1050°
6.5

Days Gone Review - IGN

Frantic hordes of zombies can't save Days Gone from its repetitive gameplay, bland world, and meandering story.

2239d ago Replies(5)
Razzer2239d ago

Doesn't really mean anything when a lot of reviews agree with her. Metacritic of 71 right now so essentially reviewers are saying it is good, not great, game.

TGGJustin2239d ago

Game has FAR more positive scores (7.5 or higher) on MC than Mixed/negatives scores which means that this is in the minority. It's pretty clear some of the bigger sites are dragging the average down.

sprinterboy2239d ago

71 is solid imo especially since its there first AAA. Unfortunatly today's gamers think 7s and 8s means is a shit game lol.

81BX2239d ago

I'll take a good game! They all can't be 5000ft. homeruns!

TheKingKratos2239d ago (Edited 2239d ago )

We are in time where 7/10 means game sux

But i was never hyped for it but i will give it a try maybe i will love it don't care that much for reviews

kreate2239d ago

Basically it's a above average game. Regardless of who is reviewing it. It's ok though cuz PS4 has a lot of games and still coming.

I mean if 3/5 Sony games are great and 2/5 games are average or above, that's a pretty good success in my book.

I'm still glad Sony is giving that freedom to it's development teams. Some games work, others dont.

2238d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2238d ago
2239d ago Replies(2)
UltimateSanto2239d ago

Thanks Sushinama, i needed Ad Hominem examples for my college essay.

shabz6662239d ago

She’s great, not sure what you’re implying. Her reviews are really spot on, anyway gonna play this tmrw anyways.

2238d ago
starchild2239d ago

Reviews are subjective. They always have been. It's best to learn as much as possible about a game you're interested in and follow your own instincts about whether to buy it. The scores are pretty mixed, but it's still hovering at an average that's considered to represent a good game. Ultimately use your own judgement.

2238d ago
2238d ago
King_Noctis2239d ago

But this, but that. Why can’t a score just be a score without all these conspiracy theories?

NecrumOddBoy2239d ago

Agreed. Once I saw Lucy on the review, I knew was going to be poor. She is also on IGN Beyond. She is a horrific IGN employee and a sexist

2238d ago
sprinterboy2239d ago (Edited 2239d ago )

Exactly, I watched beyond the other day and she said she was deep into the review and I was like its gonna be a 6 from IGN.
Just watched digital foundry and it's all positive from them although a few frame drops here and there but tbh every game has that. Looks beautiful and df did point out they didn't have the day 1 patch

2238d ago
frostypants2239d ago (Edited 2239d ago )

The reviews are pretty universally mediocre. Let's not circle the wagons and polish turds here. Sometimes games are flops. It looks like there's a reason Sony didn't hype this. I mean it doesn't look *bad*...but it just sounds like (as many feared) it's very generic. Likely will settle around a 70-75 on MC. I was really hyped for it when they showed the gameplay demo a few years back with literally hundreds of zombies chasing the player around some rural structures, but I've been worried for quite some time that THAT game never came to fruition and they went a more mundane route.

Sunny_D2239d ago (Edited 2239d ago )

I’m going to be honest, this game really didn’t look like it was going to be that great. It’s entire premise really didn’t make me go wow. I think if this game came out a few years ago, it would be better received.

Ratchet752239d ago

Bland world????
Are you kidding??

2239d ago Replies(1)
2239d ago
+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 2238d ago
2239d ago Replies(6)
2239d ago
RangerWalk2672239d ago

Hey, before you write it off... Redbox it. We don't all share the same opinion. If you like it after a day of renting it. Go and buy it.

