430°

Xbox Boss has seen upcoming Ninja Theory, Rare, Playground Projects

"I’ve seen what Ninja Theory’s working on next and what their pipeline looks like. I saw what Playground’s working on next, I saw what Rare is working on next and their continued growth and success with Sea of Thieves.

"The real goal with the studios for me is to get a large enough studio base where we can delight and surprise ourselves and our fans with games, and it’s on a regular cadence, so we’re not always pinched to say ‘okay, well what can we announce?’

gangsta_red2325d ago

"I’ve seen what Ninja Theory’s working on next and what their pipeline looks like... I saw what Playground’s working on next, I saw what Rare is working on next and their continued growth and success with Sea of Thieves."

There were rumors that Rare was also working on another game besides SoT. Should be interesting if that's true. NT has been quiet since they released Senua's sacrifice which was in 2017, no doubt they will have something new to show and maybe even a release date sooner rather than later. And of course Playground has been rumored to be on Fable for a good minute, I bet they'll have something to also show off at E3.

Those three studios will likely have something, maybe even Compulsion may have something else to show since We Happy Few came....and went.

TK-552324d ago

I'm most interested in Playground's next project (on the condition it's not another Forza title) since it'll really determine just how good the studio is. They've done brilliant work on the Horizon series and I believe their next project is going to be an open world game which has led to people believing its a Fable game. Personally I hope its a new IP because I think Fable has always been overrated but I think they'd do a better job with the series than Lionhead.

shiva12324d ago

Of these two studios who should do Fable? Playground or Rare?

I believe its safe to say either is fine.

TK-552324d ago

@shiva1

I think I'd have the same opinion with Rare in that I'd rather they be working on something completely new. But if I'm forced I think I'd rather see Playground make it. Would love to see the seasonal changes in Forza implemented in a Fable game!

KillBill2324d ago

Playground has already had the rumor their next title is not in fact a driving game.

Razzer2324d ago

"Of these two studios who should do Fable? Playground or Rare? "

Playground. Pretty sure they are. We know they are making an open world RPG.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2324d ago
coolbeans2324d ago

There's been rumors Rare has 3 projects going on (SoT updates being one of them). NT's rumored game is supposed to be called Bleeding Edge (may not be final name).

"... maybe even Compulsion may have something else to show since We Happy Few came....and went."

Nah. They're still dedicated to updating that to get past the buggy launch.

King_Noctis2324d ago (Edited 2324d ago )

“Compulsion Games promises to continue making ‘crazy games’ following Microsoft acquisition”

https://www.polygon.com/e3/...

I think they have new projects in mind, since the acquisition by MS might mean their team has expanded as well.

Automatic792324d ago

@gangsta_red

Besides
Ninja Theory
Rare
Playground Games

We also get to see
The Coalition-Gears 5
343-Halo Infinite
MS Global Publishing -New IP
Plus a few surprises.

Obscure_Observer2324d ago

@gangsta_red

"There were rumors that Rare was also working on another game besides SoT. Should be interesting if that's true."

RARE working on a new IP was never a rumor. It was confirmed last year at E3 by Craig Duncan himself.

https://www.gamereactor.eu/...

:)

lxeasy2324d ago

@obscure I don't know if I'm more excited for Ninja Theory or Playgrounds new game. Who are you most excited for?

Obscure_Observer2324d ago

@lxeasy

It´s a hard question. I´m excited about both of Playground and Ninja Theory´s new game. I think that i´m a bit more excited about Playground´s new game because the RPG genre is new to them.

I was thinking they were working on a new Fable game. Now, i think they´re working on a new IP. :)

https://n4g.com/news/221886...

King_Noctis2324d ago

Isn’t Rare working on Battletoad? Or maybe they have multiple projects going at once.

