Scorn Is an XB SeriesX Console Exclusive Because It “Enables Parity With the PC Version of the Game”

The game’s director also reiterates that the game will run at 4K and 60 FPS on the console.

[TeamIcoFan]

Oh, this is definitely gonna ruffle some feathers. https://gph.is/19yQDcd

[Whitey2k]

I think ps5 is more capable of doing 4k 60fps. Look when digital foundry tryed replicating the gfx for ps5 on an 5700xt and that was capable of doing doung 4k around 40fps on ultra and this is RDNA 2 so its more capable. And since fanboys is like ssd is for this and its just us guys havent got a clue on how customized ps5 is

[OB1Biker]

People are just falling for gaminbolt baits.
The parity bit is just why they can't develop it for xb1

[darthv72]

Maybe the game is built using DX12... does the PS5 even support DX12? Meaning their OS and software tools because obviously the hardware supports it.

[ANIALATOR136]

I'm not worried about the new consoles doing 60fps. As long as they can do between 40-60fps new TVs will likely have Hdmi 2.1 and g sync to smooth it all out

[Sophisticated_Chap]

Whitey2k is a perfect example of someone on this site, of which there are many, who doesn't understand even the basics about computer hardware. It's mind blowing how someone could think that a 10.3 Tflop console with a 36cu GPU and a 3.5 GHz 8 core 16 thread CPU, is more capable at running games at 4K/60, than a 12.1 Tflop console with a 52cu GPU and a 3.8 GHz 8 core 16 thread CPU. It also seems that many people believe that the PS5 SSD creates graphics or something... just really really stupid.

[super_bruno]

but... but, what about SSD

[indysurfn]

Plus i overheard A conversation:
Microsoft: "The EXCLUSIVE looks close to the PC version of the EXCLUSIVE.
Andre the Giant says: " I don't think that word means, what you think that word means".

[Unspoken]

Sony PS5, 🏃 at 30fps. SSD allows faster frame rates without GPU assist.

[rainslacker]

@OB

Except, that is what the dev said is their reason for not releasing on PS5.

For once, the quote isn't actually taken out of context.

It's still a BS reason, and GB of course did jump at the oppurtunity to click bait, but they aren't misrepresenting the quote this time. There is more to the quote, but that involves the nature of it's exclusivity, and there are comments which tend to be used when there is some paid deal going on, which could be timed or not.

[OB1Biker]

@rainslacker
No that's actually the reason for not releasing on xb1 X or Series SS. (Why Series X)
They dont mention ps5
The answer about exclusivity is different.

https://store.steampowered....

[RpgSama]

Good games are good games, Xenoblade Chronicles runs between 504p and 720p when docked on the Switch and it's getting 10's and 9's left and right.

Having said that, until these consoles are actually out this is all water cooler talk.

[Veneno]

Are we still spamming popcorn gifs?

[TheGrimReaper]

Edit: nevermind

[4Sh0w]

Contract with Microsoft. The End.

[Obscure_Observer]

Some people were betting on timed exclusivity.

[rainslacker]

And this dev saying they can't talk about a PS5 version now tends to mean that they are unable to talk about a potential PS5 version. Otherwise, they'd say something like they aren't working on a PS5 version now.

But, parity with a PC version is BS. No way the min specs for this game on PC are going to be anywhere close to what the PS5 can muster. It may be more than what this gen has to offer, but if the dev wants to put their min specs that high, then that's going to be more an issue for the success of their game on PC, than it will be a detriment to Sony.

[Obscure_Observer]

@rainslacker

Well, the developer said that their game is a next gen one. He also said that CPU is the game changer for next generation and not SSDs. Maybe the PS5´s architecture focused on SSD and variable clocks is not viable for them to achieve their goal (4K/60fps) without compromises.

