490°

First gaming benchmarks released for the AMD Radeon RX 6900XT GPU

AMD has shared the first gaming benchmarks for its upcoming Big Navi GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 6900XT.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1718d ago
Hakuoro1718d ago

If AMD can nail the price they can have an extremely competitive card. If they could put this card out at $600 or less it'll be very competitive. If they can get it at the rumored $500 or less it'll be the go to card for a lot of people.

ABizzel11718d ago (Edited 1718d ago )

It wasn't confirmed to be the 6900 XT, but all things suggest it to be especially since this lines up with the Igro's lab rumor from about a month ago, that pretty much nailed performance to be right between 2080ti / 3070 and RTX 3080, but closer to the 3080, which these benchmarks practically confirm.

It also said they were looking at a $599 price for the GPU, which would offer a potential highly competitive GPU that's $100 less than the 3080, and $100 more than the 3070, but much closer in performance to the 3080 than the 3070 in most games. Which overall is a solid spot to be in.

That being said AMD needs a fallout win, and not a solid spot to be in, because NVIDIA still likely has the Ray Tracing advantage, and the other benefits of their architecture for editing, and non-performance related things likes broadcasting.

So here's hoping AMD has their software together, their drivers together, and the supply together to cover gamers for the holiday as NVIDIA is likely launching the 3070 and having minuscule supply for the remainder of the year.

If AMD can produce a healthy supply for the holidays then they might make a small dent in NVIDIA's armor with the 6900 XT on the high-end, and bring a value battle to NVIDIA across the mid-range as well with the rumored performance and prices of the 6000 XT line.

6900 XT, $549 - $599, around 10% - 15% less performance than the RTX 3080
6800 XT, $399 - $499, around RTX 2080 ti performance
6700 XT, $299 - $349, RTX 2070 super performance

If they can safely hit the $549, $399, and $299 prices, and have a stable supply, then AMD has a holiday win on their hands, but I expect them to be at the higher prices of $599, $449, and maybe $299, which would still be good especially since NVIDIA doesn't have supply.

yeahokwhatever1718d ago (Edited 1718d ago )

BL3 on the 3080 with the same settings as whichever navi2 card was shown(no indication that it was a 6900xt or if a 6900xt even exists), is the same. 60fps.

you basically just typed hella words for no reason. congrats!

CrimsonIdol1718d ago (Edited 1718d ago )

@yeahokwhatever until we see more then all there is to say is speculation. I don't think it's unreasonable to speculate that the card in question might be the 6900 XT, that in may have 10-15% less performance than a 3080 overall or to guess at the prices or the models. I reckon most of us are under the impression that AMD is showing favourable cherry-picked benchmarks and that the 60fps in Borderlands 3 to match up nicely against the 3080s similar benchmarks doesn't necessarily mean they have the same performance overall, though this marketing is definitely designed to lead people to believe that.

ABizzel11718d ago (Edited 1718d ago )

@yeahokwhatever

No the 3080 performs around 65 fps in Borderlands 3, 4K on Bad@$$ settings, and also Gears 5 runs better on the 3080 than the benchmarks provided by AMD. Therefore, once again it runs around 10% better on the 3080 than the leaked benchmarks AMD released, and according to AMD own words the Ryzen 5000 series is better for gaming than the Intel 10000 series and allows games to squeeze out a few more fps, which all benchmarks from the 3080 are on Intel 10000 or Ryzen 3000, which is where the range of the 3080 being 10% - 15% faster came from, outside of AMD optimized games where the 6900 XT should win.

So you basically replied just typed a waste of a response that added nothing to the conversation for no reason. Congrats!

MusashiBlack1717d ago

Well stated. Nvidia’s software is going to be hard to beat. DLSS has come a long way over the last 3 years, and I’m wondering if AMD will have something right out the gate. Everyone is upgrading something for CP 2077

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1717d ago
Ju1718d ago

Waiting for one of those, tbh. I am sure it'll be at least $50 below a comparable RTX30 series. Hopefully lower power, too. Probably not going for the top tier. Want <250W and <$500. That would probably be the 6800XT. 1440@100fps over brute force 4k@60, tbh.