PrinceOfAnger2239d ago

State of decay 2 got a 7,5 from IGN
But it's a flop

Razzer2239d ago

Uh....I never called State of Decay 2 a flop so no idea what point you think you are making.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2239d ago
Cyb3r2239d ago

The same person who reviewed it gave Rise Of The Tomb Raider a higher score than Uncharted 4 and Detriot: Become Human

Blastoise2239d ago

She also gave Little Big Planet 3 a 6.8, but you might want to save your outrage until the slant review hits n4g lol

EmperorDalek2239d ago

Well LittleBigPlanet 3 was broken, so that's probably what it deserved. But yes she gave way too high of a score to Rise of the Tomb Raider, absolutely rubbish game. I wasn't a big fan of Uncharted 4, but it was undoubtedly 10 times better than ROTR.

itsmebryan2239d ago

This is not the only low score.. look at metacritic it's at 72. 72 is not awful.

spicelicka2239d ago

The game has an average of 72 on meta, I guess it's not that far off from what other reviewers think.

Twinblade2239d ago

Meta is also a troll site.

SegaGamer2239d ago

So what? She prefers some games over others, big deal.

Tototot2239d ago (Edited 2239d ago )

Yeah, ign reviews is the cause that days gone are getting bad reviews from other outlets, days gone are far better than horizon, hahahaa

81BX2239d ago

Bad reviews or decent?

shabz6662239d ago

I would give rise of the tomb raider a higher score than Detroit too. -_-

OneLove2239d ago

Shut up and take the review. Its ign.

2239d ago
2239d ago
Sharky2312239d ago

At the end of the day a review is one persons opinion. Another person might love this game. Another might hate it. All I know is I can’t wait to find out for myself. 6.5 isn’t a terrible score. A game series has to start some where! Whatever is broken they can do better on the next!

RangerWalk2672239d ago

I agree with that review though. I really didn't care for Detroit become human. Great concept just not my style of game. and the part of rise of the tomb raider I enjoyed more than uncharted 4 was the fact that they kept adding content. Uncharted 4 was fantastic but at the end of the day it was still a one-and-done

shabz6662239d ago

Yeah true, bit too long at the end as well.

bolimekurac2239d ago

the way you guys stroke eachother is so crazy

Donjune2239d ago

You just dropped the mic sir!

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 2239d ago
Show all comments (293)
380°

The Days Gone Remaster Is an Unsurprising Cash-Grab and Nothing More

Honestly, who is the Days Gone remaster for? Fans of the original won't find anything new here.

Read Full Story >>
fortressofsolitude.co.za
Christopher28d ago

I don't know why you're being downvoted. It is a new thing in the remaster. Perhaps it's not worth the $10 upgrade if you've played. But, I mean, if you never played the game, then just wait for it to go on sale, forget about it, and continue not playing it like you did for the last 6 years?

TheEroica28d ago

The downvotes are likely from the excuses... Horde mode doesn't obsolve Sony from cash grabbing its easily duped fanbase.

S2Killinit27d ago

I love how people call this a money grab while the real money grabbing is in other genres. But, I think people who are that dumb deserve to be fed with skins and micro-transactions, and don’t get to complain that single player games of this caliber are few and far in between.

IAMRealHooman27d ago

@TheEroica
they changed the header. it was originally the " Remaster has nothing new" or something similar.

Christopher27d ago

It's still in the description: "Fans of the original won't find anything new here."

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 27d ago
princejb13428d ago

Days gone is amazing regardless and for those that didn’t play the original I highly recommend.

SimpleSlave28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Yes. All of Sony's Remasters - all the ones stemming from the PS4 library - are cash-grabs. When all they needed to do was patch them to run at 60fps, up the resolution, and be done with it. But then they had to actually care about Bloodborne, and that's a cardinal sin over at Sony.

On a side note. I just got The Sinking City Remastered for free, because I owned the game. Weird...

anast28d ago

The Bloodborne thing is a real issue.

SimpleSlave28d ago

I'm sure they banish people to the Nightmare Frontier if they as much as whisper the name in the office.

Bebedora28d ago

Cash-grab or not. As long the Bend Studio gets their share, I am for it. I don't know, but I still hope for making of a second title. However, in a way It's a cash-grab. They still put something extra to it (horde mode), that is.

anast28d ago

lol Yeah they seem to hate the idea of a new Bloodborne anything.

I've still got to play the shrinking city. I enjoy Lovecraftian stuff.