I don´t think they´re looking for success in a sense of popularity. They want their game to express their art, vision and philosophy for those that will appreciate their work. Like myself for instance. :)

[remixx116]

Will it?? Why does every little positive or negative seem like a win or loss to people on this site. It's as you got pregnant and birthed these consoles. You'll shout in joy when you see halo 6 and backaway or spin negativity when you see horizon 2.

I'm just glad these damn things exist despite not being a big Xbox can though I've owned every console.

[RpgSama]

SHHHHH! It goes against the narrative!!! The Ps5 it seems that it can only do 1080p x 30fps (with only a 17% difference in performance against the Series X) even though games on the One X like Gears 5 run at 4K x 60fps, therefore Ps5 weaker than the One X!!!! /S

[Prubar]

What the shit is this? THAT gets flagged as (inappropriate) yet Xbox gets slammed in every article In the comment section. Im console neutral for the most part but that’s bullshit!!!

[StoneyYoshi]

You must have missed some of the Xbox articles. There's plenty of times where almost every other comment was marked as inappropriate even if it wasn't trolling, just negative opinions.

[scofios]

Funny some second rang developer who is saying that his shovelware game wil not work on PS5 and some salty Fanboys are now celebrating hahaha , but i gues if your favorite gaming platform has no games you have nothing else to do .

[rainslacker]

Scorn is one of the more impressive showings from their last "game play" showing a few weeks ago.

Not that they showed game play, but they showed some talent in the graphics department.

I don't believe for one second that parity was a consideration for making it XSX console exclusive though. The min specs on PC for most games now are well below what the PS5 can handle.

[ABizzel1]

Why?

When the same game will be running on Series S which is much weaker console in the scope of things. This is simply them saying they can't get it running on last-gen without huge compromises to the settings they want to target on PC.

Any game the Series X can run, the PS5 can run as well, even if it means a worst-case scenario of having a slightly lower resolution, or having to opt for global illumination based RT, compared to dedicated ray tracing.

[Fantangoooo]

Oh they sure are, SSD will save us from all this funny business lol

[DarXyde]

This is the typical "this game is only possible on [insert hardware] for [insert reason]" early generation exclusive hype.

Nothing to see here, honestly.

[Vasto]

Only Series X is capable of running the game at PC performance.

Series X is just on another level just like everybody has been saying.

[TeamIcoFan]

Well, TECHNICALLY since PC games have multiple graphics settings, any console can run a game a PC performance...if you downgrade it enough.

I get what you're saying though, the series X is a powerhouse.

[BehindTheRows]

The PS5 is also a powerhouse that happens to be, roughly, 17% weaker than the Series X (much less of a difference than the Pro vs X).

In any event, I can believe the parity part for Scorn, given the API/OS. Based on the article, they won't even discuss a potential PS5 version due to knowing less about it, so it's a moot point.

I plan on buying the PC version where it will look/run best (and where development has been for 6 years), but I'd really like to see a Series X-only game (though I know the possibility of that is next to nill).

[i3eyond the Circle]

That 17% is just the gpu side at things considering the max is always met by no high CPU workload.

1024 more shaders.
320bit bus vs 256bit bus
3.8ghz locked cpu vs (Up to) 3.5ghz cpu
If the way dedicated ray tracing works in amd apus is how it’s explained in a patent and how Microsoft presented it in its “holy grail” gif that means 44% more ray tracing hardware.

17% is void imo when talking about the overall strength differences between Ps5 and Series X.

[BehindTheRows]

@i3eyond the Circle

No, it's not void and the differences in games will hardly be big enough to display these percentages. It won't even be as big as early PS4/Xbox One games (in which the differences were quite noticeable).

My main point was that the talk of power is moot anyway as this developer hasn't even had time with the PS5. So, any chatter of "better hardware" are merely beating chests and nothing else.

[Minute Man 721]

@Beyond

These Sony Only fanboys are in for a rude awakening.

[itsmebryan]

@behindTheRow
But now 17% is about 1.7tflops. The PS4 was 1.84tflops. that's a big difference. Also we know the 17% is in variable "boost mode". So, the realgular mode gap is probably even more.

