880°

Epic Games claims that Unreal Engine 5 Tech Demo can run with 40fps on RTX2080 notebook at 1440p

DSOGaming writes: "Earlier this week, Epic Games presented an amazing tech demo of Unreal Engine 5 on PS5. That demo was running at 1440p with 30fps and looked spectacular. However, that same demo can already run with 40fps on an NVIDIA RTX2080 notebook at 1440p according to Epic Games China."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
Looper1440d ago

Turns out an off the shelf SSD was sufficient to do all of that at a better frame rate on top of that. So much for the flying section using some sort of secret sauce.

Turns out the conclusion those who haven't had a sip at the kool-aid had was correct; just a bunch of paid for marketing baloney.

Jin_Sakai1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

“Turns out the conclusion those who haven't had a sip at the kool-aid had was correct; just a bunch of paid for marketing baloney.“

We’ll see about that kool-aid when Sony 1st party devs start firing on all cylinders with a 5.5Gbps SSD at their disposal.

1440d ago
ElementX1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

Lol level design won't require 5.5Gb per second. There's less then 16GB of RAM available for the GPU on the consoles and they'd both full it up fast enough to do anything. The Series X decompresses at 6GB+/sec. Less than 2 seconds to fill up whatever RAM is used by the GPU, fast enough to fill up the screen with whatever you can throw at it. By the time you moved across the screen the next area would be loaded.

If you actually used 5.5GB+/sec transfer the game speed would be too fast to even be playable. Even the streaming part of the demo was too fast too really do anything other than jump and that wasn't even pushing the SSD to it's limits. The images at the sides of the screen were blurry from the speed, it's just not feasible for gameplay.

coolbeans1440d ago

You're literally not 2 days out from utilizing rhetoric like how that UE5 got MS shook and general gloating about it. You should be the first in line to reconsider your rhetorical approach before pivoting at the nearest convenience.

Kiwi661440d ago

Mate just admit that you bragged a little too much over the demo reveal and move on

Hakuoro1440d ago

ElementX, what official paper has said 6gb/s?

You guys call out people for talking about PS5 SSD but you guys keep lying about the speed of the SX's SSD to compensate.

And you guys are all over the place yesterday someone was claiming it was over 9gb/s. There is no way that a 2.4GB/s SSD can decompress at 6 GB/s it's simply not realistic. With 2.4 gb/s SSD your looking at 4 to 4.5 GB/s and that's being generous.

If you're going to call people out don't turn around and make up lies in the same sentence.

Babadook71440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

Guys this is just running the MP4 video on a laptop. Not "running" on the laptop.

https://twitter.com/TimSwee...

And... https://twitter.com/TimSwee...

starchild1440d ago

Well, sure, some of Sony's studios will continue to make some of the best looking games around. That's part of why Sony bought those studios and why they encourage them to push the visuals as much as possible. But that doesn't mean that other studios won't make some equally amazing looking games. Quit trying to act like Sony 1st party studios all perform at that level because they don't. Second of all, don't expect sensible people to believe that Sony studios have some secret sauce that just can't be matched by anything else, even PC, because that's just a load of bunk.

It's great what Sony has done with the very fast SSD and supporting architecture, but it isn't the end all be all. GPUs, CPUs and traditional memory bandwidth still matter a lot. A SSD can allow for some really awesome things that will be greatly appreciated this upcoming gen and I'm glad that Sony and Microsoft decided to improve things in that area. But storage speed doesn't overcome every other consideration.

ElementX1440d ago

I'll quote the math from reddit since that's easier than typing everything out on my phone.

"That's why it's 4.8GB/s to 2.4GB/s raw (-50% compression) and the PS5 is \~8/9GB to 5.5GB/s raw (\~-39%/-30% compression). "

Kraken provides about 30 to 40% compression at the time of the spec reveal. Algorithms change and improve. Cerny talked about up to 22Gb, lol.

