Rockstar aimed to "revolutionise" the genre, but did they?
Games such as Mad Max, Red Dead Redemption 2, and Batman: Arkham Knight desperately deserve a modern-day revisit.
RDR2 still looks astounding on PS4 Pro. i cannot imagine how it could look with a next gen upgrade.
It's obviously never gonna happen since Sony killed the game and studio, but Driveclub. Even in its current state, 10 years after release, it still puts many competitors to shame ...
Mad max ikr! Far cry primal, it amuses me how ubisoft just left ac unity hanging, sadly most of the good staff left from rocksteady while being forced to make that abomination smh
Rockstar Games' open world action adventure game, Red Dead Redemption 2, can now run on Android devices, but only barely.
Oh great. So glad this is a thing and not the current gen update we’ve all been asking for. /s
Red Dead Redemption 2 wins 'Best Game Sequel' in BAFTA poll, surpassing Half-Life 2 in a landmark victory.
hmm kinda out there i find red dead 2 a over hyped game i am sure there are other's out there worthy of this award.
Are we saying rdr 2 mp is better than the first one?
The cover shooting better on #2 than #1?
I mean they reused 80% of rdr 1 map on rdr 2
Hmmm don’t know about that one myself. There’s some good sequels there….
No way last of us 2 was a better sequel than the original resident evil 2. The story of TLOU2 was a huge let down for me!
Assassins creed 2 was a vast improvement over the original and still the very best of the entire franchise imo.
Half-life 2 will always be legendary.
RDR2 is great but the best sequel ever? I don’t think so… just my opinion though I guess
Sure, if you started playing game yesterday and just for this series. Otherwise? lol... No.
I love Red Dead 2, but I'm not sure it was a revolution as much as it was just an evolution of the genre. Rockstar relied too much on old gaming tropes; for example, the auto-fail mission states if you for exampe lost the bounty, or "abandon the mission", or you went to point 'X' when you're supposed to be at point 'Y' - whatever. The story and mission should have just continued regardless, and those "fail-states" should have just become a part of your story canon and impacted on how Dutch and other gang members react to you.
I understand that they are trying to tell a linear story, in an open world; but maybe it's time to allow the player decide how they want that story to progress. At one point I just wanted to shoot Dutch and get the whole thing over with. He was't leading me anymore and I wanter Aurthur to part with the Gang much earlier - as soon as he realised he was sick. At that point, I would have run off into the sunset with Mary Linton - again the game plays up the romance but give you no agency to affect it. The game didn't allow for any of that kind of player agency. A revolution would have been allowing the player some more of that freedom to dictate the direction of the story, and take it of the linear-story rails.
No, it didn't. it's just another great rockstar open world game.
No. There was nothing revolutionary about it. God of War had no loading screens or camera cuts and the best combat and graphics this gen.
Not likely.