Have they ever stated what the clock speed is when it's not in boost mode? Because it can't run "boost mode" all the time It would just be called regular mode lol

[cfir]

@itsmebryan
Your comment shows you really know very little about ps5. It will run both gpu & cpu at the maximum clock speed most of the time. It will only reduce (one of the clock speeds) in the event the combined power draw exceeds the designed limit for thermal cooling. This doesn't mean the both can't run at 100% utilisation. It will depend on what operations each are doing and the power draw for those (not all operations require the same power).

[cfir]

@i3eyond the Circle
You make a number of statements, but they are all incorrect, or at least don't tell the full story.
Max GPU is always met by no high CPU workload. This is not correct. The PS5 is utilising a max power draw to keep it within the thermal window the cooling solution is designed to handle. Different operations within the GPU and the CPU require different power utilisations. The max power draw level is set such that the GPU and CPU can both run at max utilisation (in parallel) for the majority of the time, but if they are both performing power heavy operations it could breach the power threshold and one may need to be throttled back. Mark Cerney said that to drop the power draw by 10% would require a 1-2% clockspeed reduction. If we use the max reduction here, then for the GPU that's a reduction in theoretical TF from 10.2 to 10.0. Not really that big an impact...
1024 more shaders & 44% more RT hardware. Yes there are. As there are 44% more CUs there are 44% more shaders and RT cores. However, in XSX they run slower than the PS5 equivalent, so you only get the same % increase over the PS5 as the theoretical TF numbers, so max 17%.
3.8Ghz CPU vs 3.5Ghz cpu. You shouldn't compare these numbers. The 3.8 is single threaded compared to the multi threaded 3.5. The Multi threaded CPU on average does 30% more processing, so it's actually slower than the PS5 CPU in that configuration. You'd be better using the 3.6 mode on the XSX in the argument as it's actually faster.
320bit memory bus vs 256bit yep. this is correct. It doesn't make the memory any faster, but it can shift more in parallel. So 25% more in parallel, but the PS5 GPU can access the bus faster with it's higher clock speed which is 22% faster, so the difference is still in the XSX favour, but it's not what the 320vs256 would suggest. That's not the whole story though since the XSX has a separate lower speed bus to the slower memory for the CPU which it's not sharing so...
Also the memory bus is 25% larger, but there are 44% more CUs. Actual memory bandwidth per CU for the PS5 is higher than the XSX. 560/52=10.77GBps per CU on XSX, 480/36=13.33GBps per CU. Again not the full story due to the separate lower speed bus on the XSX for the CPU but...Whether or not that could be a bottleneck on the XSX or not I'm not sure.
Lastly, the actual performance of the GPUs will be less than the theoretical TF numbers. Performance does not scale linearly when adding more cores (or CUs). The more cores you have the more overhead there is on managing those cores. So your 17% increase in theoretical TF numbers won't result in a 17% increase in actual GPU capability. I don't know what the scaling factor for the RDNA2 CUs is, but it will be less that 1 i.e. 52 cu's doesn't provide 52 x processing of 1 cu. I'm not saying it evens out the 17% or anything like that, just that it won't be as high as 17%
How this all stacks up in the end remains to be seen, but the difference won't be what you seem to think it is.

[Sunny_D]

Yeah so much that they can’t talk about the PlayStation? Hmmm wonder why that is.... the parity part obviously is in regards to the Xbox one. The last gen consoles can’t keep up so they had to drop it. The SSD probably comes into play here.

[Ricegum]

What on earth is "PC performance"?

So you're telling me this game can't even run on the lowest settings at sub 30fps on PS5? Come on Vasto, you don't even know what you're saying half the time.

Once again a load of Xbox fans start spewing rubbish and fall for the clickbait. If you read properly the developers aren't discussing PS5 due to the fact they obviously have a contract with Microsoft.