BCPack compressed at least 50% at the time of the spec reveal. The 6gb decompression is from the Eurogamer article:
" Our second component is a high-speed hardware decompression block that can deliver over 6GB/s," reveals Andrew Goosse". https://www.eurogamer.net/a...

I posted yesterday about a compression expert who believes it to be more than 50% compression. Microsoft hasn't come out with exact numbers yet. So the decompression block can handle over 6gb/sec. Why would they give that number if the compression wasn't capable? Your guess is as good as mine but it leads me to believe that BCPack will get closer to 6gb, thus the compressed IO will be higher than 4.8GB. If they were getting only 4.8GB compressed then they would've said so. It's speculation, of course.

Babadook71440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

ElementX

6 GB/s vs 22 GB/s are the limits.

Sony has about a 3x advantage

Kraken numbers are for the total asset compression so you would have to compare those numbers to the total asset compression on BCPack. Not total vs texture only. Kraken is likely better.

Hakuoro1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

ElementX The spec sheet on that page you linked says 4.8

IO Throughput 2.4GB/s (Raw), 4.8GB/s (Compressed)

Which again, having 2x the speed of the device is highly unlikely. So I don't know where this guy comes up with 6GB/s other than it's Microsoft not being truthful to make a favorable comparison to PS5.

Again I guarantee you that it'll be around 4-4.5 GB/s

ElementX1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

Series X uses BCPack and ZLib from what I've read. BCPack is designed for textures. Textures can be highly compressed, a texture specific algorithm is better than one that does everything. PS5 supposedly also uses ZLib. As algorithms improve, compressed IO improves. I know 22Gb is the limitation, it would never get that good. 6Gb decompression could've been left out of the discussion of it weren't reachable, it may be possible, well have to wait

MS was still improving compression in March

https://twitter.com/JamesSt...

@gaming. Yeah as of the current compression available at the time. That page also talks about the decompression block, which is what I'm talking about. Compression improves all the time

Kribwalker1440d ago

PS5 Secret Sauce confirmed to just be McChicken Sauce from Mcdonald’s.

More at 11

Eonjay1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

In before you guys realize the tweet was fake 😄😄😄. Again. John2 With the fake news...

Tzuno1440d ago

faster load times? i can live with a +5 sec loading

Unspoken1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

Oh man, now this deserves some pop corn!

Where are all the usual Sony faithful?

Laptop GPU and 970 Evo bested the PS5...you guys are getting played.

1440d ago
gravedigger1440d ago

@ElementX

BCPack is already included in XSX SSD compression speed 4.8 GB/s, same as Kraken in 9GB/s. But Kraken is a lossless compression, BCPack is lossy compression. Accept, Xbone fans, that XSX SSD is inferior to PS5 SSD

CH33S31440d ago

God damn it! I wanted to see how this played on PC. I've already dropped some cash on a nice PCIe 4 Corsair drive that comes in at just under 5GBs. I just want to see how it runs with UE5 and what do I get? BS from China that's already been proven to be fake.

Look, I'm not being down on PlayStation. I just game and create on PC mostly and wanted to see requirements. Well. That and whether they'd fixed problems with blueprints (talk about a pain in the ass).

Can we just get some real information from epic already. All this fake shit from fans because PS5 was the reveal platform is crazy.

1440d ago
umair_s511440d ago

That what I was thinking. Game will probably be already GPU or CPU bound before requiring those SSD speeds.

ElementX1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

@gravedigger it was 50% compression AT SPEC REVEAL. I said 4.8GB(compressed) was 50%! They continuously work on algorithms to improve compression. The compression Sony is using might improve also! We don't know any details about BCPack, the Twitter link I shared was from a MS employee working on compression tech for MS and Series X. He stated that MS has shared further information with developers and partners, however it's not publicly available yet.

