730°

COD Black Ops Cold War: PS5 vs Xbox Series X - Ray Tracing, 120Hz Mode Tests + Series S Analysis

Black Ops Cold War ranks among the best ways to showcase the next-gen PS5 and Xbox Series X hardware at launch. A strong performing 120Hz mode and ray-traced shadows both feature - in a package that's all round surprising for its polish in its frame-rate delivery. Tom and John team up to pick out the advantages of each console release - and also the fate of the Series S version.

Read Full Story >>
digitalfoundry.net
mrsolidsteel201614d ago ShowReplies(2)
Ninver1614d ago

Interesting how both consoles perform better in certain modes. They failed to mention the ps5 will be getting VRR support in the near future but it was a solid comparison.

alb18991614d ago

When the PS5 get VRR they talk about it. They compare what they got on hands.

RaidenBlack1613d ago

"Trading blows" I'd say ...
~42fps RT PS5 vs 60fpsRT XSX
120fps PS5 vs ~103fps XSX
ballpark lowest on one platform while the opposition is maintaining the stable cap.

senis_kenis1613d ago

@Raiden it's seems to be a bug on ps5 side, because drops are not reproducible (holds solid 60fps in same scene):

https://www.resetera.com/th...

RaidenBlack1613d ago

@senis_kenis
Yea, saw the VG Tech comparison. Might be erratic.
Now I am even doubting who has the more accurate analysis tool.

Kornholic1613d ago

@senis_kenis

I can't believe you are getting downvoted for that.

senis_kenis1613d ago (Edited 1613d ago )

So much for xbox win talk, Digital Foundry confirms it's a bug:
https://twitter.com/dark1x/...

John Linneman :"The drops are very much real but they can be eliminated, it seems, but restarting from checkpoint. Which...kinda sucks? So it's not actually a performance limitation so much as some kind of performance bug."

Sunny_D1613d ago

Digital Foundry just retested the PS5 version and found the PS5 version framerate has a bug. They’re finding the framerate will sometimes stay locked on playthroughs and on other playthroughs, it dips. They think the latest patch has something to do with it.

Cockney1613d ago

I disagree, they often use the old "expect a patch" to excuse any deficiency shown that doesn't support their narrative.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1613d ago
shabz6661614d ago

It’s all about optimizations I guess.

Ju1613d ago

RT seems to pull ahead on the SX Possibly where the compute advantage counts. On high bandwidth modes, interestingly, the PS5 is ahead.

1613d ago
Zhipp1613d ago

@Zeeb
We're literally looking at a game where Series X performs better with RT, though...

OT: This is the first game I've seen on next-gen consoles that really meets what I was expecting from both systems. If you had told me that 60fps cross-gen titles on these new consoles would be dropping to 1440p back when their specs were announced I would not have believed you. This is looking very solid, though. 1800p as a minimum for 60fps mode, low res for performance mode but runs at a very nearly locked 120. Very nice.

1613d ago
Ju1613d ago

Whatever it is. In this example the SX has an advantage. I doubt that Activision actually did not optimize for both and if they could have, they'd probably would have implemented it differently for one to match the other more.

But again, the more obvious reason why that could be, is that in lower bandwidth modes one can scale better and vertically which indeed would favor the SX more. Its kinda interesting that a 4k60fps mode is rather considered lower bandwidth in that context. If CUs are somewhat related to RT "cores", then I would imagine that would also scale vertically with the number of CUs on both machines (but that's speculation).

Maybe one day we'll learn more how RT differs on the PS5 vs. SX. Would be really interesting.

Babadook71613d ago (Edited 1613d ago )

"We're literally looking at a game where Series X performs better with RT, though... "

Unless you restart the PS5. Then the bug is eliminated and it locks 60 fps in the "problem areas". Someone already linked to John from DF's twitter post (look above) admitting the bug. So nothing to do with XSX 18% stronger hardware. If you ever see one of these systems outperform the other by a considerable margin, it is a bug. Unless its I/O related, possibly down the road.