[tontontam0]

Official Minimum Requirements
OS: Windows 7, 8, 10 64 bit
Processor: Intel Core i3-2100 / AMD FX-6300
Memory: 8 GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti / AMD Radeon HD 7870
DirectX: Version 11
Storage: 50 GB available space

midend pc spec from 2013

so this pc is more powerful than ps5??

[DJStotty]

@tontontam0

Anyone knows if you try to run a game on the minimum requirements, it runs like dirt, with screen-tearing, pop-in the lot.

You should have compared with official recommended requirements. Which will probably run the game at a stable 45-60fps. For Ultra settings, you will need well above the recommended specs.

[RazzerRedux]

@DJStotty

Even "recommended" is not demanding. The PS4 Pro's GPU is twice as fast as those listed.

OS: Windows 7, 8, 10 64 bit
Processor: Intel Core i5-2500 / AMD FX-8350
Memory: 8 GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 / AMD Radeon R9 290
DirectX: Version 11
Storage: 50 GB available space

https://www.thenerdmag.com/...

This dev is talking about of his ass if he trying to claim parity.

[RazzerRedux]

lol....nonsense. Are you seriously going to believe that the minimum system requirements for the PC version of Scorn will only be hardware that is able to hit 4K/60? Hilarious.

[Hakuoro]

So when you say PC specs you mean it won't take full advantage of the SSD?

[pornflakes]

what has the SSD to do with the graphics output??

[ChiefofLoliPolice]

Oh please lol by this time next year PC will even further outperform Series X. Although I do get the appeal, I mean for the potential price point you do get close to super high end PC performance.

[rainslacker]

So, if when this game's minimum specs come out to be what the average PC gamer has for their systems now, or maybe a bit above to raise the bar a bit, will you still be saying that PS5 can't handle it?

This is a BS excuse, and I'd wish you guys would try to base your little jabs on things that can't be so easily refuted as BS statements.

particularly when the way he talks about PS5 tends to imply that this is a timed exclusive. Even the article writer stated, "at launch", and the developer stated they couldn't talk about PS5, "right now".

Edit:

Tonton posted the min specs.

Isn't the Radeon 7870 the GPU that the PS4 is considered to be equivalent to? Like the original PS4, not the PS4P?

Yeah, I can see how the PS5 couldn't handle that.

Seriously, do you or iBeyond ever even think about anything you say?

[Angrymorgan]

S friend of mine has a 5litre ford mustang but it cant beat a corsa vxr in a race, cant keep the power down without spinning up the wheels...just saying, raw power isnt everything so, let's just wait and see before we shout from the rooftops eh?

[i3eyond the Circle]

Um no wrong. The SSD can move graphics so fast that the gpu doesn’t even have to work and when it does finally have to work it uses all that extra power to take all those 4k streamed assets and simply display it on the screen using minimal power.... the reserved bank will allow true 8K gaming to be pursued with virtually no loading. GPUs are so yesterday.. they will not be the contributing factor to performance at all this generation!

[TeamIcoFan]

...Did you seriously just suggest that the PS5 has a super special ssd that'll make the GPU irrelevant? That all games will run off an SSD only and no gpu will even be required?

https://i.redd.it/lr06q1dr2...

[i3eyond the Circle]

Uh yeah dude didn’t you hear Cerny? 12 channels of decompression. That means 6 can move assets and the other 6 can you know “channel” it to the screen.

[Eonjay]

You are gonna need to be able to tell when people are being sarcastic. Obviously he is not being serious.

[warriorcase]

This is some grade A bait for sure.

[RamRod88]

You gotta be trolling, right?

[Vasto]

What?

https://media.giphy.com/med...

[i3eyond the Circle]

What guys? I have an extensive knowledge of this stuff from MBGs comment section on YouTube. Don’t test the knowledge.

[carlosjrix]

Sarcastic?