Sciurus_vulgaris2324d ago

Dlala Studios is the main developer of Battetoads (2019), Rare is still involved in the game though.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2324d ago
Jin_Sakai2325d ago (Edited 2325d ago )

“Xbox Boss has seen upcoming Ninja Theory, Rare, Playground Projects“

Hopefully we’ll see what you’ve seen come E3. I’m excited to see what Playground Games have been working on.

lxeasy2324d ago

I'm really excited to see what Ninja Theory and Playground game are going to reveal. I think the next Rare game will be really good because I think they wont commit the same mistakes from SOT launch on there new game.

tontontam02324d ago

We'll see it get cancelled just like other games, then ms will just stick to halo forza gears all pver again.

beulahland2324d ago

We'll see it get canczzzzZZzzzZZZROOOOONC!

NEXT!

jmetalhead778122324d ago

Nothing funnier than a tired outplayed joke that was never funny to begin with. Try coming up with an original thought. If that’s not possible for you, maybe try something that’s actually funny or clever.

lxeasy2323d ago

@tontontm0 we all know you would like to see that since you are one of Xbox biggest haters. But sad news for you. There first party studios will only grow and there exclusives will keep getting better. Cheers mate :)

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2323d ago
rainslacker2323d ago

Playground I'm most interested in, since they said it was an new IP in RPG genre. I hope that's still what they're working on.

AngelicIceDiamond2325d ago

So whats this bs I keep hearing about Phil Spencer needing to get fired?

Turns the hardware of the original X1 around from a terrible launch and perception.
Fix the issues with Xbox Live and added gaming services. Added BC when the other boss would not of done so.
7 new studios under their belt all within the same year. With rumors of a few more.

N4G logic. Hes a terrible boss...

Lets make one thing clear Don Mattrick wouldnt have done anything of those things. He saw the backlash with Adam Orth 2 months prior to the X1 reveal didn't listen.
Rumors of tv and media talk at the X1 reveal, which also garnered backlash didn't Listen.
Drm not flippin a switch didn't until after he quit lol.
Most importantly, if he didnt do anything about lack of games, studios AAA output in 7th gen what makes you think he would do anything about it now??? He would of done the same old thing. Halo would be released every other year with little breathing room for change and would have gotten worse, Rare would still be tied down Kinect (yes Kinect would be a thing) the same ol tone def Mattrick. I ask again who is worse?

Btw it seems MS projects are coming along quicker than I thought.

I_am_Batman2324d ago (Edited 2324d ago )

Some people don't seem to understand that there is a time delay between cause and effect in the games industry. I think if you look at where Xbox was 6 years ago and where it s now it's clear that Phil has done a lot of work. On the other hand MS hyped him up too much early on and he might've tried to turn the ship too fast. I can definetily understand the disappointment of Xbox fans after the cancellation of titles like Scalebound, the Phantom Dust remake, Project Spark and Fable Legends with the closure of Lionhead studios that is associated with it.

Phil might be the right guy to save Xbox but there is no way around the fact that this generation was a disappointment. The trajectory looks good though and I think that he has a chance to make next gen much more interesting and win some Xbox fans back. We'll just have to wait and see how it all unfolds.

bluefox7552324d ago

Better? We're at the end of the gen, and Xbox still has almost nothing to show for it. I'm not saying Spencer deserves all of the blame, but pretending like he "turned things around" is laughable.

I_am_Batman2324d ago

@bluefox: Are you responding to some hypothetical comment I've never made? I'm somewhat confused.

rainslacker2323d ago (Edited 2323d ago )

People understand there is a delay. But you can't use this argument that it takes time, when it's the same damn argument that was used three years ago when apparently Spencer started investing all this money into making games.

We know it takes time. Even if we still say they need to bring games, it's not because we don't recognize it doesn't take time, it's that we aren't here to wait on a whim of MS to get something for our support of their system or services. It's because we want products to play. Not promises. The promises come up emptier, the more they make them, and when another year passes where we hear, "it takes some time", we already know. Which is why this stuff should have been done years ago.