1613d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1613d ago
jukins1613d ago

I guessbit deserves a mention but honestly I'm sure the people with vrr tvs or monitors are slim

NeoGamer2321613d ago

The key thing I have taken away from all these comparisons is that both consoles are pretty much equal. XSX and full PS5 perform pretty much the same most of the time. Dips in performance in either console can be (for now at least) attributed to the OS/Firmware and SDK bugs that are inevitable at the start of every generation. By year two or three I expect both consoles will be performing pretty much the same all the way through.

No secret sauce making one console magically better then the other.

GUTZnPAPERCUTZ1613d ago

What's not being talked about in this community is the fact that the GDK for SX is missing tools and developers have not had it in their hands no where nearly as long as the PS5's. Once developers can properly optimize for SX then it should outperform the PS5 in every aspect except loading.

fr0sty1613d ago (Edited 1613d ago )

This is only true on multiplat games where the ps5's ssd speed advantage isn't utilized. If it were possible to load up ratchet and clank on both systems, it would tell a far different tale.

NeoGamer2321613d ago (Edited 1613d ago )

@fr0sty
There has been performance comparisons of SSD for both XB and PS5 and in a practical sense they have not yielded a significant difference.

Yes, there was the Assassin's Creed load demo where the PS5 skipped title screens making it way faster, but when you compare apples to apples, the load times from SSD are pretty much equal. In most of the demos when they were loading the same stuff from SSD the XSX was usually a couple second difference (usually in XSX favor) which to me is nothing.

People keep talking about the SSD difference between the two console but there has not yet been an apples-to-apples comparison where SSD on PS5 has been shown to wildly out perform XSX SSD from a practical sense. For SSD to make a true difference it has to get into the same balk park as memory in performance. neither of the new console's SSDs are anywhere close to memory speeds.

Like a bunch of PS5 fans keep stating with the CPU and GPU. There is more to this then raw power. Pure PS5 fans cannot have it both ways. If the SSD makes a difference then it has to be acknowledged that CPU and GPU raw performance can make a difference too. In everything I've seen so far I don't see any advantage for either console. Load times are similar, framerates are similar, game functionality is similar. I just don't see either console in a situation where it is going to gimp a game in any significant way.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1613d ago
Father__Merrin1614d ago

Although they are same there's dips in small set pieces on both. They shows running down hallway and exploding your rcxd under plane where ps5 dips and series x dips during helicopter segments.

Still the Ps5 takes this. World's most powerful console? A weaker system allegedly? Can't wait for games years down the line

1613d ago Replies(9)
stiggs1613d ago

How did you come to the conclusion that the PS5 "takes this"? You should watch the video again but remove the rose colored glasses.

OB1Biker1613d ago (Edited 1613d ago )

Very balanced but PS5 DualSense features.
It's in the video. He is objectively right.

Father__Merrin1613d ago

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Ps5 DF retested video. Now smooth 60 and more lod than series x

chrisoadamson1613d ago

The xbox series x skus and development tools were only received by devs a few months ago. These are needed for optimisation. Ps5 equivalents have been available for a lot longer. This is the reason that some games I.e. assasigns creed are running better on ps5 . The next round of games (not rushed launch /cross gen titles) will perform better on the X

SullysCigar1613d ago

Except the Devs of Sirt 5 (Codemasters) already debunked that nonsense.

1614d ago Replies(2)
RazzerRedux1614d ago

Haven't watched yet, but saw some summary on resetera:

-60fps with Raytracing runs better on Series X
-120fps which disables RT runs better on PS5
-Series S looks and runs great at 60fps, no RT option
-They really like the dualsense support on PS5

So a tie?

Atticus_finch1614d ago

The tie breaker is that sweet $400 price tag though. Very important detail.

Ju1613d ago

Well and I still think the controller. But I can agree in MP only games that's probably less an argument.

phoenixwing1614d ago

Razzer it's not a tie if the controller is better. But honestly it doesn't matter the only differences worth mentioning is the controller. Everything else requires an fps counter and other software to notice lol

blackblades1613d ago

Saying that would make ps5 win every time.

