220°
5.0

Crackdown 3 Review - Man Of Steel | GameSpot

Crackdown 3's campaign is short on new ideas, while Wrecking Zone fails to fully utilize its destruction tech.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
MasterCornholio2266d ago

Pretty much what the majority are saying. Microsoft should have given this game to a much more capable developer. Such a shame that it took them a long time to produce this mediocre title.

IamTylerDurden12266d ago

Sumo isn't a great developer, but they did make a competent LBP3 for Sony. While LBP3 wasn't a great game, it was a suitable 79 Metacritic. I think Microsoft is largely to blame. They put this production together, made the decisions, and guided the ship. Obviously Microsoft doesn't do a great job of getting the most out of their devs. They completely mismanaged this project putting multiple teams on it and attempting to make it a vehicle for cloud tech. Team Xbox cared more about native 4K and cloud power than actually creating a worthwhile game.

mkis0072266d ago (Edited 2266d ago )

I think they lack focus. They needed to go all in on the cloud tech or not bother with it. ( probably the latter)The prevailing theme in these reviews is that the game can be fun on the surface, but there arent any new ideas. What they should have done was spend some resources on local destruction tech for single player. They had plenty of time to make update crackdown for the new generation even while keeping the core the same.

TFJWM2265d ago

@mkis007 I think they went all in cloud tech and it couldn't do as promised. This is why we have the game we have.

darthv722265d ago

Sumo's racing games are great so they are good at that. Platformers and open world... not so much.

Sgt_Slaughter2265d ago

Sumo had three major projects at once delayed/in limbo, so I'm putting more of this on them.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2265d ago
ApocalypseShadow2266d ago ShowReplies(1)
TheColbertinator2266d ago

I hope we get new multiplayer modes soon.

badz1492266d ago Show
Ratchet752265d ago (Edited 2265d ago )

Some games are good, some games are bad.
What I don't get is they canceled a game like scale bound and published games like crackdown 3, state of decay2, sea of thieves.....
Well done PHIL SPENCER. 👏👏👏

EmperorDalek2265d ago

Just imagine how bad of a state Scalebound was in.

Christopher2265d ago (Edited 2265d ago )

It wasn't cancelled because of quality but because of funding. MS added the requirement of MP, devs needed more funding to make it happen, MS said no, game cancelled.

I think with the buying of new studios MS has realized, even if late in the game, that they need to invest money to get the desired quality, even for non-wheelhouse games.

EmperorDalek2265d ago

Source?

Even then I don't know if I'd blame them. They were developing it for three years, and obviously weren't even close to finished. Budgets exist for a reason, and if they needed far more than originally planned, that's on their poor management.

Besides, they announced and released Nier Automata after the Scalebound announcement. Platinum aren't usually slow developers, so something must have been seriously wrong for the project to be so far behind and over-budget.

The Wood2265d ago (Edited 2265d ago )

There's no God given right that scalebound would have been a good game or that it was sacrificed for this. Maybe Phil saw more potential in the projects you mentioned than scalebound. Out of all of those mentioned, crackdown had more riding on it.

I'm also not sure about the man of steel bit. . . I really liked that film.

Ratchet752265d ago

And that's exactly why Phil Spencer is such a poor leader imo. With all the money in the world all he managed to come out with this gen is mediocrity and poor sales. And now Microsoft has given him more studios to manage while he could not not even extract the best out of the ones he already have.
Am I missing something here???
🤔 🤔 🤔 🤔
Any other company would have fired him a long time ago.

The Wood2265d ago

I agree but that doesn't go down to well with many Xbox guys on n4g. I've said my piece on his achievements and failings.

RauLeCreuset2265d ago

Phil didn't do that. That was Don Mattrick if you let some people tell it. We're supposed to ignore all the years it spent in development under Phil and call it the last of the Mattrick games.

Germaximus2265d ago

Will never forget Scalebound. Never. Saw an hour of gameplay and was blown away. Wanted so bad.

Nodoze2265d ago

Same here. My take is that it was not in that bad of a state. MS just did not want to pay for them to complete it. RPG's are not popular on the Xbox platform. I am sure they did the math on what they spent, what they needed to spend to complete, and what the game might take in. It was an accounting exrecise.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2265d ago
Show all comments (24)
690°

Tencent to buy Crackdown and Sackboy developer Sumo in $1.3bn deal

Tencent is set to buy Sumo Group in a deal worth $1.27bn (£919m), the companies have announced.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Darkborn1383d ago

Tencent is really buying up everything. I'm surprised everyone is selling to them like this.

