Approvals 5/3 ▼
Vits (2) - 1805d ago Cancel
Immagaiden (3) - 1805d ago Cancel
190°

Google Stadia vs. PlayStation Now: Which is better?

Google Stadia and PlayStation Now both allow you to pay $10/month to stream games across devices. Both services offer free trials so you can test them yourself, but this guide lays out the features to help you figure out what's right for you.

Read Full Story >>
androidcentral.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1805d ago
Changed: title
FallenAngel19841805d ago
Knightofelemia1805d ago

No brainer PSNow is the winner Sony has been doing it longer and you're comparing a library of 800 games to a magazine rack of 40 games.

UltraNova1805d ago (Edited 1805d ago )

...and the amazingly unique option of being able to buy new games for full price, on a streaming-only service!

CaptainCook1805d ago (Edited 1805d ago )

Streaming and games. Stadia is suprior in every aspect.

Stadia:

Streaming quality - 1080p upwards with no monthly payments unless you want 4k Streaming

Games - New triple A games releases on the service all the time.

TKCMuzzer1805d ago

Eh but you have the option to download loads of games on the PS4, no lag, no picture loss and so on. Also, there are a lot of quality titles on the PSNow, Stadia, not so much.
Plus, correct me if I’m wrong, it may be free but you still have to buy the games if you want to play them. So, pay £ 8.99 and get access to 800 games and play them when you want and just cancel if you no longer use it, or pay nothing, fork our for a controller and chrome cast if you want the tv experience and then start purchasing full price games to start streaming from a pretty dismal collection.
In its current state, Stadia is the poorer choice, both in value and content.

Knightofelemia1805d ago (Edited 1805d ago )

@Captain Cook

Sony has it better then Stadia disc based games which opens up another library if the game is not on PSNow. Yeah you can do 4k and 1080p but for what you're paying to access 40 games on a magazine rack is not worth it. PSNnow accesses the library of the older Playstation consoles sure Stadia gets access to newer games day one. But you compare the numbers of people who own and play on Stadia and people who play and own a Playstation the numbers surpass Stadia. I have a feeling Sony will allow day one new released games on PSNow even they have to play catch up and keep up with features.

RazzerRedux1804d ago

"Stadia is suprior in every aspect."

False statement. Unlike PS Now, you have to buy the games and you cannot download the games and play locally at all. Those are two aspect where PS Now is factually superior.

JackBNimble1804d ago

You sound like a Google rep.
Stadia isn't doing anything better , in fact I don't think they should sell any games on that platform. It should be a subscription plan for access to all games on stadia.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1804d ago
DragonWarrior191805d ago

Streaming for gaming never wins. It's all trash.

XBManiac1804d ago (Edited 1804d ago )

I only can play Stadia with wired connection on PC, because artifacts, changes in resolution and lag is too high. Only racing games are really playable on Stadia and selection of games available is not made with experience and quality on first place. It seems that everything can be on Stadia and it only makes the service worse, because not all games can be well played on streaming yet. Exclusives like Gylt, tend to kill the experience on very dark passages, where I only can see stain covering the screen... it really ruins a dark game. Competitive modes like Destiny 2 Cruzible tend to compensate too much, with autoaiming and it is not comparable to playing on PC with 120+ fps. But... yes... not having cheats and hacks is a positive point for Stadia.
In the other side... PlayStation Now tends to care about what games come to the service and it is a better experience, for the moment.
PSNow wins in 2020. Maybe with 5G it can change... but Stadia is a no go (expensive, not good product and bad selection).

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1804d ago
Vits1805d ago

Stadia is technically the better. Newer games, better streaming quality and more supported devices.

However PS Now have a much better value as you don't have to pay for each individual game. And also feature the larger library. So between the two I would go with PS Now. Just be sure to not hook it up to a 4K TV. Or you going to have a blurry mess.

TKCMuzzer1805d ago

Er, I’m not sure the games are better, newer yes but I have just looked at the list and it’s not great if we are being honest.

Vits1805d ago

I never said the games were better. I said the service is overall better as far quality goes. But the games are newer.

1805d ago
caddytrek1805d ago

What does newness have to do with anything? I played Control on PSNow last month and I am 100% certain I enjoyed it just as much last month as I would have day 1.

I'll take the variety in both numbers and genres PSNow offers over any other service hand down. Any game I haven't played is new to me.

And the service is only $5 a month an amazing price for what you get.

caddytrek1805d ago

Thanks, it was good for me.

I also enjoyed playing Warriors All Stars and Nights of Azure and Romance of the Three Kingdoms, all of them were new to me. And when I get some free time I am going to play The Evil Within 2.