It isn't on the customer to wait for MS to get it's shit together for us to support them. It's on MS to give us support, so we want to support them. Many Xbox fan boys have their role as consumers mixed up. At the start of a gen, sure, give them some time, we're early adopters, so it's kind of expected and we know what we're getting into. But after year three and your output becomes one big AAA game a year, sometimes with it being a yearly franchise release? That's not right for a console maker.

it's not like Spencer just took over a few months ago, or even a year ago. It's not like he didn't have authority to do stuff. Hell, remember when Nadella took over, and said how much he was behind Xbox and gaming? But it took how many years for them to do what they should have been doing back then? I know it can take some time to procure studios, but it doesn't take years. A studio acquisition can take 3-6 months. Not 3-5 years. NetEase just acquired partial ownership of QD in what was probably less than 3 months.

I think Phil has done a lot of work. It's just the focus of what he's working on hasn't been prioritized correctly. And ultimately, they make it sound like they're doing all this good stuff, but not mentioning that they aren't going to deliver anytime soon, except on the rare occassion where he tries to appear humble and pander to the community as if he's hearing them. Plus, all that other stuff shouldn't have been the crux of what they were working on, but supplemental to doing what should have been done from day one.

There was a way around the gen being a disappointment. It would have been for Phil to keep that fire for producing games that he seemed to come into the head of XBox with. About all he's done with fire, is create smoke and hype, and the fire to produce games seemed to have been put on the warming burner....which they just recently realized wasn't even turned on.

lxeasy2324d ago

@angeliclcediamond you are 100% correct. Phill Spencer is a way better boss than don mattrick.

xX-oldboy-Xx2324d ago

I troll xbox pretty hard, unashamedly too - but I can honestly say I've never seen anyone call for Lucky Phil to be sacked. At least not to the extent your inferring.

Obscure_Observer2324d ago

@xX-oldboy-Xx

Then you haven´t been paying attention. Phil Spencer made some venemous enemies on N4G. Most of them don´t even own an Xbox One.

Cmv382324d ago

I agree old boy, all I see are people who aren't xbox fans laughing at how phil acts and carries himself. He saved nothing.

xX-oldboy-Xx2324d ago

Obscure_Observer - That's a tad OTT, but he isn't the 2nd coming like xbox owners on N4G make him out to be. This gen has been a disaster regardless where you want to lay the blame.

And, I still don't see 'this bs I keep hearing about Phil Spencer needing to get fired' - especially PS fans. That's what I was replying to.

They should sack Larry Hryb and Aaron Greenberg before anyone. Both lack any class,

rainslacker2323d ago

I've never seen any concerted effort to say he should be fired. I criticize his actions mostly because I feel he panders more than he produces, but I don't think he's doing a terrible job. I just think he isn't prioritizing things correctly, as studio acquisitions shouldn't have taken this long, and they weren't necessary to produce games, which could have been done through 2nd party if they actually care before about delivering games.

I'm not going to pat him on the back because after years of being told what he has to do, he finally starts doing it, especially when there won't be any immediate results from it. Every time I see Spencers name, or one of these articles, I'm just reminded how gullible I was for believing he actually wanted to do anything with the X1. All these years later, after he convinced me that maybe Xbox could be great, and I have a $350 box under my TV which doesn't have enough from them to make me turn it on. I'm not going to pay $500 to get the best version of games, and since I have a PS4P, there is no point me buying multi-plats on the system. That leaves 1st/2nd party games, which MS is pretty much not even trying to release with any fervor.

But then you have Phil tweeting or giving interviews, or the media acting like MS is going to kill it next gen, and it angers me, because all I see is a guy who panders, and does nothing but promote the brand far beyond what it's worth, when all I can ask is, "OK, but what about the past three years or the rest of this gen?" I supported MS after Phil took over. They're the ones that failed me, not the other way around.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2323d ago
rainslacker2323d ago

Don Mattrick had things going when this gen released. So, who's to say if he would have kept going. Nadella had more of an impact on Xbox moving towards service than Spencer did. He set forth the path, Spencer found ways to work it into Xbox.

it's great that he's now getting around to doing stuff. But it's coming pretty late in the gen. I guess it's good for next gen, but what about THIS GEN is so amazing about his performance that makes him worthy of respect?