1613d ago
Ju1613d ago

"Saying that would make ps5 win every time."

Right?

RazzerRedux1613d ago

Controller? Yeah....ok. But a tie is a loss for XSX in every way possible for the "worlds most powerful console".

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1613d ago
Ninver1613d ago

I'd say a tie but the dualsense controller automatically makes the ps5 version more appealing.

crazyCoconuts1613d ago

It really is awesome on this game

Sunny_D1613d ago

Yup. Lots of dual console owners on other forums have had a dilemma where they may now have to buy their multiplats on PS5 because the dualsense is so good. They were originally only going to get multiplats on Series X since MS kept saying games would be best played on Xbox. Guess that was lie.

dumahim1613d ago

"-They really like the dualsense support on PS5"

The impression I got is that Tom and John are mixed on it. They both feel it's something to disable during multiplayer because it can slow down your trigger pull. Tom seems to imply that after a while he didn't even notice it until he switched to Xbox and it wasn't there. It's kind of how I felt about 3D. It's neat, but after a while you kind of don't notice it anymore.

Nacho_Z1613d ago

Like any quality of life improvement you get used to it eventually, but if you miss it when it's gone that means it's good.

Seems pretty unanimous that it's not ideal for competitive multiplayer but that was never the point of it.

1613d ago
angh1613d ago

They confirmed that rt ps5 drops is a bug. After scene is restarted the issue is no more, so no performance bottleneck but had coding. Patch will fix this.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1613d ago
Show all comments (167)
50°
9.0

Review - Blue Prince (PS5) | WayTooManyGames

WTMG's Kyle Nicol: "Even if you aren’t a fan of roguelikes, Blue Prince feels much more like an elaborate puzzle box. There’s a satisfying feeling in making it further than you did before, finding clues to a puzzle, then stumbling onto another piece of that puzzle a few runs later. Blue Prince is certainly one of the most interesting games of this year. It takes a fairly novel concept in a roguelike puzzle game, adding elements of deckbuilding and base crafting. It all comes together for a gameplay experience unlike anything else out there today."

Read Full Story >>
waytoomany.games
220°

Days Gone Original vs Remastered – Is The Visual Upgrade Worth Revisiting?

Days Gone Remastered is now available, and if you’re looking to find out how it compares with the original PS4 version, read ahead.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Cacabunga5h ago

Huge difference i must admit, but not sure i would notice without 2 screens next to each other.

Not getting this game still, i want a new game and im tired of remasters

Muigi5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

It’s $10 and there are plenty of games out there for you.

Flewid6384h ago

Then its not a huge difference?

Fishy Fingers5h ago

Settings > Graphics > Change preset from medium to high.

Remastered.....

Tedakin5h ago

Sony is now remastering games with 71s on metacritic.

Bathyj5h ago

Like that's a judge of anything
This game got scored before it was released.

andy855h ago

Days gone is 85+. It got heavily marked down at launch for bugs where as others get a free pass for that. It's a fantastic game.

andy855h ago

I spoiled myself by modding this game on my PC. Genuinely one of the best looking games I've ever seen. Whilst this remaster looks nice it just doesn't compare to that sadly. It shows the effort that these remasters could put in if they wanted

REDGUM4h ago

I so hope this game or DLC for those of us who own the original sells well.
Ive said it before, its an underrated game for sure & was unfairly judged upon release.
Please try this game if you haven't already.

For those who say 'i won't purchase digital only' you can pickup a hard copy for 5 bucks here in Australia, then add the DLC and you have a superb game for $20 or so.

Give it a shot, tell me I'm wrong After completing the game.

Game on gamers.

Show all comments (19)
50°

Pre-Orders for EA SPORTS MVP Bundle Now Live

Time to build your legacy! Today, EA announced that pre-orders are now available for the EA SPORTS MVP Bundle, which includes EA SPORTS College Football 26 and EA SPORTS Madden NFL 26.

Read Full Story >>
terminalgamer.com