All games I was interested in but never got the chance to play.

Tross1805d ago

If you have to ask you must not have gotten the memo that Stadia is a dumpster fire.

TheSaint1804d ago

At least a dumpster fire can keep you warm.

JEECE1805d ago

PSNOW lets you download some games (PS4 games, not PS3 games). This alone makes it better. If companies are going to insist on streaming, download should always be an option for those of us who don't enjoy input latency.

badz1491805d ago (Edited 1805d ago )

"SOME" is an understatement. There are more downloadable PS4 games on PSNow than the whole of Gamepass even, let alone Stadia.

But why are we even comparing these 2? You pay $10/month for PSNow and get access to 800 games but you pay $10/month for Stadia, you still need to buy the games amd most of them are full priced. How the hell is the Stadia even a comparison here??

Show all comments (29)
50°

Turtle Beach Reveals New Xbox And Switch Headsets And Controllers

Turtle Beach has revealed new Headsets and controllers for the Switch and Xbox thst have a colorful look.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community14h ago
190°

PS Plus, Xbox Game Pass Are Not the Future of Gaming, Says US Analyst

For the first few years of this generation, a number of industry analysts argued Sony may need to add first-party games to PS Plus at launch in order to maintain pace with Xbox Game Pass.

The Japanese giant, to its credit, always maintained its position that this was unsustainable. It later added tiers to its subscription offering, providing good value with PS Plus Extra and PS Plus Premium without going all-in like its Redmond rival.

Microsoft has since missed a number of targets with its own service, and has subsequently started releasing games like Forza Horizon 5 and Indiana Jones and the Great Circle on Sony’s console.

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community17h ago
1d 2h ago
23h agoReplies(1)
italiangamer21h ago

Well Sony never said that, the other camp did and we all know how that went.

goken2h ago

Not all know. I am betting those observing this while obscured may have trouble comprehending 😅

dveio21h ago

Back in the day, there were even discussions and I believe statements from Spencer about wether Sony would allow Game Pass on Playstation.

At least for the time being this option seems definitely to be ruled out completely.

Show all comments (32)
80°

Why Portability Still Matters for Nintendo Switch 2—and What We’re Hoping to See

Nintendo Switch 2 upgrades portability with a bigger screen, 1080p handheld play, and Wi-Fi 6. Here's why it still matters in 2025.

Read Full Story >>
clouddosage.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 12h ago
Profchaos2d ago

As someone who travels for work I still care about portable systems.

I have found using remote play in a hotel room is an excellent experience in a major city as I've got my console hard wired to a gigabit connection at home however it's not perfect if power trips the console tends to go to the repair section and can't be booted remotely so it's a annoying call to family to power it on for me.

A hotel out of town or regionally though that can cause havok for remote play as I'm always on 5g using it hotel wifi is never good enough for a solid remote play session.

But leaving a stable location and getting onto a plane or train and there's little to no chance of a good experience with remote play thats where something like the switch 2 will really shine for me personally long haul flights are exhausting and one of my most hated things the switch has been invaluable for me and I'll absolutely be upgrading

Goodguy011d 9h ago

Nintendo has always done it the best, handheld is in their genes. I do wish their dock could be like an egpu though and it make it much more powerful, it's a bit harder for me to play portable now for some odd reason, love just sitting on the couch with a big screen and controller. And ofc always great to have the portable option and for me it's best for smaller games.

jznrpg1d 7h ago

I was hoping for a little more than 540p upscaled

UltimateOwnage1d 6h ago

IMO, 540P upscaled in portable mode to a 1080P screen using DLSS on the tensor cores will likely extend battery life using a lower TDP and provide much better anti-aliasing and similar clarity compared to native 1080P with med/low AA at a higher TDP. It’s just a better way to use a mobile chipset. That’s not a flaw or weakness, it’s a key benefit for the portable design of the platform.

repsahj1d ago

Lol, even the impressive upscaling feature of Switch 2 can now spin to a negative one.

jznrpg4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

Switch 1 was hitting 720p and above that with no upscale, so why can’t they have a higher res and upscale it more

repsahj3h ago

@jznrpg
Because of that even the current gen games will now run on switch 2 that looked as good and with decent framerate as the current gen consoles.

Do you watch Nintendo's hands on preview for switch 2? LOL.

badz14917h ago

because aside from Nintendo's own games which have their dedicated fanbase, portability is the only other thing it has going for it. Nintendo will be eliminated faster than xbox if they ever decide to do a dedicated home console again. going the hybrid way is the only way left for them and they are lucky they dominated the portable market all those years ago. imagine the power of the Switch 2 as a console this day and age with the same price as PS5. they will be the laughing stock of the market.