[Ricegum]

My guess is he's trolling because of the lack of Xbox One exclusives I guess.

[Sunny_D]

The parity part obviously is in regards to the Xbox one. The last gen console can’t keep up so they had to drop it. The SSD even on the series x probably comes into play here. Since they don’t want to discuss PlayStation, most likely a timed exclusive.

[crazyCoconuts]

Will the 1 agree please step forward lol

[Ashunderfire86]

A lot of these Xbots don't know what your talking about lol!!!

[Ratchet75]

Dude, assets still need to be process by the gpu/cpu.
Yes, it will help assets being accessed and delivered to the gpu/cpu much faster.

[rainslacker]

GPU doesn't have to work?

I see you're trying to make some sarcastic reference to people saying that SSD is a game changer, but your attempt comes off flat, because really, what you say isn't what people are saying when they talk about such a thing.

Oh, and parity my ass. The PC specs for this game are equivalent to the launch PS4, and SSD is completely irrelevant to this game since it's being designed for PC as well, and doesn't require SSD on PC.

[rlow1]

He didn't shoot down the idea of a PS5 version. He said they wouldn't discuss it.

[crazyCoconuts]

"can't" discuss it. Undoubtedly part of the contract.

[aaronaton]

the game looks shite lol, i don't think PS5 players are that bothered.

[rlow1]

Wow, really? A unique take on horror from the first person perspective. Never heard of a gamer saying they don't need a game when they hardly know anything about it. Ever heard of the old saying? Don't judge a book by it's cover? Take note.

[monkey602]

Future PS5 buyer here! I want scorn. Have wanted it for years now.

I would expect better taste from someone with a Timesplitters 2 avatar 😜

[Outside_ofthe_Box]

"He said they wouldn't discuss it."

Interesting...

I know a couple of people including some in this very article that would have been quick to point this out had this been about another console. .

[rainslacker]

They did when the same thing was said about FF7:R. This dev stated it twice even more empathically.

[Profchaos]

They are under a marketing contract or trying to become an Xbox associated studio to garuntee income anything else is misleading

[Pricey]

If you you read the "article" they are only quoted as saying "We can’t discuss any info regarding PlayStation." F-ing gaslighting as usual from gamingbolt. Ban them already.

[crazyCoconuts]

You can't make this stuff up. He doesn't even finish the quote before being caught in a lie: “It’s very simple,” Peklar told us when we asked them about the game’s console exclusivity. “Good performance of the game is important to us. Xbox Series X is a very capable hardware that enables parity with the PC version of the game. We can’t discuss any info regarding PlayStation.”

THEY CAN'T DISCUSS INFO REGARDING PLAYSTATION BECAUSE THE ARE IN A CONTRACT WITH MICROSOFT! A contract that tells them what they can say and what they can't say.

Not so "simple" anymore, huh Pecklar?

[rlow1]

Just like Sonys contract with Epic. Both consoles are very powerful and we will see a lot of games on parity.

[ElementX]

They could be talking about not being able to discuss the PS5 console. They said they can't discuss Playstation in the sentence following the Series X hardware mention. Companies are under NDA for hardware, even Sweeney said so.

[RazzerRedux]

Or they don't even have a PS5 devkit. This guy's quote is so useless as it is. Amazing so many people are drawing so many ridiculous conclusions from it as far as PS5 is concerned.

[ElementX]

That's true! Good point

[rainslacker]

There are no NDA's they could have broken by stating anything within the scope by which they were talking about the game here on the XSX. There is absolutely nothing that prevents them from saying that they plan on, or would look into a PS5 version in the future. NDA's don't work like that.

The parity part was BS given the min specs for PC of this game.

The rest was either them having a contract preventing them from talking about a PS5 version right now, or a somewhat unorthodox way of saying that they simply aren't working on it right now, or have no plans for one.