I said we have to wait and see if they improve the compression, it may result in 5+GB compressed down to the 2.4GB(raw) IO speed of the SSD. Nothing you stated in your post is anything I haven't said already! Did you even read my previous comments?

gravedigger1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

@Element

Yes, i've read your comments. But somehow with some theorry and quotes you trying to mitigate XSX SSD lower speed compared to PS5s SSD.
Spec is 4.8GB/s compressed ( BCPack within. Theoretical max is 6. YOU CAN'T CHANGE THE LOCKED numbers. That's it. XSX SSD compressed speed is below PS5 RAW. Accept that and move on. BCpack is texture ONLY and lossy one, Kraken is for general decompression and lossless. That means EVERYTHING.

itsmebryan1439d ago

@jil
That's just said. Just take the "L" and move on. Smh

rainslacker1439d ago

All this discussion about compression when all that really matters is physical throughput. Compression just makes the files smaller, it doesnt speed up the actual transfer of bits. Compression, regardless of the technique is never going to achieve a 50% reduction of data across the board. Some things may compress more, others less. Media data doesnt tend to compress well beyond what formats already offer compression for saving.

If a drives actual specs are faster on one system, then it's going to be faster with or without compression. Better compression will only mean that you may be able to transfer more data, but it's highly unlikely two high performance compression algorithms are going to have a significant difference in their compression levels.

gravedigger1439d ago

One interesting tidbit :

"
I think that’s simply a case of crossed wires over running a mp4 of the demo vs talking about how the tech runs on a laptop. In the technical detail, nothing Sweeney or this Q+A reportedly revealed contradict each other. What that Q+A just more explicitly confirms is that Nanite can dynamically scale triangle fidelity according to your data access. 1080p/2tris per pixel should indeed be in the realm of MB/s rather than GB/s. Sweeney already said this will scale down, it just won’t look as good. In saying ‘this needs MB/s, not GB/s’, I don’t think this engineer is at all claiming you’ll get the same fidelity on MB/s. Simply that the tech can scale it down to that level."

https://www.resetera.com/th...

So, MEGABYTES

brrdat1439d ago Show
Drew3451439d ago

@ ElementX

The Series X can compress 4.8GBs of data, not 6GBs.

The demo being ran during the flying scene was not pushing the PS5's SSD to the limit. You say 5.5GBs of UNCOMPRESSED data isn't needed because it would be blurred out. You forget, nothing was going on during that scene, though. The more you have in a frame, the harder it will be to process that information without running into a bottleneck. What does that mean exactly? The PS5's SSD is going to allow a lot more on screen per frame, whether you are falling or just walking around -- especially when that data hits 9GBs compressed.

UltraNova1439d ago

One thing's for sure, if an engine demo got so many people riled up, imagine what a Sony 1st party game will do to them. Fun times ahead!

1439d ago
Profchaos1439d ago

It's been now proven the China leak was completely fake with Tim Sweeney stating they just played the video as is on a laptop the same way people watched it on their device at home.

+ Show (27) more repliesLast reply 1439d ago
Obscure_Observer1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

A RTX2080?

According to PCGamer, Xbox Series X´s 12.155 TFLOPs GPU is theoretically faster than a GeForce RTX 2080 Super´s 11.15 TFLOPs GPU

Interesting fact is that PS5´s 10.28 TFLOPs GPU is also theoretically supposed to be a tiny bit faster than Nvidia´s RTX 2080 10.07 TFLOPs.

https://www.pcgamer.com/on-...

Xbox Series X faster GPU and CPU could (on paper) run that demo at superior resolution and framerate in direct comparisson with that RTX2080 notebook.

Asuka1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

This is incorrect. You cannot compare Turing architecture to RDNA2 in that way.

Turing Tflop != RDNA2 Tflop. This is why I hate the whole Tflop metric. It mean next to nothing unless you are comparing generations of the same gpu architecture.

Obscure_Observer1440d ago

@Asuka

"This is incorrect. You cannot compare Turing architecture to RDNA2 in that way."

Except it´s not me, dude.

https://www.pcgamer.com/on-...

