school grounds.

I appreciate them including Hogsmeade but I felt like it didn't need to expand past that point

7d ago
SimpleDad38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Why don't we have more 12-15h single player stories for $45 is beyond me.

Profchaos38d ago

My guess is I recall around the late 2000s game trades were a big issue which resulted in publishers shifting away from standard single player campaigns that could be beaten in a month and we started to see more expansive open worlds that would take longer to see everything to keep the player invested long enough that they wouldn't trade in the game when it was going to be the most profitable retail window e.g the first month

With the rise of all digital games I can see those games making a comeback as there is no second hand market

I_am_Batman38d ago

Expecting a 12-15h game to be $45 is part of the problem. These games don't sell well at full price anymore and relatively speaking it takes a lot fewer resources to stretch it into a 30-40 hour game that can be sold for full price.

We can complain about padding all we want, but most people simply pay more for padded games.

thorstein38d ago

Eternal Strands $48. 18 hours

Citizen Sleeper 2 $23 10 hours.

AstroBot (got as a gift) 16 hours and they keep adding levels.

CantThinkOfAUsername38d ago

Totally agree. I'm tired of the same bloated fluff that games present as 'content.'

anast38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

BG Act III is dense. It's the opposite of bloat.

andy8538d ago

Act 3 is massive. I think I finished the game 4 times for the platinum and I know I must have missed at least half the stuff in that city

anast38d ago

There is some much unique content in that ACT.

gold_drake38d ago

i feel like Rebirth only really had Costa del sol as a bloat. but its a long game, so i dont blame the author

Show all comments (21)