Rebel_Scum1383d ago

They want/need capital I guess.

darthv721383d ago

No way they are worth that much. They are a support studio. I guess tencent decided to throw them an insane price that Sumo would be crazy to turn down.

Its like the godfather. "Im going to make you an offer you cant refuse"

UltraNova1383d ago

Always the case.

Who owns the rights to Crackdown and Sackboy IPs though?

boing11383d ago

I've heard some time ago, that they created a special unit that has a mission to search for acquirable devs all around the globe.

-Foxtrot1383d ago

Going off their business practices they seem like a cancer in this industry

1383d ago
blacktiger1383d ago

chinese currency, no limit in printing, but they are selling in USD

PrinceAli1383d ago

Maybe because they're a publisher of games with a history of success loool..?

barom1383d ago

Even Microsoft can’t compete with that kind of money.

Zeref1383d ago (Edited 1383d ago )

Uhm yes they can.. What do you mean?

Zeref1383d ago

Money talks, Besides, those developers don't need to worry about income anymore.

enkiduxiv1383d ago

I doubt anyone that matters to the actual production of the games is getting a raise. The only thing that has changed is that now they can't buy any Winnie the Poo products for their kids.

senorfartcushion1383d ago

Well they’re allowed. America and China are leading the world in toxic capitalism.

n1kki61383d ago

As publicly traded companies it's either they sell and potentially get more, or tencent initiates a hostile takeover and buys at least 51% of the shares. These companies might not even be amicable to the buy out but opt to take it because hostile takeovers are terrible.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 1383d ago
frostypants1383d ago (Edited 1383d ago )

Yep. A company that built itself by ripping off IP of small, innovative developers and out-marketing them. Tencent is everything wrong not just with gaming but corporate ethics in general, and the assymetric regulatory playing field we for some reason permit from the Chinese government. Egregiously corrupt companies like Tencent should be banned from the US market.

senorfartcushion1383d ago

The US market would take Tencent to dinner and have it naked on the bed by midnight if it could. America and China are as bad as each other

Lightning771383d ago

They can take Sumo those devs really aren't that great. Sack boys big adventure scored good however but Crackdown 3 wasn't great. They're 50/50 Sony will find a suitable replacement for Sack boy. MS desperately needs a suitable replacement for crackdown, if it's not already too late in terms of fanfare at this point.

Sumo to me isn't that big of a deal there are better devs out there.

senorfartcushion1383d ago

Crackdown 3 was cancelled and remade a few times. Hardly their fault.

darthv721383d ago

This is the same Sumo who made Outrun 2, 2006 Coast to Coast, Sonic Racing Transformed as well as Forza Horizon 2 on the 360. I think they are better than you give them credit for.

Wulfer1383d ago

You might want to walk this statement back. Why else do you think this game goes for over $200 now?

https://www.ebay.com/p/5144...

1383d ago Replies(1)
ScootaKuH1383d ago

I'm surprised Sumo are valued so high

solideagle1383d ago

yeah, thats what I thought. $1.3 billion is very high, Insomniac sounds like a bargain deal for Sony!

chadwarden1383d ago

And they likely bought Housmarque and Bluepoint for even less than Insomniac.

phoenixwing1383d ago

at the two above me,
it's easy to sell for less when you know you're in good hands business and culture wise. I mean sure you could scratch out some extra money elsewhere but are all the people you know going to be taken care of when you get bought out? Sony takes care of them. Basically you can tell who's a scheming money scumbag by what ceo's/execs choose to be bought by. In the end money talks but there's extras to consider sometimes.

roadkillers1383d ago

I am as well. They do not own any IPs from my understanding...

DOMination-1383d ago

Me too! After looking them up, it seems like they were the parent of other game studios: Lab42, Red Kite, Sumo India, The Chinese Room and PixelAnt Games and also have some cryptocurrency technology.

They may also still hold the IP for back when they were Gremlin Interactive.. back in the Amiga days they were really a dev of some repute.

