Approvals 11/3 ▼
Asuka (2) - 1908d ago Cancel
KingKionic (3) - 1908d ago Cancel
ccgr (4) - 1908d ago Cancel
AwperX (2) - 1908d ago Cancel
330°

Microsoft Can Afford to Be a Follower Rather Than a Leader for VR, Says Dev

Microsoft can afford to be a follower rather than a leader in the Virtual Reality space, according to the CEO of Schell Games, and that's not necessarily shortsighted.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1908d ago
KingKionic 1908d ago

Yea this is true. Microsoft have there ecosystem to let it ride.

VR is still very niche.

No reason to be number one of the pack right now.

RpgSama1908d ago (Edited 1908d ago )

It seems VR it's not the only place where they can afford to be a follower not a leader.

RangerWalk2671907d ago

They once again have the best hardware and services in the business. How are they "following"?
Don't say exclusives... They just spent more money on developers than Sony has in the bank. The games are in the pipeline.

RpgSama1907d ago

@RangerWalk267

As long as they are last out of 3 in the console race they are following, simple as that.

Unspoken1907d ago (Edited 1907d ago )

Have you seen Sony cell phones? Yeah, me either. Not a big deal if you are't in the market.

zeuanimals1907d ago

@Unspoken: Sony's Phones actually do well in Asian markets, that's why Sony's still making them, because people are buying them. MS also had a smartphone division. Had.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1907d ago
rainslacker1907d ago

They want devs using their api, but their lack of investment outside their api has made it so the hardware makers are leading the way, and MS is kind of behind the curve on a lot of those things with their DirctX implementation. They have a better footing on the AR side of things, but they're still licensing a lot of tech from other companies to include in dx for that, and the current ar APIs arent well documented.

In reference to the article, yeah, MS has the money to be a leader, but their attempts at it so far aren't really showing they're trying too hard to compete. The longer they let it ride, the more chance someone else becomes more entrenched, and I wouldn't be surprised if other hardware makers join together to make their own multiplatform solution at some point. It's the most obvious way to proceed for the future of VR if it's going to make its way more into the mainstream.

Atticus_finch1907d ago

Xbox series X "You lead, we follow"

Genkins1907d ago

It is a console made by xbox gamers no doubt.

BLizardXD1907d ago

when they made it faster than a RTX 2080 out of the box that was listening to fans.

NeoGamer2321907d ago

From specs it looks like XSX has leading performance GPU, CPU, memory, and storage size.

Atticus_finch1907d ago

@Neo On paper maybe but real world performance will favor the brilliantly design Ps5.

1907d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1907d ago
lelo2play1907d ago

The question should be... People that purchased VR kits 1-2 years ago, do they still use the device in a regular basis?

Neonridr1907d ago

you will have some that use it all the time, some that use it once in a while and then those that probably haven't dusted them off in some time. Personally I have owned a VR set since March 2016 (most recently with an Index as of last December) and I can say I use it several times a week.

porkChop1907d ago

I don't use mine as much because I need prescription lenses. For any game where you need to read anything, it just isn't enjoyable because I can't see the text. Butt once I get an updated prescription, I'll get these lenses and use it much more.

1907d ago
xTonyMontana1907d ago (Edited 1907d ago )

I think you'd be surprised. VR isn't a gimmick, far from it and the technology associated is ever growing. It will never replace traditional gaming or at least it won't for the next two decades but I know I'll still be going back to it multiple times a week.

I'd compare it to owning a Nintendo platform, it won't always be your first choice to go to and you won't be buying new games every week but there is a magic there that isn't available anywhere else and it's just something you want to have on hand as a gamer. I've been this way since the gameboy colour (as a secondary platform) and can totally see myself doing the same with VR for the future.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1907d ago
1907d ago
1907d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1907d ago
specialguest1907d ago

It won't hurt MS if they don't support VR at this time. I've been a supporter of VR since the Oculus dev kit days. The VR market is still not big enough at this time to really hurt XSX if they're not involved. The market certainly has a healthy growth especially during the release of HL: Alyx

StormSnooper1907d ago

The only place where they will be hurt by not joining VR, Is in the experience department. While Sony is gaining critical hands on experience making VR games, MS studios will have to start from scratch. Although it’s possible that MS will simply buy studios with experience. All in all, as a VR fan I’m disappointed in MS, but I can see how this strategy works for them.

StormSnooper1907d ago (Edited 1907d ago )

Not really to which part?

specialguest1907d ago

Yeah, XSX owners will miss out on some great VR experiences for sure

Imalwaysright1907d ago (Edited 1907d ago )

They can hire people with the experience if down the line they do decide to get into the VR market with their own peripheral and games.

StormSnooper1907d ago

Imalwaysright
Yes they can, but the difference will be the same as let’s say Naughty Dogs, versus any Xbox first party studio. These studios, just like any other organization, are more than the sum of their parts. Bringing in talent is very important, but there are other factors than can’t be bought outright.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1907d ago
xX-oldboy-Xx1907d ago

But of ms was involved with their vast amounts of cash it'd get to where it needs to be faster.