MS, and Spencer have pretty much made clear that this gen is a bust, and they're going to be better next gen. While that's all good and fine, it doesn't remove the piss poor management that they've done up to this point, and all the moves they are making now, still don't bring games to this gen's console.

Maybe you're happy with their output for the past three years, and that's fine, but I have higher standards for a console maker when it comes to games they release. So far, MS has done next to nothing to make my X1 purchase worthwhile. A few good games to play, most of them from early in the gen, haven't made spending $350 on an Xbox worth it. Them moving on to new hardware hasn't made it worth it. BC isn't worth it, because I don't own that many Xbox games, and the ones I do own, aren't on the program, and theres no point buying them digitally because I probably have them in my rather extensive PS3 collection.

You can say Mattrick didn't do anything. And yes, he wasn't all that great either, but he had games lined up for X1 for the first several years, and its safe to assume he would have kept doing that....especially after his pet kinect project failed. But Spencer hasn't done what you say Mattrick wouldn't have done, because if Sony was decimating MS market share on Xbox with him in charge, he would recognize what needed to be done. A few years at the end of 360's life where people said he needed more games, isn't the same as a whole gen, where you are close to being dead last in market share, and the higher ups would certainly have their say. Plus, I think Mattrick probably would have been better suited for figuring out what was needed to push this services thing that they making Phil do.

So, who is worse? They're both bad. But as time has passed, I actually think Mattrick is the lesser of two evils, because at least he wasn't a snake oil sales man. He was easy enough to see through, while Spencer has you wrapped around his finger, and losing all of your common sense, while you welcome a future of GaaS, while you pay monthly for the privilege.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2323d ago
Team_Litt2325d ago

This does put a smile on my face. I'm really glad MS did not pull the plug on Xbox even when they had every reason to this gen.
I'm glad they committed to turning things around instead of just cutting their loses.

The failure of the Xbox One gave rise to the Xbox One S/X, backwards compatibility, game pass and 7 new studios. All fantastic for us the consumers/gamers.

Job well done Phil. Keep at it.

Show all comments (74)
70°

Warhammer 40,000: Boltgun 2 devs praise games like Space Marine 2 for "lowering the barrier"

Warhammer 40,000: Boltgun 2 developers discuss the huge success of Space Marine 2 and its effect on the series as a whole.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Jingsing13h ago

How about an official level editor for Boltgun?

80°

Inside the ‘Dragon Age’ Debacle That Gutted EA’s BioWare Studio

The latest game in BioWare’s fantasy role-playing series went through ten years of development turmoil

In early November, on the eve of the crucial holiday shopping season, staffers at the video-game studio BioWare were feeling optimistic. After an excruciating development cycle, they had finally released their latest game, Dragon Age: The Veilguard, and the early reception was largely positive. The role-playing game was topping sales charts on Steam, and solid, if not spectacular, reviews were rolling in.

HyperMoused1d ago

Its easy they called the die hard fans people in their nerd caves who will buy anything and then went woke to reach modern audiences....insulting the nerds in their caves along the way showing utter contempt for their fan base. very hapy it failed and any company who insults their fan base and treat their customers with contempt and insults, in future, i also hope fail.

neutralgamer199220h ago

It’s disappointing but not surprising to see what's happening with Dragon Age: The Veilguard and the broader situation at BioWare. The layoffs are tragic — no one wants to see talented developers lose their jobs. But when studios repeatedly create games that alienate their own fanbase, outcomes like this become unfortunately predictable.