Personally, I don't care about if they're working on a PS5 version, but I'm not a big fan of BS reasons like citing parity as their reason for choosing XSX. If that was their real reason, I'd want to hear more about why XSX is where parity can be achieved, when the game is designed on PC for hardware that is equivalent to the launch PS4. It can be something as simple as saying that they don't have the resources to do a PS5 version, or they're utilizing DX, and can't port it right now, or just be honest and say they have a contract with MS....the latter of all these being the take away that it sounds most like from the quote.

[ElementX]

Maybe it is due to DirectX. Nobody can say but them at this point. DirectX will help developers with ports

[MellauxGMNG]

Damn looks like you blew the case wide open bro

[gold_drake]

mkay lol

[GreatSako2020]

People believe in BS from a developer who is most likely gonna deliver high resolution ps3 graphics with RT and outdated animation.
Also many PC gamers won't be able t run the game at 1440 and 60 FPS. I am still on GTX970 and I believe many of them are like me.
Will this developer ignore those PC gamer with RX5500? Is that a parity?

[Veneno]

Spencer: so devs are talking about how good the PS5 is? Quick get someone on our end to do the same!

[gravedigger]

Parity with PC.....but Ampere Nvidia is coming!

But what actually Scorn dev said :

"Once all that was agreed upon it was a no brainer decision when you look at all the benefits Scorn will get from this partnership, from additional resources to much bigger exposure(marketing). It will certainly help us make Scorn a better, polished game in the end"

https://www.resetera.com/th...

It's money, man! Not some parity with PC

[RazzerRedux]

lol....this will be shown to be absolute bullshit when the PC system requirements are revealed.

[AK91]

So uh are we ignoring all the games that are available on PC and PS4 simultaneously?

[averagejoe26]

It's hilarious that the only positive articles for the new Xbox are made up click bait from gaming bolt.

Must be rough to be an Xbot.

[chiefJohn117]

Lol someone's mad.xD why attack Xbox fans?

[smashman98]

Lol the PC version doesn't enable parity with the PC version. Such a nonsense reason.

[ninsigma]

And what about PCs that don't perform to that level?? Ya know.... Most of em?? 🤔

[Terry_B]

The game could probably even run on a Xbox 360 or PS3 without any Problems.

[Pancit_Canton]

A Wii can probably run that game

[slavish0]

i guess powerful cpu, gpu, and memory due matter and ssd cant change that 🤔

[Silly gameAr]

We'll just have to see then, won't we?

xbox fans believe anything they get told without proof. Luckily, some people have to see if it's PR bs or not.

[ssj27]

Lol the game doesn't eve look next gen but ok

[Father__Merrin]

gamingbolt will be proven wrong yet again.......roll on ps5 reveal

[boing1]

And here I thought they are talking about PS5 not being capable where it's clearly about the rest of Xbox family not being capable. Nice clickbait, gamingbolt.

[Sophisticated_Chap]

This will be commonplace this generation, and it makes perfect sense. The PS5 is the weaker of the two consoles, and has a special SSD set up. Meanwhile, the Series X is essentially what a typical powerful gaming PC would be, outside of using the faster GDDR6 system memory over the typical DDR4 we see in PCs today.

There aren't many devs that are going to take the time to custom make games for the PS5, with its intricate SSD set up, when they will most likely be releasing their games on the both the Series X and PC also. Not to mention, when selling their games on PC, they will want as many people to be able to play as possible, so these games will be developed so that people with older PC hardware can play too, including people with mechanical HDDs.

[Aenea]

Even tho the PS5 might be weaker, the GPU power difference isn't such that this game would not be possible on the PS5. Especially when they also are releasing it for PC where many PC's have lesser specs than the PS5.

Many an Xbox fan seems to think the power gap is so huge that differences would be massive, sadly for them that will nog be the case.

Besides, if devs won't have the time to custom make games for the PS5's strengths why on earth would they do it for the XSX?

[Sophisticated_Chap]

"Besides, if devs won't have the time to custom make games for the PS5's strengths why on earth would they do it for the XSX?"