There's no easy money in VR and nothing is a given, THAT'S the biggest difference between Sony and ms.

ms struggle to make a decent new ip, they've tried to address that by investing in studios - still no guarantees they'll produce hit games.

VR development is the same thing, you've gotta approach development in a different way. Sony now has 4 or so yrs lead on ms in that area.

ms are going to be caught with their pants down once again, pony up the cash and start investing in an area that will only get bigger as time goes on.

Abnor_Mal1907d ago

No one expecting for Microsoft to come in a be the leader in the VR space, but rather simply have a place in VR.

If they can create such a big ecosystem for their games then why not also add to VR, helping to grow VR to more than where it is at the moment

People like to say that VR is niche, but so was crossplay but they brute forced others to also follow suit. Next will be their model of Gamepass that others may structure their service more like. Seems like MS does want to play since they can't lead the charge, but they can participate and help change the current VR landscape.

As soon as there's a XBox VR system it will be no surprise to see many who decry it as being niche, be the new heralds and we will hear them sing its and Microsoft praises.

Pickledpepper1907d ago

You cant compare cross play to VR, thats like comparing a vacume cleaner to a hair dryer.
With cross play you dont wear a egg box size thing over your face while holding a controller in each hand, waving your arms around while looking around like a kid in a candy shop.

StormSnooper1907d ago (Edited 1907d ago )

You clearly are not familiar with VR gaming. remember when a lot of older adults talked in the same way about gaming in general? Imitating what kids did holding the controller and making faces to make fun? Yeah.

Sitdown1907d ago

I think he is familiar. VR is an enhanced form of gaming which has been around for years and still not fully adopted. What is video games an enhanced form of? And it's pretty much fully adopted. It will be niche for a while.

ThinkThink1907d ago

MS has invested in VR for Window's PC once that matures, they will bring it to consoles as well. Right now they are focused on their next gen system launch, gamepass and their 1st party output. No point in spreading themselves too thin right now.

TommyVercetti881907d ago

Just wait when Half Life:Alyx releases for the PS5 and the upcoming VR camera mode in GTA VI.

Atticus_finch1907d ago

You keep mentioning Vr in a the new GTA and at first it didn't seem likely but after thinking about it, it could happen.

Ausbo1907d ago

It would only release on the psvr2. The current headset just isn’t powerful enough. Even then, we are talking years from now

LordJamar1907d ago

So another 100$ or more for a few VR games

TommyVercetti881907d ago

@shaggy2303 It's coming just wait till next year.

RangerWalk2671907d ago

Microsoft, HP, and Valve are currently working on a VR headset. So if they decide to get into the market... They would have Valve in their corner. Game over for my cheap PSVR plastic of a headset I own.

Atticus_finch1907d ago

You're assuming PS is not working on a new Psvr, okay bro. So you think valve won't support the Ps5. Lol

FlyingFoxy1907d ago

If you check OCUK forums the people tell you that even first gen PC headsets are better than PSVR, though I've heard people say PSVR is decent.

LordJamar1907d ago

Yeah uh huh I’ll keep waiting and I won’t be holding my breath

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1907d ago
Thundercat771907d ago

Microsoft has not been a leader for a long time and most of the things they are doing is just being a follower so I am not surprised at all.

Sitdown1907d ago

I'll be intrigued to hear some of the things you feel they are following in.

1907d ago
aconnellan1907d ago

Yeah like implementing a robust backward compatibility system during this gen, they really followed Sony on that one.

Or adding first party games to Game Pass on release day, I also remember when Sony added that to their ecosystem before MS.

Getting Series X exclusives on the One for 2 years after release so they support it for longer, I also remember Sony announcing that and MS following.

Just because MS isn’t the leader of the ‘console race’ doesn’t mean they don’t lead in some areas, or that they’re just a follower

ElementX1907d ago (Edited 1907d ago )

Plus standard hard drives and a robust online service.

1907d ago
1907d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (87)
50°

Rematch director says there’s “room for more than one take of football”

In an industry with countless FIFAs, sorry EA Sports FCs, Sloclap’s Rematch is a brilliant arcade football game that feels incredibly unique. Putting players in the shoes of an individual player, the new multiplayer game is essentially Rocket League without the rockets and cars… it’s football.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community43m ago
Scissorman9m ago(Edited 8m ago)

Yeah, remember NFL Blitz.

90°

Rematch devs confirm crossplay is “top priority” as the team plans improvements

Sloclap's Rematch is far from done with major improvements on the way for the multiplayer football game after launch.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d ago
MetroidFREAK2123h ago

Any multiplayer online game that doesn't launch with crossplay is a big skip from me...

60°

Ministry of Truth: 1984 — Game Overview • VGMM

Obey, hide or fight the system. It's all in your hands. And remember: "War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength."

"Ministry of Truth: 1984" is an upcoming political dystopian simulation game developed by Ukrainian studio 'False Memory Dept.'

Read Full Story >>
videogamesmademe.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 3h ago