SlapStic.com's regular contributor Scott Meador gives us this fantastic review of the newest 007 game. Is it the true successor to Goldeneye, or is it just another movie game? Find out here.
Everyone’s been thinking about James Bond lately, with the franchise’s latest cinematic release tantalisingly close yet pushed back by the pandemic. It serves as a reminder of the wider obstacles faced by this particular franchise—one that can be nimble, competitive, and invigorating—but yet is a behemoth always struggling against the weight of its reputation in a changing creative landscape. The video games inspired by these films are a particular testament to those difficulties, considering their trajectory: an early enormous success in GoldenEye, through weakly received adaptations and original stories, to a near-decade of non-existence.
In the 38th episode of GO!, the first person who plays as three different characters in three different video games who have the same first name as an Achievement Hunter becomes this week's victor and gets a sticker to add to their collection.
Continue Play's Shehzaan Abdulla takes a look back at the first major Bond outing for the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 - an FPS/TPS hybrid that does justice to neither of the genres it draws inspiration from.
I actually enjoyed the game. The scenery was really good and varied. It wasnt the best shooter ever, but it was certainly worth playing if you like the bond franchise at all. Bloodstone was good to, just different.
I don't care HOW good this game turns out... Goldeneye showed people how to play AND how to make first person shooters on consoles.
The movie is a less trashy Transporter. And the game? A less interesting Call of Duty.
This is an alright game, nothing worth looking at in a cluttered holiday, though.
I like the new facility level.
I bet this game is better than people give it credit for... I really loved the multiplayer in Nightfire.