Call of Duty 4 was last year's greatest game. Or at least that's the consensus that we IGN editors came to during our end of the voting. Now we have a new entry in the Call of Duty franchise known as World at War. It comes to us from the hands of those who churned out the maligned Call of Duty 3, but this time Treyarch has managed to make a highly exciting and fully realized wartime first-person shooter. But is it enough to topple last year's greatest production?
Everything you need to know about Modern Warfare III coming to Xbox Game Pass and PC Game Pass.
Huzaifa from eXputer: "2008 was home to the likes of Call of Duty: World at War, Dead Space, GTA 4, Far Cry 2, Left 4 Dead, and many other hits, which is outright remarkable."
Just about every year in the 7th generation was great and something we most likely won't experience again.
2009 for example had Assassin's Creed 2, Batman: Arkham Asylum, Dragon Age: Origins, Uncharted 2, Halo 3: ODST, Killzone 2, Borderlands, Bayonetta, and Demon's Souls to name a few.
MW 2019 is five years old at this point and on previous gen hardware, but it is still the best looking Call of Duty game to date.
MW was an excellent videogame. They messed up Spec Ops big time, but aside from this it was a huge step in the right direction initially. Most notably, at launch it seemed to come from a very cohesive creative vision that was felt across gameplay, to story to art style/visual direction. It was also very notably written by prominent ex-Naughty Dog guys that quit almost immediately before release.
That COMPLETELY dissolved through post-launch content and the full pivot to a "cross-mode" narrative that completely obliterated the cohesion in overall story direction. Warzone then "became" the new face of Call of Duty and the franchise completely removed itself from anything remotely creatively "good". It is a pure money machine, so I kinda get why they're doing it....but I personally completely lost interest.
I would love to see Infinity Ward move off CoD and get to make their own product with full control. They clearly have some massive talent in their ranks but it's perverted by Activision's corporate interests.
It's good, but not better than Cod4. Especially SP is not as good...
i like both the same. but of course cod5 wouldn't be that badass if it wasn't for the cod4 engine.
World at War is not nearly as good as CoD4.
Um does anyone else have a problem playing? for me it says the video is unavailable..
not as good as 4. people want their laser sights back