CantThinkOfAUsername1717d ago

AMD no longer wants to be the underdog. Expect the same prices as Nvidia's and Intel's from now on.

Fishy Fingers1718d ago

Not too shabby.

But I want to see how they compare when it comes to RT, being AMDs first stab I doubt they will rival Ampere and their how is their feature set, do they have an answer to DLSS2.0?

TheOptimist1718d ago

Apparently, Division 3 is launching next with DLSS like implementation from AMD. That's what I have heard from my sources. Don't take my word for it.

Mr Logic1718d ago

A theoretical Division 3 (D2 didn't meet Ubi's sale expectations) would not arrive before March 2021. That means AMD has NOTHING in the meantime.

ABizzel11718d ago

Allegedly their GPUs are better than Turing at RT, but not up to par with Ampere which makes sense considering they had years to learn from Turing and create something with the advances in tech during that time. They also will have some form of machine learning to compete with DLSS, however, this is where they will definitely be behind, as I think they will be starting from a DLSS 1.0 level of performance and playing catchup with NVIDIA on this.

According to the leaks that is.

Edgelordsupreme1718d ago

Wait for independent benchmarks, numbers out of AMD, Intel and Nvidia should never be taken as gospel.

Hakuoro1718d ago

I mean to be fair AMD has been spot on with the information they have been providing for quite a while. Yes, it'll be nice to get independent reviews but let's not drag AMD through the mud when their track record on Zen and RX have been very accurate.

Anomander1718d ago

Thermals please! Numbers are not looking too bad, but I want to see what the Temp of the card while the card is running. My RTX 2070 Super never goes beyond 65'C at full Core Clock (2,000Mhz).

1nsomniac1718d ago (Edited 1718d ago )

I’ve got an RTX 2070 Super also. I would say you’ve got a good card and very good cooling system. The cards themselves are known to run hot and loud. I can get my MSI Armor to run at @2040mhz max with a lot of tinkering and new paste but the cards hellova loud and hot over about 1900mhz.

Although the thermal limit is set at 88’c my card will not allow it to go past 79’c. It can hit that pretty quick and then it’ll just keep clocking down to keep it from going above that.

They’re easy as loud as the PS4 jet engine if not louder!

RaidenBlack1718d ago

So it managed to beat out Turing's best and came close to Ampere's 3080.
Pricing needs to be sub-650. But .... this is no Radeon VII vs 2080 anymore.
There's more to raw power comparison now.
What's their answer to Tensor cores and RT cores?
20 more days.

Hakuoro1718d ago

Well their RT solution should be the same as or improved from the consoles. But I would be happy to pay a little less for a little less RT as long as the base performance when using traditional post processing techniques was solid.

RT is a complete after thought for me at least.

Either way i agree, i am looking forward to their big event.

Fishy Fingers1718d ago

RT and post processing are not remotely related....

Hakuoro1718d ago

Fishy Fingers

Post processing is anything that happens after the base 3D image is rendered(processed) like anti aliasing, lighting, shadows, anisotropic filtering, ambient occlusion and even ray tracing are all post process effects.

RaidenBlack1718d ago

Ray tracing is a rendering technique.
RT can produce indirect lighting, soft shadows, depth of field, motion blur, and ambient occlusion.

Hakuoro1718d ago

"RT can produce indirect lighting, soft shadows, depth of field, motion blur, and ambient occlusion."

After the the 3D image is processed.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1718d ago
Show all comments (34)
40°

Absolutely Beautiful Sega Genesis Games

The three most beautiful sights in this world are: 1) your spouse on your wedding day 2) the birth of your first child 3) a walkthrough for Ecco the Dolphin in some long forgotten scrawl.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1h ago
80°

Nintendo Switch 2 Console review - Worthy Successor with Issues

"Nintendo Switch 2 is a safe and solid follow-up in many respects but it has its issues, including the Virtual Game Card system and an aging UI."