You've completely missed the point.

[rainslacker]

The min specs of this game on PC are a launch PS4. If it's going to be commonplace for devs to BS their reasons, then maybe it's time we call devs out for just spouting BS excuses, instead of trying to make this into a big thing about the disparity between consoles.

TLOU2 game play showing today looked better than anything that we've seen of Scorn, and the only thing MS has that looks better so far is a couple in-engine rendered trailers. That's using 1/3 the power of the XSX, and yet this game can only achieve parity, despite the PC requirements being 1/6 the TFlop power of the XSX. Sure, OK, that makes sense if you try real hard to make it make sense. But what doesn't make sense is why parity with a PS4 level PC can't be achieved on a PS5 which is roughly 5-6X the speed of the minimum PC specs. SSD has nothing to do with it, because the SSD isn't a factor to the game design on PC, nor will it be overly utilized on XSX in this case.

What you're saying is that devs won't take the time to utilize the extra features on PS5, but will do so on XSX? How exactly does that make any logical sense?

"There aren't many devs that are going to take the time to custom make games for the PS5,"

Probably not on the lowest level no. Game design is still going to be based around the lowest common denominator. But there will be those multiplat games that utilize what the PS5 has to offer to optimize their code. It doesn't have to be an all or nothing scenario, which could lead to better performance or even graphics depending on the situation.

[Sophisticated_Chap]

"What you're saying is that devs won't take the time to utilize the extra features on PS5, but will do so on XSX? How exactly does that make any logical sense?"

Just like Aenea, you've completely missed the point. The Series X really doesn't have any secret sauce extra features. It's essentially a straight up high end gaming PC, that uses GDDR6 system memory, and an SSD, nothing more.

[DOMination-]

Yes! I am pumping the air right now. It's good to have green back on top. After that trailer shook the world I can only imagine what the developer splash screen will look like let alone the title screen.

[Hakuoro]

I'm not sure if your serious or sarcastic, but either way I am laughing. lol

[Minute Man 721]

4K/60. Heard that Ubi?????

[Mister_G]

Won't be playing this then. Oh well :)

[chiefJohn117]

Damn....they basically said ps5 too weak to run it

[Aenea]

And yet, the 95% of PC's out there with weaker specs than the PS5 can!

Amazeballs what some people want to believe!

[chiefJohn117]

And not all of those 95% of PCs will be able to run it

[RazzerRedux]

"And not all of those 95% of PCs will be able to run it"

Pretty much any low to mid-range gaming PC of the last 6 years can run this game.

https://www.thenerdmag.com/...

You still buying this bullshit that PS5 can't run it? Hell, PS4 Pro could run this.

[chiefJohn117]

Not about about what I believe I'm just pointing out what they were implying true or not.

[RazzerRedux]

"true or not"

Not, then. How hard is it to say it isn't true? Man up.

[chiefJohn117]

How would I know if it's true or not true? They're the game devs. Y'all take everything devs say that's pro PS even if it could be multi console related but this got you in your feelings lol

[RazzerRedux]

"Y'all take everything devs say that's pro Xbox even if it could be multi console related but this got you in your feelings lol"

Well....right back at "y'all" then.

[Minute Man 721]

What bothers the Sony Only crowd is the last 3 gens the PS brand only beat the Xbox in power once.

Before I get labeled an "Xbot" take a look at my profile😎😜

[Hakuoro]

And uh, who's sold the most consoles and software?

[Minute Man 721]

But we talking about power, stay on topic

[Hakuoro]

Exactly, even if Xbox is is more powerful it doesn't matter. PlayStation will continue to sell more consoles, and sell more software.

[waverider]

Lol. Microsoft payed them. Nothing more. They must think gamers are morons. Look at tech genious that think a game made by a small studio with zero blockbusters is graphics power house. The teraflops...

[Benficaman]

dont make me laught. pc can go beyond 4k/60.