Hit the global authority on PC games at Twitter and speak your mind. :)

FlyingFoxy1440d ago

This was a laptop, a laptop GPU. Laptop GPUs aren't as fast as a desktop GPU.

https://www.youtube.com/wat... This demo would probably run 60fps on a 3070 class card

Eonjay1440d ago

Unfortunately the demo on the 2080 tweet was a fake so we can't say either or. What we do know is that Tim stated that the engine itself can run on both current and next gen.

anubusgold1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

@MasterCornholio The asset streaming doesnt matter since intel is stuck on pcie 3.0 that is why epic was so impressed they are stuck on crap hardware. Intel has the whole market and Amd only had 5 percent of the market so amd hardware is on pcie 4.0 for a year now with much faster ssd speeds up to 4.9 speeds where intel is stuck on 1.5 speed drives. Its so bad at intel that intel have to test their New SSD 4.0 drives on Amd motherboards that has to burn their ass lol. Intel is waiting for Pcie 5.0 then their speeds will be beyond playstation 5.

amazinglover1440d ago

Flops don't translate 1 to1 across architecture so comparing them that way is pointless.
RDNA 2 flops are less powerful then RDNA 3 an RDNA 2 card with 10 TF will be less powerful then an RDNA 3 card with 10TF

until more devs get there hands on both consoles all where doing is making uneducated guess as these run on architecture we haven't heavily tested yet.

rainslacker1439d ago

A flop is a flop. Doesnt matter the architecture. I think what's confusing with the way people are talking about is this perception that a flop can perform a specific amount of work per flop. What is really happening is that different classes of hardware, or core functions can process the data from these flops in different ways, and achieve results using a different amount of data. A streamlined rendering process can theoretically do more with the same amount of data, or the less efficient one may require additional workload to achieve the same results.

In this way, comparing flops from one processor architecture to another is not really prudent. But it's fine when comparing processors from the same class of processor.

There is also the matter of the API that is being used to process the graphics. DirectX and Vulcan for instance handle their render streams in much different ways. One isnt better than the other, at least not for the purpose of this discussion, they're just different, and how well they work on various architectures varies as well.

brrdat1439d ago Show
anubusgold1439d ago

@brrdat Linus tech tips just called out Tim sweeny for lying for Sony he showed 3 ssd's that are at least as twice as fast as the PS5 SSD He clearly shows it at the 22:00 min mark on youtube https://www.youtube.com/wat...

ABizzel11439d ago (Edited 1439d ago )

@Obscure_Observer

No Asuka is correct, that article is about TFLOPS only, not performance.

PCGamer should be ashamed of themselves for even posting that article. This article is a comparison of TFLOPS, which has nothing to do with performance when comparing different architectures. NVIDIA cards have almost always had lower TFLOPS than AMD cards, and still perform on par and for the last 10 years beat AMD in the same tiers.

TFLOPS is nothing but the CU * 64 * 2 * the GPU clock speed, which is why it's standard across the board. However, it does not take into consideration the IPC of each CU, or if the CU is combined with other cores (such as RT Cores etc...)

Two different GPU can have 40 and 56 CUs at 2 GHz, using TFLOPS alone the 56 CU GPU comes in at 14.336 TF while the 40 CU GPU comes in at 10.24 TF, and instantly all the non-tech people on this sight would say the 56 CU GPU is better. When in fact if the 40CU GPU has a 50% IPC performance increase then it's still 10.24 in overall TFLOPS, but in reality, it performs closer to 15.36 TFLOPS and is more powerful than the 56 CU GPU even though the TFLOPS are lower.

This is basically the battle NVIDIA was winning against AMD prior to RDNA (closer, but still a bit behind on IPC) and RDNA 2 (hopefully equal).

A prime example, they have the Vega 64 listed 2nd in the ranking because it has high TFLOPS because it has 64CUs, however, it's second to last in game performance only beating the original base RTX 2060, and competes with the RTX 2060s only in games that favor AMD.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Please stop spreading misinformation.