ScootaKuH1383d ago

Gremlin. Now there's a name that takes me back. Ocean as well.

Teflon021383d ago

They're not, it's likely them just throwing money around to make sure they have no opposition. Sumo is a valuable developer as they've assisted in alot of great games. They did LBP3, Sackboy, Sonic Transformed, I believe Assisted in both ModNation Racers and LBPK, Team Sonic racing, just to name the few off the top of my head that I own.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1383d ago
IRetrouk1383d ago

I honestly thought ms or Sony would have nabbed them, seeing as they have worked for both on their respective ips, colour me surprised.

Bennibop1383d ago

It's a lot of money for a group with no ips, what would they have worked on to keep so many studios and staff employed. For now at least they continue working on ips for the likes of Sony and Microsoft.

IRetrouk1383d ago

Sony and ms have more than enough ips to keep em busy, the price would have been an issue though, that I agree with, just surprised is all🤷‍♂️

frostypants1383d ago (Edited 1383d ago )

Tencent doesn't exactly pride themselves on original IP anyway. They just steal someone else's. They only need developer drones.

Sephiroushin1383d ago

They have enough to make them busy but there is no point in buying the studio that high, they could just make the developers some offers and thats it... heck every single developer could just quit the studio and with what is tensen left? no point in buying a studio with no IP you dont own the developers

IRetrouk1383d ago

I already agreed that the price was high, still don't take away that they could have been used, and be useful to either ms or sony

Show all comments (86)
80°

Xbox Cloud Gaming PC Preview/Hands on Impressions (BETA) - CG

Microsoft recently released their Xbox Cloud Gaming PC Beta which allows users the opportunity to stream Xbox games to their Windows 10 PCs or laptops. This follows on from being able to use the cloud gaming on mobile devices which works very well but is limited to the size of your screen. Having the option to play Xbox games with a larger display has its obvious benefits.

Read Full Story >>
cramgaming.com
1468d ago
280°

Crackdown 3 8K 60 FPS - Possible at Low-Medium Settings with an RTX 3090

CG writes: Nvidia’s claims that the RTX 3090 can render games in 8K at 60 FPS, ring true for us in this video. We put the game Crackdown 3 through its paces with some interesting results.

Read Full Story >>
cramgaming.com
bunt-custardly1660d ago

If you've ever super-sampled anything you would know why it can make things look better.

bouzebbal1660d ago

Let's talk about powahhhh of da clawwdd for a second 🤣did they give up with this thing?

bunt-custardly1660d ago

Oh right, I didn't get the joke sorry, it just clicked. Hmm, is Crackdown 3 really that bad/universally hated especially as it's on gamepass?

SullysCigar1660d ago

My attempt at humour could have been clearer, in hindsight..!

Yeah, sadly Crackdown 3 had been hyped so hard and so long by Microsoft, that when it launched as a mediocre game, it got panned. It was mainly the broken promises about the power of the cloud I think that did it. This was the 'cloud power' poster child for years and it all amounted to nothing, which is a real shame, because if they'd realised their initial vision it could have been special.

bunt-custardly1660d ago

I do remember the original vision where entire buildings could be demolished but wasn't that feature relegated to the multiplayer mode? For me, Crackdown 3 comes across quite generic. I suppose if it had the full destruction in the story mode that would have been bad-ass. If Red Faction Guerrilla can do it why not CD?

FanboySpotter1660d ago

Crackdown 3 was made for crackdown fans. Hated by non crackdown fans. Enjoyed by crackdown fans.

MadLad1660d ago

I played it on PC for a little while via gamepass. It's not nearly as terrible as people would try to make it out to be, but it's the definition of a "meh" game.
There's fun to be had if you're bored.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1660d ago
andy851660d ago

It's good it's possible but who would pick this over 4K60 on ultra? It would look far better

IanTH1660d ago

100%. This is obviously just showing what can be done with the current highest end hardware, rather than what should be. And if you're splashing out for an RTX 3090 over a 3080 for gaming (small performance delta if not using that huge buffer for productivity), then I guess you'll also consider splashing out for an 8k screen. And, I mean, you'll want to be able to do *something* with it lol.

outsider16241660d ago

Let's be honest here, even with extra high settings at 8k 120fps... it'll still look like crap. Sorry.

Show all comments (19)