There’s a pattern we’re seeing far too often: beloved franchises are revived, only to be reshaped into something almost unrecognizable. Changes are made that no one asked for, often at the expense of what originally made these games special. Then, when long-time fans express concern or lose interest, they’re told, “This game might not be for you.” But when those same fans heed that advice and don’t buy the game, suddenly they're labeled as toxic, sexist, bigoted, or worse.

Let’s be clear: the overwhelming majority of gamers have no issue with diversity, LGBTQ+ representation, or strong female leads. In fact, some of the most iconic characters in gaming — like Aloy, Ellie, or FemShep — are proof that inclusivity and excellent storytelling can and do go hand in hand. The issue arises when diversity feels performative, forced, or disconnected from the narrative — when characters or themes are inserted not to serve the story, but to satisfy a corporate DEI checklist. Audiences can tell the difference.

When studios chase approval from a vocal minority that often doesn’t even buy games — while simultaneously dismissing loyal fans who actually do — they risk not just the success of individual titles, but the health of their entire studio. Telling your core customers “don’t buy it if you don’t like it” is not a viable business strategy. Because guess what? Many of us won’t. And when the game fails commercially, blaming those very fans for not supporting it is both unfair and self-defeating.

Gamers aren’t asking for less diversity or less progress. We’re asking for better writing, thoughtful character development, and a respect for the franchises we’ve supported for decades. When you give people great games that speak to them — whether they’re old fans or new players — they will show up. But if you keep making games for people who don’t play them, don’t be surprised when those who do stop showing up

Armaggedon14h ago

I thought the writing and character development were fine. Sometimes things just dont resonate with people.

220°

Phil Spencer Teases 2026 As A "Really Special Year" For Xbox

2026 will mark the 25th anniversary of Xbox, and Phil Spencer has teased it as a "really special year" for the games division.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
TheEroica1d 5h ago (Edited 1d 4h ago )

You got downvotes by pathetic gamers for feeling hopeful about good games coming out next year. Imagine how small your brain must be to downvote someone excited for future gaming joy? It is pretty neat to see people's world view blow up in front of them as they realize Microsoft has put themselves in a driver's seat that Sony hasn't been able to touch all generation.... What's even more pathetic is the same people downvoting you are the same people wishlisting Microsoft games on their ps5s 😂

P_Bomb1d 2h ago

“Imagine how small your brain must be to downvote someone excited for future gaming joy?”

My dude your post history shits on EVERYTHING. You never have a good thing to say about anything lol! 🤣

PanicMechanic17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

“Getting ready for those GaaS reveals! Sony is a shadow of themselves this gen.”

You literally said this a couple of days ago. Start applying the clown make up, you hypocritical jester

derek1d 2h ago

Yep we'll see, they have alot releasing next year.

RaidenBlack23h ago

NGL, next year might be one of the best years in gaming ... starting off with RE9 and GTA VI ...
and then all the good games that's been cooking
Pragmata, Sands of Time, Saros, Gears E-Day, 007 First Light, Blood of Dawnwalker,
Mortal Shell II, Onimusha, Marvel1943: Rise of Hydra
current-gen only Infinity Ward's CoD, Duskbloods
+ My guess: Wolverine, Exodus, Mudang, Crimson Desert, Clockwork etc ...
~ seems like it might get too stacked

1Victor21h ago

@rokos:”Hopefully “
I downvoted you not for been hopeful but because I have seen the same “NEXT YEAR WILL BE SPECIAL “ comment for the last 10+ and hasn’t seen anything special from Microsoft.
I hope next year will be the one that everyone been waiting for since the last 3 years of the Xbox 360, it have to be after over $80 billions spent on acquisitions.

Lightning7721h ago

So the new excuse is they don't count because it's from the ABK now huh. I guess all those 3rd party games count even less because they don't own them. According to your always crappy logic.

InUrFoxHole12h ago

Lol. You haven't seen anything special? Do you even game?