The Series X performance ranges around the RTX 2080 and RTX 2080 Super, the PS5's performance ranges around an RTX 2070 super. Therefore, the Series X performance will be on par with this laptop, as the consoles are basically high-end gaming laptops.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 1439d ago
alb18991440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

They ran the famous demo on a portable PC with RTX 2080 mobile that has a 9.4 terraflops of performance when is connected but they ran that demo with the portable disconnected and still the PC managed to run 30% faster than the ps5. It takes us AGAIN to the question of how many terraflops does really has the ps5?
I will help....It isn't 10.2.

Profchaos1440d ago

That's not how tflops work rDNA vs turning can't be compared in that way

Sophisticated_Chap1440d ago

alb1899 has a point, since the PS5's GPU has dynamic frequency scaling, so it may not be running at the full 10.3 Tflops the entire time, possibly due to heat. But then again, this could be how RDNA2 Tflops compare to Nvidia Tflops, in which case RDNA2 isn't much better than RDNA1.

Having said that, AMD did say that RDNA2 PC GPUs would be different from what is going to be in the consoles. Perhaps this is the same kind of marketing AMD does with their mobile Ryzen CPUs, where they are calling them Ryzen 4000, but in reality, they're actually Ryzen 3000 (Zen 2) CPUs.

Either way, it's going to be interesting to see the final performance numbers when the time comes.

Eonjay1440d ago

You do realize that this story is a fraud per Tim himself, right?

1440d ago
brrdat1439d ago Show
itsmebryan1439d ago (Edited 1439d ago )

@brrdat

Where did EPIC say that XSX would not be capable of the demos level of performance? You and other Sony fans are so desperate for a win, you crow about a next generation tech demo running 1440p @30fps. Now who is really desperate? Smh

Donnie811439d ago

Yeah the 10.28 is just a best case number that will never be reached. They know good and well the ps5 is a 9 tflop machine. Just 10.28 sounds better than 9.28 vs 12 plus.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1439d ago
Asuka1440d ago

I know they are not devs, but Digital Foundry did say in their analysis that the demo appeared to be very GPU dependent. If that is the case then it would make sense that the demo would run better on a rtx 2080 (a downclocked rtx2080 at that since it specifically stated notebook.)

alb18991440d ago

The performance of a PC portable unplugged is a lot less than plugged. The demo was running at 40fps unplugged

sinspirit1440d ago

@alb1899

This video was debunked as taken out of context and not an actual demo running. They are discussing other information and watching a video on the laptop, hence the ".MP4" on screen.

On top of this faked info. Where would you even get the unplugged info from? Where did you conjure this up from?

They mentioned 40fps as a target to hit to maintain at least 30fps for an acceptable framerate on PC hardware. 30fps with VSync. Tim Sweeney's Twitter states this. This is likely how they will decide levels of fidelity while using these features on existing hardware. They aren't just gonna run the same graphics settings on every type of hardware. Now they gotta experiment with settings to find the sweet spot for different tiers of current hardware.

GTgamer1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

FALSEEEEEEEEE
https://mobile.twitter.com/...
TIM SWEENY says that's a video playing on the laptop you can clearly see mp4. Smfh
Damn UE5 demo really got y'all going crazy nice try tho.
Can't wait to see what else you guys come up with

Asuka1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

Eh I'm still skeptical. who transcodes and plays back a video at 40fps?? Doesn't make much sense, then again most things these days don't...

GTgamer1440d ago

@Asuka
"Not sure exactly what was said. The translated quote on 40 fps isn't a comparison between hardware capabilities. To hit a 100% solid 30 fps with vsync in the demo, per-frame times vary from 30 fps up to much higher."

Go on his Twitter page he's responding to as much as he can debunking all of the nonsense

GTgamer1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

Keep the disagrees coming boys I get it truth hurts
https://mobile.twitter.com/...
Admins report this story as fake please and thank you 😂😂
Don't worry boys you'll get Sony and Sweeny next time

zypher1440d ago

@GTgamer

Funny how people are down voting you when all you're doing is posting facts.

XabiDaChosenOne1440d ago

The disagrees to sources and facts should prove that people on this site hate being informed and are emotionally attached to narratives.

