320°

Crackdown 3 crash lands to under £30 already

"It's not often you see such a surprisingly large saving on a game that's been out for just six days. Reception has been middling for Crackdown 3, too, which finally saw release last week after years of delays and development troubles"

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
RpgSama1982d ago (Edited 1982d ago )

There you go, a combination of bad reviews and that the game is easily and readily available day one on Game Pass

Muzikguy1982d ago

Yes, another effect that Game Pass will have on the games themselves.

Muzikguy1982d ago

@Anthony

If it were then that just proves my point even further. No developer is going to go full on for years into one game just to have it at half price or even free shortly after release.

AnthonyDavis1981d ago

^ well developers still make games even with discounts and piracy. The problem is they can now make cheap budget gamers and make more money on mobile.

Muzikguy1980d ago (Edited 1980d ago )

You keep helping my point thank you. Cheap mobile games are not something that I'm looking for or something I'd pay a subscription to play. There have been some that have been good, but with an idea like Game Pass you can look forward to cheap budget games more frequently. Or in this case, a game that gets touted for years as being a huge hit to be a bigger letdown. I just don't see big names on the service helping much more than smaller companies with smaller games

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1980d ago
rainslacker1981d ago

MS needs to be careful. If they keep up with this day one game pass thing, retailers aren't going to carry their games unless MS offers them a substantial buyback incentive where they aren't stuck with merchandise they can't sell.

An occasional bad game is one thing, but a service which directly takes incentive for people to buy a product away from the retailer is quite another.

Potnoodle9991981d ago

Argh what!? It’s still £30!?!? As if it’s not down to £10 yet. Bargain bin inbound

Thatguy-3101982d ago

lol hopefully people were smart enough to not buy this game for 60$

1982d ago
annoyedgamer1982d ago

All they had to do was make a clone of Crackdown 1. But that wasn't enough. Im certain the people running Hollywood and the games industry are on some sort of drug, and it isn't greed otherwise they would have backtracked by now.

Christopher1982d ago

It's better than Crackdown 1, IMHO. The problem is that's the best thing you can say about it because while it's better, it's not that much better and it's really out of date. I had fun for most of it, but it made me appreciate Agents of Mayhem more even though I thought that game was a bit lacking (in comparison, it's more than a generation ahead of CD3 for single player game).

tinchotin1982d ago

I saw comparison videos and crackdown 1 has better physics, and looks more fun.

Christopher1981d ago

***I saw comparison videos and crackdown 1 has better physics, and looks more fun.***

I've actually played both to completion and CD3 has better physics (it's different in how it's handled but not at all worse) and was more fun. But, hey, I'm sure you got the same experience as I did by just watching videos.

badz1491982d ago (Edited 1982d ago )

what? but to many gamers this game only worth the $2 for the Gamepass subscription and nothing more. Pricedown 30!

Muzikguy1982d ago (Edited 1982d ago )

I've argued a few times about prices of games and quality of the games on Game Pass along with the future of gaming if it stayed like this but it's like talking to a brick wall. Most think you are being crazy yet here is a perfect example.

Yi-Long1982d ago

Why keep a poorly/mediocre reviewed game at 60 bucks? Gamers these days (well, most of them), aren't stupid: They'll take a quick look at scores online, or check with friends, to see if a game is worth picking up or not.

This seems like a throwback to the original game, and while it's not for everyone, I'm sure some fans of the first game (or perhaps even the 2nd game...) might look at this through nostalgia-tinted glasses and deem it worthy of picking up at 30 bucks. And they'll get the same kind of enjoyment out of it as they did 10 years orso ago.

However, in this day and age, where we have lots of options on how to spend our money on games (I JUST picked up Disgaea 5 Complete for 20 bucks on PS4), games like these have to price competitively in order to appeal and sell.

tontontam01982d ago

I'm pretty sure that if they just upgraded Crackdown's graphics and did'nt change anything it would have gotten better scores.

Kiwi661981d ago

Someone somewhere would still find something to do with the game to complain about

Show all comments (62)
690°

Tencent to buy Crackdown and Sackboy developer Sumo in $1.3bn deal

Tencent is set to buy Sumo Group in a deal worth $1.27bn (£919m), the companies have announced.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Darkborn1103d ago

Tencent is really buying up everything. I'm surprised everyone is selling to them like this.