RaidenBlack28d ago

Hope the recent remasters like Sinking City and Oblivion, ups the ante and alters the industry's approach.
But what fans really want is just a straight up sequel ... oh and add sequel to 1886 as well.

GhostScholar28d ago

I would love a days gone sequel. Days gone to me is such a better game than the last of us. The world in days gone was so great.

28d ago
mkis00728d ago (Edited 28d ago )

To me they appeal to different players outside of just being zombie games. I like them both, but days gone is more fun to me. The last of us 2 is my murder game though along with red dead 2 and gta 5. Love the realistic violence.

jznrpg27d ago

I’m a big fan of Days Gone but TLOU is a better made game. How much you enjoyed each game is of course up to you.

neutralgamer199228d ago

With the recent cancellation of Bend Studio’s live-service project, there’s now a real and exciting opportunity for the studio to revisit Days Gone 2. This might be the perfect time for Sony to greenlight the sequel—especially with the PS6 likely on the horizon—because Days Gone already has a strong foundation, a passionate fanbase, and significant untapped potential.

It’s worth remembering that Days Gone was Bend Studio’s first major AAA title developed for a home console. Before that, the studio had primarily worked on portable systems like the PSP and PS Vita, or acted as a support studio. That leap to a full-scale open-world console game was ambitious, and although the game launched in a somewhat rough state, that context is crucial to understanding its initial reception.

Gaming critics were often harsh in their reviews, frequently comparing Days Gone to other PlayStation exclusives that came from more seasoned console studios like Naughty Dog or Santa Monica Studio. Despite these comparisons and the early technical issues, Days Gone still went on to sell over 7.6 million copies—a remarkable achievement for a new IP. Even more importantly, Bend Studio listened to fan feedback and steadily improved the game through patches, updates, and optimizations. Today, Days Gone stands as a much more polished and enjoyable experience than it was at launch.

That kind of growth shows Bend Studio’s resilience and potential. A sequel would not only benefit from their hard-earned experience, but also avoid many of the pitfalls that affected the original’s development. Much of the foundational tech, gameplay systems, and world-building has already been done, meaning the studio can focus more on innovation and storytelling rather than reinventing the wheel.

Compared to the high-risk, long-development timeline of a new IP—which could take 5+ years just to get through pre-production—returning to Days Gone is both a smarter and more efficient route. If Sony and Bend Studio commit to Days Gone 2 now, there’s a strong possibility it could be a key PS6 launch title—offering a fan-driven, proven IP with greater polish, depth, and scope.

Let’s not forget Bend Studio’s deep legacy either. This is the same team that brought us Syphon Filter, a series that helped define early PlayStation experiences. With the right support and direction, they can absolutely deliver a worthy sequel that lives up to the franchise’s potential and the studio’s legacy

Harkins172128d ago

Loved it on PS5. Cant wait to play again at somepoint on PC when on sale

Show all comments (45)
210°

Days Gone PS5 Is a 'Really Good Piece of Work', Say Tech Experts

Sammy writes: "Back when Days Gone Remastered was announced, many fans were squinting to see the differences between the excellent original PS4 version and its PS5 re-release.

But now with the game readily available – and our 8/10 review declaring it the “definitive version of a fan favourite” – we’re beginning to get some meaningful tech analysis.

And according to Digital Foundry, this is not just the bare-bones resolution upscale some had anticipated – “a lot of effort has gone into it”, according to the tech experts. "

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
IAMRealHooman42d ago

First game sell well enough to warrant a sequel? Our received well enough?

Alos8842d ago

It sold well but reviewed only okay, which apparently wasn't enough for Sony.

Cacabunga42d ago

Sold well and received even better.. had a bad first month due to technical issues but ended up being one of the best games from last gen

Knightofelemia42d ago (Edited 42d ago )

That's the nature of the beast. If a game like a movie does not meet certain numbers then they write off the franchise. EA scrapped DS2 because the DS1 remake did not meet certain numbers. I was hoping the remaster of DG and the fact it also came to PC would convince Sony to green light a DG sequel.