Imalwaysright1440d ago

Nope Epic's engineer point blank stated that his PC with a mobile RTX 2080 could run the demo at 40 fps but didn't specify the resolution. All Sweeney is talking about is a video from a presentation wich has nothing to do with the claims made by the engineer.

GTgamer1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

@imalwayright proof?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PS...
Here's all my info from the stream translated.
And even if Epic themselves said since day one of the stream UE5 can be downscaled to run on most hardware so what's the point especially since you don't know if it was on the level of the PS5 demo.

ElementX1440d ago

So where did the 40FPS come from? I thought the Epic guy said he was getting that on a laptop, I don't believe they actually claimed it was running on stage on the laptop.

GTgamer1440d ago

@ElementX
I'm going to bed just go on Tim Sweeny's Twitter or use any of my links.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 1440d ago
_dangerclose_1440d ago

Turns out you're still bitter that demo was running on PS5. Grow the hell up and let it go Elsa.

Kyizen1440d ago

You believe everything coming out of China? Haha

OB1Biker1440d ago

The PS5 demo can run higher than 30fps it was just locked. They played a video on a laptop here

1440d ago
gravedigger1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

Not exactly. Looks like plot got a twist. Chinese dev ran originally PS5 demo on his laptop :

https://twitter.com/iamalit...

Of course you can run an .mp4 file on a laptop. Even Sweeney said something about this :

" They playing the video on the stream. Do you see the ".mp4" in the title bar?"

https://twitter.com/TimSwee...

"I think people were confused by an event where the VIDEO was played on a laptop."

https://twitter.com/TimSwee...

Btw.resolution by this chinese dev. WASN'T SPECIFIED. He only mentioned 40+ fps

https://forum.beyond3d.com/...

Demo could scale to other platforms it doesn't mean every setting is going to be the same or run the same because of it. Sweeney already said this will scale down ( depending on specs ) it just won’t look as good.
Nanite and Lumen requiring good I/O SSD output. And PS5 can deliver that.

OB1Biker1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

I dont know why people are so dense. They said many times its scalable. They can just reduce the level of details for other platforms.
UE5 will run even on android.
In this case it was just a video though.

umair_s511439d ago

I think for next gen ps5 will be the weakest link

1440d ago
sampsonon1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

Epic games china? lol how about sweany himself https://youtu.be/VBhcqCRzsU...
So enjoy the bone Epic China gave you lol. So yes it will play on any pc or Phone. But they would need to scale back in order to run it.

I leave you with exhibit B : https://youtu.be/VBhcqCRzsU...

1440d ago
SyntheticForm1440d ago

I love how fanboys are playing tug-of-war over this Sweeney dude.

Only on N4G.

richie007bond1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

Truth always comes out in the end.

MadLad1440d ago

"Dah powah of dah dwive"!

1440d ago
PrinceAli1440d ago

Turns out you were wrong and they were only WATCHING a video and not playing the actual demo loool... but thanks for trying.... I dont understand why people like you are SOOOO upset lool

itsmebryan1439d ago

You better be careful what you say because the Sony fanboy defense squad will come for you. Lol. But, they set themselves up to look bad by making up facts. Stating that a weaker PS5 will some how out perform the stonger XSX. Smh

Pyrofire951439d ago

Why is there so much venom in your blood? What fuels your desire to shut down other peoples work? Are you a happy person, a balanced person, are you lost in this world and grasp at anything you can find just so you feel like you exist?

brrdat1439d ago Show
1439d ago
anubusgold1439d ago

Linus tech tips calls out Epic games for lying on how fast PC SSDs are at the 22:00 min mark he shows that epic games is lying. https://www.youtube.com/wat...

isarai1439d ago

All that talk and it turns out it was a MP4 of the demo playing on the laptop not the demo itself lol...

WelkinCole1439d ago

Man the salt. EPIC showed their engine running on the PS5 and everyone loves it and you xbox fans are just salty.