Rebel_Scum1103d ago

They want/need capital I guess.

darthv721103d ago

No way they are worth that much. They are a support studio. I guess tencent decided to throw them an insane price that Sumo would be crazy to turn down.

Its like the godfather. "Im going to make you an offer you cant refuse"

UltraNova1103d ago

Always the case.

Who owns the rights to Crackdown and Sackboy IPs though?

boing11103d ago

I've heard some time ago, that they created a special unit that has a mission to search for acquirable devs all around the globe.

-Foxtrot1103d ago

Going off their business practices they seem like a cancer in this industry

1103d ago
blacktiger1103d ago

chinese currency, no limit in printing, but they are selling in USD

PrinceAli1103d ago

Maybe because they're a publisher of games with a history of success loool..?

barom1103d ago

Even Microsoft can’t compete with that kind of money.

Zeref1103d ago (Edited 1103d ago )

Uhm yes they can.. What do you mean?

Zeref1103d ago

Money talks, Besides, those developers don't need to worry about income anymore.

enkiduxiv1103d ago

I doubt anyone that matters to the actual production of the games is getting a raise. The only thing that has changed is that now they can't buy any Winnie the Poo products for their kids.

senorfartcushion1103d ago

Well they’re allowed. America and China are leading the world in toxic capitalism.

n1kki61103d ago

As publicly traded companies it's either they sell and potentially get more, or tencent initiates a hostile takeover and buys at least 51% of the shares. These companies might not even be amicable to the buy out but opt to take it because hostile takeovers are terrible.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 1103d ago
frostypants1103d ago (Edited 1103d ago )

Yep. A company that built itself by ripping off IP of small, innovative developers and out-marketing them. Tencent is everything wrong not just with gaming but corporate ethics in general, and the assymetric regulatory playing field we for some reason permit from the Chinese government. Egregiously corrupt companies like Tencent should be banned from the US market.

senorfartcushion1103d ago

The US market would take Tencent to dinner and have it naked on the bed by midnight if it could. America and China are as bad as each other

Lightning771103d ago

They can take Sumo those devs really aren't that great. Sack boys big adventure scored good however but Crackdown 3 wasn't great. They're 50/50 Sony will find a suitable replacement for Sack boy. MS desperately needs a suitable replacement for crackdown, if it's not already too late in terms of fanfare at this point.

Sumo to me isn't that big of a deal there are better devs out there.

senorfartcushion1103d ago

Crackdown 3 was cancelled and remade a few times. Hardly their fault.

darthv721103d ago

This is the same Sumo who made Outrun 2, 2006 Coast to Coast, Sonic Racing Transformed as well as Forza Horizon 2 on the 360. I think they are better than you give them credit for.

Wulfer1103d ago

You might want to walk this statement back. Why else do you think this game goes for over $200 now?

https://www.ebay.com/p/5144...

1103d ago Replies(1)
ScootaKuH1103d ago

I'm surprised Sumo are valued so high

solideagle1103d ago

yeah, thats what I thought. $1.3 billion is very high, Insomniac sounds like a bargain deal for Sony!

chadwarden1103d ago

And they likely bought Housmarque and Bluepoint for even less than Insomniac.

phoenixwing1103d ago

at the two above me,
it's easy to sell for less when you know you're in good hands business and culture wise. I mean sure you could scratch out some extra money elsewhere but are all the people you know going to be taken care of when you get bought out? Sony takes care of them. Basically you can tell who's a scheming money scumbag by what ceo's/execs choose to be bought by. In the end money talks but there's extras to consider sometimes.

roadkillers1103d ago

I am as well. They do not own any IPs from my understanding...

DOMination-1103d ago

Me too! After looking them up, it seems like they were the parent of other game studios: Lab42, Red Kite, Sumo India, The Chinese Room and PixelAnt Games and also have some cryptocurrency technology.

They may also still hold the IP for back when they were Gremlin Interactive.. back in the Amiga days they were really a dev of some repute.

ScootaKuH1103d ago

Gremlin. Now there's a name that takes me back. Ocean as well.