OtterX1d 8h ago

Always with the "next year..."! 😂

neutralgamer19921d 7h ago

I don't know they have delivered this year and even last year. And they have a lot more content in the pipeline right now than anyone else. We can't just keep hating on MS

Indiana Jones
South of midnight
Avowed
Flight simulator
Hell Blade 2
Minecraft update
Gears of war reloaded
Indian Jones:expansion
Gears E day
Clockwork revolution
Fable
Doom the dark ages
The outer worlds 2
Grounded 2
Call of duty

OtterX1d 7h ago

How many of those titles were just buyouts of companies that were going about making their games anyways? *Throws cash - "Oh look what we made!"

dveio1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

This list, that's been posted again, and again, and again in every single topic like this, contains almost nothing, literally almost nothing from Microsoft's own creational thoughtprocess.

It's a bunch of former 3rd party IPs.

Now even slowly returning to Playstation in some cases like Indiana, Hellblade, probably Starfield soon too, after they were made exclusively to Xbox on purpose.

Due to Microsoft's lack for own IP material except Halo & Forza. Which, the lack of, was the sole reason for all of it to happen in the first place anyway. Please don't pretend it wasn't.

And just look at all the games that come from Obsidian alone.

You really think Obsidian wasn't already working on Avowed and South of Midnight even without Microsoft buying Zenimax?

Microsoft delivered nothing but cheques.

OtterX1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

@dveio THIS. Lol, this dude thinks Call of Duty wouldn't exist without Microsoft! smh 😂

neutralgamer19921d 6h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

Common narrative I see often — that Microsoft shouldn’t get credit for the games its studios release because they “just bought them.” But this viewpoint ignores key context and sets a double standard that other platform holders aren’t held to

No one is saying these games wouldn't exist at all without Microsoft. But let’s not pretend that having a trillion-dollar company backing a studio doesn’t make a massive difference. Obsidian never had AAA funding before the Xbox acquisition. Pillars of Eternity was crowdfunded, and their resources were always stretched thin. Now they’re working on Avowed, with proper support behind it.

Ninja Theory’s Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice was made by around 20 people, using borrowed equipment and doing mocap in a boardroom. It was a passion project held together by tape and willpower. Today, Hellblade II exists because they were given resources, time, and freedom — something many developers don’t get unless they’re owned by a company that believes in their vision.

ZeniMax (Bethesda’s parent company) was in real financial trouble before the Microsoft acquisition. Reports and insider accounts have pointed out how much they needed a cash infusion. And while some people want to write off Xbox’s ownership of Bethesda titles, they forget the alternative could have meant layoffs or even closures.

The same goes for Activision Blizzard. Would you really prefer the company to stay under Bobby Kotick, after all the documented workplace misconduct and toxic leadership issues? Say what you want about Microsoft, but their acquisition brought accountability and change to a company that desperately needed it.

At the same time, Xbox gets hated on for doing what every major company does. Sony bought Housemarque, Bluepoint, Insomniac — but no one says Spider-Man 2 “doesn’t count” because of that. Why does Xbox get treated differently for acquiring struggling or undervalued developers and giving them a chance to thrive?

And the idea that Xbox locks games away is outdated. They're pushing cross-platform releases, cloud gaming, Game Pass, and backward compatibility more than any other platform holder. They're not forcing all studios into live service. If anything, their upcoming lineup is less GAAS-heavy and more focused on narrative and creativity — Avowed, South of Midnight, Clockwork Revolution, Fable, Perfect Dark, Towerborne, and others show real variety.

Whether people like it or not, Xbox is now the biggest publisher in the industry and owns the most gaming IPs. But what matters more is how they treat their studios. Most of these teams were previously stuck making AA games with limited scope — now they’re getting the tools and support to aim higher.

So when people say “Microsoft didn’t make those games,” they’re missing the point. It’s not about who started the studio — it’s about who enabled them to do their best work. You don’t have to love Xbox to admit they’ve helped a lot of developers and are taking a player-first approach.