Don't get a heart attack once Sony 1st party show what next gen is.

Rude-ro1439d ago (Edited 1439d ago )

😂😂☝️ the Xbox force is out with their multiple accounts again.

The ps5 demo was running with 8k textures.... guess what 1440p is doing?

The only good news here is that the engine is scalable.
Obviously, high end PCs, the ps5 are known for what is going on in the demo.

The scale down part is the tell of the ignorance levels in this troll of a post.

tontontam01439d ago

Yup

Sony a multi million dollar company is so dumb they spent millions developing their ssd solution.
they should have just slapped together powerful parts like microsoft and they could have easily won next gen.

MWH1439d ago (Edited 1439d ago )

Let me tell you when i'm reading all about the magic stuff SSDs can do i think wow how many PhDs in ignorance we have here someone got to say something but then i tell myself man let it roll toward that wall facts are facts in the end of the day no matter what they do or say.

seanpitt231439d ago

This got debunked haha the laptop was just playing a video of the demo couldn’t actually run the demo.. pc elitists are trying there best..

ps5fanboy1439d ago

turns out where??
show us the pc demo , not an appeasment statement from an ex pc games producer...

+ Show (26) more repliesLast reply 1439d ago
1440d ago Replies(8)
XxINFERNUSxX1440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

Didn't this shill Tim Sweeney say it can't run on PC? If so that's some marketing BS right there. Anyway lets try a 2080 ti and also next gen RTX cards are coming with a rumored RTX 3080 with a possible 21 tflops. UE5 4k 60fps will be pretty easy with that kind of GPU :D

Ceaser98573611440d ago

Cant imagin the price for RTX 3080 which most pc gamers wont be buying... but ya 4k 60fps would be amazing.

ANIALATOR1361440d ago

I'm waiting for the 3080ti

Movefasta19931439d ago

why do you worry about what other people spend their money on? Are you the type of guy to make fun of someone who owns a McLaren f1 because only a few people have it?

Movefasta19931439d ago

They keep making these high end graphic cards yet nobody buys them right? why keep making them... LOGIC.

Unspoken1439d ago

If AMD continues to push on the GPU front prices should theoretically prices should come down for the 3000 series. Then again it's nVidia.

Ceaser98573611438d ago (Edited 1438d ago )

Oh it doesnt bother me what other people buys. They can do whatever the hell thy want. My response was to that guy who brought up rtx 3080 (didnt even got announced )could handle it when Tim said PS5 ssd is superior then current gen pc. Infact alot of pc players are genuinely butthurt and most boast about specs they dont have, so ya most wont be buying a 21tf cards for GAMING since it would be expensive. May be few would buy it and say Look my PC is more powerful then console where the price between the two will be a big difference. Unless Nvidia is kind enough and sell the 3080 3080ti for cheap like 200 USD lol!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1438d ago
starchild1440d ago

Yep, DDR5 memory, PCIE 5.0 and the increased bandwidth it offers for new graphics cards and faster NVMe SSDs, AMD Zen 3 processors, Intel Rocket Lake S processors (finally a new Intel architecture)...all of these leaps forward are coming within about a year. Pretty exciting stuff happening in the PC space, along with the new consoles.

1440d ago
1440d ago Replies(2)
Profchaos1439d ago

Tim Sweeney tweeted earlier this demo did not run in real time on the PC it was simply played at an event as a video on the device that same way we all watched it on YouTube

Cmv381439d ago

I swear you fanboys love making shit up. Nobody said this.

Hungryalpaca1439d ago

No, he said a modern SSD can run it fine.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1438d ago
Babadook71440d ago (Edited 1440d ago )

This demo reportedly doesnt exist on PC. Is Epic China really a trustworthy source?

OMGitzThatGuy1440d ago

How can it not exist on PC when it is made on PC?

Babadook71440d ago

Because it wasn’t compiled for PC?

rainslacker1439d ago

It probably exists on PC. Unreal builds easily to PC for testing purposes. To my knowledge, they havent released a PC build of the demo to the public though.