Teflon021103d ago

They're not, it's likely them just throwing money around to make sure they have no opposition. Sumo is a valuable developer as they've assisted in alot of great games. They did LBP3, Sackboy, Sonic Transformed, I believe Assisted in both ModNation Racers and LBPK, Team Sonic racing, just to name the few off the top of my head that I own.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1103d ago
IRetrouk1103d ago

I honestly thought ms or Sony would have nabbed them, seeing as they have worked for both on their respective ips, colour me surprised.

Bennibop1103d ago

It's a lot of money for a group with no ips, what would they have worked on to keep so many studios and staff employed. For now at least they continue working on ips for the likes of Sony and Microsoft.

IRetrouk1103d ago

Sony and ms have more than enough ips to keep em busy, the price would have been an issue though, that I agree with, just surprised is all🤷‍♂️

frostypants1103d ago (Edited 1103d ago )

Tencent doesn't exactly pride themselves on original IP anyway. They just steal someone else's. They only need developer drones.

Sephiroushin1103d ago

They have enough to make them busy but there is no point in buying the studio that high, they could just make the developers some offers and thats it... heck every single developer could just quit the studio and with what is tensen left? no point in buying a studio with no IP you dont own the developers

IRetrouk1103d ago

I already agreed that the price was high, still don't take away that they could have been used, and be useful to either ms or sony

Show all comments (86)
80°

Xbox Cloud Gaming PC Preview/Hands on Impressions (BETA) - CG

Microsoft recently released their Xbox Cloud Gaming PC Beta which allows users the opportunity to stream Xbox games to their Windows 10 PCs or laptops. This follows on from being able to use the cloud gaming on mobile devices which works very well but is limited to the size of your screen. Having the option to play Xbox games with a larger display has its obvious benefits.

Read Full Story >>
cramgaming.com
1188d ago
280°

Crackdown 3 8K 60 FPS - Possible at Low-Medium Settings with an RTX 3090

CG writes: Nvidia’s claims that the RTX 3090 can render games in 8K at 60 FPS, ring true for us in this video. We put the game Crackdown 3 through its paces with some interesting results.

Read Full Story >>
cramgaming.com
bunt-custardly1380d ago

If you've ever super-sampled anything you would know why it can make things look better.

bouzebbal1380d ago

Let's talk about powahhhh of da clawwdd for a second 🤣did they give up with this thing?

bunt-custardly1380d ago

Oh right, I didn't get the joke sorry, it just clicked. Hmm, is Crackdown 3 really that bad/universally hated especially as it's on gamepass?

SullysCigar1380d ago

My attempt at humour could have been clearer, in hindsight..!

Yeah, sadly Crackdown 3 had been hyped so hard and so long by Microsoft, that when it launched as a mediocre game, it got panned. It was mainly the broken promises about the power of the cloud I think that did it. This was the 'cloud power' poster child for years and it all amounted to nothing, which is a real shame, because if they'd realised their initial vision it could have been special.

bunt-custardly1380d ago

I do remember the original vision where entire buildings could be demolished but wasn't that feature relegated to the multiplayer mode? For me, Crackdown 3 comes across quite generic. I suppose if it had the full destruction in the story mode that would have been bad-ass. If Red Faction Guerrilla can do it why not CD?

FanboySpotter1380d ago

Crackdown 3 was made for crackdown fans. Hated by non crackdown fans. Enjoyed by crackdown fans.

MadLad1380d ago

I played it on PC for a little while via gamepass. It's not nearly as terrible as people would try to make it out to be, but it's the definition of a "meh" game.
There's fun to be had if you're bored.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1380d ago
andy851380d ago

It's good it's possible but who would pick this over 4K60 on ultra? It would look far better

IanTH1380d ago

100%. This is obviously just showing what can be done with the current highest end hardware, rather than what should be. And if you're splashing out for an RTX 3090 over a 3080 for gaming (small performance delta if not using that huge buffer for productivity), then I guess you'll also consider splashing out for an 8k screen. And, I mean, you'll want to be able to do *something* with it lol.

outsider16241380d ago

Let's be honest here, even with extra high settings at 8k 120fps... it'll still look like crap. Sorry.

Show all comments (19)