220°
8.5

Marvel's Avengers Review - Worth Playing

Featuring a completely original story, Marvel's Avengers is being designed for gamers worldwide and will be packed with all the characters, environments, and iconic moments that have thrilled longtime fans of the franchise.

Read Full Story >>
worthplaying.com
shepherdzeMan1695d ago (Edited 1695d ago )

honestly, marvel didn't deserve crystal dynamic, marvel has always had shit games, and no matter how great avenger game is, it won't be considered as due to marvels shit record of crappy games.

CorndogBurglar1695d ago (Edited 1695d ago )

You realize Marvel doesn't actually make their own games, right? It all comes down to other developers to deliver a quality game. I doubt Marvel told those developers to make bad games.

Spider-Man would be a great example of a good Marvel game. As would X-Men Legends 1 & 2, Marvel Ultimate Alliance 1-3, Hulk Ultimate Destruction, and even X-Men Origins Wolverine.

Not sure where you're getting the idea that Marvel has a bad history of games. There have been bad ones. But there have been good and even great ones also.

shepherdzeMan1695d ago

I never said marvel make their own games, they just choose crappy dev is all.
spiderman was only good because it was SONY.
and all those other you mentioned are good in your opinion, as most were mediocre garbage.
spiderman PS4 was the only good Marvel game but still not comparable to the likes of Arkham and injustice series.

Silly gameAr1695d ago

@shepherdzeMan

Those are your opinions. None of those games Corndog mentioned were bad or garbage. I think Wolverine was one of the best super hero games every made, even if the movie was trash. All of those games are great games. If you really played them, you wouldn't be saying that they're just mediocre garbage.

shepherdzeMan1694d ago

Wolvirine had 72 metascore , definently not one of the best!

BenRC011695d ago

Looks utter garbage. Predict a slew of 5s.

1695d ago
1695d ago
drunkenspy0071695d ago

the demo was hot garbage, I doubt they fixed enough to make this game viable in any way. Expect paid for reviews.

BlackTar1871695d ago

The demo was fun for me and friends.

shepherdzeMan1694d ago

paid reviews is sonys territory

Show all comments (16)
60°

It's Not Too Late For Suicide Squad To Learn From Marvel's Avengers

TheGamer writes, "It feels like live service history repeating itself right now, but it's not too late to change that."

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
130°

I’m so ready for Suicide Squad to fill the Avengers void in my life

Marvel’s Avengers didn’t soar properly on PS5 and Xbox, but Kill the Justice League looks like it will improve on it in every way.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
poppatron456d ago

I can’t work out if this guy is just being sarcastic

Leeroyw456d ago

This website pumps out one shill article after the other. Does not qualify as journalism.

ShwaaMan456d ago

Said the guy who just got a big check from WB.

YourMommySpoils455d ago

Does that mean it will have a thousand pointless costumes like Avengers did, not related to the game or source?

coolbeans455d ago

"Guy who's excited for Suicide Squad to fill the void left by The Avengers' closure."

Traecy455d ago

I'll be checking it out on day one of release.

Show all comments (12)
180°

Why Have Many of the Online Multiplayer Games of the Past Five Years Failed?

Here's a look at why so many online-multiplayer games from the past five years have struggled to retain players and their attention.

ChasterMies558d ago

Or put another way, why don’t people want to invest in an on-line storefront?

sparky77558d ago

It's simply FOMO.

Gamers always go back to their staples like COD or Fortnite. Those games have constant content and leaving them for another game means getting left behind. Why start a new game and be behind when you can stay with a game you already excel at.

ZycoFox558d ago (Edited 558d ago )

COD is replaced every year or almost every year, it has no time to hold a player base. 3-4 years is a good timeline for a sequel IMO if the game has enough content to begin with, maybe add a couple of free content updates a bit later after release if needed, and job done until the next game.

Soldier of Fortune 2 was one of my first few online FPS games apart from RTCW and a couple of others, and that had a couple of free patches which added in new weapons, maps and a new game mode in just a year or so. I hope the series makes a comeback, I heard MS owns it now and it has been dormant for a while.

The only sequel that came fast (just 1 year later) that impressed me with extra content over the original was L4D2, makes me wonder what happened with Valve. If they can do that in one year then what have they been doing since..

-Foxtrot558d ago (Edited 558d ago )

Because it's not about putting out a fully completed game packed with content and something that actually works

It's about putting something out broken and barebones, slowly drip feed content with a roadmap and offering tons of MTs which they hope people will buy.

I miss when you'd just get games like Killzone or Halo and they'd get a couple of DLC packs then the developers would move onto the next game. Problem is they started to be influenced by COD where future games had to have gimmicks, weapon mods, loadouts, killstreaks and other shit which just become about what you had unlocked rather than skill.

The last multiplayer game I really enjoyed was Uncharted 2s, it was literally just two boosters and everyone started with the same weapons. It was great and felt like it was more about skill but then we got Uncharted 3 and 4 where the COD influence creeped in thinking that everything had to be bigger rather than sticking to the fanbase they had.

Nitrowolf2558d ago

i agree. i used to love MP games for these titles, and be excited about the map packs and such. now it's we will release one mode and one map, and see how people take to the game. Flops? cool move on.

isarai557d ago

Even before the PS3 generation ended, I was already longing for a return to simplistic MP without all the XP, booster, perks, and ridiculous custom loadouts full of op exploitation. Like there's definitely a huge audience for that, but there's NO classic style simple MP modes anymore, I'm just asking for some

ZeekQuattro557d ago

Most people don't have the time to invest into playing multiple GAAS and stick to just one. It also doesn't help that so many games in that field only have a roadmap laid out for the first month or so. Hard to keep people invested when you don't give them a reason to stick around after the initial launch month.

excaliburps557d ago

Yep. I know what you mean. I can't play more than 1-2 live service games at a time (this includes shooters) since it's just so overwhelming.

shinoff2183557d ago (Edited 557d ago )

My theory , well online gaming just sucks, so many online games recently that if done the right way could've been dope ass single player games. One that comes to mind evil dead. What a waste of the title

Show all comments (15)