We do know the demo they showcased was captured from a ps5 dev kit.

The chinese thing seems to just say that a pc can run the demo, but there are conflicting reports about the translation, and sweeney seems pretty adamant about it requiring at least what the ps5 offers in terms if SSD throughput.

I'm prone to side with sweeny on this, but I'm willing to accept that it can run on PC with a suitable SSD installed. There are still some unknowns with the SSD implementations of what they were showing in the demo for me to make a twchnical.judgement on what would be required, and honestly, I dont think it's worth the time to really try and figure out.

Profchaos1439d ago

Tim Sweeney tweeted that they had just played the video on the laptop not actually run the demo in real time the system did not run it.

It's the same as me watching it in my three year old android phone and claiming my device can run the demo

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1439d ago
shiva11440d ago

They why is Sweeny up late night answering on twitter? He could have just said we dont have epicness in China and there is still no PC which can run this demo in China.

tontontam01440d ago

Everything with "CHINA" slapped on it is untrustworthy in these troubled times.

Show all comments (284)
80°

Fan-Made Unreal Engine 5 Version of Toy Story 2: Buzz Lightyear to the Rescue!

Dive into a stunning fan-made version of the beloved 1999 game set in Toy Story's Andy's room. Get nostalgic with Unreal Engine 5 graphics.

Read Full Story >>
retronews.com
DazaMc15d ago

I'm getting PS2 vibes. Still good for homemade.

90°

IGN - Gray Zone Warfare: 23 Minutes of Exclusive Gameplay

Get a look at 23 minutes of exclusive gameplay from Gray Zone Warfare, the upcoming Unreal Engine 5-powered military shooter from developer Madfinger Games. Wishlist it on Steam if you're interested: https://store.steampowered....

RaidenBlack45d ago

The most realistic and engaging open world FPS game in works. for quite some years, by Madfinger Games.
Here's more about the game :
https://youtu.be/Romb5AIbce...

PsychoKiller44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

Atmospheric and immersive!

160°

The Future is Now: Upcoming Unreal Engine 5 Games That Will Amaze You

Explore the future of gaming with upcoming Unreal Engine 5 games. Discover how this groundbreaking engine is shaping next-gen titles across various genres, from stealth survival in 'Nakwon: Last Paradise' to action-packed adventures.

Read Full Story >>
finalboss.io
rlow191d ago

I’ve been waiting to be amazed since they launched it. Some beautiful games out there, but not mind blowing. Hopefully this year is better.

FinalBoss91d ago

It's still early days, most of the games that have already been released under UE5 were started under UE4.
The devs are going to get to grips with this new engine, and come up with some great games.

rlow191d ago (Edited 91d ago )

I know but it’s been a minute….lol

I just remember those Gears of War, Halo, God of War holy crap moments.

My guess, the engine takes longer to optimize and more manpower to do it right.

EvertonFC91d ago

Nxt gen, it's always the same until you actually get the OMFG new engine games. Might see some in 2026 though.

FinalBoss91d ago

In fact, one of the biggest advances in UE5 is the 'ease' with which content can be created.
Take a look at this video from 3:50 onwards, showing how the engine automatically generates the scenery.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

UE4 wasn't capable of that at this level. And the devs had to resort to all sorts of tricks to make quality procedural.
UE 5 greatly simplifies all that. In my opinion, games will take a different turn in the coming years.

rlow191d ago

Thanks for the link, will check it
Out.

PRIMORDUS91d ago

We need Unreal Tournament 5. If Epic won't touch it I would rather pay fans money to make it. Lately I'm having more respect for fans of games that mod and or do total conversions than the actual devs.

FinalBoss91d ago

Oh boy, I forgot about Unreal Tournament! Such a good idea!

Yes there is many indie solo dev that works on UE5 'remake' which are doing a great job.
Like OverJump Rally - remaster of Sega Rally 2.
And Shenmue, that is entirely remade by a dev in UE5 as well.