Instead of writing off everything they do, maybe try recognizing the good they’re doing for both devs and gamers. At the end of the day, we should want more studios to succeed — no matter who owns them

BeHunted1d 5h ago

I'm surprised Clockwork Revolution (BioShock meets Dishonored) isn't getting more media attention. The game looks interesting and reminds me of the old RPG games.

anast1d 5h ago

The only good game on that list is Flight sim. The rest are either average or will be average. It's not a good look for MS.

TheEroica1d 4h ago

My god.... Look how many comments are upset about microsoft's successes... 😂 This may be my new favorite thread. Not one gamer saying thanks for all the goodness coming their way, just bitter anger and downvoting the very games they themselves will purchase throughout 2026.... Sony really worked you guys over this generation.... Condolences.

DivineHand1251d 4h ago

@neutralgamer1992 You said what needed to be said.

I have heard for years from older gamers that fanboys are the biggest issue with any fanbase. They will defend or gloss over negative news as long as the correct logo is on the box and they bash the competing platform no matter how much good they are trying to bring.

Right now their advocacy for PlayStation is elevating that platform so high that Sony no longer believes they need to do anything to satisfy their loyal fanbase like they did in the PS4 days.

I just hope most of them will eventually start advocating for themselves and encourage others to do the same. No one should blindly support one platform because these companies do not care about anything other than profit.

neutralgamer19921d 3h ago

Hunted

And first proper game done by the studio with proper AAA budget and saying it will be released when ready

Anast

I believe we went through this before that you are objectively wrong. Meta critic, user reviews, game sales. In Playstation top 10 best selling games were 5 from Microsoft studios

Otter

No this dude is saying so many other studios wouldn't be thriving without MS money and people would be getting abused physically and mentally with Bobby kotick and his side kicks

Also maybe look up how the original founder of Bethesda and zenimax was kicked out of his own company by his best friend lawyer. So that was always a shady place and had been struggling financially before MS paid a premium of almost 7 billion

Eroica

I use to be a die hard Playstation fan and now I only have a Pc. I see how these fans are so toxic. They just can't handle any positive news regarding Xbox. When the best selling games on playstation are Xbox titles. Look at Forza horizon being best seller and that's years old game by MS. I guess ms don't deserve credit for that success too since they are the only company in gaming making acquisitions

Forget the fact Sony paid 3.6 billion for bungie and MS 6.9 for zenimax. Which investment has turned out better

Destiny and marathon with a lot of controversy

While zenimax output is nothing short of amazing compared to what bungie has released

crazyCoconuts1d 3h ago

Yeah it's tricky. "Xbox" has morphed to mean different things to different people.
Console, now Windows, GamePass, and the cross platform games. There's a mix of attitudes towards all those things individually, and maybe an overarching attitude towards MS. But can't argue that the game companies MS recently bought continue to flourish, and GamePass PC has been a great value over the last year.

InUrFoxHole12h ago

@OtterX
You're the dude mad at your exes new guy. She's with someone else... get over it.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 12h ago
Lightning771d 4h ago (Edited 1d 4h ago )

They've had good output so far. So waiting for those games shouldn't be a problem.

Who cares if they're buy outs of companies or whatever excuse you want to make. They're games that are being distributed to other console. Play the games and enjoy it instead of fanboying or complaining.

ocelot071d 6h ago

They going to be a he best and biggest publisher on Xbox, Playstation and PC next year. They not really said anything about Switch 2 though spite claiming to be big supporters.

quenomamen1d 5h ago

If you call making one last Xbox before going full Sega, as Great. Then yea.

TheEroica1d 4h ago

Doesn't feel like you're paying attention to what's happening.

RhinoGamer881d 5h ago

It will be, his net work will hit 50 million and he plans to buy a new mansion in Cape Cod. Thanks everyone! #failup

Show all comments (39)