- Stuart Cullen, TechStomper

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Bad Editing
Remove name of site from title
MaximusPrime_21h agoWhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community7h ago
Changed: title
Chilliersplash5h ago

Not sure what games you're playing to average 5 to 6 hours battery. Mariokart World and Zelda gets 2 and a half hours max.

gold_drake1h ago

not sure if its a successor or an upgrade.

and theres no way u get 5 hours.

100°

Even the Meta Quest can be an Xbox — Leaked images show an Xbox-branded Quest 3S

Windows Central writes: "CEO of Microsoft Gaming, Phil Spencer, had previously been vocally opposed to the idea of a native Xbox headset, stating in 2019 that 'nobody's asking for VR' on Xbox. However, Microsoft's marketing strategy for the Xbox Series X|S generation has shifted with the rise of Xbox Cloud Gaming and the 'This is an Xbox' marketing."

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (3)- Updates (3)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 7h ago
Changed: content
shadowT2d ago
Changed: content
shadowT2d ago
mooreneco211d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

Ah, a contributing factor to Meta dropping PSVR2 support for Beat sabre! Microsoft’s always stuck with the modus operandi of “if you want an original idea steal someone else’s” and try to destroy markets they cannot win in. They are doing to to console gaming and now trying VR!

OtterX1d 5h ago

It's like a rich kid who pays the smart kid to do his homework for him.

*Yea, such a shame about Beat Saber dropping Playstation support btw. :\

DivineHand12511h ago

Why would this deal with Xbox cause meta to end beat Saber support for the psvr2 when the game isn't even available on Xbox?

It is more likely that psvr2 is under performing and they feel it is time to end support. The psvr2 headset only sells whenever there is a sale to make it competitive with the meta headset.

OtterX1d 5h ago

The XBox way. Hardware, even game development companies.... let them do the hard work of building things, throw them some money, then slap an XBox logo on it!

Jin_Sakai1d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

Good old fragmentation. Just what Xbox needed.

IRetrouk1d 5h ago

Looks nicer than the standard one

PapaBop1d 2h ago

This is probably nothing more than a branding attempt to show Xbox really is on all platforms. The Quest already has the Xbox Cloud app that supposedly works great. Would be cool if Microsoft actually entered the VR space in a larger capacity but if they was doing that, I imagine they'd have showcased it at their summer showcase.

Vits23h ago(Edited 23h ago)

Yeah, it's basically the same idea as the ROG Ally Xbox. Just a regular device that gives you access to the Xbox library and carries the brand, but nothing really special or groundbreaking beyond that. It’s not some custom Xbox hardware, just a repackage of existing tech with a logo and some software perks.

Now, when it comes to VR, Microsoft actually made a pretty serious attempt with something called Windows Mixed Reality. It wasn’t just a headset, they were aiming for an open ecosystem. They had APIs for developers, support baked into Windows, and even tools to convert regular desktop content into VR environments. On paper, it was a solid play. But it never caught on, third part support was half-baked and basically only Samsung headsets were worth anything. After about five years of trying to push it, they gave up and shelved the whole thing.

The bigger issue here is that VR just isn't ready for the mainstream. People love to hype it up, but at the end of the day, it’s a hard sell unless it’s cheap enough to feel like an impulse buy and even when you can do that, you need to support it with software. Making it a extremelly expensive segment for any company, just look at Meta, bleeding literal billions every years trying to get this stuff off the ground, and they are the market leaders.

OptimusDK5h ago

I don’t understand how people don’t understand that this is a huge consumer benefit. When I buy all these hardware component’s I can take my games with me. How many of us have not ended up buying the same game for handheld, vr and console not to mention pc. Stop the clear console war dogs and recognise this is good for consumers.