[tontontam0]

Googled Scorn, looks at pc system requirements????
Dafaq is with this shit so the xbox series x is on par with pc parts from 2013.

[Voodoopower73]

Scorn rofl.

It's a last gen looking game.

Seriously guys.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Doom Eternal destroys this game graphically with ease on current gen.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Wait for a better game to show off what's possible on next gen. Because Scorn isn't it.

[Traecy]

Knowing it's Windows PC game it was somewhat to be expected.

[sampsonon]

That's the reason why lol Stupid
Did you see that trash game?

[WeaseL]

So 95% of PC players will be locked out?

[NewEnds0186]

Whichever comes out first is the one I'll own first so if PS5 drops first I'll have it and vice versa with the XSX, I already got my preorder in for the XSX. I know both will be dropping bombs this gen so I have to own both.

[ColdSin]

You have strange prioritization criteria. Why buy the console that drops first? That isn't that logical. Buy the console with the launch titles that interest you the most.

[Stevonidas]

Hear that? That's the sound of jimmies being rustled...

[masterfox]

Awesome this confirms the PS5 is on a higher level. :D

[DreadGara]

Wtf, my old garage PC can play that shit!!!
On Windows 98 too /s

[rainslacker]

So, the minimum specs on PC are going to be well above what the average PC gamer has available, because I know the PS5's specs are well above what the average PC gamer has.

While I'm all for developers pushing the envelope, unless this game's minimum specs are outlandishly high for the current PC market, which is more a hindrance to this dev's chances of success for this game than it is a negative for Sony, this kind of excuse doesn't hold any weight.

Also, he couldn't discuss any info about a PS5 version, which either means they aren't making one, or MS is paying for this game to be exclusive to their console in some way. He also never says that it will always be exclusive to the XSX, although that may also be part of the deal with MS, so that's still a possibility.

I don't get what the issue is in just saying that a console maker is helping fund the game in some way, or paid to get it exclusive, or whatever. There is no need to make things up to justify why they may be releasing it on a particular system.

A developer isn't going to be sitting there thinking of their game in the early stages and say to themselves, "Oh, you know, sales are great and all, but we have this ideal that there should be parity for this game between two completely different markets which don't overlap that much, and because we're so high minded in that way, we're going to disregard the console platform that has more potential to have our game sell on it based on history, and current trends."

That just doesn't happen, and outside of resources not being available to make multiple versions, any dev releasing on console is going to have more logical and reasonable reasons for picking one console over another.

[Charal]

What is this crappy statement?
Does that mean that PC gamers not able to run the game 4K/60FPS ultra settings on their machine will be forbidden to launch it? Come on....

This felling I often have to be considered as a dumb and uneducated individual by some PR revolving around Xbox game division is I believe the main reason I can not stand them.

[MADGameR]

We know what an exclusive is. If it's on PC, regardless if its optimized for ''the Series X'' it's STILL not exclusive.

[chiefJohn117]

Key word "console" exclusive

[Master of Unlocking]

So THAT is what PS5 players may miss out on (if it turns out to be actually exclusive to the Xbox Series X and never comes to Sony's system, which I doubt) ...?
https://www.youtube.com/wat...
I'm sorry but I have 0 want/need to play that thing. Even from a technical point of view, Resistance Fall of Man on the PS3 looked way better than that... thing, whatever that disgusting mess in HR Giger-esque decorum is trying to be.
LOL, if all Microsoft's exclusives are going to be in that vein I'm not worried one bit about the success of the PS5, as Sony will no doubt be able to secure much much much more interesting IPs than that Scorn game.

[TheHan]

I knew it. Awesome though.

[garos82]

so "exclusive" now means also on PC? i love how in 2020 words dont mean the same thing anymore

[PunksOnN4G]

Lol so ogame cameout and was no where close to 4k 60 LOL XSX it ran at 1190P at beast XSX was 1080p but more common to dro pto 720p LOL