PanicMechanic42d ago

Critic reviews were appalling. The worst reviewed game I’ve ever seen. By that I mean, poor quality journalism, dishonest writing and review scores which are out of touch with fan reception.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 42d ago
anast42d ago

Fans are having fun with this one.

380°

Days Gone Original vs Remastered – Is The Visual Upgrade Worth Revisiting?

Days Gone Remastered is now available, and if you’re looking to find out how it compares with the original PS4 version, read ahead.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Cacabunga47d ago

Huge difference i must admit, but not sure i would notice without 2 screens next to each other.

Not getting this game still, i want a new game and im tired of remasters

Muigi47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

It’s $10 and there are plenty of games out there for you.

Flewid63847d ago

Then its not a huge difference?

Killer2020UK47d ago

Of course you wouldn't, nobody would. If you have never experienced the other, then you don't have the reference needed for comparison.

TheEroica46d ago

Sony getting ready to milk some more people on dumb products.... I can see the psvr1 and 2 owner salivating over days gone remaster. Lol. What a ruse song is pulling.

Knushwood Butt46d ago

How can Sony milk customers if it's such a 'dumb product'? If it's so dumb, nobody will buy it, and there's no milking.
Plus, there's nothing preventing people from getting a copy of the PS4 version.

46d ago
Babadook746d ago

As a PSVR2 owner. Yup. If there’s a VR version I would be there day one.

Greg280146d ago

There are plenty of people who never had a chance to play this game, now they can with the remaster.

Don't understand why people who already played the game complain about a remaster. No one is forcing you to buy it. There are plenty of new games to play

MoonConquistador32d ago

And then there's a group of people who did play the game, thought it was awesome and would be happy giving it another play through.

Unfortunately I'm one who only got it on the PS5 instant game collection so no path for a 10 quid upgrade for me.

marioJP8746d ago

Huge difference where? Besides blue color filter and darker lighting?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 32d ago
Fishy Fingers47d ago

Settings > Graphics > Change preset from medium to high.

Remastered.....

Tedakin47d ago

Sony is now remastering games with 71s on metacritic.

Bathyj47d ago

Like that's a judge of anything
This game got scored before it was released.

andy8547d ago

Days gone is 85+. It got heavily marked down at launch for bugs where as others get a free pass for that. It's a fantastic game.

MoonConquistador32d ago

One of my favourites actually, I thought it was fantastic from beginning to end.

Kosic47d ago

And it's not even a big overhaul remaster. It's list turning up the graphic level by one. It's quite embarrassing, as the original wasn't that bad. And the remaster isn't that noticeable

PanicMechanic46d ago

“And it's not even..”

Bugs bunny NO meme

TheEroica46d ago (Edited 46d ago )

Poorly remastering if images are to be believed.

Tapani46d ago

To me it was very close to The Last of Us Part I. It was that good quality.

PanicMechanic46d ago (Edited 46d ago )

Shut up. Best open world zombie game on the market

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 32d ago
andy8547d ago

I spoiled myself by modding this game on my PC. Genuinely one of the best looking games I've ever seen. Whilst this remaster looks nice it just doesn't compare to that sadly. It shows the effort that these remasters could put in if they wanted

REDGUM47d ago

I so hope this game or DLC for those of us who own the original sells well.
Ive said it before, its an underrated game for sure & was unfairly judged upon release.
Please try this game if you haven't already.

For those who say 'i won't purchase digital only' you can pickup a hard copy for 5 bucks here in Australia, then add the DLC and you have a superb game for $20 or so.

Give it a shot, tell me I'm wrong After completing the game.

Game on gamers.

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH47d ago

It was full of bugs at release I wouldn’t call that being unfairly judged. If you want your game to score well then release it in a completed state. Now with that being said I think the game was pretty good.

Knushwood Butt47d ago

It really wasn't.
The worst I encountered was a horde spawning on top of me when exploring a cave.
Did you even play this at launch?

S2Killinit46d ago (Edited 46d ago )

It wasnt full of buggs, it was very playable. That was the excuse for the hit job at launch before people started to speak up about how great the game was.

Show all comments (59)